What IF?

It's February 2010, and a newly-emboldened democratic Congress - having successfully passed healthcare, cap 'n trade, and card check- now seeks to eradicate ALL possibility of "voter disenfranchisement."

A new bill speeds through both chambers, called the "Americans for Fair Elections Act." Nancy Pelosi calls it "breakthrough legislation." Harry Reid dubs it, "America's best way to assure increased participation in the democratic process."

But the proposal is neither; in fact, quite the OPPOSITE: It enables anyone - any John Doe or Mary Smith - to go to ANY library or post office (similar to filing one's income tax) and pick up an absenteee ballot form; fill it out, sign, and mail in. Universal voting by mail.

Just before the final measure is voted on in the Senate, Chuck Schumer (D-NY) comes forth with his amendment, allowing that any voter can pick up additional blank ballots and distribute them to other "voters" in their county as they see fit - no limitations on number.

Sound improbable? Think again! Democrats everywhere are out to subvert our inviolable electoral process, and are slowly but surely getting away with it!

ITEM: April 15, 2008, Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner introduces her proposal permitting every Ohio county the option of asking voters whether they want to conduct elections entirely by mail: Ohio's legislature would give counties the authority to put a vote-by-mail issue on the ballot. Brunner's reasoning? Counties would find voting by mail "more convenient" and "less expensive" than opening polls on Election Day. Brunner also wants more early-voting locations, and early drop-off points for absentee ballots.

ITEM: Because of the efforts of Edward M. Kennedy, the Massachusetts State Legislature grants the Senator's dying wish - authorizing  Governor Duval Patrick to immediately name an interim U.S. Senator - bypassing a pre-existing law, requiring a 90-day wait.

ITEM: In Minnesota, "relaxed" voter laws permit people to register & vote on election day at the polling sites. There is no ID requirement. No way of confirming residence within the precinct - or whether they're even CITIZENS. If you've registered before the election, you simply tell them your name and vote - no ID required.

ITEM: The "Association for Community Organizers Now" fight a pending lawsuit in Allegheny County, Pa., denying that workers use registration quotas as conditions for employment - declaring their mission of preventing voter disenfranchisement. However, ACORN was active in but SEVEN states in the 2008 general election - all falling under the definition of "tossup" or "battleground states."

ITEM: In the New Jersey 2008 election, voters are not required to give a tangible reason - such as illness or travel - to vote absentee. Governor Jon Corzine had been instrumental in the passing of a "no-excuses" absentee voter law in December of 2007.

New Jersey has had more than its share of razor-close gubernatorial elections, starting with Tom Kean's (R) 1,700-vote victory over Jim Florio (D) in 1981, plus two narrow wins by Republican Christie Whitman in the 1990s. Hence, the democrats have come prepared: they have "seeded" Hispanic and black districts in Camden and Newark with a deluge of absentee ballots. 

(QUOTE) "Battles are won by slaughter and maneuver. The greater the general, the more he contributes in maneuver, the less he demands in slaughter." - Winston Churchill

QUESTION: Is Commander-In-Sneak Obama setting us up another for another "Black Hawk Down" debacle?

Is the American public even aware of the rashly irresponsible orders he has issued to our "fighting" troops in Afghanistan - ordering them NOT to fire back - a prelude to certain decimation?

And worse - why is our lamestream media ignoring this outrage?

Recently, BBC television depicted a U.S. Marine hunkered down in Afghanistan, complaining that..." he was not allowed to shoot back when under fire;" a situation resulting from Obama’s new rules of engagement (ROE) . 

Last July, General Stanley McChrystal explained the new ROEs to BBC news: (quote)..."We are now advising troops to break off from firefights with the Taliban...If you are in a situation where you are under fire from the enemy... if there is any chance of creating civilian casualties, if you can withdraw from that situation without firing, then you MUST do so”...(unquote).

Remember the pacifist in "Saving Private Ryan" - insisting his squad let their German prisoner go, then later cowered as he watched the same Nazi kill his fellow Americans?

This is EXACTLY what our dearly-beloved anti-President is doing to our brave troops! 

Yes, it's all the idea of our honorable Commander, Barack H. Obama, who has never spent a day in uniform - not even as a Boy Scout. 

So why even bother with issuing such orders?

Why not just take away our soldiers' M4 rifles, and equip 'em with squirt guns? Or maybe they can suddenly appear, and shout "boo!" Better yet, use paintball rifles; that way, they can let those nasty Taliban dudes be aware that indeed, they're "marked men."

Meanwhile, month-after-month, the increasing casualties of our brave troops - fighting in this mountainous Afghan hell-hole -indicate no forseeable end in sight to the carnage.

Last July, patrolling Bravo Company Marines of the 1st Battalion, 5th Regiment in Nawa (Afghanistan) had surprised 40 Taliban insurgents, caught inside a suspicious-looking, isolated compound.

The Taliban immediately opened up with automatic weapons and rocket fire:  

The Marines could have instantly wiped out the insurgents by calling in an air strike -patrolling overhead.  Instead, they followed the "Obama Rules of Engagement" - show restraint.  The result? One U.S. Marine dead, one wounded, and the Taliban insurgents escaping unharmed out the back door - undoubtedly laughing at the folly - emboldened and free to kill again.

Meanwhile, Obama is back in Dover, Delaware showing his "compassion" for 15 recently-arrived deceased troops; solemnly saluting their caskets - "deeply concerned" for the soldiers' grieving families.

But why did Obama drag along the cameras? Could not the entire 4 AM ceremony (travesty) have been done just as well in private? 

Obama plays the political game; always thinking ahead; never caring about anything other than his own selfish ends - and how he can achieve them at the expense of others: in this case, 15 dead Marines, and three fallen DEA agents.

POINT: There never has been a modern war without civilian casualties. Trying to fight one - that the other side has zero civilian deaths  - is impossible.  And to require that our military obey those rules repeats the same mistake over and over again: US Marines dead...Taliban allowed to flee unharmed.

Lacking prior military experience, Obama is unaware that in ANY urban environment, civilians are present in almost all firefights.  And his insipid rule only encourages the Taliban to hide amongst civilians - hence "the chance" of ALWAYS creating civilian casualties.

Think about it. Is this not tantamount to allowing the enemy to "fire at will", but requiring our soldiers to cower and take it?

And what about the horrid roadside bombs that continue to kill and maim our soldiers?

Does Obama not realize that Afghan "farmers" (camouflaged as such) can go about planting these devices at will - feigning as though they were doing road repairs, or even agiculture? What is this president thinking? Certainly not about the welfare of our troops!

Does he not seem more concerned with his Moslem "brother" enemy?

Sink the Bismarck; Guns of Navarone; Longest Day; Battleground; Battle of the Bulge; Patton; Saving Private Ryan. One cannot help but be dazzled by the villainous Germans, and their ruthless efficiency. 

They wore slick uniforms; fought with unbelievable weaponry; they had an intense, precisely-organized Prussian approach to war - compared to the "laid back," improvisational method of the Americans.

The Nazis had all the best armaments. The renowned Bismarck...Tiger tanks...the 88mm cannon...the M42 machine gun...ME 262 jet fighters; V-2 rockets. Yet they lost to the Americans, with their flimsy Sherman tanks, and lumbering B-17 bombers.

Obviously then, it begs the question: How did the Americans manage to win?  

But to those who had lived through that era, they would reply, "We out-produced 'em".

Indeed; immediately after Pearl Harbor, the incredible wartime economic shift in the USA took place with amazing rapidity:

Ford and GM quickly changed over their assembly lines to producing tens of thousands of jeeps, trucks, and tanks. Arsenals in the Midwest manufactured shells and cartridges by the millions.

Boeing, North American, Douglass, Curtiss, Grumman, et al. hired hundreds of thousands of aviation workers; and by mid-1943, were turning out thousands of warplanes every month to be shipped to the ports of departure on our two coasts.

No less impressive was the remarkable wartime re-organization of the railroads, instrumental in shipping the weapons of war - plus the oil and gasoline to fuel them - running on precise wartime schedules.

But the key to it all was STEEL; and the workers who labored on 12-hour shifts - seven days a week - in the booming mills that produced it.

The Germans had their gigantic Krupp works in the Ruhr Valley. We had Pittsburgh, Gary Indiana, and Youngstown.

If one had been living in any of three major steel towns during the war, they would recall the smokey, orange-hazed night sky. Crashing noises from the mills. Train whistles blaring at night.

15 to 20 minute waits at railroad crossings were commonplace during the 1940's.

Now, trains are a rare sight; you might hear one at night. 

Nowadays, because of the scrap metal boom, most traces of the old steel mills have literally vanished. The air around Pittsburgh, Gary and Youngstown is pristine, compared to the days of steel prosperity, before the major manufacturers began shutting down.

But why - for the most part - the absence of steel making in America? Were we to fight another prolonged war, what then?

First came the incompetent Jimmy Carter of the late 1970's, who's lack of foresight started our steel-manufacturing demise.

It was he, plus his fool Attorney General, Griffin Bell, who had denied the lawsuits of the fired steelworkers, who were suing the major steel companies on the premise that by closing down their plants, it would bring not only local economic calamity, but also risk our national security (in the event of war).  

Then came Reagan...Bush...Clinton. Need we go on? 

Promises, promises. All initially promised they'd bring manufacturing and steel jobs back to those distressed rust belt towns; but after their elections, they were probably just too darn busy to get around to it...but they sure meant well.

Of course, over the past few decades, it’s been cheaper to import steel manufactured in foreign countries. 

But that doesn’t mean that America's steel industry is doomed. Many mills are actively producing high-quality specialty steels for specific markets requiring it. Demand for seamless pipe for the oil drillers has remained especially strong.

On the contrary, in the coming months & years, many economists predict heavy manufacturing is going to make a comeback in America; although nowhere near the heydays of the 40's, 50's and 60's.

But it all remains contingent on the availability of cheap energy.

Today, moderately strong world steel demand, higher global prices, a weak dollar, high ocean freight rates- all are acting as a disincentive for steel imports, with a concomitant rise in strength of our slowly-recovering domestic steel industry.

Hence, once the economy improves, an expected rise in demand portends good times ahead for US steel makers...except for one "X-factor" now ominously looming on the horizon: the bizarre environmentalism of the Obama administration - and the green fanatics looming within both halls of Congress.

And what do they have in store for us? Prosperity? Another Great Depression? Who can even explain their motives, other than ruin?

In a time of severe recession; a real unemployment rate hovering around 16%, with no end to the job losses in sight, and ever more families seeking food stamps, Barack Obama and the Senate democrats have chosen "climate change" as their priority.

Never mind that polls reveal less than 10% of Americans even care about climate change, or the bizarre premise that the earth is warming. They feel otherwise. They don't believe it; nor can find evidence of it in their daily lives.

But those same polls reveal that the vast majority are DEEPLY worried about the economy: 

They DO see the suffering that's evident around them, as wave-after-wave of job losses keep rippling through the nation, with no end in sight.

But Barack Lunatic Obama seems to feel otherwise:

Incredibly, this vainglorious man is encouraging the Senate put “Cap-and-Trade” on a fast track to passage, so he can go to Copenhagen this December and crow heroically (to the European socialists) that the United States is now the leader in the green energy revolution- saving the world from the non-existent threat of global warming!

But as they say...misery loves company.

The European nations have ruined their own socialist economies after adopting the insipid, job-destroying, "green energy revolution" - and are mired in deep recession. So naturally, they're exerting enormous pressure on Obama to do likewise.

Hence, he is quite bound and determined to please them. He seeks glory in Copenhagen. He wants to arrive there, triumphantly waving his victorious Climate Change law to the world, proclaiming the damnation of fossil fuels for all time!

And if it sparks an inevitable downward slide of the US economy - so be it.

But we know Cap 'n Trade has nothing to do with the climate; in reality it will be the fast track to economic ruin.

Cap and Trade will tax all energy use in America, spelling disaster for the energy-intensive steel industry, let alone how it will destroy another 30-50% of what remains of our manufacturing base.

But liar Obama remains in full campaign mode, running around the country, happily proclaiming his favorite mantra about how his plan (scam) "will generate millions of new green jobs."

Sure it will.

In reality, it will generate millions of newly-unemployeds, now dependent on their monthly Obama check for survival.

Cap and trade will inevitably destroy the coal industry. It will all but level the budding recovery in our steel industry. It will put people who work as drillers and refiners on the unemployment lines.

But it will produce a great spike in the economy- in China.

As the cost of manufacturing gradually rises over this next decade, we'll witness millions of jobs fleeing offshore in the inexorable search of higher profits. The laws of economics cannot be repealed. Those countries offering the lowest production costs (energy-taxation) always emerge the victors. 

Meanwhile, the entire United States gradually becomes a massive, California-like disaster, as the radical environmentalism of the1980's that ruined that state is foisted upon the rest of the country, by none other than the mean-spirited diminutive weasel from San Francisco, Barbara Boxer- proud sponsor of the Senate climate bill.

Obama's insistence of switching to higher cost wind/solar generated electricity (and other alternatives) is less than a zero-sum game. Any green jobs created are more than offset by the loss of conventional energy jobs- hurting the US manufacturing sector which requires reasonably-priced energy to compete in the global marketplace.

Higher energy prices literally ruin the economies of scale in every facet of our lives.

Look for the doubling and trebling of our electric bills; five dollar-a-gallon gasoline; and keeping our houses at a shivering, European-like 59* at night.

And what about the inevitable spike in food prices? Or the fact that school after school will be forced to close down - or seek higher tax levies - as their energy costs skyrocket, and teachers are laid off en masse. Has anyone considered that?

And for what? Because of preventing too much carbon dioxide - a gas humans exhale  -from "poisoning" the air?

Meanwhle, what's the first thing Mr. Obama will do after returning from Copenhagen next December 19, having accepting the world's accolades for pushing through his destructive plan?

Of course; he'll go to his oval office; crank up the heat to 80*, roll up his shirtsleeves, put his feet up on the desk; light a cigarette and think..."what a country!" 

Meanwhile, millions of the newly unemployed, and millions more miners, blue collar workers, and others worried about their futures, will think..."What a president- aarrgh!"

Thanks Mr. Obama; have a Merry Christmas.

Yes; be glad to know that our nice friends at the "Association for Community Organizers for Reform Now" have a new defender – the esteemed Alan Grayson.

So how did still another democratic leftist manage to get elected to the 111th Congress?

Simple.

Alan Grayson - the self-acclaimed Congressmen from ACORN - funded 70% of his 2008 election campaign himself. Mr. Grayson also "won" the endorsement of the left-leaning regional media.

In the weeks preceding the November 2008 election, the "Orlando Sentinel" printed four different editorials, in an attempt to water down strong support for incumbent Republican Rick Keller, who previously had held the traditionally conservative central Florida 8th district seat.

Not surprisingly, Grayson won by the usual ACORN chicanery.

He was the beneficiary of nearly 70% of the "early" votes cast; and although losing to Keller in the outlying rural counties (Osceola-Lake-Marion) he won in Orange county, helped by strong support of ethnic Puerto Ricans, SEIU members, Convention Center employees, Disney World, Universal Studios, plus the tourist hotel workers.

Although Republicans have tagged Grayson as a "loud-mouthed idiot-embarrassment" to the people of central Florida, that's EXACTLY what Rahm Emanuel - who "imported" this New York thug to run in a heavily-red district - wants them to think.

Grayson represents all the democratic party stands for: big government, and the full socialization of the US economy by 2015. And what can stop him? The Republicans under estimate this monster at their own peril!

So who is Alan Grayson? Just check out his hard left resume and judge for your self :

Originally from the Bronx, NY; educated at Harvard (Karl Marx U); worked for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in DC where he was further indoctrinated to the left, while working at her husband's Washington law firm; moved to Florida to get elected; finally made it on Obama's coat tails; 13th wealthiest member of Congress.

WARNING: Grayson's Republican opponent in 2010 will need heavy support to oust this most clever democrat. Yet Republicans are taking his demise for granted, and all because of what? That Grayson is obnoxious?

Wake up, Republican fools, Grayson acts obnoxious for a reason! It works! It draws this previously unknown slimeball ATTENTION.

In summer of 2008, Grayson drove around Orlando with one of those "Bush lied/People died" bumper stickers - yet still managed to win in November in a Republican district.

This August, Grayson held a contrived Town Hall meeting in a tiny Union hall, right AFTER holding a meeting with union members; thus all available seats were occupied, leaving non-union constituents haplessly stranded outside.

And just how clever is Mr.Grayson - supposedly some foot-in-the-mouth jerk who somehow made it to Congress?

POINT: Before being elected, Attorney Alan Grayson worked extensively on uncovering and combating contractor fraud in Iraq; and rather amazingly, was the ONLY counsel to win a corruption case against a defense contractor during the Bush administration

POINT: When asked to put into context ACORN's impact on the American taxpayer, Grayson replied: "The amount of money that ACORN has received in the past 20 years altogether is roughly equal to what the taxpayer paid to Haillburton each DAY during the war in Iraq."

POINT: Grayson is a founder of the "Alliance for Aging Research" which is supposedly a non-profit organization getting research grants - mostly stem cell research. This organization also receives funding for various "elderly health issue" related projects. Hence, Grayson stands to benefit handsomely from the Public Option.

POINT: Grayson publicly came out AGAINST Henry Waxman's cap 'n trade bill last June; but at the "last minute" dropped his stand against the energy tax after Waxman personally bribed him with a phony, $50 million pork project for Orlando - the National Center for Hurricane Research (yes, we'll soon learn how to prevent those nasty, level 4 hurricanes)

POINT: Last spring, ACORN made a personal stop at Mr.Grayson's Orlando district office to "thank" the Congressman for supporting Barack Obama’s budget; which of course, clandestinely funnels taxpayer money into ACORN's coffers.

Since the Obama administration is 100% behind Grayson - despite his so-called "gaffes" (all intentional) - this is all the more reason for Republicans to GET SERIOUS about defeating this bully, who threatens conservatives - not just in central Florida -but throughout the entire Republican party itself.

Who can remember any Congressmen bearing such arrogance (save for the odious Chuck Schumer), who is more articulate, more self-assured, and has an inherent knack for returning barbs aimed directly at him, with even greater political effect?

The Republicans foolishly discount Grayson's masterful, Alinsky-esque rhetoric:

Argue NOT the issue. Don't refute with facts or evidence. Just ridicule and call names; typical communist tactics - but with incredible damaging effect!

EXAMPLE: Grayson personally erased all Republican "death panel" momentum in public opinion polls vs. government-run health care -standing on the House floor and asking rhetorically: "What is the Republican plan? They want you to die quickly." Grayson has since received a net inflow of $2.5 MILLION dollars for his campaign war chest, rendering him virtually UNBEATABLE for the 2010 election.

CONCLUSION: Alan Grayson is God's gift to the Left.

He is a consummate liar. He lies about Republican proposals; lies about the Democrat's plan to tax the middle class into poverty. He refuses to address statistics that prove that the Democratic socialist agenda will put many mid-size and small businesses, OUT of business.

Grayson is already one of the best at spinning - and outright lying - to the media and his constituents.

Grayson is on Barney Frank's banking committee - a sponsor of the "Pay for Performance Act of 2009." It would impose government controls on all employee pay (not just top executives) of companies receiving funds from the U.S. government - altering the compensation agreements already in place.

He is one of 83 members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus- basically communists masquerading as..."those bringing together the collective wisdom of progressives inside and outside of Congress" (their mission statement).

Can you picture Alan Grayson in the Senate, whereupon he would be more than likely to serve for life? Well that's just what the DNC has planned for their newest rising superstar.

Ah yes; we'll have Pelosi, Frank, Feinstein, Boxer, Schumer, Durbin, Hoyer, Waxman, Waters, Weiner, Nadler... and NOW Grayson, driving the Marxist agenda into our living rooms; as we yell and scream at the television, faced with the prospect of watching these leftist cretins be perpetually re-elected for the remainder of their political lives.

And what are the savants from the Republican National Committee planning for their newest, and possibly most dangerous threat of all?

Delusions! Pretensions! Naively assuming that "the conservative people of central Florida will vote this idiot from office."

Sure.

Every Republican should be scared to death of Grayson. The RNC undoubtedly won't throw enough money into the 2010 race- not when their resources are so limited.

Grayson is loaded. He has his own personal wealth. Whichever of his GOP challengers survives the primary will have little name recognition, and not enough money, as the GOP will undoubtedly blunder again in 2010, perpetually wondering...."why are people so stupid to keep re-electing these jerks."

But who are the stupid jerks?

Rahm Emanuel personally imported a New York City radical to steal yet another Republican seat from a highly conservative central Florida district - even going so far as to brand Grayson a Blue Dog.

And with the help of ACORN, it worked.

Two things you cannot deny:

1) liberals are immensely astute about obtaining positions of power.

2) liberals extend their political power by clever inversion of language- lying openly by stating everything as polar opposite of what they actually attempt to accomplish, or believe themselves. 

For example, when liberals say they want a Public Option "to increase competiton among private insurers," what are they REALLY saying? It means they want the government to be able to drive them all bankrupt!

Which begs the question: "What if liberals actually knew climate change/global warming was baloney, but are using it to make "useful idiots" out of the Right? 

That's correct: to all you so-called brilliant conservatives...you've been had. You're a bunch of gullible dolts. Stop playing into these liberals' slimy, power-hungry hands! 

We know damn well there is NO climate change, nor global warming; but so do the liberals! They're using both terms irresponsibly (and interchangeably) to covertly extend their POLITICAL POWER, painting the conservatives as the ones preventing progress. 

If libs are smart enough to garner political majorities, are they not able to realize that man-made global warming IS sheer scientific folly, yet cleverly use it for the obfuscation of their real agenda - wealth transfer, via the consolidation of everyone into "one world" government?

Let's begin with Carol Browner, Obama's proud choice for Climate Czar, who's been "unearthed" as a member of the radical organization known as "Socialist International"(SI); not exactly your local rotary club, but a hardball group of leftists, with their avowed goal: forcing a radical environmental agenda upon the ENTIRE world.

Socialist International purports all the shop-worn liberal mantras: peak oil; CO2 is a pollutant; we're on the verge of irreversible climate devastation; the U.S. is poisoning the atmosphere. And all this can only be "counteracted" by cap-n-trade.

S.I. calls for the, "redesign of the international rules on intellectual property," i.e. more twisted liberal lingo for compelling all U.S. inventors to surrender their advancements, in order to "share" technologies with less-developed countries.

Socialist International holds that America - being the world's largest energy user- must shrink its economic output (energy usage) in conjunction with the lesser countries increasing theirs, and strive for "world equality." 

Does anyone smell a rat?  Is America being set up for a massive economic fall?

An in-depth look at Socialist International reveals the organization has been pushing hard for "global governance," meaning that "dangerous" climate change is caused by America emitting far too much Co2, in comparison to smaller nations, which emit little greenhouse gas - therefore, they must be rewarded for their good climatic behavior.  

Hence, America owes a "climate debt" to the world: and the Copenhagen Conference will be SI's ultimate payback for their concerted efforts, as the other socialist countries of the world gather to divvy up the spoils, and make America pay for its horrendous, environmental sins of the past. 

NOTHING!

First it was the economic/stimulus "crisis", then the budget "crisis ; then the health-care crisis; and now it's the climate crisis. Each crisis designed to further sink our country into debt, and take our individual choices away.

This perfidious COP treaty sets up a global governing body, with the power to demand massive transfers of wealth FROM the "developed" world (US and Europe), TO the rest of the world (third world).

Such a deal! Obama signs this 180-page global travesty, and the American economy plummets accordingly.

(Page 127): Developed country Parties shall provide financial resources and transfer technology to developing country Parties, to make full and effective repayment of climate debt, including adaptation debt, taking responsibility for their historical cumulative emissions, and current high per capita emissions.

(Page 128): The financial mechanism shall be fully accountable to the COP, which shall decide on its policies, program priorities and eligibility criteria, and allocation of resources for adaptation, mitigation, technology and capacity-building, and any other function that may be determined by the COP 

(Page 169): Define non-compliance parameters, penalties and fines as appropriate, and implement parameters and procedures defined by the COP to retrieve funds derived from fines and penalties (enforcement)

(Page 171): Impose financial penalties, at a minimum of ten times the market price of carbon, for any emissions in excess of the level implied by the emissions reduction commitment.

This barbaric treaty arrangement - coupled with cap 'n trade legislation- is akin to economic rape; a phony excuse to tax energy users and providers, and send the money to the UN - then to be distributed to third world dictators abroad.

The goal? Increasing the political power of the Obama administration to all continents.

Barack Obama- president of the world!

So is it all falling into place now? Obama gets his stupid Nobel Prize, in return for promising to sign the Copenhagen Climate Change treaty - a classic international quid -pro-quo. 

Socialist International, Carol Browner, Obama, the UN, and all the other enviro-marxists, actually hide within a "smokescreen", under the guise of saving the environment; a Machiavellian masquerade to take their power to all corners of the earth. 

And the key? The hoodwinking of the conservative Right, who have foolishly convinced themselves that liberals ARE fools, believing that man can change the climate. 

But herein lies the brilliance--who are the ones ACTUALLY being fooled? 

It's almost like a plot from the old "Batman" TV series from the mid 60's:

"We Leftists - in our fictional determination to save the world- feign stupidity about global warming, thereby outsmarting the Right, who think WE are the idiots." HAH!

"So go ahead and oppose us, gullible conservatives; we liberals have outfoxed all of you. We have the media on OUR side; we have the school children on OUR side; we have conned the moral majority - the ignorant American electorate - over to OUR side..."

"And we'll eventually get our way. Domination of the earth!"

So are the wonderful objectives of these so-called, "dumb liberals" sounding clearer now, or do we need further explanation?

The Obama administration will tax the coal companies, power plants, steel companies, and all of heavy industry according to their usage of fossil fuels; they will be required to buy carbon credits, and trade with nations that produce no energy or emissions .

This is all part of an even more hidden agenda-- an undeclared war on capitalism; 

It will be the U.S. who will be funding all these payments to 3rd world countries - wealth redistribution on a GLOBAL scale. And the American People will have no SAY in the matter; none at all.