About Me

Name: thekeenobserver
Email: reallykeenobserver@yahoo.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

ACORN's mountainous Louisiana Oak

 
Selma, Alabama - March 7, 1965: State troopers move on marchers crossing the Edmund Pettus Bridge - provoking the worst incident of violence of the entire Civil Rights era.
 
At once, Washington moves to overcome Southern legislators' resistance to effective voting rights legislation:
 
President Johnson issues an emergency call for a"strong voting rights law."
 
Congressional hearings began. Soon thereafter, a bill emerges that would become the "Voting Rights Act." 
 
Three decades later, a Louisiana election takes place - a mockery of democracy. Its outcome would profoundly shake the nation to its very foundation - an outcome "credited" to ACORN.
 
ACORN is a political cancer that continues to metastisize. Voter fraud perils the Republic. Corrupt democratic election officials want to count every vote - again, and again, and again.
 
Recently, in an office building in the New Orleans suburb of Metairie, workers were gathered about the coffee machine - reminiscing about the stolen 1996 election for the U.S. Senate, when Democrat Mary Landrieu "defeated" Republican Louis "Woody" Jenkins:
 
A brilliant conservative orator serving 25 years in the state Legislature, Jenkins was pitted against far-left challenger Landrieu, in a race for the seat vacated by J. Bennet Johnson (a democrat). 
 
On election day, Jenkins led exit polls 51 to 49. As returns came in, it held until 9:45 PM, when suddenly, a surge of votes from New Orleans  saw Landrieu edge slightly ahead.
 
Final returns showed Landrieu won by only 5,788 out of 1.7 MILLION votes cast  - the closest Senate race in America that year, and the closest statewide race in Louisiana history. 
 
Outside New Orleans, Jenkins won the state, prevailing 53% to 47%; but within New Orleans, Landrieu's incredible 100,000-vote margin was just enough to eek out her razor-thin "victory."
 
But it was all the work of ACORN, who's fingerprints were everywhere:
 
Throughout election day, there were countless reports of "irregularities." Jenkins had refused concession - loudly demanding the results be investigated.
 
Predictably, Democratic election officials began stone-walling - defying a federal court order. They denied access to voter registration applications, and other vital documents.
 
Nevertheless, on Dec. 5 1996, Jenkins filed a US Senate petition, challenging the results. 4000 pages were given to the Senate Rules Committee, documenting massive voter fraud, where democrat machine corruption had been obvious.
 
But even though Jenkins had cried "foul" immediately afterwards, a Democratic Committee majority pronounced him..."a sore loser"... who needed to "get on with his life;" the request for a Senate investigation denied.
 
In New Orleans, examples of the rampant vote fraud were unending:
 
The local media garnered hundreds of reports from witnesses who were offered money (or alcohol) to vote. Democrats had placed voter punch cards throughout all black churches in Louisiana.
 
On election day, hundreds of vans and buses cruised New Orleans' public housing projects - soliciting persons to "make some money" by going to the polls, then voting multiple times. Democrats were paid anywhere from $10 up to $120, for their votes.
 
Transcripts of conversations with persons selling their votes in New Orleans - and drivers who paid them - revealed a complex network of democratic operatives, who were paid by county commissioners, with access to large amounts of cash.
 
"This nice person drove up and asked whether I was registered," one woman said to the lawyers and investigators for Jenkins. "I told him I was, but didn't feel like voting. He said, 'If I paid you, would you go?' I got up from the bus stop bench - dusted off my pants - and got in the car."
 
The woman, who neither reads nor writes, claimed the man took her to three polling places, where she voted and signed an "X" each time. 
 
That same election day, a 32-year-old mechanic testified he drove a van, "picking up people who proceeded to vote at least ten times, or even more." For his efforts, he received $700.
 
One woman, who said she voted three times, groused about how much she was paid. "I was supposed to get $75; but all they paid was $25." Added the woman..."they gave me some 'stanky T-shirt' with Landrieu's picture on it."
 
Throughout that election day, Orleans Parish exit polls showed Jenkins and Landrieu in a virtual deadlock. But at 9:45 p.m.--almost two hours after the polls had closed-- some 70 of New Orleans' 474 precincts had not yet reported their votes.
 
Outside the city, Jenkins had won by 95,000 votes. Within city limits, however, he was buried by a margin of 100,000.
 
Over 200 New Orleans city employees had been ordered to campaign for Mayor Marc Morial's "hand-picked candidates" - or be fired. A list of employees was posted in City Hall, directing them to either Clinton or Landrieu headquarters, where they would be given directives.
 
In certain New Orleans precincts, computer voting-machine tapes had incorrect dates -precincts where Jenkins lost to Landrieu by a margin of NINE to one.
 
Under Louisiana law, when polls close, voting machines are to be locked: then three days later, re-opened - in full view of the candidates - and their totals reviewed. But an invesigation revealed the Orleans Parish Clerk of Courts - a Landrieu supporter - opened all 677 voting machines outside the presence of the candidates
 
Democratic Election officials swore the machines had not been tampered with.
 
In 1994 - as required by federal law - Louisiana had enacted a "Motor Voter" statute, allowing voters to sign up at license bureaus or at welfare and government offices. To protect ballot security, any voter registering by mail - who never before had cast a ballot -would produce a photo ID at the polls.
 
That seemed reasonable. But in September 1996, the Clinton Administration said "no."
 
Assistant Attorney General Deval L. Patrick decreed that (quote)..."the provision violated the Voting Rights Act of 1965, because blacks were not as likely as whites to have driver's licenses or other picture IDs."
 
Hence, under Clinton's decree, officials at Louisiana's polls could no longer request a photo ID to uncover fraud.
 
Ten months later, a Lake Charles investigative reporter sent 25 bogus voter applications -complete with fake names, addresses and dates of birth - to Louisiana voter registrars. Twenty of the fictitious residents--including one signed "X"--received voter registration cards.
 
Jenkins's investigators uncovered evidence that of the addresses of 3169 registered voters in New Orleans' public housing projects - considered VACANT by the city- 1380 voted illegally in the election.
 
One unnamed ACORN worker revealed yet more "company secrets”.
 
- Among "certain demographic groups," voters got not only rides to the polls, but money  for "expenses," a free box lunch, plus a list of "those one should vote for."
 
- Certain “poll watchers” also got paid, who's job it was to "co-ordinate votes" with the same list. Hence, Landrieu won 85% of Orleans - the final parish to be counted.
 
- There were a significant number of phantom votes cast: the number of votes tallied on voting machines exceeded the number of voter signatures on the precinct register. Also specific names appearing on poll lists were not found on the lists of registered voters.
 
Not surprisingly, Clinton's Justice Department - under the initiatives of Duval Patrick- made sure that all legal venues sought by Woody Jenkins would mysteriously run into legal "roadblocks."
 
Even worse, the overwhelmingly republican Congress left Jenkins hanging! They did NOTHING - a tradition which seems to have carried over to this very day.
 
Thus, are we not getting the government we deserve? Mary Landrieu, purportedly a moderate democrat, has all along represented the radical left - placed on her Senate throne by ACORN.
 
How many more elections will ACORN steal?
 
How many more "one-critical-vote" margins will the Senate maintain, before we realize how a marxist oligarchy of 60, continues to hold sway over 300 million Americans - two thirds of whom OPPOSE what they do!
 
Meanwhile Landrieu - Harry Reid's high-priced call-girl - has time enough for ACORN to hatch another plot to steal yet ANOTHER election, when she runs in 2014.
 
ITEM:  Landrieu's brother, Mitch, currently, Louisiana's lieutenant governor, will campaign for Mayor of New Orleans in 2010. Hence - like Marc Morial before him – if he wins, Landrieu's 2014 re-election could be a fait accompli.
 
ITEM: Mary Landrieu - is the daughter of Maurice “Moon” Landrieu, former mayor of New Orleans.
 
ITEM: The Landrieus are deeply entrenched in Louisiana politics. Mary’s sister, Madeleine, is a Civil District Court Judge who, like most CDC judges, ran unopposed last election.
 
ITEM: The Landrieu's were germane to the founding of ACORN. 

In 1969 Maurice “Moon” Landrieu ran to become mayor of New Orleans.
Despite winning but 19% of the total vote (placing second in an initial Democrat primary), Moon somehow "defeated" highly favored opponent Jimmy Fitzmorris in a run-off primary, then went on to win the Mayor’s race in 1970.
 
Co-incidentally, in 1970, New Orleans native Wade Rathke moves to Arkansas - founding the "Arkansas Community Organization for Reform Now" (ACORN).
 
But then - viola!  ACORN soon becomes headquartered in New Orleans- then right behind follows SIEU. The "A" in ACORN is changed to "association."
 
Here things become "fuzzy."
 
Did Rathke have a cryptic connection to a prominent political family of corrupt New Orleans?
 
Even more mysteriously, who was it that backed Wade Rathke financially, enabling ACORN to spread like cancer throughout the country?
 
Then twenty six years later, Mary Landrieu - abetted by the SEIU and ACORN - wins her senate seat, setting a pattern which would enable the left to eventually seize control of Congress, using the thuggish tactics of the ACORN playbook. 
 
Mary Landrieu’s sell-out "yes" vote came with a hitch: Hary Reid's promise to funnel campaign money to her brother, to get the "extra ground game" to win the new Orleans Mayorial race - virtually guaranteeing her re-election in 2014.
 
This the real secret behind Reid's so-called "Louisiana purchase."
 
So to all you brain-dead republicans out there - ARE YOU PAYING ATTENTION?
 
Despite polls showing 2-1 voter opposition, is it any wonder that the Senate Democrats have rammed through Obamacare?  
 
Despite polls that show America is a "conservative-center" nation, liberal democrat incumbents keep winning re-election - often by the narrowest margins - yet it never seems to end.
 
POINT: A federal judge (Clinton appointee) has ruled ACORN's 'defunding' was ruled "unconstitional.' Again, the republicans do NOTHING!
 
POINT: Michael Steele, Newt Gingrich, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and every other conservative mouthpiece, keep reassuring everyone..."We'll get 'em in 2010!"
 
POINT: Pollsters and political analysts alike "question" whether incumbent Senate democrats can continue to survive politically.
 
Stupid fools! Don't the republicans realize that this is EXACTLY what these venal democrats want them to think!
 
The Republicans foolishly KEEP DISCOUNTING ACORN! Until this surefire blueprint for stealing elections is made illegal, senate democrats will triumph again & again! Do not the republicans perceive the idiocy of their overconfidence? Is it any wonder why these radicals have no fear of their constituents?
 
Why would democrats vote for something (Obamacare) that is so blatantly unpopular? - are they stupid enough to committ politcal suicide? Liberals are all about control- and never giving it up!
 
Ask Minnesota's Norm Coleman how he feels about it: ACORN stole away his Senate seat like a thief in the night, while Michael Steele and idiot Tim Pawlenty did NOTHING!
 
The result? Two more despicable leftists - Franken and Landrieu - enough to empower a runaway leftist Senate - giving them a crucial 60 seat super-majority, moving to enslave us - usuing OUR OWN tax money- and who will probably remain in power again in  2010!
 
Yet the tea parties and Republicans talk of "sweeping then out of office"
 
Sure. 
 
ALL politics is LOCAL. Politics is not unlike war; and to the overconfident goes defeat.
 
One can only wonder how many other Democrat Senators stole seats with extra votes -added at the last minute. The Dems have concocted a perfect plan to steal elections, thus achieving the magical number of 60.
 
Like 1965, a new federal voting rights act is needed! ACORN cannot go unchallenged!
 
CHANGE # 1: all statewide voting laws must be made federal (i.e. standardized throughout ALL 50 states).
 
CHANGE # 2: all voter registrations must be uniform: One registration- picture ID required - and no "same day" register-voting.
 
CHANGE # 3: absentee ballots must be adressed to a federal voting center in Washington DC - to be counted under supervision of the FBI - who will will arrest anyone showing duplicity.
 
CHANGE # 4 - the BREAKTHROUGH: trash all paper ballots - trash all the expensive voter machines - thereby eliminating all possiblity of local corruption. The republicans submit a new plan for INTERNET VOTING : computer terminals placed nationwide throughout the local polls, enabling voters to cast ballots- who receive a special voter "password," that can be used only ONCE.
 
a) it would trap the democrats: how could they oppose such a measure to assure intregrity in the upcoming 2010 election?
 
b) ACORN would be powerless to submit fraudulent votes, or multiple votes from a single person
 
c) the public would overwhelmingly support such a measure; and the House and Senate majorities in Congress would be virtually powerless to oppose it.
 
Like the IRS in charge of the nations tax-collection, why not a governent agency - in charge of nationwide voting - with authority to punish those who dare to attempt voter fraud.
 
Until elections are controlled, and politicians (like Landrieu and the rest of the corrupto-crats) are thrown out of office, we will continue to march headlong towards one party rule, and the tyranny of the left.
 
And should not the hydra-headed monster of ACORN be slain, the Republicans could be left wandering in the political desert for another 40 years.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Jed Clampett's day off


Whee-e-e doggie-e-e!
 
Remember that one? Need a hint? Of course! It's Jed Clampett, from "The Beverly Hillbillies."
 
Watching the show, whenever ol' Jed came across something that inspired a feeling of glee (or amusement) he'd let forth with a..."Wheee dog-ge-e-e! 
 
And on this December day, what could be more amusing -or gleeful - than a massive blizzard, rushing headlong towards Washington, to engulf the liberals in Congress!
 
WHEE -- DOG-GEE!
 
Even better, it's just in time to sock in DC's Reagan Airport -meaning that Obama's return flight from Copenhagen (the international global warming conference) will be diverted, due to 15 inches of blowing/drifting snow!
 
Wheee-ee Doggee-ee!
 
But here's the topper: on Sunday, a desperate Harry Reid will have the Senate in session, trying to get year-end business completed - aiming for a last-chance Christmas-Eve vote on Obamacare. In fact, Dirty Harry is undoubtedly watching the weather channel, with perhaps more than mild concern: What if Capitol Hill becomes snowbound?
 
Poor Harry! He'll have a heckuva time trying to find a government aide to shovel snow on a Sunday. Hope he's familiar with Craig's list.
 
Actually, if one stops to ponder, the weather determines the day-by-day course of all of our lives - more than one could ever imagine.
 
In winter, we dress differently; eat differently, even act differently. Subconsiously, we adopt a  type of "siege mentality"..."if I can only get through this terrible winter."
 
In summer - once again - we dress, eat & act differently. And, of course, subconsciously we think differently..."If only it could be summer forever."
 
It's remarkable how much the weather defines our lives, our destiny, and perhaps - our politics? Could climate even determine one's religion, or belief in a Supreme Being?
 
EXAMPLE: Take California - the land where the weather never changes. Everyday is just  another (ho-hum) repeat of the same ol' thing.
 
If you were in California now - where its sunny and 70* - would you be thinking of chestnuts roasting over an open fire? Jack Frost? Singing carols? Or of the Christ Child in a cave, laying in a manger?
 
Nah! All those thoughts are weather-related. Your mind must be proprerly oriented for Christmas - the most religious-intensive holiday of the year. And religion is something liberals despise.
 
Think about it (hypothetically); you're a liberal, you live in California, and surrounded almost always by good weather - practically everyday. So then what?
 
You don't have to think about overcoats; or long johns; you don't have to worry about anti-freeze - or even a heating bill. Gloves? Hah!
 
Life is simple - too simple.
 
Unencumbered by the concerns of most other Americans, Californians have time enough to think about other things, like..."I'm such a wonderful person"..."How can I make this world better..."
 
"An idle mind is the devil's playground."
 
Californians simply have too much time! Are they not always considering new ways to control other people's lives?
 
Are we (ahem, ahem) getting "warmer?" Is this why California is so much at odds with mainstream America?
 
California is California for a reason. The place crawls with left-thinking people, who literally have nothing better to do than to impose their ideology on the rest of the nation.
 
But where did all this liberalism start? Sure, it was in California, but how did it originate there? And why?
 
Obviously, no more liberal (or more antithetical) place to traditional America exits than San Francisco. But extreme liberalism didn't just appear there because, "hey, it's San Francisco man!".

Erroneously, most Americans believe the 60's hippie movement gave rise to San Francisco's radical-left politics.
 
But hippies didn't just spring up from psychedelic music; nor from the "flower power" of drugs, or because of "free love man!" 
 
Actually, the real origin goes back to the Second World War - when tolerance for the unusual was largely non-existent.
 
Back in the early 40's, in many cities, if you were even SUSPECTED of being gay, you could be run out of town - or murdered. For those of 'different orientation', you wouldn't want to trumpet it in the singles section of the local classifieds.

On the west coast, San Francisco was known as the P.O.D. (point of departure) for all soldiers in the Pacific theater of the war.
 
There were a number of large military bases around San Francisco during World War II; and many of the men stationed there were gay.
 
As the war dragged on, San Francisco's growing list of gay bars got an unknowing assist from the armed services, who routinely posted lists of "places off limits," where one would be subject to arrest by the M-P's (military police).
 
Homosexuals were carefully screened out at military induction centers - the premise being..."they would make poor combat soldiers"..."their presence would threaten discipline and morale."
 
But if they did slip by at induction, gays (popularly known then as "fruits") were subjected to harassment in the barracks, due to their inability to explain to their fellow inductees "what type of women they liked."
 
When off-base passes were issued,  gays were easily pegged by their non-chalance toward female companionship.

Rather than returning home, many gay soldiers (particularly those dishonorably discharged for homosexuality) stayed or settled in San Francisco after their service ended.
 
Imagine a dishonorably-discharged soldier, calling home and "proudly" telling his mother..."hey ma, great news! You and pa won't have to worry about me fighting in the war...I got discharged for being homosexual! We'll all celebrate when I get home!"
 
Actually, rather than admit to dishonor, many gay soldiers stayed to start a new life in wonderful San Francisco USA.
 
And why not? There were more gays there than anywhere; and more tolerance. So this lent origin to the gay/liberal movement of the left coast.

With the onset of the 50's, the rest of California (and the nation) took notice: Gays (from everywhere) migrated to San Francisco - setting up underground organizations, clubs, bars, newspapers and gay magazines.
 
With the 60's, the Vietnam war gave the "hip" or hippie movement an aura of legitimacy; i.e. "We hippies say Vietnam is an illegitimate war, and America has not the right to fight it!"
 
San Francisco today can best be described as a "city-nation" unto itself - the capital of gay by the Bay.
 
San Francisco is all about "being one"..."treating everybody as one". For those who migrate there they discover "heaven and hell on earth"- depending on orientation.
 
The homeless in San Francisco are of particular interest:
 
By day they hang out in packs together - even belong to their own "union" - unlike the despondent, drug-dependent winos of other cities, who keep to themselves.
 
San Francisco is all about "tolerance" - "Amsterdam at night"- gateway to hundreds of gay bars, tattoo and massage parlors, and gay strip clubs. Visitors describe it as having an 'underground appearance' in almost every neighborhood.
 
One recent traveler described San Francisco's 'jovial' atmosphere as..."pot-smoking wierdos, walking around everywhere."
 
But what if the liberals have been right all along?
 
What if California ACTUALLY was hit with rapid climate change? What if San Francisco's weather suddenly turned "Midwestern?"
 
Would not San Francisco be transformed overnight?
 
Threatened by snow storms and zero temperatures, what would happen to the city's huge enclave of the homeless?
 
What would become of the city's underground atmosphere? Would there be pot-smoking hippies, wandering aimlessly? Would the city still retain its flavor of being "Amsterdam at night?"
 
Which goes back to our original point:
 
Man's behavior on earth is largely contingent on the weather. It can determine our resolve to succeed in life - or be a bum. It affects one's subconscious mind  - even to the point of determining liberal or conservative; Christian or atheist. Or even patriotism, vs. one who hates America.
 
The Beverly Hillbillies bear out a true lesson about Californians: Just as ol' Jed Clampett was entirely out of his element in Beverly Hills, the crux of his problem was the fact that he (and his family) no longer had anything worthwhile to do!
 
Once again..."an idle mind is the devil's playground." Which of course explains why these mean-spirited California liberals  (Boxer, Pelosi, Waxman, Feinstein, Barbara Lee, etc.) are always out to subvert their country - they simply have idle minds! 
 
But unfortunately, their constituents will never vote any of them out.
 
So make like a liberal. Insist that climate change is coming, and transforms all of California; then the state becomes too occupied to ever send another leftist to Congress again!
 
Whee doggeee! Wouldn't that be worth a shout!
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The monster that devoured Cleveland


Cleveland?
 
Could it be America's most misunderstood city? The Mistake on the Lake?
 
Perhaps it all started back in the late 1950's, on a TV show called, "The Many Loves of Dobie Gillis" - an inane sitcom about adolescent love, starring Dwaine Hickman.
 
But the program survived only because of the iconic popularity of "beatnik" Maynard G. Crebs," (played superbly by Bob Denver - aka Gilligan), who stole the show.
 
With his quirky disdain for "avoiding work", whenever Maynard Crebs appeared, he would always be on his way to see the movie "The Monster that Devoured Cleveland" - then a barrage of uproarious canned laughter would follow.
 
Hence, from the 1950's on, Cleveland's curse of hapless notoriety would take hold; and nowhere would this become more apparent than with its professional sports teams:
 
In 1954, The Indians won an incredible 111 games, and were expected to sweep the underdog NY Giants in four straight. Then irony struck in game two of the World Series:
 
At a crucial point, feared power-hitter, Vic Wertz, with runners aboard, hit a herculean, 480-foot, high-arcing blast to dead center field, only to have Giant rookie Willie Mays, make his legendary, impossible over-the-shoulder catch - instantly ruining the Indian's momentum; and Cleveland then lost 4 straight in utter humiliation.
 
In 1959, the Indians featured Rocky Colavito, a cannon-armed right-fielder, who occasionally pitched in relief, and quickly became a fan-favorite. 
 
The "Rock" had movie-star looks; he was the second-most-feared hitter in the league (besides Mickey Mantle), and hit a league-leading 47 home runs that year. The Indians - led by their cult hero - held first place until the last week of the season.
 
But then, yet another Cleveland debacle: on the first day of the 1960 season, Frank Lane, Indians general manager, on a spur-of-the-moment quirk, called the Detroit Tigers, and offered Colavito for Harvey Keunn, a singles-hitting short stop, who had led the American league with a .321 average the previous year.
 
Thinking Lane had gone insane, the Tigers jumped at the chance, and made the deal on the spot. The reaction in Cleveland was WHAT???....ARE YOU KIDDING ME!!!!
 
To this day, the town has never recovered.
 
If the deal to sell Babe Ruth (from the Red Sox) to the Yankees had precipated the 84- year "curse of the Bambino," the Colavito-for-Keunn deal would have an equally devastating effect on the Indians.
 
In 1960, attendance - which had always been Cleveland's forte -completely collapsed. Fans felt betrayed. Soon, the franchise came within a inch of leaving town - saved only by the eleventh-hour intervention of Vern Stouffer, a longtime local businessman. 
 
Then, in 1966, Cleveland's affinity for athletic irony would strike again; this time, in the form of Art Modell, the 5-year owner of the Browns (da Browns).
 
But first we regress, back to 1957, when Cleveland drafted their iconoclastic running back, Jim Brown -  their last first-round pick to become a star.
 
From the day Jim Brown arrived in Cleveland, those who saw the man play knew there would never be another:
 
Brown had sprinter's speed, and seemed to be chiseled from granite. On his patented sweep play - with his hall-of-fame guard Gene Hickerson blocking - Brown would take the ball upfield, with opposing players LITERALLY bouncing off his body- lying in his wake. 
 
It was as if Superman himself had donned a Cleveland uniform.
 
Brown led his team to the NFL championship in 1964, defeating the Colts; it would be the last championship of any kind for Cleveland.
 
By 1965, Jim Brown had set every record in the league; many of which stand to this day.
 
But Brown - although he loved Cleveland - despised Modell, who foolishly alienated the mega-star by nitpicking at his demands to be paid accordingly. 
 
Then Modell (who knew as much about football as "Lassie" the collie) made the most foolish blunder of any owner in pro football history:
 
During the off-season, Brown had been in Italy, filming the spaghetti western,"100 Rifles," with co-star Raquel Welch. Production had been delayed by heavy rains in spring (1966).
 
When training camp broke in late July of that year, Brown insisted on finishing his movie. He bitterly resented Modell's demand that he be in camp for the very first day of summer practice; a no-no for someone befitting the status of the all-time leading rusher in pro football history.
 
Then Modell issues his ultimatum: He calls Brown long-distance in Italy, and tells him..."either leave now for training camp, or be kicked off the team." Brown, in effect, tells Modell..."you can't fire me, I quit."
 
The next day, Jim Brown would shock the sports world (and rock Cleveland down to its very foundation) by announcing his official retirement from football - that he would assume a new career as a full-time Hollywood actor.
 
Again - to this day - it would be another Cleveland team that has yet to recover.
 
With his freakishly-solid physique, and fierce determination, Jimmy Brown could undoubtedly have played for at least another five, maybe seven, or possibly even ten more years.
 
Perhaps it would have been the Browns who would've defeated Joe Namath and the New York Jets in the 1968 Super Bowl - and changed the course of pro football history.
 
Perhaps the Browns would have gone on to win four consecutive super bowls.
 
But Cleveland would be left to forever wonder about what "coulda-shoulda-been"- all because of the idiopathic stupidity of Art Modell, who fired both the greatest coach in history (Paul Brown) and football's greatest player ever.
 
But through it all, thick and thin, Clevelanders could count on one thing: their great hometown newspaper, "The Plain Dealer."
 
In 1969, when the Cuyahoga river caught fire, everyone rushed out to buy a copy of the Plain Dealer: Grease had been discharged from a river-front plant, formed a floating slick, then became ignited from sparks coming from a train crossing a trestle.
 
Time magazine ran pictures of arcs of water - shooting from fireboats - landing in an impressive ring of fire on the Cuyahoga’s surface. 
 
Predictably, the wire services, morning disk jockeys, and late-night comedians had their wildest dream come true- yet another way to humiliate Cleveland.
 
Then, on October 16, 1972, the Plain Dealer carried the tale of how mayor Ralph Perk accidentally set his hair on fire while attempting to use a welder's torch for a ribbon-cutting ceremony at a downtown convention.
 
Yep. Another time-honored way to bash Cleveland.
 
But the Plain Dealer was always there to defy the city's reputation as some backwater hick town - one that couldn't get out of its own way. From the '60s to the '80s, Cleveland had become the Rodney Dangerfield of cities.
 
Then, in 1981, a Plain Dealer ad campaign came to light, to combat Cleveland's sullied, hapless image. A clever theme had emerged..."If New York's the Big Apple, Cleveland's a Plum."
 
Finally, a spark! A budding revival had taken hold - designed to reveal the city as more cosmopolitan, more sophisticated; more interesting; cooler than one could imagine.
 
Under Mayor George Vionovich, plans were made for a lakefront Rock 'n Roll Hall of Fame: and around it all, began a new downtown revival.
 
By the1990's, America had taken notice.
 
The Plain Dealer began touting the Cleveland Clinic as the number-one ranked heart hospital in the United States, with a staff comprised of the best cardiologists one could find anywhere.
 
Cleveland then began to ballyhoo its educational excellence- Case Western; a world-class university with a biotech research department second to none.
 
Then viola! The piece' de resistance.'
 
The Plain Dealer broke a story that would once and for all cement Cleveland among the pantheon of great Amercan cities: the Euclid corridor - a  private/public developement that would connect the downtown - via a new modern public transit system - to the midtown area, comprised of several Hospitals of the Cleveland clinic complex.

And lastly, the corridor would run out to University Circle, serving the Case Western campus. 
 
At once, doubters emerged. Critics said it wouldn't be feasible.
 
Cleveland's inner city had a reputation as one of the most dangerous anywhere, and naysayers predicted people would avoid public transportation in droves; that the idea to link downtown to the outer corridor - using public transit - was an expensive boondogle.
 
But The Plain Dealer stayed out in front of the critics; and with its recent completion in 2008, the Euclid Corridor has blossomed into a smashing success. 
 
In 20 minutes, you can get from downtown (Tower City), past the midtown Cleveland Clinic complex, and arrive at University Circle. Thus, the central city & the region's two largest employers are now linked to many of the city's cultural, educational, medical and business centers.
 
And along the way are a plethora of all-new condos, apartments, restaurants, shops, etc. that dot the entire corridor.
 
Heard any Cleveland jokes recently?
 
Cleveland at last is again showing itself off to the nation - living up to the Plain Dealer's claim...the Euclid corridor would "pump new life" into Cleveland's economy and be the "rebirth of Downtown and Euclid Avenue."
 
Indeed, like few other urban areas, Cleveland can proudly extol its claim of a med-centered, recession-resistant regional economy:
 
POINT: Cleveland’s healthcare institutions are consistently ranked on par with anywhere else in the nation.
 
POINT: the Cleveland Clinic has developed its widely-copied philosophy of "patient-centric" care - encouraging innovation and adoption of leading-edge med technologies - attracting brand new businesses - specializing in the latest in patient-care and med devices.
 
POINT: More than 400 bioscience companies are located in Northeast Ohio; Cleveland is now known as a budding new life-science research center, with its strategic midwest location on Lake Erie.
 
POINT: Cuyahoga County employs more than 120,000 healthcare professionals, including 36,000 at the Cleveland Clinic; 25,000 at University Hospitals - providing interaction with influential leaders from top medical associations and administrations around the world.
 
Day-by-day, Clevelands prowess as America's great new health metropolis just seems to get better.
 
For two years now, The Plain Dealer has carried plans for a huge new 120,000 sq. ft. Cleveland Medical Mart; a combination convention center, showroom, meeting complex, etc. for major medical manufacturers and service providers.
 
The completion of the Cleveland Med Mart could catapult the city as the pre-eminent location for the latest in cardiology, surgery, OBGYN, medical imaging, orthopedics, sterilization, office furnishings, patient care, IT, and medical devices.
 
But ironically, is a new curse about to dawn on Cleveland?- one borne of political ignorance, that could (one day) undermine all the planning, all the construction, all the new jobs - destroying much of the progress made thus far?
 
After all these years, has the once-great Plain Dealer turned on the great city it has served so well?
 
Disastrously, Cleveland has fallen victim to the great media cover-up - hiding the true-to-life monster of government run healthcare! 
 
Do the people of Cleveland even realize the calamity - coming out of Washngton - that awaits them in five years? Once it begins, they can thank the censorship of the wonderful  Plain Dealer - and its liberal editors.
 
That's right Clevelanders; your great hometown newspaper has betrayed you. They have taken up the cause of the left - one that will leave Cleveland in shambles, and Washington DC with unprecedented power to control Northeastern Ohio for the next 100 years.
 
Has the Plain Dealer even bothered to explain terms like "Public Option?" Or "single-payer?" Or defined the role of HHS secretary Kathy Sebelius?
 
So here's a quick refresher. Learn it well, lest you be caught blindsided like the rest of the sheep, who are about to be led to the slaughter.
 
When government-run healthcare takes hold, it inevitably creates a public option: i.e. the federal government eventualy becomes the only one (single payer) to compensate the medical providers. Hence, they automatically begin to restrict health care, making it as "economic" as possible (e.g. rationing - pulling the plug on grandma).
 
Got it? Let us expound further:
 
The government now will be able tax private-employer insurance policies, leading to the eventual dropping of all private coverage- forcing everyone into the public option, and ergo - more rationing!
 
Result? A complete takeover of the entire American medical estabshment!
 
This means funding will be drastically cut for medicare; drastically reduced payments to doctors and hospitals for all procedures; hospitals will reduce services; many will go bankrupt; doctors of all specialties will be performing less procedures. Less cancer treatments; less heart bypasses. Less of everything; many physicians & nurses will retire out of necessity - or disgust.
 
With single payer, the goverment can tell any doctor/hospital to either take the fee we offer you - or leave it! Quit! Close down; or go elsewhere! What do they care? The profit incentive in medicine is GONE!
 
With single payer, boitech and research companies will have no incentive to innovate. Many will fold. Pharmaceutical innovations will come to a standstill!
 
With single-payer, many college students will chose fields other than nursing and medicine. The inevitable shortages of medical professionals will lead to an influx of Indian & Muslim doctors into northeastern Ohio, who will be required to fill the gap.
 
For many, expensive cancer treatments will be denied by Health & Human Services secretary Kathy Sebelius, who will have the god-like power of life or death over the eldery, and those stricken with all forms of carcinoma.
 
Premature babies will be left to die; Down's syndrome children will be out of luck; the autistic will be denied therapy; older disabled people could be denied modern wheelchairs.
 
The nightmares go on and on: new  expenses  on employers of companies with more than fifty employees , who MUST provide health coverage or pay a fine. All other individuals MUST maintain qualified health coverage or pay a fine. If you refuse the fine, you are subject to imprisonment!
 
Even worse, with the unconstitutional mandate of everyone having to purchase health insurance, it will suck hundreds of billions out of Cleveland's economy to Washington, and transferred to inner city community centers across the country - providing subsidies to "poor people."
 
And being forced to buy expensive health insurance- many college students will abandon their post-grad educations, and enrollments at local Cleveland universities will suffer, leading to staff cuts, and yet more unemployment.
 
Wage-earners - rocked by higher federal taxes - will have much less disposible income to spend in the local economy.
 
Many of Cleveland's medical device makers will see profit margins suffer, with the burden of a federal 2.5% excise tax on everything - from canes, to the braces the orthodontist will install on one's crooked teeth.
 
With socialized medicine, everyone gets to share in the misery; but nothing like what is about to befall Cleveland.
 
Consider: no longer will the Cleveland Clinic be able to operate as a "world class health center." No longer will Case-Western obtain proper funding for its world class reseach. The Cleveland Med Mart may open just in time to see it become a white elephant in its first few years.
 
But Cleveland has asked for it: given its number of medical centers, the town will one day operate like a giant department of motor vehicles: endless lines; endless waits; endless anger and frustration.
 
Northeastern Ohio voted heavy for Barack Obama; and Obamacare will be the monster that finally devours Cleveland.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Who is the real enemy here?

 
Sunrise...April 8, 2009: A small blip - closing rapidly from the East - appears on the Maersk Alabama's radar. It can only mean trouble.
 
Fearing the worst, Captain Richard Phillips arouses his crew to general quarters. The blip, growing closer on the screen, is now within one mile.
 
The captain sounds the alarm
 
Acting with military precision, the crew files into a "safe" room, and cuts off all power to the vessel.
 
Using grapnel hooks, four Somali pitates - armed with AK 47's - board the unarmed ship, rush the bridge, and training their guns on the captain, yell..."Summon the crew immediately, or we shoot!"
 
Calling their bluff - Captain Phillips does nothing. The pirates do not shoot. A long, 36-hour stand-off begins.
 
The pirates are first to wilt. They dispatch their ringleader on a search below deck, seeking the crew.
 
The crew has been waiting. They ambush the young pirate in the engine room - who suffers a deep stab wound to his left hand.
 
Immediately, the crew restores power to the Maersk. Calling the bridge, a swap is agreed upon: the wounded pirate for their captain - and passage back to Somalia.
 
But now, a slip-up.
 
As the four pirates step into one of several lifeboats, they cajole Phillips aboard for operating instructions. The ploy works. Suddenly - to the consternation of the crew -the five speed away toward the Somali coastline.
 
Of course, the five-day ordeal EVENTUALLY came to a happy ending, all due to Frank Castellano, commander of the destroyer USS Bainbridge, and the unbelievably-superb marksmanship of three navy seals.
 
But why did it take five days? One modern-armed US navy warship, versus a lifeboat with 4 men, armed with rifles?
 
First, recall the escape of Captain Phillips:
 
Affter 24 hours on the lifeboat, one of the pirates guarding Phillips began retching over the side, violently seasick. The other three were asleep. Phillips suddenly leaps overboard, and swims towards the Bainbridge, about a quarter mile away. But to his utter dismay, the Bainbridge - obviously zeroed in on the lifeboat - holds fire!
 
Inexplicably, the President had issued rules of engagement (ROE): No shooting. A peaceful solution was the President's only acceptable outcome - unless Phillips' life was in clear, extreme danger.
 
Even more astonishingly, Obama had ordered the hijacking to be treated as a crime (scene).
 
For four days, Obama hindered the Navy from taking action:

FBI hostage negotiators were given preference over military intervention. But as the ordeal dragged on, it became increasingly apparent; only the Navy could save  Philllips, and it would not be pretty. 
 
Meanwhile, the pirates had caught on (to Obama's ROE): Whenever the Bainbridge would close within range, they would spray the ship with their weapons.

After two days of taking periodic fire, Castellano - the on-scene commander - decided he'd had enough, and ordered the three-man Navy Seal team to take their shots: fire as soon as they had their targets sighted.
 
Bingo! Three rounds downrange; all three brigands become enemy KIA (killed in action); and Phillips was safe.
 
Not surprisingly, the great Obama proved himself a spineless lily: indecisive, slow to act, and had foolishly insisted that FBI hostage negotiators be given charge. 
 
For four days, Obama hindered the Navy from taking action:
 
POINT: Obama wouldn't authorize the Navy seal teams to the scene for 36 hours - going against OSC (on scene commander) recommendation.

POINT: Once the seals arrived,  the ROE's were repeated - reminding them they would do nothing unless the hostage's life was in "imminent" danger

POINT: When Phillips first went overboard (during the night) and separated himself from the lifeboat, the Bainbridge could have immediately blown the lifeboat out of the water, were it not for Obama's idiotic Rules Of Engagement!

POINT: Obama personally had denied two rescue plans: one developed by the Bainbridge Captain; and the second from the seals who had parachuted on board.

Afterwards, Obama - a man with no shame, no background of dealing with military issues, and no track record of decisiveness - then orders Robert Gibbs to issue a press release, declaring..."The dramatic end to the standoff was a result of the President's toughness and decisiveness!"

What should have lasted only hours, had become an embarrassing, four-day standoff between a ragtag handful of criminals (with rifles) and a modern U.S. Navy warship.
 
Result: Barack Obama had done the impossible! Who would have thought there could EVER be a Commander-in-Chief worse than Jimmy Carter?
 
But Carter was a bungler. An incompetent. But not a hater of the military, as is Obama. 
 
Obama is against the military; against America itself. He deliberately allows the troops to be in harm's way.
 
Examples abound:
 
- Obama never saw a pentagon budget cut he didnt like.
 
- Obama's shocking, detached response to the Ft. Hood Massacre; his obnoxious "shout out" was offensive to everyone.
 
- Obama has now ordered his military lawyers to bring charges against three Navy seals, falsely accused by a cowardly, murdering Iraqi terorist -Ahmed Hashim Abed - claiming he was assaulted by one of the seals. NOTE: The three seals involved are Special Warfare Operators 2nd Class Matthew McCabe and Jonathan Keefe, and 1st Class Julio Huertas.
 
Is Obama deliberately trying alienate the military? Is he trying to discourage volunteerism and re-enlistment? What other reason could there be for trying to ruin the careers of three brave young men, who literally risked their lives to capture a most-wanted Iraqi terorrist, who had murdered Americans?
 
And to add insult to injury, these three Navy seals have been framed - the truth suppressed by Obama's military-goon lawyers!

PREDICTION: Look for the seals to eventually be vindicated.
 
After capturing Abed, he was turned over to the Iraqi military, and the seals retired to their base. But upon orders to pick him up for further interrogation, the seals noticed Abed had obviously been assaulted, and bore facial scratches and a swollen lip.
 
Indeed; it was the Iraqis who hads roughed-up Abed. But Abed then tells Naval authorities that it was one of the seals who assaulted him.
 
So now, the three are in danger of losing rank, pay, and face humiliation, plus harsh reprimands.

Welcome to Obama-justice: after three Navy seals literally save Obama from being exposed as the inept fool he proved to be during the Maersk hijacking, he now goes against three equally-heroic seals who captured an extremely-dangerous, wanted enemy.  

Strangely, Obama views the military (and by extension, the seals) as a police force; and insists upon making an example of them. They took a suspect into custody. The suspect is due his day in court.

But the seals deliver him with his hair out of place, and a cut lip.
And for that, Obama wants them humiliated before the eyes of the world!
 
BOTTOM LINE: Obama has pressured Naval command to accept the claim of one of the most-wanted Iraqi terrorists, versus three of their own men!
 
But treating heroes as criminals? Where is the Naval command's backbone? What happened to the leadership principle of looking out for your troops? Why do they not stand up to Barack Obama? Is there no honor left amongst them?
 
CONCLUSION: Subjecting our best and bravest to a court martial - for an offense worthy of a few hundred pushups - sends a devastating message throughout all the special forces.

So what's next? Will we need rifle-cams now,  to assure every shooting in a war zone is justified? Is
upholding the civiI rights of killer-thug terrorists behind some ulterior motive? - like demoralizing our soldiers on the battlefield, and bringing unbearable stress on our front line forces?

The Obama administration's aggressive prosecution of battlefield events, where enemy terrorists are treated as "crime witnesses," is not some misguided application of political correctness, but instead a deliberate strategy to hamstring the troops, and thwart battlefield success.

So do the seals have their weapons pointed in the wrong direction?

Once again, who is the REAL enemy here?


www.keenobserver.blogtownhall.com








 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Doing nothing is not an option!


What's the popular definition of insanity?
ANSWER: Doing the same thing over & over - but expecting a different result!
 
Insanity means to keep on worshipping our conservative talk-show "heroes," who espouse patriotism, but do little else except the promotion of their best-selling books.
 
Insanity is allowing the Congressional leftists to chisel away at our Constitution, but responding with the same lame tactics: townhalls; e-mails; calling Washington switchboards. Hence, the radicals in Congress fear us as a cat fears a canary. 

Yet, our conservative talk heroes advise us to..."be polite"..."above all, do
not act like a mob." 

But mob opposition is the only thing we have left! 
The American dam of freedom is cracking. And rather than piling sandbags, we conservatives have been instructed to build boats.
 
How much longer can we delay, before the radicals sweep democracy aside forever?
 
Consider: Is this not the exact same scenario Americans endured in the early 1770's? Only substitute "Congress" for "British Parliament."
 
The colonists were bedeviled by one tax after another; unrelenting harassment- stripped away of their freedom - as they watched their hard-earned wealth sent to England. And the Crown thus responded with even MORE horrid measures.
 
Finally, the Sons of Liberty - led by Samuel and John Adams - at last realized: the more they begged the Crown to stop, the more weakness they showed.
 
And now, we are witness to the quietest revolution in modern times- one taking place without even a shot being fired.
 
America is imploding right before our eyes!
 
First, Pelosi rams climate-change through the House - destined to destroy nine million domestic energy jobs. And despite conflicting science, a climate bill will soon make its way through the Senate.
 
Then, with the final passage of Obamacare, Americans will be deprived of both their wealth and dignity; it shall be transferred by the radicals to the urban parasites - who pay no taxes -to buy their votes!
 
But unbelievably, it grows even worse. Congress seeks amnesty for 15-20 million illegals, who'll vote in the 2012 general election - planting the seeds of everlasting democratic control.
 
But aren't we Americans supposed to be above all this?
 
In our gloried past, if ever Washington got unruly, voters sought remedy at the polls. 

But now - many months before the next election - t
he radicals rush post-haste through this political window, passing laws that forever will transform our nation's character into the mindset of Obammunism.
 
Soviet-style, centralized control is woven into the fabric of all their radical legislation. Even worse, trillions are recklessly spent - the debt stretching beyond even our grandchildren.
 
And now, the ultimate knockout punch to democracy: alien amnesty; unworthy citizenship: the tyranny becomes permanent. One-party rule in America for pehaps all time.
 
Even well before his election, Obama viewed amnesty as key to a second term.
 
(Quote)..."I know this is an emotional issue; I know it’s a controversial issue,” Obama told an audience at a town meeting (on March 18) in Costa Mesa, Calif. “I know that people get real riled up politically about this."(unquote)
 
Like an Energizer Bunny, Obama is non-stop: Cap 'n trade; climate change; socialized medicine. And now, the nightmare of alien amnesty.
 
Imagine; two parallel societies; two separate "common" languages. Bi-lingual schools. Bi-lingual books; Bi-lingual billboards. Bi-lingual labels. Bi-lingual voice mails. Bi-lingual everything! Plus a permanent democratic voting majority - all but assuring nothing changes in the future!
 
Is this not worthy of taking action now...or do we just keep sending e-mails to Washington, asking a democratic Congress to vote against their own radical agenda?
 
Is this not a fools errand for all time? Like Nero, conservative America fiddles away, while democracy burns to the ground.
 
But how did we get here? It was ACORN thuggery. The tactics of a mob: stolen elections - enabling the radicals to overrun Washington.
 
And when a mob takes over, there is but one way to fight them:
 
No, not with weapons; not with fists; and certainly, NOT with complacency or decency. "Polite" is no longer an option.

We need an ACORN for our side!
 
We must adopt their tactics: Charter buses. Picket their Washington offices! Or even their homes! Wave signs that convey our true feelings. Let us not be intimidated by the media! Get in the faces of these leftist traitors!
 
After all, what's worse? An arrest for disorderly conduct; or losing our Constitution forever?
 
How many more elections do we let ACORN steal? How many more blows to the Constitution can our nation withstand, before disintegrating into disharmony forever?

We must find the resolve necessary to get our country back - back to a republic that belongs to the people. Otherwise, we're about to sing the swan song of our democracy.
 
Like the radicals in Congress blithely profess..."DOING NOTHING IS NOT AN OPTION!"
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obamacare: back-door assault on the Second Amendment


Charlton Heston: was he the best actor of all time?

 

Sure there was Bogart, Brando, Cagney and Gable; but at his peak (between the late 1950's and early 70's) Heston - who died in 2008 - left a legacy in Hollywood that may go unsurpassed - perhaps forever.

 

With his versatility, commanding voice, and riveting presence, the brilliance of Heston's performances - in his many, larger-than-life roles - has been vastly underrated.

 

It was renowned director, Cecil B. DeMille, who saw him as Moses in "The Ten Commandments" (1956) - the role which christened him an international star.

In 1959, he starred in Ben-Hur - a three-hour Biblical epic - which became the standard by which all other large-scale cinema productions would be judged.

 

Tall, with features chiseled in stone, who else but the multi-faceted Heston could have lasted in front of the cameras for 60 years - never seeming to change?

 

In 1968, he starred as time-traveling astronaut, George Taylor, in the blockbuster "Planet of the Apes." In 1976, he was a US naval flight officer in the war-drama "Midway;" and later that year, an L.A. cop tracking a sniper in "Two-Minute Warning."

 

In 1978, Heston would again become a US naval officer in the submarine thriller, "Gray Lady Down".

 

But what if Heston could have starred in an even bigger role - one that would have undoubtedly been his greatest - reprising Reagan in the Whitehouse? Would not Heston - a staunch, red-blooded republican - have made one of the great presidents of all time?

 

Instead of war-hero Bob Dole - what if cinema hero Charlton Heston had been the GOP's challenger in 1996?

 

Clinton would have been a one-term wonder; China would still be seeking "most favored nation" status; and "Lewinsky" would best be known as some beer-bellied guy on your Tuesday-night bowling team.

 

Heston was pure presidential timbre: a conservative's wet dream:

 

An avowed, staunch defender of the Constitution, the man could give spellbinding speeches. He loved the outdoors; he despised liberalism. Heston stuck up for the rights of the common man - America's modern-day Andrew Jackson.

 

But one can only ponder why this movie icon never sought the Whitehouse.

 

On December 20, 1997, Heston would address the crowd at the Free Congress Foundation - perhaps his most riveting performance of all time:

 

Speaking out against Bill Clinton's cultural war against gun owners, Heston would deliver a remarkable speech- one well worthy of a classic inaugural address, or the keynote of a national GOP convention:

 

Here is an excerpt:

 

(QUOTE)..."Bill Clinton’s cultural warriors want a penitent cleansing of firearms, as if millions of lawful gun owners should genuflect in shame, and seek absolution by surrendering their guns!"

 

"But that’s what happens when a generation of media, educators, entertainers and politicians - led by a willing president - decide the America they were born into isn’t good enough any more! So they contrive to change it through the cultural warfare of class distinction!"

 

"Mr. Clinton, sir, America didn't trust you with our health-care system. America didn't trust you with gays in the military. America doesn't trust you with our 21-year-old daughters; and we sure, Lord, don't trust you with our guns! "(Unquote)  

 

Ironically - despite all his cinematic fame - Charlton Heston is perhaps most famous for his "From My Cold, Dead Hands" speech made at the year 2000 NRA convention:

 

While raising a priceless, hand-made Brooks flintlock rifle over his head, (as only he could ) railing at the top of his iconic voice - said Heston, in reference to presidential candidate Al Gore ...(Quote) "I'll give you my gun when you take it from my cold dead hands!"

 

Ironically, Charlton Heston - titan of gun ownership - expired in the same year that gave rise to Barack Obama, America's most avowed hater of the Second Amendment - who worked all his political life to undermine it.

 

While a State Senator, Obama voted for banning ownership of every shotgun, hunting and target rifle - authorizing the Illinois state police to raid homes (Gestapo-like), to forcibly-confiscate all banned guns.

 

Obama would co-sponsor a bill to shut down gun manufacturers - including Springfield Armory, Armalite, Rock River Arms, and Les Baer. Thus denied, he then sought to prohibit law-abiding citizens from purchasing more than one gun per month.

 

And now, Obamacare - a covert, sinister assault on the Second Amendment.

 

And should the Senate vote to pass it, either kiss goodbye to your gun(s) - or else be prepared to pay for them dearly; for Commander-in-Sneak Obama will have won his most prized victory of all.

 

In 2000, it would be the gun issue that would ultimately be the undoing of the vile Al Gore - resulting in his losing of West Virginia, and even his home state of Tennessee.

 

But Obama would prove to be no Al Gore:

 

In perhaps his greatest political 'makeover,' the Obama campaign took deception to an art form: and none worked better than his so-called "endorsement" from the "American Hunters and Shooters Association" - a phony 'front' group - misappropriating its title from a patrician British hunting club - replete with howling dogs and riding jodphurs - who go on controlled foxhunts in merry olde England's shrinking forests. 

 

In an ad run heavily in the pro-hunting, battleground state of Pennsylvania - Obama (while posing in front of a verdant, pastoral, woodsy backround) promised, "I won't ever take your gun away."

 

But soon, the IRS will:

 

While Rahm Emanuel is secretly conducting closed-door negotiations on merging the two congressional chambers' health care bills, the "National Institute of Health" (NIH) has quietly completed its study of the..."health effects of gun ownership."

 

These two, seemingly disparate activities are, in fact, joined at the hip.

Shockingly, the NIH has a pre-existing position that (quote)..."owning a gun is a public health risk."

 

The NIH intends to "prove" this theory by investigating..."whether adolescents who consume alcohol and/or carry firearms, and/or...whose daily activities occur in surroundings rich in alcohol and/or firearms - face a differential risk of being shot with a firearm...or injured in a non-gun assault."

 

In other words, the NIH is going to study "urban" gang-bangers - using them as pretext to support their position that..."firearm ownership is a public health risk."

Private studies (even casual observation) tells us cities, with a higher level of gun ownership, consistently have lower levels of crime, vs. those who pass strict gun-control laws.

 

Indeed, far more often than not, firearms PREVENT crime - an estimated 2.5 million times per year - resulting in zero bloodshed, and discouraging criminals, who decide to take their business elsewhere.

 

Based on such overwhelming anecdotal evidence, one could argue that firearm ownership is indeed a health BENEFIT; that it SAVES lives. But Obama, Emanuel, and the NIH have zero interest in this angle whatsoever.

The NIH, using the "Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence" for cover, will apply their "findings" to gun owners across the board; and people applying for mandatory health insurance - required to disclose whether (or not) they own firearms - will be forced to buy liabilty, in lieu of possible bodily-harm, injury/death - ala the auto-insurance argument. 

 

Hence, firearm owners will pay significantly higher federal health insurance premiums - perhaps as much as an additional $1000/year per handgun; $2000/year per rifle; and $5000/year per auto/semi-automatic weapon. And viola! Obama has achieved a defacto dismantling of the Second Amendment.

Many Americans will either be forced to give up their guns, or use them to mount a John Brown-type insurrection against the Obama administration.

 

And of course, by sharing data between federal agencies, the government will already know whether or not you own a firearm. And for those who have flaunted the laws - and never registered their guns - they will go unpunished. 

The 2000 elections taught Democrats the painful lesson that Americans overwhelmingly support gun ownership as guaranteed in the Bill of Rights.

 

Hence, rather than accept the will of the American people, Obama has instead sweated blood to get his healthcare initiative rammed through Congress. It will be the crowning achievement in his life's work - his ulterior motives become reality:

 

-He can begin building his "as-strong-as-the military civilian force." It will then go largely unopposed.

 

-He can collect his reward (for socializing America) from sugar-daddy Geoge Soros.

 

-He can laugh at all the people, who spent untold millions to arm themselves, but now no longer can afford their guns - outfoxed by the most wiley political hunter of all time.

Obama will have succeeded in taking them from our cold, bankrupt hands.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Surrendering democracy for idiocracy


"Hello (pause)...you have reached the Department of Motor Vehicles (pause)... Please hold for the next available representative..."

Sound familiar? Of course! Yet another government agency, bungling & bumbling through whatever menial task it's been assigned. 
 
So why then, do we trust Washington to do anything? Why do we continue to cede our cherished freedom - the right to be left alone -to a voracious federal bureaucracy? Why do we ignore its creeping tyranny? A tyranny so powerful that it threatens our very lives!
 
Our government - with Congress' tyrannical goal of passing "health reform" - could one day determine life or DEATH. A radical-leftist Senate wants to destroy the jobs of ten million Americans - a Stalinist measure known as cap 'n trade.
 
But Americans have bigger things to worry about - like the aldulterous escapades of a celebrity golfer, or their perverse curiosity with two high-society party-crashers. Indeed, we ARE getting the government we deserve - one bent upon enslaving us.
 
Although the Declaration and Constitution made liberty the law of our land, the Founders realized Americans would one day, need to fight to preserve it.
 
In the past, saving freedom required taking up arms - even losing one's life. Never was liberty taken for granted. It was considered sacrosanct. Something worth dying for in war.
 
Hence, Americans now have it easier than any other people in the history of the world - much too easy. To our great peril, many know not of even the basic nuts and bolts of their own government - having no concept of civics - nor do they even seem to care.
 
Not long ago, if something of great personal concern would arise, we were told..."just write to your congressman..let your voice be heard in Washington!"
 
But what about now? Who even cares enough to write? Schools no longer even teach cursive writing, let alone the proper construction of a personal letter.
 
Writing  -or even basic communication skills - has yielded to ipods, cell phones and computers. Conversation itself will one day face extinction.
 
The incredible dumbing-down of America is illustrative of the problem faced today. Many actually believe ignorance REALLY is bliss; that to "get involved" is just plain stupid - taking away from the more important things in life: TV, tail-gating, video games, texting, sexting, and 'hooking up.'
 
Dangerously, in defiance of our Founders, we have become incredibly self-absorbed: the few problems most of us face (jobs, careers, medical bills) are now "entrusted' to Washington politicians- who respond by usurping the Constitution, and casting our individual freedoms asunder.
 
Many shun even the most basic civic duty - taking the effort to vote. "Aw, I'm too busy to register"..."What's the use? Republicans & democrats are all alike..."
 
And residing within such apathy are the seeds of Socialism; many remain aloof of its horrid consequences - or even its basic meaning:
 
"Socialism? Sounds cool! I guess I'd be okay with it."
 
By refusing to be responsible for even ourselves - leaving government to solve virtually every problem- we are insuring Socialism (equal misery for all) will inevitably supersede democracy itself.
 
And we've now reached the pinnacle in personal irresponsiblity: people actually risk their own lives - plus that of their fellow drivers - by engaging in text-messaging behind the wheel! And even worse- laws are actually required to ban such idiopathic stupidity!
 
Consider: a person driving; or walking down stairs; or crossing a busy street - head down - their attention focused on the two-inch display of a flip phone? Is this not the most mindless endeavor one could imagine?
 
America has reached the point where self-obsession now trumps decency and common sense.
 
The fact that there are so many who eschew respect for themselves (and those around them) indicates an unprecedented abuse of personal freedom; abdication of basic responsiblity; and the inevitable disintegration of polite society.
 
So add it all up. What lies ahead for the United States of America?
 
Many Americans now believe the world revolves around them. But any such egregious abuse of personal liberty always has consequences; and we are seeing them now in Washington DC.
 
Once again, we are getting the government we deserve - well along the way to establishing a new American idiocracy. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

EPA: traitor to science


SETTING: Cape Canaveral, Florida: A crowd has gathered, in expectation of a spectacular nighttime launch:
 
"Ten...nine...eight...seven...six...five...wait; we're getting word from Mission Control! The space flight has been...what? Canceled! Because of the EPA?"
 
Thousands of sightseers are in utter disbelief!
 
But what if the EPA actually were to ground some future Space Shuttle launching -calling it, (quote) "an excessive greenhouse event." What then? Is it really as far fetched as it sounds? The so-called CO2 "endangerment finding" by the Environmental Protection Agency grants them control that would make Stalin himself jealous. 
 
Back in 1959, scientific literature first began denoting evidence of the "greenhouse" effect: Suddenly, stories began emerging - warning that high atmospheric concentrations of CO2 would one day turn Earth into a hellish-like inferno, brought on by the horrors of trapped sunlight!
 
Then, in 1970, a fellow by the name of James Hansen burst onto the scene:
 
Hansen - an unknown NASA scientist at the time - released the first (of many) of his apocalyptic forecasts about the Earth's warming. His "revelations" would open the door to a new, controversial field of study known as "junk science." (Quote)...The world is heating rapidly! Greenhouse gases from burning fossil fuels are the reason! Civilization has but a 10-year window of opportunity for decisive action, to avert catastrophe!"
 
But in early 1978, after two consecutive winters of Arctic-like bilzzards, and Siberian temperatures, "Newsweek" began carrying articles by scientists, who were now convinced of "an impending new ice age."
 
So now, the stage had been set:

Years of rapidly-rising temperatures - then two consecutive horribly cold winters - all adding up to climate change, caused by burning fossil fuels. Makes perfect sense. Basically, the assumption being: "Jeez...all dis burning of oil and coal must be doin' somethin' to da atmosphere" (duh).
 
Currently, proof of global warming is on par with evidence of an abominable snowman; all theory; no existing proof. Like having symptoms, without cause.  
 
Actually, many questions can be raised that are counter-intuitive to fossil fuel-burning as being even remotely connected to Earth's warming.
 
The cataclysmic eruption of Mt. St Helens occurred in May of 1980.  How many mega-million tons of  greenhouse gasses were spewn into the atmosphere then?  Everyone remembers seeing the damage (on TV) to Yakima, Washington - covered by three inches of volcanic effluent. 
 
It then proceeded to blow all over the North American land mass. 
 
But the following summers of '80 and '81 were normal. There was no anticipated warming.
 
Actually, volcanoes have always taken part in global cooling. The Krakatoa Island eruption in 1883 caused a worldwide decline in Earth's temperatures for two consecutive  years.
 
But if volcanic eruptions beget cooling, are not these emissions similar to a Midwestern power plant, burning high-sulfur Appalachian coal? Coal-fired generators have long been tagged as culprits in warming, yet they basically emit the same content as a volcano - but on a much lower scale.
 
What about California forest fires? Could they be a factor in global warming? What mass-quantity of fossil fuel burned would equal the heat (energy) and CO2 generated from just one massive wildfire event, that may continue burning for weeks. 
 
Now consider the Kuwaiti oil-well conflagration - started by Saddam Hussein in the first Gulf War - a true environmental debacle. Incalculable amounts of foul, filthy oil smoke filling the air - resemblant of hell on earth. But was the following summer of 1991 any warmer? 
 
Another consideration is urbanization, which spawns hot spots worldwide over all large metropolitan areas, such as Tokyo, Beijing, New York, and Paris. Scientists dub them "heat islands" because of their starkly different color on a satellite thermal imaging map, measuring 10-20 degrees warmer than the surrounding land mass.
 
As man continues to cover green earth with asphalt and concrete, we create even more urban heat islands, which necessitates more air conditioning, more compressors, exhausting even more heat - an endless, self-generating cycle of rapidly-rising surface temperatures.
 
So, do we then proceed to outlaw the biggest cities? Should the EPA order the dismantling of New York? What about Los Angeles? If internal combustion engines - burning fossil fuel -are a primary cause of global warming, would not the LA basin be plagued with some of the hottest temperatures on earth? 
 
But has any of this ever been diliberated? Where are all the scientists concerning these factors? Conveniently, none of this will be open for discussion in Copenhagen.
 
Despite conflicting evidence (and extremely cold recent weather) the EPA has been adamant in stating that carbon dioxide is a direct cause of global warming - claiming "urgent action is needed" to avoid upheaval of the planet’s climate.
 
But where to start? Motor vehicles? Lawnmowers? Pleasure boats? Campfires? Fireplaces? Farm animals? How about marathon runners? Do they not exhale - running 26 miles - an excess amount of CO2, compared to a man riding the bus to work?
 
And speaking of busses, should the EPA order them to either convert to solar power, or be banned from service? Where does it stop? Do we then ban airliners? Steamships? Spaceflights? Ground the United States Air Force? Forbid the Army from running its tanks? Ban helicopters from the Afghan theater of war?
 
Ever since the Industrial Revolution began 250 years ago, mankind has asaulted the atmosphere with apocalyptic amounts of CO2. First, with coal-fired steam engines. Then oil was discovered in 1859, and powered a new energy era. Two consecutive World Wars were waged, releasing titanic amounts of greenhouse gas , but no detectable post-war global warming.
 
The United States has grown to be the greatest economic power the world has ever known. And it was based on the availability of three abundant, cheap, easily-accessible energy sources: coal; oil; and natural gas.
 
These so-called "dangerous" fossil-fuel industries are not only the foundation critical to America's economy, but also employ nine million people, in high-paying, permanent jobs.
 
Yet now we have the EPA - serving as puppets for the Obama administration - who would blithely eliminate every last one of these nine million workers. This is enviro-lunacy - taken to the extreme! An obsession to undermine the United States, and turn its citizens into third-world status, ruled no longer by Washington DC, but by the one-world Socialist elite at the UN.
 
To believe the use of fossil fuels will someday destroy Earth seems almost Biblical - implying Mankind has acquired prowess bordering on the Divine. But the godless heretics of science at the EPA - who now hold our economy hostage -  are intent upon having the final word.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

McConnell's revenge

 
"Aw-w-w shucks! Dad-gummit! Can ya beat that?"
 
"Oh well...we'll git 'em next year..."
 
This terrifying, vitriolic rant could very well be attributed to Kentucky's Mitch McConnell -our fiery, stalwart Republican Senate minority leader.
 
McConnell - who looks like he just arrived on the last train from Petticoat Junction- has put up about as much fight against the democrats' health reform bill as Captain Kangaroo.
 
But this profoundly begs the question: WHY IN THE WORLD is McConnell playing nice? The Republicans have 40 votes! Haven't they ever heard of making a clandestine, back-room deal? This is no time for sainthood!
 
Why couldn't McConnell, and perhaps Jim DeMint, quietly approached Blanche Lincoln, or big-hair Ben Nelson - BEFORE the vote to open the Senate health-care debate - and offered a deal:

"Ben (Blanche), if you vote for NOT opening debate - sure your democrat cohorts might get a little irate; but THEN, in return, we GUARANTEE NOT to run any Republican who could beat you in 2010 (or 2012). You'll basically be running unopposed - saving you millions in campaign funds. Mike Steele will definitely be cool with it..."
 
(continue)
 
"...This way, everyone wins big. You'll hardly need to campaign; and for sure, you'll keep your seat. Better yet, you're a permanent hero in your home state - re-elected for life! That's plan A"
 
"But conversely, if you vote FOR opening the debate - plan B - then we all lose. You'll forever be castigated by your constituents back home; forever reading in the local newspapers about how you sold out; you're the new 'Benedict Arnold' in the senate, and all that."
 
"And worse, you'll be campaigning like a desperado - blowing millions on TV attack ads; worried to death about the polls. At best, you'll stand even money of losing either this next time, or any election in the future." You'll forever be dodging bullets, and answering poignant questions."
 
"And forget all your party's B.S. about being the "one who defied history." Are you really malleable enough to fall for that? By voting FOR the debate, you are HISTORY- forever pilloried by your constituents as the great betrayor; the Judas Senator. The one who cast the accursed 60th vote."
 
"Think carefully Ben (Blanche)...is it worth it? Is it worth forever spending your life trying to clear your name, explaining your key vote - a vote that brought on socialized medicine, the worst calamity ever to befall America? Your name will forever be Mudd!"
 
"And for what? Barack Obama? Does this aloof radical leftist really care one bit about you? So why even consider saving his presidency? The vast majority of white voters detest him. And they'll be the ones turning out big in 2010.
 
"If it wasn't for the minorities, Obama would collapse in the polls. There are more death threats against this guy than Bin-Ladin."
 
"Even the independents fear Obama like the plague. They know he's all about reparations, and taxing working people to funnel money to his inner city parasites; nothing other than some sugar-daddy, liar-socialist, who conned his way into the White house.
 
"So why let him con you?"
 
"And those hapless Blue Dogs in the House? After being conned by Obama, they changed their minds and voted with Pelosi. Now they'll soon all be unemployed -forever cursing the day they were misled into losing one of the most coveted jobs on earth."
 
"So what good is having empathy for Obama? By 2012, he's toast!" 
 
"But don't worry about him; Obama gets his big reward from Soros for passing health care, but what will you get? Where will you be in 2012? You'll be unemployed - forever in fear of running into some hothead back home. And believe us: the American people are fuming mad - and you're smack in the middle of their bullseye!"
 
"Once again Ben (Blanche) is it worth it?"
 
"And can you hear them all?..."Hey Blanche! Hey Ben! You voted for this horrid, socialized medicine for us, but you get to keep your feather-bed Congressional plan for yourself - you phony!"
 
"Can you imagine getting that everywhere you go...for the rest of your life? Some retirement eh?"
 
"And think what will happen to America. What will happen to all the old folks back home?
 
What's worse than having to forever dodge complaints about people losing their old insurance; waiting for months to see some strange, new doctor - only to find out that Kathy Sebelius rejected their hip replacement, or their cancer medicine, simply because they were beyond the accepted treatment age-line?"
 
"Are you that cold-blooded that you'd actually sanction that? Have you forgotten about sanctity of life? - of common decency toward your fellow man? Just because your party has swung to the radical left, why let them force you to go along on this socialist ride to hell? These people are tyrants- drunk on their own power!"
 
"Again, is it worth it? Worth it to have a guilty conscience for the rest of your life? What amount of money or payoff could justify that?"
 
"Anyway Ben (Blanche), we know there is overwhelming pressure from your entire party, riding on your one vote; we understand. But Obama has brought all this mess to a head. It's HIM that's got you in this bind. So don't think it's about allegiance, or making history, or of finally achieving the goals of Ted Kennedy."
 
"Face reality. Kennedy is gone. 90% of Americans aren't worried about their healthcare. They're worried about their jobs; their families; tapping into their kid's college fund, just to pay the mortgage. And you're about to vote for something that will make their sitution even worse?"
 
"Once again Senator; who was it that put you here? Obama? Chuck Schumer? Harry Reid? Kennedy? To them, you're only some number. It's the people back home who made you; and now you're gonna stab them in the back? You're only courting bitter revenge."
 
"If you were some voter going to the polls next year how would you feel?"
 
"Anyway Ben (Blanche) that's plenty of food for thought. You've got a lot on your plate. But hey, don't be afraid to pull an Arlen Specter; we'd love to have you on our side. So I guess we'll all know Saturday when we cast our votes."
 
(end of the secret meeting)
 
Of course we know how badly it all ended: The democrats have their 60 votes, and are at the threshold of enslaving us under a nightmare of Socialized Medicine...except for perhaps ONE LAST HAIL MARY:
 
Sen. Blanche Lincoln's  Washington, DC office:
355 Dirksen Senate Office Bldg., Washington, D.C.  20515
Office:  202-224-4843; Fax:  202-228-1371
 
Sen. Ben Nelson's Washington, DC office:
720 Hart Senate Office Building
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510
Tel: 1-202-224-6551
Fax: 1-202-228-0012
 
So why don't we all drop these two phonies a last minute plea? A message that they be defiant!
 
Yes, of course it's a long shot.
 
But if enough of us conservatives take the time to actually WRITE each Senator; (yes, a handwritten letter), perhaps they themselves would then examine their corrupt souls - and would actually feel guilty enough to vote "NO," and save us all.
 
Go ahead everyone; take out a pen, get an envelpope, and put a scare (or possibly some common sense) into their power-corrupted brains. Use the talking points above to make your case.
 
At this final desperate hour, "what have we got to lose?"  GO AHEAD AND WRITE IT!

McConnell, our clueless minority leader, needs all the help he can get.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is the green sky falling?

 
SITUATION: You're an Eagle Scout, enjoying a hot afternoon at the beach. There is no lifeguard. A sign reads..."swim at your own risk."
 
Suddenly, you notice a flash crowd gathering. They are encircling an unconscious 8-year old boy, near death from possible drowning.
 
Rushing to his rescue, you immediately place the child on his back, with the chin jutting upward, thus preventing his tongue from blocking the airway. Then you blow a series of long, deep exhalations into the victim's mouth.
 
Now - with his lungs expanded and full of air - the pulmonary vein force-feeds a renewed flow of blood into the boy's heart, and miraculously, it resumes it's rhythmic beating. 
 
The unconscious child begins to stir!
 
But instead of being hailed as a hero, now emerges an enforcement agent from the EPA, and pronounces you "under arrest" - for child endangerment: you are in violation - for exhaling "dangerous CO2" into the boy's lungs.
 
But despite its utter absurdity, the recent CO2 "endangerment finding" by the EPA is no laughing matter - bespeaking of the days of Stalin; and of a marxist-like seizure of the  US economy.
 
Consider: to regulate CO2 means control of everything. Carbon dioxide is germane to Earth itself. With CO2 now pronounced as dangerous, it portends disorder, unreality, absurdity, inconvenience, commotion - the inevitable upheaval of free society itself.
 
Should Coca-Cola be banned? Can Canada Dry be outlawed? How about Alka-Seltzer? Will champagne bottlers be placed under arrest? Can dry ice be considered toxic? How about the "dangerous" leafblower in the garage? Or the old clunker parked next to it?
 
Yes America; if we resign ourselves to this incredulous mandate, it means surrendering every facet of life to Obama and his liberal enviro-cultists. Think of "1984" on steroids - Big Brother at the EPA, watching over everyone - thwarting our attempt to live as we once preferred.
 
To live is to breathe; and to breathe implies the egress of CO2.
 
Hence, will we all soon need a permit even to exhale? Or drive to the grocery? Will the EPA require us to bicycle to work? Will Obama mandate we cut our grass with a solar-powered lawnmower?
 
Where does it stop?
 
And why play around with the small stuff? If the EPA is really serious about greenhouse gas emissions, will erupting volcanoes be subject to stiff fines? - or possible arrests? What about those herculean California forest fires? Is Smokey the Bear destined to become the EPA's key enforcement narc?
 
The reign of the Obama administration has come to fruition: environmentalism is the new socialism. The EPA - having sway over virtually anything - will now have carte blanch over Obama's favorite whipping boy: Big Oil -  targeting the one vital substance that no nation (especially the US) can do without...crude petroleum.
 
With the EPA's sword of Damocles hanging over large CO2 emitters, the entire domestic refining industry could one day be shut down. Refining crude in the US would become prohibitively expensive. Shortages, caused by importing gasoline, would make the four dollar-a-gallon prices of 2008 seem like the good ol' days.
 
And what about Obama's promise that he'd bankrupt demon coal? With the EPA set to fine coal-fired generation plants by weight of their CO2 emissions, who will eventually pay?
 
Imagine opening your electric bill by 2012..."This *!#*!+*!*&!* Obama and his *!#!!%!** EPA! I knew this was going to happen!"
  
Not surprisingly, all this is happening just in time for Copenhagen - where big-shot Barack can triumphantly parade on the world's stage, crowing away about..."America is serious about cutting its greenhouse gas emissions"...as the conference hails him as Earth's great environmental savior.
 
And how will Mr. Obama get to Copenhagen? By flapping his skinny arms? With a round trip to Denmark on Air Force One, plus his gratuitous, 20-car presidential motorcade, Obama will leave a carbon footprint as wide as the Atlantic itself.
 
But if Mr. Obama (and the Copenhagen delegates) were indeed serious about saving the world, could they not have arranged for teleconferencing, and spared Earth from so much more "dangerous" CO2? Could they not all have just stayed at home in their mansions, and decided - via the internet - what's good for us run-of-the-mill serfs?
 
The natural evolution of mankind has always been to utilize his God-given intelligence, and employ the world around him to solve his problems. This implies the discovery of a clean, renewable, and inexpensive energy resource - nuclear power.
 
But will the word NUCLEAR even be mentioned at Copenhagen? Or by Obama?
 
These so-called environmentalists - who mindlessly rant about being "carbon-neutral" - are the biggest offenders themselves. 
 
The return on investment for green energy is decidedly negative. If green technologies were indeed feasible economically, the world long-ago would've supplanted oil and coal with solar and windmills farms.
 
Indeed; the real story here is that climate change "happens" - there is no global warming. The switch to a green energy economy has failed miserably in Europe. So how could we expect things to be any different in the United States?
 
But misery loves company.
 
Now that the Euro-socialists have foolishly converted to green energy, in Copenhagen they will demand Mr. Obama do likewise: ruin the US  economy, thereby transferring millions of jobs overseas to the Asians, who continue to add coal fired generators - producing the cheap power to out-compete us; as our ecomomy inexorably deteriorates to one of a second-tier nation.   
 
In Copenhagen, the world's elitist liberals will implore Obama to abandon fossil fuels - all in the name of Climate Change; and all based upon some bogus, scientific deception about non-existent warming trends, supposedly caused by fossil fuel exhaust.
 
But even a high-schooler taught basic physics understands Newton's first law: "ENERGY (or matter) CANNOT BE CREATED - or destoyed. Excess carbon dioxide is either consumed by all plant matter; or stored as carbonic acid in the oceans of the world. And neither process raises earth's temperature, or adds significant warming.
 
Hence, to regulate fossil fuels is to tax free movement itself; which is why these phony Socialist tree-huggers seek to put a price tag on everything we do. They care not about saving Earth. They seek only "climate justice" (better known as wealth redistribution).
 
The only real "change" from the climate will be that which the EPA will be removing from our pockets. And now, with our economy half-dead, the carbon police are on the way to deliver the final blow.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

America on life support?

 
Allright students; time for your pop history quiz. Get out paper and pen; and no looking at your neighbor!
 
QUESTION: Of what historical significance was the date 476 AD?
 
ANSWER: It was the year officially listed as the fall of the Roman empire.
 
QUESTION: What was the major cause of the downfall?
 
ANSWER: The Roman Empire fell because it was bankrupted by its leaders; primarily those aristocrats who served in the Roman Senate.
 
Indeed, it was the noble Roman Senate: arrogant; corrupt; bigheaded; comprised of one hundred patricians, who sought complete power in overseeing an entire world empire. But debauchery, greed and political self-aggrandizement would one day spell the end.
 
By 100 BC, as Rome grew and eliminated its main external threats, (e.g. Carthage) the expansion of its empire would serve as pretext for the Senate to consolidate its vast political power.
 
Roman Senators, the "Honestiores" (the honored) were selfish; self-absorbed; determined to promote an expanding empire to enhance their wealth even further. The common people, the "Humiliores" (the humble), were lucky if they had food sufficient to eat.
 
The Roman Senate met privately in one great chamber. The executive branch (consuls) and the judicial branch (praetors & aediles) also wielded considerable power; but the supreme honchos were ultimately Senators, who themselves chose their emporer.
 
Emnity would one day become the lattermost reason for Rome's downfall: Initially, Senate disagreements about how Rome should be run. Then eventually, open, violent civil war - leading to disorder, disintegration; and ultimately, in 476, utter collapse.
 
While every great civilization (empire) has fallen in history, is it thus inevitable that America should one day decline over time?  Do we then shrug our shoulders, in utter resignation of accepting it? 

Ever since our miraculous founding, America always seemed destined to be the one unique exception. It was
our Founders- all students of ancient history- who decided they would 'buck' the historical trend, and write a near-perfect document- The US Constitution - that would stand for all time.
 
If one looks at history, all declines started within: immorality, loss of faith (God); economic turmoil; government tyranny - and ultimately the failure of its citizens to do everything possible to preclude it.
 
Hence, if we resign ourselves to "inevitable decline," we deserve its inevitable consequences: the fall of America to a third world nation, before even the conclusion of the 21st century.
 
Like no other nation, America felt protected by its Constitution, believing  that it - plus the providence of God - would protect us from the "inevitable."
 
But for the first time, a defiant, cult-like group of senate democrats now attempts to usurp the basic character of our nation - constitutional debauchery - disguised under the title of "Senate bill #1769."

And
God help America should this horrific measure become the law of the land. It will bestow a price tag on life itself!  It will destroy our quality of life. It will heap untold trillions upon our nation's deficit for decades to come.

Senior citizens will see calamitous reductions in Medicare. Nursing homes, small hospitals, and home-care agencies, all face extinction. Life itself to be cut short by callous rationing of doctor and pharmaceutical services - all for the sake of the almighty dollar.
 
By 2014, demand for healthcare will begin climbing exponentially; but tax rates can only rise incrementally. Yes America; it's only a matter of time before we're transformed into a permanent debtor nation.
 
Hence, the stakes could not be higher.
 
Majority leader Harry Reid claims S-1769 will (quote)..."save lives, and save money."
 
But Senator Reid is a liar! It does neither!
 
The Congressional Budget Office says individual health care premiums would still increase. Middle class Americans face tax penalties - or even imprisonment, should they refuse to purchase government- mandated health insurance. Many will see their current premiums to near double in price.
 
Hospitals nationwide will face $150 billion in cuts by 2015. Children's hospitals and rural health care centers will close because of tight operating margins.
 
S-1769 cuts additional billions from US nursing home payments over 10 years. More than two-thirds of the nation’s home health-care programs will disappear by 2016; again, because of catastrophic cuts. Thus sick people - unable to obtain home health care - will further threaten overloaded, underfunded hospitals with a plethora of new, unplanned admissions.
 
The states - compelled by unfunded federal mandates - are invariably facing billions of dollars of added Medicaid costs in the future. S- 1769 would onerously require new state income taxes or cuts to other essential programs.
 
And worse, tens of millions of senior citizens will eventually lose their private health coverage through Medicare Advantage.
 
Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist David S. Broder calls S-1769..."a 2.5 trillion dollar budget buster.” But more accurately, it is a sinister, 2000-page, massive wealth transfer. Creating 118 new government agencies, it bestows god-like power upon Health & Human Services secretary, Kathy Sebelius. 
 
Once S-1769 passes, the Tenth Amendment is all that stands between Americans and socialized medicine. And when the government controls your health, it controls your LIFE. Who of us - save for the most unfortunate - would want to live under such tyranny?
 
Not unlike Rome, we face downfall: morally and financially corrupted by 60 power-crazed Senate patricians, who care not about the unborn, the middle class, the elderly, or even the young - only themselves, and saving the presidency of Barack Obama.
 
How soon will government-reformed healthcare tear away the fabric of our democracy? How soon will it create a black financial hole - destined to suck taxpayers into oblivion? 
 
Socialized medicine will spread like a pandemic - and there can be no cure.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

17th Amendment- modern tyranny?


Is the 2008 election destined to become the greatest disaster ever to befall America? Sure looks that way.
 
It was the day the leftist immates turned Congress into a socialist asylum -dragging America into the dark depths of Marx, Engels and Trotsky - sans the hammer & sickle flag.
 
But who to blame? Obama? Pelosi? Reid? Boxer? Durbin? Dodd? Schumer? Nope. Liberalism started long ago before these foul creatures even were born.
 
Or how about Franklin D. Roosevelt, America's original socialist role model? After all, it was his New Deal leftism that has underscored everything now taking place in wonderful Marxland (Washington DC).
 
But lets go back even two generations before FDR and recall the original socialist: a typical liberal, who - having run afoul of some republicans - decided he would forever seek his revenge...the 17th Amendment. 
 
Remember how history has depicted William Jennings Bryan? Well sorry folks, he was no saint. Despite never achieving the Whitehouse, Bryan - an extreme leftist - profoundly altered US political history.
 
More than any other, Bryan would transform American political dogma from laissez-faire capitalism into the modern doctrine of liberalism - first identified with Franklin Roosevelt; and later, Obama & company (his ideological descendants).
 
It was "populist' (socialist) Bryan who originally campaigned for regulation of corporations, tariff reform, the income tax, weakening of the dollar, and the sanctioning of class warfare -- all meant to "advance social reform" (wealth re-distribution).
 
In his 1900 presidential campaign, Bryan emphasized the "growing evil of trusts" and attacked American "imperialism." Sound familiar? He could very well have been Obama's campaign manager!
 
In 1908  Bryan ran  full-throttle as "progressive" reformer, but lost to Taft.  However, Woodrow Wilson would soon implement many of Bryan's socialist intiatives. By virtue of his spellbinding oratory, Bryan had effectively shifted the mantle of progressive reform to the once-conservative Democratic party.
 
If Bryan were around today, he would be strident in calling for legalized gay marriage; supporting the removal of "God" from the pledge of Allegiance; banning prayer in schools; campaigning for drive-thru abortion on demand; and favoring a 'living' Constitution
 
But nowhere would the legacy of William Jennings Bryan wreak more havoc upon our freedom (and promote government tyranny) than his campaign for the direct election of senators, and the eventual passage of the 17th Amendment 
 
After graduating law school, Bryan moved from Illinois to Nebraska to practice. His fiery oratory quickly gave him a national following. The centerpiece of his budding reform movement sought remedy from the "evil rich."
 
Soon, Bryan's socialism began seeping into conservative Nebraska politics. In 1890, he became only the second Democratic US congressman in Nebraska history. After a second term, Bryan then won a non-binding (primary) election for the US Senate. But then, disaster: the Republicans - having captured the state legislature in 1896 - appointed someone else.
 
Feeling 'ripped-off,' Bryan become outspoken in calling for the passage of the 17th Amendment. It would eventually corrupt American politics forever.
 
US Senators - APPOINTED by their legislatures - would best allow the citizens to have their voices heard in Washington. Hence, a republican state would always send  two republicans to Congress. But it's now a popularity contest: the US senate has become a haven for America's greatest - America's greatest con artists.
 
With direct Senate elections, television takes center stage; and those who sport the best head of hair, and can lie artfully with a straight face on camera, can expect "life terms."
 
Previously, state-appointed US senators had been a centerpiece of the government's checks & balances:

A state-appointed Senator -- afforded a six-year term-- could concentrate on the governmental business at hand, completely unencumbered by bribes we innocuously have re-named, "campaign contributions."

Faced with the most corrupt body of legislators the world has ever known, the overriding wisdom of our Founders becomes apparent- but too late. The will of the majority now lies betrayed - a radical leftist Senate now exacts an unprecedented tyranny upon us.

This is why Obama keeps winning: first, a razor-thin stimulus victory; and his socialist takeover of America's medical establishment seems a fait accompli - only because 60 senate tyrants have brazenly chosen to ignore the will of their home state constituents.

But is this what our Founders intended? A corrupt, power-crazed cadre of marxists, who fear not the electorate's wrath at the polls? Most will not be up for re-election for either two or four more years.

Indeed, time is with them: easily-led voters will quickly forget their transgressions; also time enough to amount a war chest for TV "attack ads."

Ask the majority leader himself: Harry Reid has repeatedly bragged to the media..."I will vaporize any republican challengers with 5 million dollars worth of attack ads!"

So next time you're about to yell at your TV - watching the cockroach Schumer, or the odious Boxer, or the pompous Chris Dodd, lying away about..."This is what the American people want"..."This will level the playing field"..."this will reduce our dependency on foreign oil"..."this will create millions of green energy jobs" etc. - just relax; try not to blow a fuse; try to save your precious breath. 

Either get used to these liars - or suffer a coronary occlusion.   

Recall when Jesus once said..."No man can serve two masters!"

Indeed; our noble senators have taken the Lord's words to heart:

No longer do they serve their rightful masters - their homestate constituents. Rather they choose to serve their evil Socialist master in the Whitehouse, and worship at his feet.

William Jennings Bryan has exacted his revenge.

 

 www.keenobserver.blogtownhall.com

Tags: bryan  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Two American stalwarts who died a little too soon


Any history freaks out there?

 

Elitist historians have always maintained (ahem-ahem)..."never bother with counter-factuals"...ignore the 'what ifs'...stick to the actual story itself".

 

But one of the most interesting things about history is to use one's imagination. Think what would have been. Consider alternatives:

 

EXAMPLE: What if Theodore Roosevelt had somehow won in 1912, and became America's only "third-party" President? At fifty four, "bull moose" Teddy would have had ample opportunity to rant from his bully pulpit, and his dream would've become reality - his chance to be a 'war' president.

 

Roosevelt always believed that to achieve true greatness in the pantheon of leaders, one must have a war - but (sigh) TR never had one. The three greatest presidents almost all historians agree on -- Washington, Lincoln, and FDR --  were all war presidents.

 

But for the presidency of Teddy Roosevelt, (1901-1908) no war would be forthcoming.

 

The "fact" is, that if TR had won in 1912, after the sinking of the RMS Lusitania in 1915, he would have immediately declared war -bumped General Blackjack Pershing -and would himself have led the First Marine division into Belgium - breaking the bitter stalemate at Ypres - then charged into the Fatherland (Germany) with all guns blazing.

 

Hence, World War I would have ended quickly - bringing about an entirely different outcome at Versailles. Then, with his newfound standing on the world's stage, undoubtedly it would have been Theodore - not Franklin - Roosevelt who would have been elected America's first four-term president.

 

Indeed; had he not died in 1919, Roosevelt would have been ideally positioned for the 1920 Republican nomination, and could easily have won the election at the hearty age of 62.

 

And perhaps the 'Bohemian corporal' (Adolph Hitler) would have been sufficiently intimidated by a hostile, "big-stick" America in the 1930's, and would most certainly have had second thoughts about threatening another European war.

 

But let's not stop with hypotheticals about Roosevelt. How about his alter-ego - born a generation later - George 'two-gun' Patton? What if he had not been the victim of some careless, inattentive chauffeur?

 

In May of 1945, Patton had suggested taking elements of the Germann SS - incorporating them into the Allied army - and rolling straight to Moscow. Having built their backward army through lend-lease, the US could have easily crushed the Soviet Union - its people welcoming the Americans as liberators from Stalin's horrific oppression.

 

Hence, Stalin would have been executed; there would be no Cold War; and General Patton - not Dewey - would've won the Republican nomination by acclamation - then undoubtedly rolled to victory in '48 over Truman.

 

So would there have even been a Korean War? Would not the North Koreans have said to themselves..."Hmmm, better not mess around with this mad dog Patton...let's leave well enough alone."

 

But that's what aggressive Presidents do! History bears it out: with the implicit threat of war, you guarantee peace! 

 

At the very moment Ronald Reagan was being sworn in, American TV viewers saw a split-screen: the other side showing our hostages boarding a charter flight to freedom, having at last been released by the Iranians - well aware they were no longer playing around with peanut-farmer Jimmy Carter. 

 

And what if John F. Kennedy had listened to his Secret Service, and not removed the bullet-proof bubbletop from his limo on that fateful day in Dallas?

 

Of course - with McNamara at his ear - there would have been a Vietnam conflict. But would it have been a Johnson-esque, gradual escalation? 

 

Kennedy, the heroic veteran from the Pacific Theater in World War II, knew the folly of limited war. After the Gulf of Tonkin provocation, Commander-in Chief JFK would have ordered his generals to launch a two-pronged, land/air ALL-OUT attack.

 

Using his armada of B-52 Strato-fortresses, General Curtiss LeMay would have bombed Haiphong (N.Vietnam's port-of-entry) all the way back into the twilight zone.

 

Simultaneously, General William Westmoreland, commanding 150,000 jungle-trained troops, would launch a massive, decisive assault on Hanoi, capturing the capitol city within 45 days, thereby eliminating the Viet Cong's hit-n-run guerilla attacks from tunnels dug beneath the jungle floor.

 

RULE # 1: never fight a limited war with an enemy on his own terms!

 

You must always fight to win; just as we did in Desert Storm - yet another conflict skillfully conducted by another World War II veteran, who also understood the folly of limited war.

 

But fantasy now yields to reality:

 

America, having again arrived at the crossroads of a conflict, has taken yet another wrong, Vietnam-like turn; led by a lily president, who views the Commander-in-Chief part of his duty with utter disdain, and seeks not what's best for neither his troops or his country, but considers only his numbers in the 'popular opinion' polls.

 

Throughout our history, our greatest presidents were decisive men, who cared not about their popularity, but sought only to do right for their country.

 

George Washington's idea to attack across the ice-strewn Delaware, was regarded by his subordinate generals as sheer insanity.

 

Lincoln's appointment of General Ulysses Grant was unanimously condemned by his entire cabinet- particualrly by Edwin Stanton, his highly-influential Secretary of War.

 

But these were men of greatness, who inherently understood: it was not their popularity that was important, but the very survival of the nation itself. These are the considerations of all great leaders throughout history.

 

When your nation is faced with going to war - or going home- one cannot cling to the middle ground!

 

And predictably, Barack Obama - who has never even pitched a pup tent - has chosen the middle ground.

 

Do any amongst us see greatness in Obama?

 

Having chosen the middle ground, does he also not choose to endanger us all?

 

A great president does not reinforce his army with insufficient resources.

 

A great president does not suggest a fruitless policy of "outreaching" to our enemies. 

 

A great president does not embolden his foe. Obama projects weakness, yet another reprise of the reviled Jimmy Carter.

 

And most importantly, great presidents do not take forever to make up their minds, when their generals urge action, and the lives of the troops  - and the fate of nations - are hanging in the balance.

 

America has survived - and later prospered- throughout all its previous wars. But that was before its people fell under the spell of a Manchurian candidate; a man - although growing up in a foreign land - managed to convince America that he would take the nation to newfound greatness.

 

But Obama, a man of mediocrity, has now marooned his presidency on the middle ground, and unwittingly has created his own reviled legacy - America's next Vietnam.

 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A deadly plague prowling the Senate


Some definitions...zoological in nature:

SERPENT:
 "animal that creeps." (Latin origin, 3rd declension - from serpens, serpentis)

 

SWAMP ADDER: "a small, thin, venomous serpent" - native to India; most notable for its exceptional intelligence. Though widely regarded as the deadliest snake in the world, it can be tamed (even trained) if rewarded with a bowl of milk.

 

BUSHMASTER: "the world's deadliest pit viper," easily identifiable by its triangularly-shaped head. It resides in remote, heavily-forested terrain. With its highly toxic venom, this killer snake is greatly feared by people indigenous to its jungle habitat. Bushmaster (translated as  'lachesis muta muta' in Latin) means..."to bring silent death".

 
AUSTRALIAN DEATH ADDER: "among the most deadly of snakes - its venom kills within seconds." With its tail shaking to lure its victim closer,  the Adder strikes suddenly - its long fangs capable of penetrating even the thickest boots. Seeking its prey, the Death Adder flicks its tongue in and out, literally tasting the air around itself - then kills and swallows its victim whole.

 

Although none of these species is native to America, there now exists a cadre of vicious, sneaky reptiles in our homeland - the most deadly to ever inhabit Earth. Their native habitat is Washington DC - slithering about the halls of the United States Senate.

 

They crawl about the Capitol, seeking victims; the slimiest, creepiest creatures one could imagine:

 

Some of the lowest forms of life, they huddle behind the locked doors of their subcommittee offices, their tongues flicking in-out, plotting their venomous undermining of the Constitution.

 

Bestowed with evil, serpent-like intelligence, these callous creatures are capable of the most cold-blooded lies, and are easily rewarded with money designated as campaign contributions.

 

Outnumbering their opponents decisively, these senate vipers strike suddenly - their long fangs penetrating their Republican prey, who helplessly succumb to their slithery, majority attacks. 

 

Nodding their heads to lure their believers, the senatorial vipers make promises of free medicine, lowered insurance costs, and a greatly-improved society from government-run healthcare.


Crawling from beneath their rocks, the snakes huddle together in caucus, calculating their next deadly moves:

 

-Removing 500 billion from Medicare: the cowardly biting of the hands that feed them - the millions of hapless senior citizens who now face the inevitable rationing of socialized medicine.

 

-Requiring both young and old alike for mandatory purchases of health insurance, under actual penalty of heavy fine and/or imprisonment.

 

-Granting free healthcare to illegal immigrants, to curry favor amongst the largest minority voting bloc.

 

-Removing the incentives for the best and the brightest to become doctors, and marginalizing all physicians into mere underpaid, run-of-the-mill government workers

 

-Undermining the jobs of the tens of millions who work at small businesses; whose owners must either take on expensive new health care premiums, or lay off  valued employees.

 

-Determining but ONE individual, the Health and Human Services Director, that would hold "god-like" power over the entire nation; who adjudicates what everyone pays for health insurance premiums, and the limits of care each shall receive.

 

And these back-biting vipers care not about those who've elected them- ignoring their expectation that they righteously serve their country. Their only loyalty is to the forked-tongued devil who charms them from his desk in the Oval Office.

 

Since the beginning of time, snakes and serpents have been used to depict evil:

 

It was a serpent that represented Satan, who had tempted Adam and Eve in the Garden -and introduced sin into God's perfect creation of Earth.

 

In the Old Testament, God rescued Hebrews from their bondage in Egypt. Pursued by Pharaoh's army, they escaped across the parted Red Sea; and when they had nothing to eat, God provided manna.

Despite their miraculous redemption, the Hebrews grumbled - hence God sent a plague of poisonous snakes amongst them.

 

Now, in the 21st century AD, a modern plague of lethal vipers has descended upon a land of liberty - swallowing their victims whole - injecting them with the poisonous venom of Socialism; and bringing silent death to a once-free nation.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Climate-change, obfuscation, and other liberal lies!


A blind pedestrian in Minneapolis is struck by a Toyota hybrid and lies seriously injured: A laid-off Houston petroleum engineer grows ever more despondent, wondering when he'll work again: In her kitchen, an Akron OH housewife accidently shatters a CFL lightbulb - contaminating her home with highly-poisonous mercury:

 

Given all three of these seemingly unrelated human interest stories, what do they share in common? In deference, we now move on to story number four:

 

A headline breaks in the London Times: "Unknown Alleged Russian Entity Hacks Into Computers of Major Center on Global Warming."

 

Indeed, hackers had now "exposed" the Hadley Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, England - obtaining 1079 emails and 72 files - containing nearly 4000 documents on global warming - proving it to be the greatest of all hoaxes...EVER!

 

The Russian hacker(s) released 61 megabytes of confidential files. The site - apparently originating in Tomsk, Siberia - is now down (closed).

 

Here is a sample of the purportedly hacked material (1079 e-mails) that had been available online:

From: Phil Jones
To: ray bradley ,mann@XXXX, mhughes@XXXX
Subject: Diagram for WMO Statement


Dear Ray, Mike and Malcolm,

I've just completed Mike's Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (i.e. from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith's to hide the decline.

 

Mike's series got the annual land and marine values while the other two got April-Sept for NH land N of 20N. The latter two are real for 1999, while the estimate for 1999 for NH combined is +0.44C wrt 61-90. The Global estimate for 1999 with data through Oct is +0.35C cf. 0.57 for 1998.

Thanks for the comments, Ray.

 

Cheers
Phil

  

Suspiciously, things began getting a bit shaky when "global warming" was esoterically morphed into 'climate change'. Then, in conjunction, the EPA "reclassified" CO2 as a "greenhouse gas." The stage was now set: the weather itself had become politicized:

 

- Blizzards in China? Climate change.

- Snow in Saudi Arabia? Excess greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. 

- Volcano eruption in Pago-Pago? Silly fool; it's climate change.

- Atlanta flooded by 11 eleven inches of rain? Yep - it's that nasty ol' climate change thing.

 

Until the Russian 'saviors' had intervened, UN liberals had been well-poised to use CO2 as a pretext to bankrupt developed countries; they would transfer trillions of their dollars to the "underdeveloped" nations by charging penalties pegged to carbon emissions (per metric ton).

 

But If Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is a such a grave danger (as the EPA tells us) what is it doing in our childrens’ soft drinks? And why has it been delineated as a so-called greenhouse gas?

 

The IPCC (Inter-Governmental Panel on Climate Change) had for twenty years been using computer models that ominously had predicted a warming rate in the troposphere; with rises of 1.2* Centigrade per decade, using calculations based upon 'greenhouse-forcing' scenarios.

 

This implied carbon-tax increases of $14 to $24 per-ton - per DECADE.

 

At the upper end of the IPCC "warming forecast," emissions' taxes would have reached upwards of $200 per ton of CO2 by 2050, forcing major carbon-emitters into bankruptcy, and a presumptive global shift to "non-carbon" energy sources.

 

But why not avoid the controversy altogether? Tie all carbon taxes to ACTUAL levels of warming. Both skeptics and alarmists alike would've had their wishes answered - problem solved!

 

Now hacked e-mails lay bare the truth: the IPCC and the leftists in our Congress care nothing about saving Earth. Rather, they have been all about creating problems: fabricating a "global warming crisis" to  further their own agenda - social justice. Or more specifically..."climate justice."

 

"Climate justice" is about redistribution of money from consumer countries (USA) to poorer countries in South America & Africa (the UN will conference in Copenhagen until December 18 to achieve this noble goal).

 

In the United States, climate justice says everyone in the middle class shall pay energy taxes; providing money to the welfare leeches (in the urban areas) for their energy needs.

 

The House Cap 'n Trade Bill provides these energy taxes to be distributed to "historically disadvantaged" urban areas. This same wording also lies in the "Stimulus" package.

 

The "endangered" coal-fired plants in the Midwest would be forced to double their rates; the energy users (everyone) would effectively be subsidizing the "poor". Hence, the leeches would get free "energy vouchers" to pay for their heating & energy costs.

 

Farmers would be devastated: cap 'n trade levies a charge of $20 for one sheep, $100 for a beef cow, $150 per head of dairy cattle. Reasoning? Methane output. Future food prices? Up 50%!  

 

In wonderful Ohio - First Energy, an Akron utility, sent two energy-saving compact flourescent light-bulbs (CFLs) to customers, charging them $21 - whether they wanted them or not. The idea? - to compensate First Energy for future costs relevant to Ohio’s new law requiring utilities to reduce coal consumption 22.2 percent by 2025.

 

If states require utilities to reduce coal consumption, or use more expensive 'renewable' energy sources, rising rates must make up the difference - meaning less disposable income; more job losses - sending manufacturing jobs fleeing overseas to China.

 

In West Virginia, if the House cap-and-trade bill became law, 11,000  mining jobs would be gone in less than 15 years, according to a study commissioned by the National Association of Manufacturers.

 

"West Virginia's coal production would fall 85.1 percent; electricity production by 18.6 percent by 2030." According to the study, the poor would especially bear the brunt: they spend a greater share of their income on energy than people in higher income brackets.

 

And if the Senate should eventually pass their version, what then?

What about the airlines? What about cab drivers? What about truckers? What happens to our conventional cars? Because of bans on domestic drilling, America has been devastated enough by high fuel costs for the last several years.

 

This ‘cap n trade’ nonsense will force a vast majority of Americans to park their transportation, not to mention the conventional energy jobs lost because of the lunacy surrounding the "restructuring" of America into a new "greener" economy.

 

The push to smaller cars will mean fewer jobs in Detroit, plus all the concomitant satellite industries. Already, tens of thousands of jobs in the petroleum industry are gone because of restricted drilling policies, and an effective ban on refineries. Cap 'n trade will ulimately accomplish the subsidizing of US jobs to competing countries - ravaging employment once found here.
 
And what about the granddaddy of all job growth...the US domestic car industry? Look what stricter CAFE standards have already done. Many US consumers cling ferociously to their older, conventional LARGE cars - portending defeat to the electric car market before it even gets off the ground.

 

Global warming; climate change; so-called 'dirty gasoline' automobiles...all a pretext to destroy our freedoms. 

 

Americans love their conventional cars, and will part with them only as a last resort.

 

But now that so-called global warming is in question, what happens to GM after all the money poured into developing its new, renewable-energy cars? Small cars, not only expensive and ugly, but inherently dangerous as well!

 

A recent study by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration found that electric vehicles (and hybrids with all-electric drive mode) are three times more likely to be involved in pedestrian accidents at intersections and crosswalks.

 

The National Federation for the Blind has been lobbying  automakers and the federal government to address the problem by ensuring that battery-powered cars make some sort of noise that will alert the sight-impaired to their presence.

 

And it’s not just the blind who have to worry: even slow-moving hybrids can get 40 percent closer to pedestrians than a combustion-engine car before being detected.

 

This endangers runners, walkers, children and bicyclists alike, who rely on hearing to place traffic around them. Hence, once electric cars become common, far more accidents and fatalities will occur than many realize.

 

Now, back to that "climate change" hoax, and its incredibly negative consequences: Add up the huge financial losses. The uncertainty and anxiety to be found everywhere. The destiny of so many lives now irretrievably altered.

 

Jobs departed. Livelihoods endangered. Increasing accidents. Our once-convenient lifestyles...our disposable incomes...our cherished American way of life - gone for what?

 

Because of some phony scam? - perpetrated by a condescending, desperado group of so-called climatologists? Laughing amongst themselves; arrogantly exchanging e-mails; congratulating one another; supportive of a scheme whereby the UN would control of much of the world's wealth.

 

But fortuituously, it now seems very much in doubt.

 

Americans are some of the most civilized, rational, and intelligent people on earth. If climate change truly portended danger, we all would be in unison about fixing the problem, before it could make life on our fragile planet even worse.

 

When the US Olympians arrived in China last year, they were shocked at the impurity of Beijing's smog-shrouded, filthy, coal-fouled air.

 

And everywhere, the global warmongers shouted "SEE... it's real! We need controls!"

 

But climate change is all about obfuscation:

 

Obfuscating data to show warming in place of actual cooling.

 

Obfuscating science to condemn harmlessCO2 as a greenhouse gas.

 

Obfuscating fossil fuel producers as agents of global warming - rather than only polluters. 

 

John Glenn not long ago had commented that the "blue earth" image he once saw from space was now grayer - much hazier than his original voyage as an astronaut in 1962.

 

Yes; carbon pollution is real; and the world must unite that it be cleaned up:

 

But Global Warming is a ruse - used by fear mongers (Gore), Congressional politicians, and the UN con artists of the IPCC - to vacuum money from our pockets.

 

Oil & coal - like stone - are pertinent to Earth's composition; they are not fossil fuels!

 

Climate Change is nothing other than a leftist scam to displace our Constitution and Bill of Rights.  To weaken America until it is "equal" to the rest of the world. 

 

Who has proven global warming even exists? 

 

The Russian hackers have inadvertently defined Climate Change for what it has been all along: a left wing, world-wide, wealth-redistributionist game - to buy Democratic votes. Nothing more.

 

There are no accurate ways to measure global warming; nor "increasing  CO2 levels," because carbon dioxide is germane to the air around us.

 

The attempt to tax us into submission, and destroy the economic base of our great country - making America part of a “One World Nation - has been exposed.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123456789102324Next »