About Me

Name: thekeenobserver
Email: reallykeenobserver@yahoo.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

A Triumph of Ignorance

 

FLASHBACK: The Obama 2008 presidential campaign.

Barack Obama has promised to create 5 million "green” jobs, jobs that cannot be outsourced; to both mitigate unemployment and boost the nascent clean energy sector.

(QUOTE)..."We'll invest $15 billion a year over the next decade in renewable energy, creating five million new green jobs that pay well; and help end our dependence on foreign oil," said Mr. Obama all during fall of 2008.

But the last time anyone checked, so far, Obama has come up approximately 4,900,000 jobs short (when we last updated this item). Even worse, just what in the world IS a green energy job?

And notice how the word "clean" is always prefixed before green; as if some magical, pristine force were at work, powering America's energy needs effortlessly; without ever missing a beat.

Even more appealing is the word "renewable."

Sounds so wonderful. Energy that "renews" itself! Sure.

Just like money grows on trees. It appears from nowhere. And not unlike an episode of the "Jetsons," clean renwable energy is just around the corner, ready to power our autos, trains and planes - leaving no exhaust gases, nor worries about paying for costly, dirty fossil fuel.

But don't laugh.
 
Despite the sheer folly of windmills, solar panels, and 'renewable" energy sources EVER fulfilling even a fraction of America's unbounded transportation needs, many voters ACTUALLY believe the impossibilty that new energy sources can be created.

In fact, the second biggest applause line found in Obama's recent State of the Union speech came after he said this:

(QUOTE)..."We can create even more jobs, lead in energy innovation and build a cleaner more prosperous future if we make the right choices and grow our current support and investments in renewable energy and energy efficiency," adding, "We can continue to produce more made-in America energy from renewable sources that won’t run out, won’t leave us hamstrung to foreign countries, and won’t hurt our health and environment."

Ah, yes. Welcome to energy fantasyland!

Wonderful, renewable clean energy - devoid of any possible downside. All positives. But isn't this more of the same phony-baloney, too-good-to-be-true babble that Obama SUCCESSFULLY handed us in 2008?

When will our dumbed-down citizens realize the obvious: if something sounds too good to be true, IT PROBABLY IS!

For one thing, if all this so-called renewable clean energy were all that it's cracked up to be, then why are we still so reluctant to adapting our society to it? After all, did not the horse and buggy quickly fall victim to the automobile? And ditto for the kerosene lamp versus the electric light. Plus any other number of examples.

So either Barack Obama is a classic energy genius (like Edison), who's onto something, or he's a con-man liar - trying to sell us a bill of goods for his Machiavellian ulterior political motives.

For one thing, can new forms of energy be CREATED? Is this not a violation of Newton's FIRST law? Can mankind invent a new form of energy? What about the great invention of steam? Or coal? Or the wind?  

Was nuclear power invented? Or did scientists discover how to unleash, and then harness it? Was oil invented? Gasoline? Alessandro Volta invented the battery in 1799; but his invention (basically) was a way to store a source of electricity  - using it as needed for an independent power source.

But Obama knows this - aware that if he can maintain his unrelenting attack on so-called fossil fuels (which DO NOT come from fossils) he'll be able to undermine our oil-coal based, "cheap-energy" economy; and eventually cripple our free-market capitalistic system until it can stand on its own no longer:

(QUOTE)..."We can continue to listen to the same propaganda from the fossil fuel industry and its supporters in Congress who say that we need to increase our reliance on dirty and limited fossil fuels; that investments in clean energy are a bad idea; or that we can’t compete with China and other countries when it comes to wind, solar and other technologies."

Notice, when referring to fossil fuel,  how Obama throws in the words, "dirty" and "limited?"

Is this not BRAINWASHING on a slick, subliminal level that only Obama could pull off? - able to maintain a 47-44% approval rating, despite the fact that - during his term - gasoline and unemployment have doubled, housing has crashed; poverty is rampant; with hopelessness among Americans prevailing as never before.

And these 44-47% are the same, incredibly dumbed-down group of voters who believe in man-made global warming; and that..."We must stop all fracking and drilling before it ruins our air and water supply!"

So what do these people expect to drive into the next decade? A George Jetson, air car? And for electric, do they all want a windmill on their roof? Or a solar array in their backyard?

But what happens on a calm, overcast day? What happens when the battery in their Chevy Volt goes dead after they get stuck in snow? - and then they FREEZE to death.

Did they ever think of THAT?

We no longer are a nation of thinkers. We just react. A result of the gradual transition from news stories to sound bites. Sugary political fluff versus sound factual substance.

A triumph of ignorance.

But nonetheless, it seems to be what we Americans want. And now, we're getting the government and society we deserve.

 

God save the republic.
 
 
www.keenobserver.com
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obamacare's "Final Solution"

 
One topic noticably taboo from Barack Obama's State of the Union spech was his obvious avoidance of discussing "Obamacare" and the horrors we're about to face when it fully becomes implemented, AFTER the election in 2013.
 
Of course we've heard of Sarah Palin's mention of death panels; which will enforce the rationing of healthcare for everyone.
 
But now, we find that there will be "comfort panels," which will DENY expensive procedures for anyone over 70; who can't afford to journey to Costa Rica for treatment.
 
EXAMPLE: A neurologist is called to the hospital in the middle of the night, to treat an 78 year old patient who arrives with a brain aneurysm; the normal procedure being immediate surgery - relieving the pressure on the brain.
 
As with any brain injury, time is of the essence!
 
Then, however, the surgeon realizes that the patient has insurance through one of the new government exchanges set up under ObamaCare and IMMEDIATELY rethinks his treatment plan. The only prescribed treatment for which he will be reimbursed for this “unit” is “comfort care." If he performs anything beyond that, it will essentially be ILLEGAL; and certainly, with no re-imbursement forthcoming.
 
Of course a ”Comfort Care Panel” may not be a “Death Panel”. But you’re just as dead; although it sounds a lot "friendlier."
 
Which is EXACTLY what they do with sick people in places like Venezuela and Cuba and the former Soviet Union; or for that matter, merry olde England.
 
Remember when we were told that to see what was inObamacare, Congress had to pass the bill?
 
Obamacare has literally hundreds of these types of INHUMANE limitations. Bureaucrats will be deciding who gets kidneys, who should get surgery; who qualifies to get a new heart; who is worthy of the expense of one type of treatment versus another.

Plus, if the government says you don't qualify for a certain treatment, it will be ILLEGAL to get it even if you want to pay a private doctor to do it.


That's right America. You will not be allowed to exceed the limits of your government mandated insurance policy, even if you have wealth enough to pay a private physician.
 
So say helllo to the nightmare of public healthcare - coming to a med center near you.
 
PREDICTION: Look for "speakeasy" style "underground" health centers to spring up like mushrooms throughout the remainder of this decade.
 
Of course most dumbed-down gullible Americans can't conceive of all this; simply because the media would be talking about it...right?
 
Plus it all sounds so blatantly un-American, it just cant be.
 
Oh yes it can!
 
For one thing, most of the HHS plans for the implementation of Obamacare are yet to even be published, and will not be forthcoming for at least another year because the volume of policies needing to be implemented is monumental.
 
And recently, we learn that at a recent (November 22, 2011)  meeting of the American Association of Neurosurgeons (AANS) and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS). the gist was that these surgeons were told, by a member of the Department of Health and Human Services, that under the new health insurance legislation (aka Obamacare) government-insured people over the age of 70 suffering with emergency brain issues - stroke, hemorrhages, etc - would see NO automatic surgical intervention, as they had previously.
 
Before any surgery could commence, an “ethics” panel  - made up not of doctors but of administrators and bureaucrats - would convene and "assess" whether the elederly person would even be TREATED.
 
Even worse, Under Obamacare, said “ethics panel” would refer to you NOT as a "you"; you will be a thoroughly de-humanized “unit.”
 
And the reason you will be a “unit” is because if this enlightened sort of “ethics panel” discussed you as a male or a female, they might be tempted to think of you as a human being  - someone’s mother or sister or wife - a person who is beloved, and whose life is valued, even if the brain and body aren’t functioning at optimal levels.

And  time is on the side of HHS, as they keep the insidious elements of the legislation under wraps for as long as possible.
 
Remember when Pelosi kept touting “Universal health care for all?” - which has been the rallying cry of the Obama administration as it implements Obamacare.
 
While this slogan may sound good, what has actually been concocted is not universal health care at all, but rather health care for the “units” that can still contribute to American society.
 
This so-called Achilles heel of Obamacare will soon become a reality unless it is stopped.
 
Which also implies that if we do go to Obamacare, everybody’s parents will most likely die with the onset of their first serious illness - a tragedy for all the families who will unnecessarily lose their loved ones, decades earlier than they would if we didn’t have the tyranny of socialized medicine.
As they say in England...“If you have a serious problem, you pack off to the United States where it can be treated in the same day. Otherwise you flirt with death.”
 
But not anymore; with the Orwellian Obamacare nightmare about to unfold - UNLESS it can be stopped. And for all you seniors who think Obama is looking out for you, wake up and smell the coffee; could this be the Democrat plan of taking care of Social Security?
 
And notice that recently, there have been several government announcements to the effect that doctors should discontinue routine diagnostic tests; for things like breast and prostate cancer, that will be lethal if not detected within a few years; yet another final solution brought on by the "unaffordable patient care and protection act." 
 
And of course, we all know when Obama and the democrats hit 70, none of these “units” over 70 will apply to them. And for many fast-aging baby boomers, 70 is not even really that old anymore; but if you do get seriously ill with an expensive brain or cardiac affliction, you can count on being shuffled off to the room with the big screen full of daffodils, and excellent speakers blasting Vivaldi, and made “comfortable.”
 
And do we all not know of people who are over 90 who were once seriously ill; or who had fallen? But after being operated on, they recovered quickly and  eventually went back to normal.
 
So what happens now? To think that someone who is 70 will not be given lifesaving care when it is possible is simply INCONCEIVABLE in most Americans' minds.
 
But it's coming fellow citizens - whether you wanna believe it or not - courtesy of Barack Obama; who has has caused more angst than any President in recent memory. 
 
We will no longer be able to retire in peace; and our younger generation (and those following) will be the first to not have it better than the previous generations.
 
Obamacare's final solution must be addressed now, and shouted literally from the roof tops, before the election; lest we all die before our time.
www.keenobserveblogtownhall.com
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Wall of Tyranny

 

Here's yet another one of Barack Obama fresh ideas for "winning the future."
 
(QUOTE)..."However many jobs might be generated by a Keystone pipeline, they’re going to be a lot fewer than the jobs that are created by extending the payroll tax cut and extending unemployment insurance.”
 
(unquote)
 
Brilliant! Masterful! Why didn't we think of this before?
 
Ergo, we should all immediately stop working - stop producing anything at all; then sit back and enjoy the incredible explosion of prosperity! 
 
That's right America: We're better off being unemployed - it's now patriotic to be on welfare, according to our beloved Commander-in-Grief; who's spent more time golfing than in his oval office.
 
But the most troubling aspect of all: why wasn't Obama laughed right off the podium when he made this almost-comical claim?
 
The Keystone pipeline adds jobs- which begets tax revenue, by direct taxing of the oil companies; adds ancillary companies. It potentially lowers gas prices; thus spurring more growth; as people spend on goods and services; thereby creating more jobs; because people have more money to spend.
 
That's what economists call the "multiplier effect."
 
Yet Obama infers that more government spending (extending unemployment comp), hence adding to the deficit; which adds more interest payments; then adds to the increasing need to pay back a ballooning deficit; where we face potential insolvency; and eventually, where no one gets anything from the government; because the US becomes BROKE.
 
And with a broken economy, Obama and his socialist minions can crow..."Capitalism doesn't work!" It's time we move to a planned economy!"
 
Obviously, Obama's callous rejection of Keystone is on track with his dream of
$7 gas; to wean us all off evil oil. Obama obviously knows if the pipeline was ok’d, we would drown in oil, the economy would boom practically overnight on $2 gas- which is in diametrical opposition of where the present cadre of DC Obammunists want us to be.
 
One only has to examine US history to discern that cheap affordable energy, be it steam, coal, oil, nuclear, or natural gas has always resulted in booming economic growth periods; and conversely, high energy prices (1973-75), (1979-81), (2008-12) have brought recession.
 
Affordable energy is what creates wealth, what has let us move from a nation of farmers to a nation of suburban information workers. But these humanity-hating environmentlists are so determined to deny us affordable energy - trying to force us back into subsistence - it becomes their obsession.
 
After all, what better way to control the masses than to keep them poor and hardworking, with "their heads down?" How can people rise up to oppose such tyranny when they're too busy eeking out an existence?
 
Face it America; we have put liberals in power who will do ANYTHING to cripple our free market system.
 
Notice how ANY industrial project that is proposed these days is automatically fought politically by the Democrat Party, and in the courts?
 
Henceforth, huge legal expenses and built-in delays guarantee that many worthwhile projects are not even tried here; and flee oversees, where red tape and regulation are non-existent.
 
For Obama and his Green Left, what matters isn’t whether the lives of the poor improve, but closing that invisible gap between middle class and poverty. Hence, killing off the middle class - turning them into the poor - thereby closes that gap much easier, and much more in line with the Lefts' views of an ideal utopian society.
 
So what does stimulate the economy? The production of wealth. And how is wealth created? Finding new and innovative ways to make use of existing resources to balance existing demands. When wealth is created, jobs are created. And more jobs leads to a productive redistribution of wealth through market channels that truly stimulates the economy.
 
And what better way to destroy wealth than to for the federal government to regulate it out of existence? - while telling us "it's for our own good' (i.e. cleaner air and water).
 
When the Deepwater Horizon wellhead blew out, was it not a foregone conclusion that Obama would impose a moratorium on ALL US offshore drilling? - even going so far as to deny a federal court order - saying it was illegal.
 
And of course, what did the political charlatan Obama have to lose? Do not the four affected Gulf states (Louisiana, Mississippi, Texas, Alabama) all vote Republican?
 
Following this, is it more than a co-incidence that EVERY state that stands to benefit from the Keystone pipeline - running through their territory - are ALL red states?
 
But denying Keystone is just another brick in the wall - being built by the Left - to block the nation from ever regaining the economic hegemony that America enjoyed for 200 consecutive years; from the very day our republic was established.
 
Indeed, for two glorious centuries, America had the highest standard of living. A nation blessed with incredible natural resources; and a bounty of human capital that brought forth an incredible stream of innovations and inventions - spurred on by the free-market capitalism that rewarded effort - enabled by the freedoms of our unique Constitution.
 
But with the onset of the growing liberal tyranny in Washington, beginning in the 1990's, the issue remains in doubt.
 
In 1787, as Benjamin Franklin - exiting the Constitutional convention - so aptly foretold to a passerby, who had asked..."What have you wrought?"
 
Franklin coyly answered..."A republic, IF you can keep it!"
 
America will never right itself until we stamp out completely the Left. Until then, the wall of government tyrrany grows ever higher.
 
We remain passive at our own peril.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Barack Obama's "Sugar-Daddy" Presidency

 
Just how desperate is Barack Obama?
 
Extremely: in fact, so devoid is Mr. Obama of ideas for his impending State-of-the-Union address, desperate presidential aides are polling LIKELY voters over the phone, asking "their opinion" on various topics that were of importance to them. 
 
But what's to discuss? That Mr. Obama has been a "jobs" president? That he's done well on handling the economy? That he's bolstered national security? Or sealed the border? Or done well with the deficit?
 
Is he not reviled by our military? Is he respected abroad? Do not our enemies think of him as an appeaser?
 
Again; can anyone name any ONE positive accomplishment that our beloved Commander-in-Grief has achieved, whereby the nation has INDISPUTABLY moved forward? - other than expanding the welfare state to heights never before thought possible.
 
But throughout it all, the Obama presidency has stressed "fairness." But does he not incessantly talk about classes? But when in US history have we been a so-called "class" society?
 
Is it not true that only in the America, one can literally go from poor to rich almost overnight? - and vice versa. Yet Obama constantly rails away about the rich paying 'their fair share" - spurning class warfare in this nation as never before.
 
But along comes Newt Gingrich - perhaps the first Republican in years - who fears not the poisoned barbs of the Left; who now has found Obama's vulnerable side - portraying him as the "food stamp president."
 
And now, angry conservative voters are coming out of the woodwork - spurned on by this one, most incendiary issue; that seems so grossly unfair to those working for their paychecks - literally fed up with supporting healthy, able-bodied people, who have chosen to ''goldbrick'' their way through life.
 
Indeed; how fair is it to see well-dressed, in-fashion customers in a grocery line? - their carts overloaded with steaks - paying with a "food stamp" card; while holding a cell phone up to their ear; obviously oblivious to the smoldering resentment around them.
 
Ironically, Americans are the most generous people on earth. But somehow, we have to pretend that to DARE criticize this blatant abuse of taxpayers' money is a NO-NO; because it's being racist?
 
But are not many of these same so-called racists the very same people who voted for Obama?- because they so despised George W. Bush.
 
Make no mistake fellow Americans; never before in recent memory have conservative voters so resented a sitting President; a two-faced sneak, who inherently believes in income redistribution; to get even for America's so-called racist, imperialist past.
 
Indeed; does not every policy of this Obammunist in the White House bear some tenet of "sharing" the wealth? - stripping working Americans of what's left of their assets - by any means necessary.
 
Whether it's the stimulus; or Obamacare; or Dodd-Frank; or Obama's plan to fix "underwater" mortagages; or to eternally extend unemployment benefits - does not this money come directly from the "hides" of the working majority, who, if Obama gets his way, will eventually become out-of-work dependents themselves!
 
But again, isn't this Comrade Obama's grand plan for his second term: eqaul misery for all? That everyone pay their fair share until they can pay no more.
 
Indeed; if small businesses can't hire because of Obamacare; if banks can't loan because of Dodd-Frank; if energy companies can't drill; if mining companies can't mine; and if manufacturers can't produce because of high energy costs, can we all not see Obama's grand plan? - slowly becoming a reality before our very eyes!
 
And just how angry is the nation? Do we not awake every day? - only to discover some new, outrageous Obama policy; whether it's his recess appointments; or his stacking of the NLRB; or his decree that..."I, as your president,  won't fail to act in the interests of the middle class if Congress won't!"
 
But is America ready for a self-proclaimed dictator?
 
How many of us are fed up? Are not gun and ammunition sales proceeding at an alarming rate? Do not many Americans believe that this next election is "it" for what remains of our sacred Constitution; and our traditional way of life?
 
Nevertheless, our seemingly happy-go-lucky, sugar-daddy President campaigns gleefully around the country, touting the 2 million new jobs he's (mysteriously) created in his new "clean energy" economy.
 
But the Obama clock is ticking. November 2012 will be on us in no time.
 
Then the "Cinderalla Obama" presidency will vanish at the stroke of midnight. The glass slipper of government dependency, shattered by Newt Gingrich; who''ll indeed get all of America back to work - just by reversing course.
 
Day-by-day, it'll be fun indeed - watching sugar-daddy Obama melt away.
www.keenobserver.blogtownhall.com
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Fracking: the New Battleground

 
Are you ready for a good, old-fashioned "knee slapper?"
 
Just listen to the Obama campaign's first political ad spot for 2012- recently aired in the seven "battleground states" that Obama thinks will decide the election.
 
After starting out with some bizarre claims about Obama "being under fire from oil barons" - turning to the economy, the ad hails...“2.7 million Clean-Energy American jobs that the president has added, while reducing the nation's dependency on foreign oil..." 
 
Of course, this superbly-timed, joke-of-an-ad comes out on the very day AFTER Obama rejected the Keystone XL pipeline; which would've created a blizzard of new, high-paying energy and construction jobs, right when (and where) the nation most needed them.
 
And just what in the hail is a clean energy job? Does any living American know of anyone who's ever held one? Where does one apply? What type of work does it entail? Where are all these 2.7 million workers? Are they hiding out?
 
Is there a vocational school that teaches clean energy?
 
But seriously folks, an Obama second term may not be anything to jest about.
 
Like offfshore drilling, this unfeeling, cold-blooded autocrat is already laying the groundwork to destroy every last remnant of oil and gas hydro-fracking, "until it can be proven absolutely safe."
 
Probably the biggest irony coming from Obama's blocking of Trans Canada's Keystone pipeline is the fact that the entire project was already funded with private money; and being shovel ready, could've been built and pumping oil within 24-30 months.
 
But since the pipelince crossed the 49th parallel, final approval rested with Washington; and who in their right mind would EVER think Obama would approve such a vital project; one that ultimately, was critical to US energy security - especially during times of war.
 
And what about the abundant new supplies of shale-enclosed natural gas that portend a new economic dawn for America? Cheap suplies of the clean-burning fuel could power a manufacturing and industrial boom in this nation, not seen since post World War Two.
 
Cheap energy means more efficient output. More output equals more productivity. And more productivity - coupled with efficiency -equals economic velocity, the number one factor in determining the rate of growth of a healthy economy.
 
But liberals (like Obama) hate the very idea of a booming economy; because it implies the very thing liberals despise most: people making "too much money." Which of course means that they have no need of government.
 
Profit is indeed the dirtiest word in the Left's dictionary.
 
So fear not fellow profiteers. Obama and his minions have already put in place their plan for undermining fracking; and with it, the entire US horizontal drilling industry; just scare everyone about "contaminating the water supply."
 
Works every time.
 
Already, many "experts" (from unheard of universities and foundations) are writing about how "unconsionable gas companies are driling down thousands of feet; then blasting open fissures in the shale - using millions of gallons of chemical-laden water and sand; where more than 75% of this contaminated water REACHES the surface."
 
Naturally, they don't come right out and say it poisons the water; they just plant the seed. And then they let frightened citizens and municipalities do their dirtywork.
 
In shale areas across the country, nervous property owners and township trustees keep echoing the words of the democrat politicians, who gleefully egg them on - shouting..."Moratorium! Moratorium! We must stop all this fracking until its proven absoluely SAFE!"
 
That's right America; just give Obama a second term, and see how fast he'll reverse the Bush-era decision to exempt fracking from the Clean Water Act, so "the federal goverment can PROPERLY REGULATE the industry."
 
Then, with the EPA as final arbiteur of drilling permits in America - whether on private land or not - we can all kiss the new shale boom in domestic oil and gas a premature goodbye, and the millions of new jobs along with it.
 
But In the meantime, look for more "slow hysteria" about how fracking can cause earhquakes, cancer (benzene in well water); and how it "can effect the human immune and cardiovascular system."
 
Already, the EPA claims that at a drilling site in Wisconsin, they found evidence of benzene in the well water only a short distance away.
 
But did the EPA reveal that it was only a few parts per million? - rendering it harmless. And did they bother to inform that benzene, like methane, is a natural by-product of oil and gas drilling, and is not always used in the fracking process?
 
After all; what does the dumbed-down US public know about it? Are they not easily led? Are they not too ignorant of science to figure out that even "contaminated water" cannot flow upward thousands of feet to reach water supplies, and thereby miraculously DEFY gravity?
 
So in the coming months, expect more lies. More innuendos. More rumors. All centering around how dirty, costly hydraulic fracking can not only foul the air, the land; and poison our bodies; plus make the earth move under our feet.
 
Ignorance is not bliss.
 
 


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Canada...Our Strategic Petroleum Reserve?

 
Today, all across China and throughout the OPEC countries, there was rejoicing: precisely the two entities that America should be most wary about:
 
Barack Obama has come out against building the Keystone Pipeline - offering the lamest of lame explanations: (quote)..."“The rushed and arbitrary deadline insisted on by congressional Republicans prevented a full assessment of the pipeline's impact, especially the health and safety of the American people, as well as our environment."
 
But did not December's payroll tax deal mandate that Obama come out and declare - within 60 days - whether the TransCanada pipeline, which would travel 1,661 miles from Alberta, to U.S. refiners on the Gulf Coast, was in the "national interest?"
 
The White House also issued a statement denouncing Congress's "rushed and arbitrary deadline," which ironically, had passed with overwhelming bipartisan support.
 
So once again, our beloved Coward-in-Chief chooses to run and hide, throwing national interest to the wind - favoring politics, versus the incredible job potential of a major transcontinental pipeline.
 
Of all the traitorous actions by Obama, this one is the perhaps the most vile and damaging to a US economic recovery. Here is a President of a nation that is suffering economically; now along comes a hope for tens of thousands of jobs (by most accurate estimates) with an opportunity to decrease dependence upon Middle Eastern energy sources, and he instead throws a political bone to a faction of his base, to the great detriment of the nation as a whole.
 
And in true Obama deception/immaturity, he blames Congress for his crime.

But is this any surprise? Did not Obama bring drilling to a halt in the Gulf? Has he not ordered his attack dog-EPA to halt natural gas fracking? - by any means necessary.
 
Meanwhile, what happens if someday Israel decides to bomb Iran, and Iran moves to block oil shipments out of the Persian Gulf? The U.S., without a pipeline like Keystone XL, and its million barrels-a-day potential, will be in even more of a ''pickle'' when it comes to securing oil supplies.
 
And what if someday Venezuela’s ailing President Hugo Chavez dies and is replaced by civil war in Venezuela? - instead of a more reasonable man who reinvigorates Venezuela’s oil production?
 
Again, the U.S., without a pipeline like Keystone XL, we'll have a tougher time replacing the million barrels a day we get from Venezuela.
 
And if such an emergency did arise, how long BEFORE our strategic petroleum reserve would be bled dry? And if war broke out, would not our entire military be placed in an Obama-induced situation of "energy jeopardy?" 
 
Yep; it's all so very assuring.
 
We have a friendly neighbor up North - serving as an ever-reliable energy bulwark versus Mid East instability; yet Obama has mindlessly ruled it out.
 
And what happens if Mexico fails to stem its declines in oil production and stops exporting oil to the U.S.? To Obama, he figures we’ll just use less energy, and pay more, and suffer slower growth and fewer jobs as a result. No skin off his pinocchio nose. 

Drilling is still not allowed in the Gulf after the BP spill; while Obama is doing everything he can to destroy this economy - unrelenting on his mission to weaken Ameerica at its basic foundation: a secure supply of reliable and cheap energy.
 
Which begs the question: Is Obama purposely trying to hurt this nation? Gee, ya think?
 
And what about the OTHER Keystone Pipeline? - running down through Nebraska from Canada; which came on line in 2010. Why do we hear nothing about that?
 
Why have we not been told that Keystone XL is an expansion of existing pipelines?
 
And forget all that bullspit about environmental danger: the Ogallala aquifer is some 400 feet below the surface in Nebraska; and in any case overlain by an impermeable layer of calcified rock, which geologists call caliche.
 
No fellow Americans, this is only about political payoffs being made. George Soros and the Middle eastern oil shieks are reaping what they sowed in summer of 2008 - being major contributors to Obama's "historic" election campaign.

Nonetheless, Keystone's rejection is flagrant, political pandering of the worst kind.
 
How many more critical decisions will the White House put off until conveniently after the election? How many millions of dollars in unemployment benefits will Obama require us to pay to people who could, and would welcome, going to work on this project? How many millions of tax dollars will we not collect because this project is not moving forward?
 
How can Obama keep speaking of jobs being his number one job? - and the best he can come up with (for a project which has been studied for years and sequentially approved) is that we have to study it AGAIN?

Worst of all, does this not portend 4-5-6 dollar gas for the future?
 
And what about when the day comes when Iran explodes its first nuke? Oil will skyrocket to 200 dollars a barrel; while the Chinese are siphoning off huge chunks of Canada's abundant energy supply; with the US left flatfooted; as our strategic petroleum reserve is quickly bled dry.
 
Gas rationing, here we come. Keep on pushing.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OPEC's Big Bang Theory

Here we go again: it's "bendover" time fellow Americans.
 
We're about to be "drilled" by four dollar a gallon gas come later this year; so say the "experts."
 
And why not?. For As long as the dumbed-down American public will keep taking it, OPEC (and Obama) will keep dishing it out, as "market factors" dictate higher fuel prices to come, due to "seasonal adjustments."
 
But is the world running out oil?
 
In fact, there are so many new discoveries set to come on line (Brazil, Utica Shale, Eagle Ford, Bakken) that those who once ominously warned us all of "peak oil" can't even be located with a search warrant.
 
Given all this supply, and in the face of declining demand, why are world commodity prices for crude predicted to head constantly northward?
 
Is this not an aberration in basic Economics 101?
 
Today's sharply rising prices hearken back memories of the summer of 2008, when gas peaked at 4.35 gallon in downtown Chicago.
 
But 4.35 may even seem cheap several years from now - given that the USA shows no signs of making itself energy independent.
 
Now recall the good ol' days, when gas was "still affordable."
 
The price of oil was $11 a barrel in 1999. It went to $22 a barrel in 2001 $50 a barrel in 2004. But now? - it's OVER a $100 a barrel.
 
And our good friends, Hugo Chavez (Venezuela) and Mamoud Ahmadenijad (Iran) are already talking about raising it to a measly $200 dollars a barrel; thereby implying SEVEN DOLLAR a gallon gas!
 
And all they have to do is a little saber-rattling, and we Americans will suffer the ever-higher ''lifestyle tax'' of more expensive gas and oil.
 
But because ninety seven percent of our transportation is fueled by oil products of one sort or another, what choice have we? - other than to DRILL baby drill?
 
Gas and oil prices are currently at an all-time high; but ONLY because OPEC sets the market price.
 
And what has our wonderful friend Saudi Arabia really been up to?- using a chunk of its oil wealth to spread its brand of radical Wahhabi Islam worldwide.

 The Saudis control about 90 percent of the world's Islamic institutions; and US oil imports are the main reason for that.

Iran's big oil profits mean big money for that country's nuclear program and its terrorist proxies, Hezbollah and Hamas.  

 
But ever since gas hit the magic 3 dollar level, and the prices "stuck", the Mideast oil barons inherently KNEW that US drivers would always pay whatever it took to keep their beloved truck/ SUV gas guzzlers running - shrugging their shoulders - saying with grim resignation..."Gee, what can you do? I guess I'll just have to pay the price."
 
We're paying the price allright - despite the fact that the US has now leaped to the forefront of nations in RECOVERABLE oil; especially given the new fracking technology, which enables formerly "entombed deposits" to be harvested in an abundance never before imagined in the lower 48 states.
 
But stupid is as stupid does fellow Americans.
 
Obama is going to extraordinary measures to block as much US domestic production; and Middle Eastern dictators keep roiling world markets intentionally - therby triggering "nervous reactions" among oil traders, who bid oil prices constantly higher, fearing "instabilty."
 
Yup; American oil and gas everywhere. And were bankrupting our country because of "Mideastern instabilty."
 
Great. Makes perfect sense.
 
But in theclassic chicken /egg conundrum, what if, say in 1995, the US had opened up ANWAR, and eventually had STOPPED spending 440 bilion dollars annually for the same imported oil we could drill at home; what then?
 
There may have been no September 11, which occured in 2001. Their may have been no Hezbollla or Hamas to undermine Israel.
 
In fact, going all the way back to its origin in 1979, there may have been no funding for any Middle Eastern terrorism network at all, had not the fool Jimmy Carter pulled support for the pro-USA Shah of Iran; who'd been instrumental in keeping OPEC prices in check.
 
And now, after 33 years of imported oil insanity, Iran's oil-funded nuclear program is about to come to fruition.
 
That's right America: Everytime we fill up, it's more oil money to our enemies.
 
We are literally funding our own demise - holding hostage our once prosperous American lifestyle; as Iran grows ever-closer to attacking Israel (and one day even America) with a "Big Bang" nuke all their own.
 
The possibilty of a third world war grows ever larger with every petro-dollar we keep sending abroad.
 
Either we drill our way out, or the Mideast will continue on its headlong rush toward nuclear blackmail.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Show Them No Mercy

 
Well meaning Liberals are like the Blind insisting upon leading the Seeing.
 
One thing you can always count on: Liberals always have "good intentions."
 
And regarding so-called war crimes, one of the worst things about "Liberals who have Good Intentions" is that they cannot imagine (and refuse to believe) the endless depths that human depravity can reach.
 
We're of course talking about that so called "deplorable video" - showing four US Marines in combat fatigues, laughing as they relieved themselves over three dead Taliban bodies lying in the dust at their feet.
 
So now, NATO forces in Afghanistan fear that outrage over the desecration of Muslim bodies will incite even more violence.

Investigators were reported to have identified the unit involved in the video as being from the 3rd Battallion, 2nd Marine Regiment, based out of Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.

Of course, all the Washington, miltary-hating, socilalist-loving liberal termites have emerged from the wood work, seeking retribution for those who would "desecrate" the bodies of those nice Taliban fighters, who suffered "humiliation" before the eyes of the world.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta promised those involved would be punished "to the fullest extent".

The incident, which was captured on video and posted online on You Tube, "united" the American and Afghan governments in condemnation yesterday, with Mr Panetta promising a full investigation and swift justice for those responsible.

(harrumph)..."I find the behaviour depicted in it utterly deplorable," said Mr Panetta, in a self-righteous huff... "This conduct is entirely inappropriate for members of the United States military. It does not reflect the standards or values our armed forces are sworn to uphold. Those found to have engaged in such conduct will be held accountable."

Not to be upstaged, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton also expressed "total dismay" at the video - saying it was "absolutely inconsistent with the standards of behaviour that the vast majority of Marines hold themselves to."

A Marine official said the inquiry would ascertain all the facts and then make a recommendation about whether to court-martial the men. The final decision would probably lie with the commander of Marine forces in U.S. Central Command, Lt. Gen. Thomas D. Waldhauser, the official said; with The most likely charge would be under article 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice - covering conduct that "discredits the service.”
 
Nevertheless, most normal Americans looked at it and thought, SO WHAT? "They're dead! A part of a terrorist organization at war with our nation. Who cares?"
 
But Is urinating on Taliban dead bodies any worse than cutting Americans throats and then exposing their genitals? Are American ever informed about how almost everyone the Taliban kill have their pants puilled down, sodomized with "objects;" and pictures of them beheading LIVE victims?
 
Funny, we never heard any outrage about that.
 
But the fact remains: these people were already dead. And what kind of mercy and respect would the Taliban show an American alive or dead?
 
And why do not Panetta and Clinton "rage" aboutthe the savage Taliban killing of nine doctors - optometrists of various ethnic backgrounds -on their way to help Afghan people/children; but were shot in the back and killed en route; yet the truck driver lived because he was a Muslim.
 
Yet that is not deemed outrageous behavior; while peeing on a few dead bodies is regarded as a war crime - punishable to the fullest extent of US and international law.
 
Go figure.
 
So are we to believe that somehow, this is why the Taliban fight even harder? Is this the reason they are in a war with us, because we urinate upon them after they are dead?
 
Should we believe that the Taliban didn’t really hate us, until THIS happened? That this is the last straw; and that now they are REALLY mad at us? Apparently so.
 
Anyone who thinks that hasn’t been paying attention the last 11 years. The truth is, the Taliban routinely behead live people, and then dance around the bloody head in barbaric celebration; a lesson to their enemies. It actually has a positive effect on their moral.
 
And did they not dance in the streets of Kabul after 9/11? - symbolically urinating upon our dead.
 
Not surprisingly, the State Department's public reaction to this incident almost laughable; if it wern't so contemptible. To be clear, the Taliban are not soldiers recognized under the Geneva or any other conventions; urinating on their corpses violated no treaty or international law. 
 
Any damage to so-called negotiations with the Taliban should be welcomed by rational observers, since, under all circumstances preceding this incident, there was no basis for peace with the Taliban; for it THEIR behavior and their existence are intolerable. 
 
Ironically, in the insane world of today’s liberal, largely-leftist run media, crapping on a cop car (while demanding bigger government) is a "social" statement, but urinating over the dead carcass of people that were trying TO KILL YOU is some kind of horrible event.
 
Again; go figure.

These Neville Chamberlains of the world are among its most dangerous citizens. If they were satisfied with hiding their heads in the sand, their stupidity would matter little. But when they take it upon themselves to force their stupidity on everyone else, it is here when their "Good Intentions" become dangerous.
 
Indeed, in what war, other than her battle to socialize America, has Hiillary Clinton ever served? What military experience has Leon Panetta? - other than fighting to defund the Pentagon, and undermine US global fighting readiness; on behalf of his beloved Comander in Sneak, Barack Obama, who has never even fired so much as a B-B gun in anger; or even pitched a backyard pup tent.
 
Yet these despicable holy-than-thou liberals  so very piously and vindicatively are bound and deternimed to ruin the lives of four, battle-hardened marines; who have risked their lives for the very country, who's "leaders' now seek to hang them with a stigma that will follow them for the rest of their lives.
 
These wretched liberals are so consumed with hate, that to them, hating is all that matters. Get even whenever you can. Mercy and forgiveness are just not within their vocabulary.
 
May God have mercy on their immortal souls.
www.keenobserver.blogtownhall.com
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Crisis of Stupidity

 

(QUOTE)..."No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public"... H.L. Mencken, circa 1935

(QUOTE) ..."We have nothing to fear except stupidity itself" (author unknown)

Face it America; everywhere one turns: We are facing a crisis of stupidity.

Take science for example; and the astounding ignorance displayed by most Americans - lacking even in a rudimentary understanding of 7th grade scientific principles; which were once taught back before our US educational system became "liberalized."

Which is why the EPA is running roughshod over US power plants and refineries - destroying jobs - skyrocketing the cost of fuel and electricity; with Barack Obama openly applauding the travesty; and with nary a peep of protest from the oh-so-gulible, dumbed-down American public.

In a recent news story released on "CNN Online:"

(Quote)..."Environmental activists are applauding the EPA for releasing greenhouse gas emissions data for large polluters through a new, consumer-friendly web platform, to help Americans work together to develop innovative ways to reduce climate pollution." (unquote)

Climate pollution?

The report continued: "The public availability of this data means that Americans now, for the first time, have access to accurate information about the heat-trapping greenhouse gases emitted by large industrial sources in their communities."

"Heat-trapping greenhouse gasses?"

Basically, this report is telling the public to bend over, because we're all about to be tatooed bigtime by even HIGHER gasoline and utility costs by mid-decade - all in the name of stopping "climate pollution" and "heat trapping green house gasses."

What utter nonsense!

For one thing, if carbon dioxide is so damm polluting, then why do we allow it to be dissolved in ours and our children's carbonated drinks? Ever try drinking a flat can of soda pop?

And why do we pack perishable goods in dry (CO2) ice? To poison someone? - or to get it shipped there before decaying.

Yet 99% of Americans NEVER stop to think for a second about the huge, non-sensical disconnect between what the media and the EPA keep telling them, versus basic, common sense, elementary SCIENCE!

How hopelessly stupid can you get?

And then there's that thing called "gravity." We've all heard about it, right?

Now using molecular weight (mw) as a benchmark, let's analyze the three main "greenhouse gasses" - carbon dioxide (mw 44), water vapor H2O (mw 18) and nitrogen (mw 28).

Ergo, carbon dioxide, being by far the HEAVIEST of all earth's gasses; then how can it possibly rise HIGH into the atmosphere and (like a greenhouse) trap heat? - thereby changing the climate.

It cannot! There is no possible evidence that anthropogenic (human-induced) global warming even exists; for if it did, it would mean that Newton's Law of Gravity would no longer apply!

Just recall all those nice, swirly-blue pictures of Mother Earth that the lunar astronuats used to transmit back home. Remember how nice and pretty our planet looks from afar? - because of its atmosphere.

Now think about. As our blue planet spins rapidly about in its elliptical orbit around the sun, why is it that "the atmosphere" travels right along with it?

Gee, could it be (duh) because of the force (attraction)  of gravity? U betcha!

 

And while were on the subject (of gravity) lets move to yet another raging controversy; the supposed contamination of our drinking water because of "fracking."

Again the EPA and environmentalists are hell-bent to shut down all drilling for US shale oil and natural gas, until it can be proven "absolutely safe."

And AGAIN, millions of potential jobs could never materialize, because most US citizens are so dumbed down about basic science that they've ALREADY become brainwashed that "greedy gas and oil companies wanna destroy our precious drinking water, in the name of corporate greed."

Indeed; pick up any US newspaper; or tun on any news channel, and invariably, one can find stories aplenty about some city, state, township, county, etc., who wants to ban fracking "until it can be proven absolutely safe." 

Okay dummies; here's your proof:

When drilling for water, one goes anywhere from 50-300 feet down before hitting the water table. Seldom is water found much lower.

Now what about fracking?

Given that natural gas and oil shale lie anywhere from 4,000 to 6,000 feet below the surface, what happens when water, sand and chemicals are forced (at high-pressure) through a horizontal drill bit? - thereby fracturing the rock and releasing the mineral wealth that is so desired.

Therefore, how could it be even remotely possible for any of these so called "contaminates" to flow UPWARD 4000 feet, and poison someone's well/water supply?

Again dumbbells: IT CANNOT! The law of gravity can never be repealed!

Nevertheless, the Left (environmentalists, Obama, EPA, the media, etc.) seem to have it their way, using safety (clean water/air) or climate change as a premise to control our lives, our wallets, our jobs; and inevitably, destroy our cherished American way of life.

After all, with no jobs, and our money sapped away helplessly on exorbitant gasoline and fuel costs, how long before the US economy becomes strangled?

How long before we are all bled dry of our wealth, and become ever-more dependent on an ever-larger, all-encompassing federal government?

And whether you realize it fellow citizens; that's their plan. And they'll continue to get away with it, simply because they think were stupid.

It's all so elementary.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Barack Obama: the Audacity of Arrogance

 

Is Barack Obama really the Messiah?

 

Why not consult CBS's "60 Minutes" production staff? -who periodically favor us with up-close interviews, with our beloved, narcissistic, anti-President; who never met a mirror he didn't like.

 

In their recent interview with Barack Obama, our Commander-in-Sneak made a truly outrageous, disconnected-from-reality remark - showing the scary depths to which his self-obsession has grown:

 

According to a transcript posted on the "60 Minutes Overtime," Obama said he would hold his accomplishments (so far as president) with those of Lyndon B. Johnson, Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln.

 

(QUOTE)..."I would put our legislative and foreign policy accomplishments in our first two years against any president, with the possible exceptions of Johnson, F.D.R., and Lincoln, just in terms of what we've gotten done in modern history," Obama told CBS's Steve Kroft.

 

So when do we start the jackhammers at Mount Rushmore?


But even more incredible: Obama made the statement with a straight face - revealing the depths of his massive, self-adoring ego. A man who believes he's already a legend in his own mind.  

 

But it's not just the fact that Obama puts himself in the same sentence with people like Lincoln. 

 

It's not just the fact that he considers the disastrous presidency of LBJ a success. 

 

It's that Obama is so incredibly audacious as to say his miserable first term was imminently more successful than that of Calvin Coolidge - who ushered in the Roaring 20s; or more successful than Ronald Reagan, who ushered in the largest peacetime expansion of our economy in history; and more successful than Thomas Jefferson, who doubled the size of the country with the Louisiana Purchase; even more successful than James K. Polk who managed in just 4 years to take us to a continental Republic - from sea to shining sea; or for that matter, more successful than George Washington himself.

 

But of course, Obamacare is a MUCH bigger deal than that!

 

Indeed, self-obsession is one thing. 

 

But when it gets to the point where you can conclude you are a greater president than George Washington, does this not reveal Obama's subconscious disdain for the very history and principles on which this nation was founded?

 

Not surprisingly, Obama's four choices are very telling: He clearly puts "black" first, and America second.

 

His aforementioned four presidents did more for blacks than any others.

 

Lincoln freed the slaves (while the Democrats fought to keep slavery), FDR’s New Deal laid all the groundwork for the Welfare State, LBJ’s Great Society began transfers of trillions of dollars of blacks over the past few decades (which cemented blacks as a permanent dependent underclass), and Obama has accelerated the deluge of taxpayer funds toward wealth distribution to the "disadvantaged."

 

Nothing else makes sense in that list of four names.

 

That said, is Obama any different from your typical Washington DC progressive/liberal?

 

Are they all not delusional about what big government can and should do? - regarding its role in our everyday lives.

Face it America: we are in the fight of our lives; with liberal, self-serving politicians - having the audacity to claim that they have control over our land, our laws; and even our God.

The American electorate has made a number of bad mistakes, but electing Obama takes the WORST WINNER award. And it probably will for many administrations to come.

It's not only disgusting but absolutely frightening to realize how easily the majority of voters were fooled into putting a person of Obama's character in the White House.

Barack Obama is - by any measurable standard - the worst president in US history; not even Jimmy Carter is a close second; which is what happens when someone of liberal intellect, with zero experience and a severe case of narcissism takes the keys.

There are but two words that describe his administration: delusional arrogance.

God save the republic.

 

 

www.keenobsserver.blogtownhall.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Voter Fraud: Let the Punishment Fit the Crime

QUESTION: what's shaping up to be the biggest issue in the general election of 2012?
 
The economy? Unemployment? Immigration reform? Repealing Obamacare? What to do about Iran?
 
Or should it be, what to do about voter fraud?
 
But here is perhaps the best indicator of all: The NAACP, the Obama administration's Department of Justice, and the democrat party in general, are all up in arms about the 21 states that have/are introducing new Voter ID laws.
 
Take for example the "rules" (or lack thereof) for voting in the New Hampshire GOP primary; there is NO voter ID required!
 
Which of course means, that if you're some died-in-the-wool Ron Paul fanatic, one could have merrily gone about the state, and voted early and often for the distinguished "Dr. Paul", who finished a strong second in a blaze of glory; but was it voter fraud?
 
Of course we'll never know; because Americans just shrug off the thought, sweeping it under their "mental rugs" - not wanting to admit to themselves that the entire US electoral process might be so blatantly corrupted, it may never be resolved; as long as each state is in charge of its own elections.
 
Or what about what happened in the Iowa caucus? Did not Rick Santorum actually defeat Romney by 12 votes? - given the fact that the VERY LAST rural Iowa precinct "accidentally" reported 20 votes too many for Romney.
 
Yeh; those darn miscounts. They have a habit of popping up in every close, important election; or so it seems.
 
And then there's the now-famous story about "the improbable" Obama upset in the previous Iowa primary:
 
On the morning of the 2008 Iowas caucus, Hilliary Clinton was far ahead in every poll - until the out -of-state busloads of Obama "supporters" rolled in.
 
Needing no ID to vote, by the night of the caucus, there were reports statewide of "boisterous groups," who had descended upon the caucus locations - waving signs wildly, shouting down Hillary supporters, badgering people into corners, and even bullying people in wheel chairs...hanging around the parking lots and entrances.
 
ACORN had arrived; even going so far as to locking doors from the inside - refusing to admit anyone "who did not look like an Obama supporter."

And gee whillikers - what a surprise! Reported the next day in the Des Moines Register..."OBAMA WINS BIG UPSET IN PRIMARY".
 
Sure he won, courtesy of bussed-in nearby Illinois ACORN  "volunteers". This is voter fraud on steroids! And Obama was their lawyer and trainer back during his days as a 'Community Organizer.'

But even worse...the actual details of the thuggery were not brought to light in many of the local papers, or TV stations around Iowa.
 
And certainly no national media outlet would pick up the story. Yet, having "won" Iowa, Obama went on to roll to the nomination - leaving a trail of voter fraud and intimidation, never before experienced in US political history.
 
Even today, remnants of Obama voter fraud in the 2008 Indiana election stink like fish carcasses rotting in the sun:
 
Seems that 150 of the 534 signatures in St. Joseph count were FORGED. Yet democrats say incidents of voter fraud "remain rare" - maintaining that measures by republicans to guard against voter fraud are "racist plots to disenfranchise minority voters."
 
Sure they are. Jim Crow, and all that. Another form of a poll tax, they say.
 
Even Artur Davis, a former Alabama black democrat House rep., claims voter fraud is rampant in many black districts, like his in Alabama - claiming (quote)..."There is the wholesale manufacturing of absentee ballots. Voting in the names of the dead, the non-existent, and the mentally impaired cancels out the legitimate votes of those exercising their rights."
 
But do voter ID laws actually hinder so-called "minority" voting? The facts say otherwise.

In Georgia, black voter turnout for the midterm election in 2006 was 42.9 percent. After Georgia passed photo ID, black turnout in the 2010 midterm rose to 50.4 percent. Black turnout also rose in Indiana and Mississippi after photo IDs were required.

In the Illinois gubernatorial election in 1982, 100,000 votes cast in Chicago - 10 percent of the total - were fraudulent, the U.S. attorney there estimated.

Fraud of the magnitude which swings elections typically combines absentee ballot fraud and voter registration fraud. At least 55 employees or associates of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now have been convicted of registration fraud in 11 states, says Matthew Vadum of the Capital Research Center, who's written a book about ACORN.

In Illinois, of 1.3 million new registrations ACORN turned in in 2008, election officials rejected 400,000.

Now think about this fellow citizens: if voter fraud wasn’t real, would Eric Holder and "his people" be working so hard, trying to keep the Republicans from stopping it?

In 2011 alone there have been investigations, indictments or convictions for vote fraud in California, Texas, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Indiana, Ohio, Georgia, North Carolina and Maryland. And in all but one case, the alleged fraudsters were Democrats.

But who can blame them? After all, is not politics akin to war? And if the enemy is too chicken to stop one's blatant agression against the rules, then why not just plow over them? - and thereby, keep winning the battles.

Indeed, probably no issue ticks off legitimate voters more than voter fraud, because it points out the cowardice, stupidity, and spinelessness of elected Republicans.

All across America (through the years) the GOP has lost countless US Senate and Congressional seats (and who knows how many other elections) due to voter fraud.

Yet, they do nothing - refusing to defend their OWN political interests. How pitiful can you get? Can it get any more pitiful than refusing to defend oneself?

And as a result, we are NOT getting the government we deserve, because of chicken-hearted GOP incumbents - afraid of being called "racists."
Voter fraud is indeed real; and we'll see it in all it’s glory in the general election of 2012, unless Republicans win every office in a landslide.
 
Voter fraud should be treated as the treasonous act it is; a direct attack on the foundations of this formerly great nation.
 
Let it be punished accordingly.
 

 



 

 

 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

It's Not Easy "Being Green"

 (scroll down)
Imagine what America would have done, had the Alaskan pipeline not been constructed:
 
Not only has Prudhoe Bay provided America with 20 billion barrels of highly-refinable domestic crude, the 1974-1977 project created some 200,000, high-paying jobs; at a time when the USA was clenched in the jaws of searing, OPEC-induced recession; when gasoline more than doubled in price - hovering around 69 cents per gallon.
 
After the pipeline opened in 1977, gas prices plunged to .49 gallon; and seemingly overnight, the American economy recovered with an incredible upward bouce; as car sales and consumer confidence came back with a pent-up fury- riding on a wave of low energy prices.
 
Interestingly, BEFORE the Alaskan Pipeline became reality, most "experts" claimed  that drilling in the Prudhoe Bay region would not even produce the nearly 450 million total barrels required to make the project profitable.
 
Then environmentalists tried every possible angle to scuttle the project - claiming all the caribou herds would be decimated; that they would be unable to "birth their calves." 
 
Since then we know the real story: The Alaskan pipeline has kept US gasoline prices lower than they would have been for 35 years -making  that state the wealthiest (per capita) of all the entire fifty.
 
Obviously, one of the major factors that provide DOWNWARD pressure on fuel prices is efficient movement of oil; and pipelines have proven to be the cheapest, if not the safest.
 
But now, in an eerie sort of "energy deja vu", the langouring, trans-Canada  Keystone pipeline has again come under the fire of environmenmtals - claiming it might leak toxic bitumen crude oil; thereby poisoning all the acquifers that lie below its 1700 mile path.
 
Sure. Just like all those dead baby reindeer that never did materialize.
 
Despite their lame claim that US acquifers would be irrevocably poisoned, is the fact that there are already over 2,000 plus pipelines that criss-cross North America, in a spider web-like maze - carrying natural gas, oil and ethylene to markets and refineries everywhere, thereby keeping US energy prices at their most efficient levels.
 
So what's the Obama administration's position on building Keystone? - a project that would create high paying, permanent energy jobs, PLUS reduce our dependency on OPEC?
 
You guessed it: Obama wants more "environmental studies." 
 
But long before Keystone came along, the Obama administration was continuing its mindless ban on offshore drilling, in favor of offshore wind farms; this at a time when gasoline threatens to reach $5/gallon; an economic nightmare the American public might see develop during an Obama second term.
 
And why NOT five bucks?
 
Did not gas prices soar over 4 dollars a gallon in 2008? Yet, the dumbed-down US public said nothing - meekly accepting the standard explanation that it was because of the "greed of big oil."
 
And for how much longer do we Americans fall for that obligatory lie..."we can't drill our way out?" Or that..."It would take at least ten years before it affected gas prices."
 
Of course, most Americans are just too plain obtuse to discern that it's basic economics 101: supply and demand; as leftist democrats block all attempts to open up new US oil fields with the fervor of religious missionaries.
 
But why do Obama and the democrats hate oil (fossil fuels) so passionately? Why do they go to extremes to block domestic exploration, leasing and drilling? - and now fracking for natural gas - always saying.." they're in favor of it... but NOT UNTIL its proven to be absolutely safe."
 
But what in life is absolutely safe?
 
Should we ban flying because of airline crashes? Or cars? Or what about crossing a busy street? From that perspective, it could be argued that jaywalking is a felony; or let's ban mountain-climbing altogether, until it can be made absolutely SAFE.
 
But the real truth lies in what no liberal will ever admit:
 
To hamper all US energy production portends energy shortages in the US ; and less US energy means higher prices; with no healthy American economy. And no healthy economy means the death of capitalism: i.e. no wealth; and no wealth means no property. No property means no liberty. - portending government dependency. Which means bigger government; which means NO LIBERTY.
 
Got it? Is it not just a matter of time befrore we’re no longer a free market economy?- as creeping socialism takes hold, via the democrats' ability to strangle the economy through permanently high energy prices.
 
It's as simple as that.
 
Think about it: America has enough domestic energy reserverves to power itself for the next 500 years.
 
In 1972, the United States paid out $4 billion for oil imports, an amount equal to 1.2 percent of our defense budget (at that time).
 
In 2007, we paid $342 billion, and this year we'll pay over $600 billion; which is more than 130 percent of our current budget for national defense.
 
Over the same period, Saudi oil revenues have grown from $2.7 billion in 1972 to $240 billion in 2007, and this year are likely to exceed $400 billion; with much of that money  being used to fund an international network of radical Wahhabi organizations; plus madrassas (schools) devoted to spreading terrorist ideology.
 
Meanwhile, our Iranian friends are using their share of the "take" to fund its nuclear weapons program, not to mention terrorist groups like Hezbollah (Lebanon) and Hamas in the Gaza Strip.
 
Furthermore, our oil exports are bankrolling the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) - the cartel that dominates and manipulates the global oil market.
 
And now, with China and India industrializing, world demand for fuel is going up. And who is best positioned to exploit this new demand? - thereby prompting even more painful price hikes - going well beyond the 100 percent increase we've already endured over the past three years.
 
In short, we are financing an economic war against ourselves - paying the enemy more than we are paying our own military.
 
Even worse, this oil/blood money also empowers OPEC to lobby members of Congress, to keep this self-destructive plunge toward US energy suicide PERMANENTLY in place; despite the fact that recent discoveries place the US as having more oil reserves than Saudi Arabia, Russia and Iran COMBINED.
 
Hidden 1,000 feet beneath the surface of the Rocky Mountains and four western states, lies the largest untapped oil reserve in the world; more than 2 TRILLION barrels; the Bakken reserve.
 
On August 8, 2005 President Bush mandated its extraction. But after the three and a half years that followed of higher oil prices, none had yet been extracted; until now, with the advent of horizontal drilling and fracking.
 
And even with this motherload of oil, we're still fighting over off-shore drilling?
 
Ironically (thankfully) these huge new discoveries in the lower 48 are the result of good ol' USA ingenuity; as American oil companies developed the amazing geological marvels of finding/extracting formerly rock-bound oil and gas; something that is curently causing the Obama administration to see RED.
 
The government is, increasingly, the enemy.
 
Imagine the millions of high-paying energy jobs: the wealth, the independence, and cutting off of the the OPEC jihad-snake at the head. There is no downside. We could easily extract that oil with minimum impact "to the trees" - safely and efficiently.
 
And why do you think the Left are brainwashing our children with all their mind-altering "green" propaganda? Going green, cleaning green, talking green, dressing green, shopping green.

Even the Muppets talk of how ..."it's not easy being green."
 
As early as the 1960's, Ayn Rand warned: (quote)..."Ecologists predict universal doom; and demand totalitarian power on the basis of arbitrary hypothesis, which sets back the possibility of such a science for centuries."
 
"Their ecology disgraces science. It is a political and publicity movement....They have no right to impose their 'wisdom' by force on the rest of mankind. Those who agreed with them would be saved; those who didn't would perish....No discovery, no concept, no fact can give any individual or group the power to enforce their conclusion on others."
 
(end quote)
 
The green movement wants to "eliminate industry and labor-saving devices" for our own good. And if the standard of living  declines, that's a positive: we must preserve nature.
 
It's all about being made to feel guilty. To the Left, "Anyone who is against nature is against man, against life, against reason."
 
Yes indeed America; it's high time the country "went green." There is (at todays' oil prices) no less than 15 trillion dollars worth of oil wealth, buried below us - ready for the harvesting. A bounty enough to pay off our national debt; and restore prosperity as never before.
 
A new "energy morning" lies at hand for our country.
 
America, America. God shed his grace on thee.
www.keenobserver.blogtownhall.com
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"While Good Men Do Nothing"

 
Throughout western history, nations turned themselves (unwittingly) over to tyrants; who'd convinced the citizenry that it was only THEY who could rescue the people from desolation; while scapegoating the "status quo" for the problems at hand.
 
Their usual modus operandi: sow discord throughout the ranks - actually fomenting revolution; and THEN come forward - presenting themselves as "saviors."
 
Sound familiar? Do not the biographies of Lenin, Mussolini, Mao and Hitler read as such?
 
Now behold the great Barack Obama; perhaps no better scape-goater has ever existed in all American political history.
 
- Obama scapegoated health insurance execs - eventually leading to the passing of the tyrannical Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act
 
- Obama scapegoated BP for the Deepwater Horizon disaster - enabling him to enact his tyrannical drilling moratorium
 
- Obama scapegoated "Wall Street - leading to the passage of the tyrannical Dodd-Frank law; whereby banks and lenders are subject to incredible (and strangling) over-regulation
 
Which of course leads us to yet another step toward tyranny; where Dodd-Frank mandates that a so-called "Consumer Protection Agency" be put into "action."
 
And when it came to appointing a head for said agency - which was set up to NOT be answerable to Congress - Comrade Obama wasn't about to be denied: he "recess-appointed" Richard Cordray (former Ohio AG) as its first boss.
 
Justifying his rebellious, extra-constutional (and illegal) actions, said Mr. Obama defiantly...“I refuse to take ‘no’ for an answer"...adding, “I am not going to stand by while a minority in the Senate puts party ideology ahead of the people we were elected to serve.”
 
Sieg Heil! Our sacred Fuhrer has spoken.
 
Obama will not let a minor thing like the Constitution or Congress stand in his way!
 
Now recall another famous quote, by the immortal Edmund Burke...who once said: "All that is necessary for evil to triumph is that good men do nothing." 
 
So what's it gonna be fellow citizens? Do we allow Obama to continue on his dictatorial path, while pretending nothing extraordinary is taking place?
 
Apparently so.
 
Obama has defied federal court orders. He ignores Congress - treating the Constitution as if were bird cage liner; all the while, openly daring someone to stand in his way.
 
Arizona passes an immigration law. Obama finds a federal judge to overturn it.
 
States - controlled by GOP legislatures - pass voter ID laws. Obama sends in Eric Holder and the Justice Department to overrule them.
 
Obama has sicced his tyrannical EPA on all coal-fired power plants - shutting down many - portending the tripling of electric rates by 2014.
 
Obama has ordered his TSA union bullies to shake down grandmas and kids; yet allow Muslim-garbed passengers to breeze through, that they not be "profiled."
 
Had eneough? Do we not all awake everyday - only to discover some new demand (or oppressive measure) from this unfeeling, Machiavellian man; who we stupidly elected as OUR president!
 
Obama claims to be a Christian. But has he ever exhibited any morality in the sneaky things he does; or in the defiant way he executes his office?.
 
Now think of this: in the last few months, Obama has been granted "emergency powers" to lock up anyone in this country without just cause, for as long as he feel necessary.
 
He routinely bypasses congress and puts "czars" in charge of made up government entities that are NOT answerable to anyone but him.
 
And whether you are Democrat, Republican, or Independent, this should greatly concern YOU.
 
Obama's Department of Homeland Security has been conducting "drills" in front of social security centers, with ARMED MEN asking for ID. They have teams roaming America's highways "looking for terrorists."
 
Is this the America we all remember? Is this how things are done here? Or is it more reminiscent of late 1930's Germany?
 
Whether you are a liberal or conservative, don't you agree this should be stopped? Where does it end? Get off the computer; get up off the couch, throw aside the video game; and look around.
 
Your country is being taken from you, a little at a time; and by the time you realize that it's being done, it may be too late.
 
So whatever happened to that TRANSPARENT government promised by Obama in the elections of 2008? Ironically, Obama has turned out to be the sneakiest, snakiest, least-transparent, most-corrupt president in US history.
 
Yet he goes about undeterred, as good men do nothing.

 

www.keenobserver.blogtowwnhall.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Will Romney Reprise Goldwater in '64?

 
Spring, 1964: The Republican primary has "boiled down" to two headstrong, irrepressible candidates...Nelson Rockefeller and Barry Goldwater.
 
But the more conservative wing of the GOP was re-emerging under the banner of the fiery Senator from Arizona. On the eve of the Oregon primary, Barry Goldwater seemed unbeatable.
 
Nevertheless, Mr. Rockefeller was not about to give up without a fight!
 
Displaying his usual charm and the fondness for pressing the flesh (that had won him two gubernatorial races) Rockefeller campaigned tirelessly - scoring his first primary victory in Oregon.
 
Suddenly the possibility of stopping Goldwater, whose campaign had been gathering momentum and delegates at a steady pace, seemed more than ever within reach.
 
Indeed, two weeks before the last Republican primary in California, Rockefeller had forged a 3-point lead over his opponent.
 
Confident that he could win the "final" prize, Nelson pulled out all the stops in a relentless (and extremely costly) negative campaign - aimed at portraying Goldwater as a dangerous politician.

"Who do you want in the room with the H-bomb button?" asked a Rockefeller pamphlet, mailed out to over two million voters across the state.
 
Although Rockefeller's brilliant negative stroke against Goldwater would fall short (due to his late-emerging divorce scandal), the pamphlet would later give birth to the most infamous negative campaign commercial of all time: the "Daisy Commercial." 
 
In 2004,  an unending series of negative Republican 527 ads "swift-boated" John Kerry to defeat vs. George Bush junior. 
 
In 2008, Barack Obama ran endless negative TV spots -lampooning McCain's support for taxing employee health care plans.
 
And most recently, Mitt Romney's supporters vaporized Newt Gingrich's  seemingly insurmountable Iowa lead: his polls dropping from 40% to less than 20%; and all because of unrelenting negative campaign commercials - appearing non-stop on Iowa TV sets.
 
Great way to pick our politicians, eh? So is any wonder that Washington DC literally crawls with slimeball vultures? - picking the nation dry of its resources - funneling 25% of the country's GDP through Washington DC.
 
And WE are the ones who keep them there - "constituents" hoping for their share of the pie - as we prefer incumbents, who "know how to get thing done."
 
Even more ironic, voters always say they will never support a candidate who uses negative ads, because they want a REAL person to vote for, who'll "campaign on the issues."
 
Sure they do. Right.
 
Negative campaigns ads - the bane of all US elections - have become a virtual bulletproof way to gain an immediate, if not decisive advantage over one's opponent. 
 
Think about it: the so-called "average voter" could view 99 factual, positive ads; but standing in the booth- just before marking their ballot - reverberating through their mind would be that ONE negative ad that they clearly recall.
 
Exit poll surveys often reveal that undecided voters often made their decision after viewing a negative ad.
 
But why? Its because of how we - the species homo sapiens - are "wired."
 
Humans are oblivious to their SUBCONSCIOUS minds: and it's the subconscious that registers FEAR higher over every other emotion - being the reason why a negative strategy usually predominates over any other.
 
In 1964, the "Daisy" commercial still reigns the most famous negative political ad of all time- surpassing far beyond the democrats' wildest expectations:
 
It featured an innocent-looking, wide-eyed little girl in a field, counting each petal as she flicked them from a big daisy. Suddenly, a harsh voice-over interjects a reverse "military"
countdown..."5...4...3...2...1..." followed by stark footage of an explosion, and a mushroom cloud rising ominously from an atomic bomb.
 
It was designed to impugn republican Barry Goldwater as a dangerous, unstable warmonger.
 
Americans - terrified over the possibility of Goldwater's proclivity to employ nuclear weapons in the Cold War - turned out in droves to elect Lyndon Johnson; and America would never be the same; with Johnson ushering a new era of the liberal welfare state - leaving us with an intractable, permanent underclass, that may NEVER go away!
 
And all because of ONE stark, horribly-effective negative TV ad.
 
Even more recently, it would be a negative ad camapign that again would change the destiny of the country - allowing Harry Reid to keep his majority leadership in the present-day US Senate.
Of course we all remember Reid's 'impossible' victory: just scare the Nevada voters, using vicious attack ads; then sit back and laugh your way to re-election!
 
After starting out, down 40-60 to Sharron Angle, Reid spent a mind-boggling 25 million dollars on negative campaign TV comercials - much of it union-funded-  painting Angle as a frightening, right-wing extremist; who was bound and determined to privatize social security, abolish the Dept. of Eduction; and who'd spoken of re-establishing Prohibition in Nevada.
 
And what about California's beloved Barb Boxer, that radical environmental leftist?
 
After her rabid, anti-business agenda had chased 1.3 million California lobs to neighboring states, she spends 15 million dollars on negative TV commercials, reminding voters that..."As CEO of Hewlett Packard, Carly Fiorina downsized her company by 30,000 employees, and shipped these jobs to China!''
 
Sure it was the "pot calling the kettle black," but despite her HORRIFIC senate record, Boxer's fear tactics worked; with Fiorina losing by a 47-53% margin.
 
And unbeknownst to GOP primary voters, there lies a treasure trove of ready-made anti-Mitt Romney negative TV commercials - left over from his 1994 race versus Ted Kennedy; where Kennedy operatives brilliantly dug up "everyday people" Romney had fired as a CEO in the private sector.
 
Now imagine these ads in the hands of Obama handlers, with a billion dollars worth of media ad buys - making Romney appear cruel and heartless; while at the same time in voters' minds, Obama coming off as "more reasonable"...more caring; ergo, the preferable alternative.
 
That's right all you moron Republican voters: go ahead, pick Romney because "he has CEO business experience," and because he's "more electable." Probably no time in recent political history - not since Goldwater in '64 - has any GOP candidate ever been set up for such a mighty fall.
 
The search for the Romney alternative goes on. Barack Obama is waiting in the wings, eager to get on with his second term; and COMPLETE his fundamental transformation of the United States.
 
The very survival of our constitutional republic hangs in the balance.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Romney's Skeletons Remain Buried

 
From the rumour department:
 
It has ben said by many that, way back then, Ted Kennedy and Mitt Romney were best buddies in Massachusetts. In fact, so jealous became Romney of Teddy''s senate seat, the Mitter decided to run against him in 1994 - but lost badly, very bad in fact!
 
Then a sulking Mitt Romney - licking his wounds - left the state to "go West" - salvaging the Salt Lake City Olympics.
 
When Romney returned to run for governor in 2002, he had to go to court to "prove" that he lived (sort of) in Belmont, Mass., outside of Boston to prove "residency."
 
Then, after a couple of years playing governor in the Mass. state house, Romney left again to campaign for the presidency - spending two thirds of his time out of state in 2006.
 
Mitt then sells his house in Belmont, and then moves to the important primary state of New Hampshire (at his estate on Lake Winnipesaukee); a fact that has remained largely hidden from the cold and calculating Romney; who's "aw shucks" all-American image could not be further from the truth from where his real ambitions lie: Romney is a man who wants POWER; and will spin his life story to the utmost degree to get it!
 
In the Republican debates, weathervane Mitt pretends that his ties to Massachusetts are "tenuous,"  and that he's a patriotic conservative who loves his country:
 
But Mitt never talks about his own years at Harvard (after graduating from Brigham Young University in Provo, Utah); where he earned joint degrees from the Harvard Law School and the Business School; yet this liberal wolf (in conservative sheep's clothing) once accused Obama of hanging out in the “Harvard faculty lounge.”
 
Mitt’s greatest achievement as governor? Of course, that ever-conservative Massachusetts health care system (which passed because of Ted Kennedy’s strong support; with only two dissenting votes in the state legislature). 
 
Correctly, Republicans see it as a stalking horse for “Obamacare.” But teflon Mitt innocently claims "it was right for our quirky state but not for the nation."
 
But he has yet to explain WHY.
 
Now recall how Obama has been pilloried for covering up his mysterious and sinister backround. His college transcripts, his lawyer files, and his records as an Illinois state senator- all unavailable.
 
Obviously, Obama has a lot to hide.
 
And even more obviously, so does Mitt Romney:
 
EXAMPLE: why did Mitt Romney spend nearly $100,000 in state funds to replace computers in his office at the end of his term as governor of Massachusetts in 2007? - as part of an unprecedented effort to keep his records secret; which Reuters has reported.
 
The move - during the final weeks of Romney's administration - was "legal but unusual" for a departing governor, according to Massachusetts officials. In other words, this smells to high heaven.
 
Curiously, Romney's purge (of the records) was made a few months before Romney launched his unsuccessful campaign for the Republican presidential nomination in 2008; a campaign he would lose to RINO John McCain.
 
We've all heard the axiom..."it's not the crime, but the cover-up that makes it worse..." So what was Mitt Romney's motive behind destroying ALL electronic evidence of his tenure in ofice? 
 
When Romney left the governorship of Massachusetts, he instructed 11 of his aides to buy the hard drives of their state-issued computers to keep for themselves. Also before he left office, the governor's staff had emails and other electronic communications by Romney's administration scrubbed from state servers, state officials say.
 
But precisely WHAT  information was erased is unclear.
 
Of course, Romney claims (falsely) that "My paper records of my governorship are not subject to public disclosure".
 
As Massachusetts governor, Romney worked with a Democrat-led state house to close a budget shortfall - by raising fees for everything - and signed a healthcare overhaul that required nearly all state residents to buy insurance or face penalties.
 
Sound familar?
 
The Massachusetts healthcare law became a model for Barack Obama's nationwide healthcare programme, enacted into law in 2010.
 
As a presidential candidate, however, Romney plays Pontius Pilate: washing his hands; while criticisizing Obama's plan as an "overreach" by the federal government.
.
Even more curiously, Massachusetts state officials have acknowledged that before leaving office, Romney asked state archives officials for "permission" to destroy certain paper records. But it remains unclear whether his office notified anyone from the state before destroying such records.
 
Officials have said the details of Romney's request to remove paper records, such as what specific documents he wanted to destroy, could be made public only in response to a request under the state's freedom of information law. Reuters has filed such a request.
 
Shades of Tricky Dicky Nixon abound. Erasing e-mails. Removing files. Removing paper records. Ladies and gentlemen, are we about to elect a yet another, sneaky, CEO-type weasel, who'll do anything to beccome president? Have we not been down that road too many times before?
 
And is this not yet another example of ..."If it seems too good to be true, it probably is."
 
So here we have Mitt Romney, the candidate from central casting; with the all-American family; who turned around the Olympics; who knows how to create jobs; and most importantly...has perfect presidential hair.
 
Oh please!
 
The REAL truth about Romney has yet to be revealed. Let the vetting process begin.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123456789105859Next »