Attention to all ye faithful environmentalists and global warming proponents...it's time for your science quiz:

Question #1:How is it possible that the ice-cap is melting at an accelerated rate at the North Pole, (implying global warming within the Arctic Circle); yet the United States-- whose latitude is located not that many degrees further south in the Temperate Zone--has experienced its coldest Oct-Nov-Dec since 1976? So does this imply that we are now in firm acknowledgment of regional global warming?

Question number 2: If it's a fact that violent storms destroyed billions of dollars of property this year, and even more powerful storms will also destroy billions of dollars of property in future years, how was it that there were no major hurricanes in the western hemisphere in 2007? Does this imply global warming is only in effect some years? So which is duh answer?

Question #3: Why have the proponents of global warming changed their tune, and now denote the "problem" as 'climate change'. This is profoundly confusing to people who are science-based in their outlook towards weather. So which is it?

Yes boys and girls; Santa may not be coming this year for the Global-Warmers .Many regions of America are seeing pre-Christmas temperatures that haven't been witnessed in 25 years, when on December 24, 1983, nighttime lows of -23 were recorded in many midwestern cities. So is this deja' vu' all over again?

And a Sacramento California TV station has reported that Siberia had a recent -82 below zero, one the coldest tempatures ever since the region began keeping records. The northernmost regions of Russia are experiencing dangerously cold temperatures, which have caused many weather casualties; and authorities are warning Siberian factories about power cuts, as the 50-year record-low temperatures are expected to continue.

The world has never seen such freezing heat! A rare 50-year Arctic blast has hit the west coast hard, including southern California. Colorado is having one of the snowiest Decembers on record.

Both hemispheres of the world are reporting unusual cold and snow. Recent news headlines were all about the sudden drops in the temperatures: "California seawater readings unusually cold"..."Highways closed, motorists stranded as snow buries China"... "Bitter taste of Siberian air, heavy snow, hit parts of Canada"..."Heavy snow forecast for Cascade mountains".

And despite all this, the global warmers refuse to be confused by the facts (as usual). But as with any disinformation campaign, our wonderful media is determined to do their part to make the case. Currently, all of broadcast television is being deluged by public service ads about coal plants causing desertification, and that CO2 is somehow akin to being a poison gas. Oh if only we could bring back the good old TV era, where litter and drugs were societies' scourge, and, "a mind was a terrible thing to waste".

These unusually cold, hard weather events could be the beginning of the end of the politics behind the warming sham, because the facts do not at all support the premise that the ENTIRE earth is warming. We humans have a negligible effect on the climate...zero, zilcho, and nein! The climate is controlled by forces greater than anything we could ever produce. You could place a million earths inside our gigantic sun, whose radiant heat controls our earthly temperatures.

The scientific basis for global warming is easily refuted. And scietifically, it's not CO2 that drives the climate, but the multitude of natural variables that are constantly changing, such as ocean currents and sunspots.

For starters, the physical laws of the universe (i.e. Newton's Laws) make it impossible to have regional global warming. All weather experienced is a product of the pattern in place. There are no big mysteries. Just like any extremes, climate changes are all perfectly natural and have been ongoing for billions of years. Just remember the dinosaurs, our poor friends who became extinct when the earth suddenly began cooling 65 million years ago.

Currently, proof of global warming parallels the existence of Bigfoot; both remain mythological until proven.  The media rant of global warming is perhaps one of the greatest frauds in human and galactic history, as well as all this "going green" propaganda that came out a few years ago, and is being taught religiously in our schools.

EXAMPLE: must we really find a way to remove CO2? That would imply that all living, breathing animals and humans (that inspire oxygen and expire carbon dioxide), must all stop breathing.

But politically, 75% Americans "want something done." But what? Maybe some ancient, all wise Indian medicine man might know; but until he's located, we'll all have to try and live through the forked-tongued myths about broiling to death “before it's too late”.

 
Lets address two basic fallacies. First: does burning fossil fuel in an internal combustion engine actually warm the earth? If this actually were the case, then Los Angeles, with more gasoline vehicles per capita than anywhere, would be an inferno, and the hottest city on earth!

Second: does burning 'dirty" coal cause global warming?  But what about the 170 volcanoes that erupt periodically around the globe? In May of 1980, the Mt. St. Helens eruption tossed unknown trillions of cubic meters of sulfuric clouds (containing heavy pollutants) that were blown eastward over North America; but the summers of '80 and '81 on the continent were normal. But historically, sun-blocking volcano eruptions are linked to periods of global COOLING.

Thus, if cloud-sized, sulfur-laden volcanic emissions cause cooling, compare it to a Midwestern power plant burning high-sulfur coal. A volcano is nature's herculean-sized smokestack venting earth's core. Coal plants are blamed for warming, but basically belch a similar volcanic by-product from their stacks, illustrating doubts that coal plants can actually warm the climate.

The one basic fact about the THEORY of global warming, is that those who support it the most, understand the least about science and physics, which are based in facts. Indeed, the facts against global warming are irrefutable; but yet there is the constant political drumbeat of, "we must deal with climate change before it's too LATE". But too late for what?

Well, it's probably too late to change the minds of the current generation of the young, who have been nothing less than brainwashed by our nation's educational system about the grave 'danger'. But this generation of greenies does pose a grave political danger to the nation in the form of a hugely misguided voting bloc, that's easily led by any candidate who's policies are also green.