About Me

Name: thekeenobserver
Email: reallykeenobserver@yahoo.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Nancy Pelosi's "classroom"

Remember your old grade school classes, when the teacher - after licking her fingers - would pass out the day's lesson to the students?

 

Picture the traditional parochial school back in the old days; with Nancy Pelosi as "Sister Mary Meany," standing over her classroom of scared children (the blue-dogs) - ready to jump at her every command!
 
But that's exactly what's going on in our most humble chamber of Congress, the U.S. House of Representatives (House of Horrors would be more appropriate).

 

This is why the democrats always manage to be on the SAME page everyday. And notice how a democrat at a townhall meeting in New Jersey, or one at a townhall in Texas, each use the EXACT same phrases, and tell the same lies almost verbatim.

 

But how?

 

How could a Democrat in New Hampshire, or one in Minnesota - having been home for the last 3 weeks- all be saying the same thing (and sounding like poll parrots) if they were not receiving general talking points from Washington every morning?

 

Picture Rahm Emanuel and Pelosi in private conference last night:

(scene: Nancy Pelosi in her office, in deep thought with Rahm Emanuel)
 
Emanuel: "These stupid *%$#**!# just won't give up! What's it gonna take to subdue them? This is the first *#%!!*#* time we’ve failed to invent a good cover story!"

 

Pelosi: "Well, it's not easy, like with the stimulus, where we kept scaring them about getting laid off, and had 'em worried about rising unemployment numbers."

 

Emanuel; "Hmmm. You're right. But we should've come up with something by now. After all, we were in the same mess with cap and trade for a month, until I came up with that phrase "creating clean energy jobs."  "The suckers sure bit on that one!"

 

Pelosi: "Well Rahm, what's gonna be your big idea this time? Another crisis? Barack's under a lot of pressure from George (Soros). He says if we don't get the bill he wants passed by November, George is gonna make it real tough on him for 2012. And you know what that means."

 

Emanuel: "Yeh...I know. But I kind of like that one Barack began using a while ago...'doing nothing is NOT an option'...maybe we should just forget all the other stuff and keep pounding away with that."

 

(the conference drags out into the early AM) 

 

As we speak, Obama; Pelosi; Reid; Axelrod; Emanuel - all the big ringleaders are under huge pressure from the "big guy" - Mr. Soros!

 

In 2008, Soros played kingmaker:

 

It was George Soros - using the internet - who funneled all those hundreds of millions of dollars into the DNCC's campaign coffers, which enabled them to run zillions of negative TV campaign commercials. 

 

Result? The democrats swept not only the Whitehouse, but the other two Houses as well!

 

Sure people were unhappy with Bush in '08; but how about Congress? Could there have been THAT MANY people who were upset with their local congressman? No way!

 

The democrats won an incredible amount seats last November, and it wasn't just because of dissatisfaction; it was because of huge campaign funding; Democrats outspending Republicans by as much as 5-to 1 in some contests.

 

How does someone like Al Franken - one of the lowliest, ugliest, most graceless and evil-minded persons around - defeat a well-educated, well-spoken classy INCUMBENT like Norm Coleman, and win away his seemingly secure Senate seat?

 

ANSWER: Repetitive, negative campaign ads- and hundreds of them!

 

October 31, 2008: one week before the election - a Minnesota Quinnipiac poll had Franken far behind Coleman- 51% to 41. 


Then, the Franken smear machine switched into overdrive: The DNCC stepped in and spent 1.5 milion dollars to run unending, negative campaign commercials - ALL lies!

 

The most damaging of the Franken ads claimed..."Norm Coleman has been ranked the 4th MOST CORRUPT Senator by the watchdog group, "Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington" (CREW):

The ad continued..."Coleman has been listed near the top as one of the 20 most corrupt members of Congress."

 

But as it turned out, the whole thing was fabricated! Coleman was not on CREW's "corrupt" list, which contained only three Senators.

 

Another phony Franken ad stated..."Norm Coleman voted to give billions in tax breaks to oil companies"..."Now they're raking in record profits, and we're paying four bucks a gallon for gas!"

 

Michele Bachmann, another heavily-favored Republican from Minnesota, came within a mere 2% from being upset, after suddenly popping up on the Pelosi /Emanuel radar screen for her comments on MSNBC's "Hardball."

 

After accusing Congressional democrats of being 'un-American', Bachmann survived a razor close race that had no business even being close. Pelosi personally had come to Minnesota, and assumed control of Democrat challenger Elwyn Tinkleberg's campaign, injecting a cool 2 million in DNCC money - mostly going towards negative campaign commercials.

 

So the next time you see some arrogant democrat on TV, defiantly answering back at a roomful of shouting constituents- stop wondering why. Their minds were made up last June, when Obama first began talking about reforming health care

 

Emanuel and Pelosi have given their "constituents" (the House democrats) zero leeway: vote FOR the bill - or we work against you!

 

If they vote "nay" they will not get any money from the DNCC (democratic national campaign committee) for the 2010 midterms. This translates to very few TV commercials - the "lifeblood" of incumbency.

 

So even though one's constituents may be pleased with a "no" vote on HR 3200, any House democrat who crosses "Sister Mary Meany" Pelosi will be dealt with harshly; a whack over the head with the yardstick, plus no campaign money- and they will still be in jeopardy (from the right) with the Republican effort to win back the House.

 

Now on the other hand, for democrats voting "yes" on Obamacare (HR 3200), many political goodies shall be forthcoming:

 

- they receive millions in DNCC campaign money; which means hundreds of negative campaign commercials - usually sufficient to defeat ANY challenger

 

- they will receive a flood of earmark money for their home districts: Just think about all those FRONT PAGE stories in local newspapers, with headlines "Local Congressman Brings Home the Bacon" (works every time) .

 

- they advance rapidly up the "key committee" ladder: There are chairmanships galore to be shuffled around; and to the victors go the spoils.


NOTE: Committee chairs are the most powerful positions in Washington, outside of Speaker and Majority Leader.

 

So if you were wondering about our democratically-elected Congress...wonder no more. It's no longer up to the constituents - it's up to the power elite in Washington, who can either bribe one to the moon, or cast them off into the political landfill, where they remain buried in ignominy for daring to go against these mafia-like power brokers.

 

Government healthcare (HR 3200) will pass in the House; not because anyone really wants it, but because the democrats have bowed to their money base (George Soros). And if they dare cross him, its just like any chain of command: the big man at the top calling the shots, and all the underlings below, who must answer- or else. 

 

It's all elementary. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Saint Obama-- prodigal son of the Whitehouse--finally comes home

 

Heads I win...tails you lose.

 

Indeed, ever since Barack Obama began campaigning for president, he's had it both ways:

 

Recall Mr. Obama's "go to" line on the campaign trail; it would work every time: (quote) "As a Senator, John McCain voted with Bush 95% percent of the time...so a vote for John McCain means four more years of  GEORGE BUSH."

 

Finally, after serving as a punching bag for 2 months, McCain himself put on the gloves and began fighting back..." Barack Obama's political career was launched at the home of Bill Ayers, an avowed anti-American terrorist!"

 

At last, the foundering McCain had discovered an effective tack: he would go after candidate Obama personally, as Mr. Obama had done to him.

 

But never lacking in resourcefulness --and backed by the media-- David Axelrod (Obama's "consigliere") quickly defused McCain's charge saying..."the accusation about Ayers was "guilt by association," brazenly skirting the fact that painting McCain as another Bush was indeed, guilt by association-- and the media KNEW it, but kept their "code of silence." 

 

Obama survived, only because the press did not expose his radical roots in Chicago; and as usual, Obama had gotten it both ways.

 

And little has changed since he was sworn in as president.

 

Never in the history of the modern Whitehouse has the once-aggressive, mainstream media given a president such latitude to have it both ways:

 

EXAMPLE: After the 800 billion anti-stimulus bill was rammed through Congress, the press hailed it as if it were the next Marshall Plan: "The President's active efforts to create jobs by rebuilding our nation's infrastucture will lead the nation out of recession."

 

But the press conveniently ignored the fact that ONLY 30 billion was allocated towards the rebuild . And doing the math; we see that 30 divided by 800 = 3.7%.

 

That's right ladies 'n gents (and all you pro-Obama media types); after all the posturing by the press, and all the braggadocio from the Whitehouse, our beloved anti-president is spending only 3.7% of an astounding 800 billion (1.2 trillion when you factor the interest) on actual infrastructure.

 

And the code of silence?  The destination for the balance of the money-- thousands of new government administrative jobs to dole out Obama's new entitlement programs-- is seldom mentioned. 

 

And those proud recipients of all the Obama largess? Can you guess who they'll be voting for in the 2012 election?

 

Bottom line: Obama's anti-stimulus is the biggest vote-buying scam in American political history.

 

Chalk another one up to Obama having it both ways.

 

And what about now, as the media has become embroiled in the Obama-manufactured CIA torture controversy, and the now-cancelled photo release?

 

In a quote from a recent Whitehouse press dispatch..."President Obama's change of heart on releasing photographs documenting prisoner abuse in Iraq and Afghanistan by the American military, is a practical decision to save lives of American soldiers."

 

Another sugary press release crows..."The President's change of heart deserves our respect and support"...."Once again, Mr. Obama has demonstrated ably that he does listen to the experts."

 

Splendid-- we now have a President that can change his mind. Such candor.

 

And get out the maple syrup; the media is lathering on sweet praise for the great "Obama Epiphany," yet there's scant mention of his administration's treasonous announcement back in April, directing the Pentagon to turn over 44 graphic photographs, each depicting abuse of detainees in Afghanistan and Iraq during the Bush years.

 

This was all in conjunction with the plan to sic our brave attorney general, Eric Holder, after any of  Bush's lawyers who'd given the green light to the CIA to waterboard captured terrorists.

 

It was to be the "great Obama master plan of distraction."

 

Whether conceived by either Rahm Emanuel, James Carville, Axelrod, or Obama himself, the sheer brilliance of the plot lay within its simplicity; put Bush's CIA lawyers to the fire, while under so-called "pressure" by the ACLU to release 44 of the worst photos depicting captives held at Abu Gharib prison.

 

This was the Obama administration's grand concept of "ex post facto"...putting the previous administration on public trial in the media, while diverting  attention away from the actual business at hand-- passage of cap 'n trade, climate change, government health care, and the other radical leftist agenda of the democrats.

 

It was all so clever-- the photos would distract a "concerned" public (and the rest of the world), while letting the Obama gang in Congress get away with legislative murder.

 

But who'd a thunk the entire plot would be foiled unwittingly by the most diabolic of all the Obama characters-- our cherished Speaker of the House-- the inimitable Nancy Pee-lo-si, whose lies have ironically blown the whole shindig sky-high.

 

So now with Pelosi under fire, suddenly-- in his great, infinite wisdom-- Obama will not release the photos, and the hysteria to prosecute the Bush CIA lawyers has mysteriously died down.

 

In his Machiavellian soul, Obama was quick to grasp it was time to breakout the political fire extinguishers, and quell the whole sinister plot...all for one basic reason: he could foresee that all the furor & investigation, would eventually lead to the evidence that might crucify his beloved Speaker on a cross of prevarication-- and his most vital cog in Congress would be banished in shame.

 

And it would all be to the great disgrace of the democrats-- negative publicity that our shiny anti-president could ill-afford. 

 

So now saint Obama-- prodigal son of the Whitehouse-- has "returned to his senses," back home on the side of sanity and patriotism; and now publicly states..."I will NOT release the photos!" (play "Hail To the Chief" music)  

 

And St. Obama (never one to omit details) has seen to it that Chief of Staff (chief thug) Rahm Emanuel has privately called each of the major media, relating, "if you continue to seek Pelosi's scalp, you will face the ultimate disaster-- no more access to the Whitehouse press corps."

 

And true to having it both ways, if Mr. Obama HAD released the photos, great praise would have been forthcoming  for his "great wisdom," his "presidential  transparency," and "change" from all past administrations.

   

Some call it a "flip-flop", some call it lying, and some call it judgment.

But in any event, a new teflon president has been crowned.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »