About Me

Name: thekeenobserver
Email: reallykeenobserver@yahoo.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Unplugging talk radio- the FCC's fascist plot for censorship

 

Here are two interesting quotes from none other than Thomas Jefferson:

 

(quote) "There is an enemy somewhere endeavoring to sow discord among us: To buy off one lie is to give a premium for the invention of others."

 

(quote) "There is no vice so mean, so pitiful, so contemptible as that which permits one to tell a lie."

 

 Here is yet another --and MORE interesting-- quote from Joseph Goebbels (Hitler's fabled "communications" director):

 

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it,  people will eventually come to believe it...The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the consequences of the lie...Thus, it becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent... for the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” (circa 1936)

 

Now let's take a qoute from Barack Obama, as he directly addresses the Iranian government for the first time, after a day of violence in Iran:

 

(quote) "We call on the Iranian government to stop all violent and unjust actions against its own people. The universal rights to assembly and FREE SPEECH must be respected, and the United States stands with all who seek to exercise those rights."

 

But what does all this have to do with talk radio? Simple; Obama intends to kill freedom over the public air waves-- a right he staunchly supports in Iran. But at home? Well, that's quite another story. 

 

Obama makes noble statements projecting First Amendment rights to the Iranians; but at the same time, he launches a covert plot to crush all political dissent in America. Make no mistake. Conservative talk radio is now an endangered species.

 

On Feb 18, 2009, Obama himself stated, (quote) "I do not believe the Fairness Doctrine should be re-instated.” But it's what he DIDN"T say that portends his ominous trap.
 
Having watched Obama rise through the ranks in Illinois, he always prefers to eliminate competition whenever possible. So now, as President, why would it be any different?

 

Localism will be Obama's contrivance to rid his world of the last bastion of political dissension...Limbaugh, Hannity, and the other mainstays of conservative talk radio.

 

If Obama truly wanted "fairness" it would also apply to TV, newspapers, and news magazines. But all of these mediums are overwhelmingly liberal, serving the big-government, freedom-killing agenda of Obama and his cadre of leftists in Congress.

 

Now, with Mr. Obama's appointment of his double-talking, Harvard law school buddy, Julius Genachowski as new head of the FCC, Obama has no doubt anointed him as another star addition to the democratic liars' club-- the ability to state one thing but imply another.

 

Recently, Mr. Genachowski told  Kay B. Hutchinson-- a member of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee-- (quote) "No, Senator, I don’t support re-instatement of the Fairness Doctrine"...."I feel strongly about the First Amendment, and I don’t think the FCC should be involved in censorship of content-based limiting of political speech.”

 

Conservatives brace yourselves-- it's all a decoy; an ambush.

Genachowski's "denial" is yet another Trojan horse concealing the evil of Obammunism. His
 repudiation of the Fairness Doctrine is seen as proof positive that the FCC intends to sneak it in under the innocuous-sounding name of "localism."

 

If "right-wing" talk radio is a cancer for these liberals, localism is their form of "chemo-therapy".

 

Obama knows if censorship is disguised as something other than the Fairness Doctrine, then he can champion it without changing his position. By stating his "opposition" to the "Doctrine", Obama's leftist minions will do the dirty work-- giving Mr. Obama the appearance of being "Mr. Forthright."

 

And having taught Constitutional law, Obama knows localism cannot easily be challenged by the Supreme Court. So now, the handwriting of censorship is on the wall-- only it's been written with invisible ink:

 

POINT- Obama's continual references about how Fox News won't give him "a fair shake"

 

POINT - Obama's inference that people should not pay attention (listen) to Rush Limbaugh

 

POINT-- on the campaign trail last year, his repeated references to Sean Hanitty

 

Obama's latest big lie (through Genachowski) is akin to waving a white flag to the Republicans, but all the while he digs a tunnel to subvert them politically. Barack Obama is about fighting dirty, preferring to "clear the field" of competition (dissent) whenever possible; and lying and doublespeak have been his most effective strategems.

 

Once anyone within the Obama administration vows something they absolutely will NOT do, rest assured that it's exactly the course of action they've planned. And Genachowski is no different; as head of the FCC, he'll lie to no end to support what Obama wants-- absolute control of the mainstream media.

 

Mr. Obama is a Saul Alinsky student-- the end justifies the means; hence, the plot will be couched within his seemingly benign support for "community programming" on local radio stations. 

 

To date, Mr.Obama has been mum on localism. But his silence is the "tipoff": he'll soon coyly announce..."I support it." Obama knows better than to take on Rush Limbaugh headlong with his 22 million strong audience-- the courts wouldn’t uphold it.

 

Localism applies only to radio, and the stations/programs that are political in nature. This leaves the bulk of FM programming out of the equation.
 
However, conservative airtime is the much larger percentage of AM political commentary. Hence, Obama (and his sneaky FCC chairman) are going to try and go a different route, but achieving the same end result:

 

-The FCC will start a movement (behind the scenes) to start a “Fairness in Ownership Doctrine"- making a "case" for minorities to own radio stations, and staging it as a "community concern."

 

--The FCC will denounce those "corporate power elites" that have acquired a monopoly of talk radio outlets across the country over the last 16 years (i.e. Clear Channel & CBS). 
 
After the above "groundwork", the process of censorship will be introduced in stages through a series of Federal Communication Commission "decrees:"

 

Stage 1) an entity can only own 1-2 stations; thus, Clear Channel and CBS will be forced to sell all their radio outlets on the "cheap."

 

Stage 2) the "monopoly" break-up will result in stations being sold to minority owners at bargain prices. Obama-connected 'friends" will constitute the mainstay of the new ownership

 

Stage 3) local-broadcast "advisory boards" (ACORN) will be formed to hold radio owners responsible to uphold "opposing opinions" OR, their broadcast licences will not be renewed. (Obama will claim he has no control over what local communities do)

 

Stage 4) more diversity (localism) program will be instituted-- a requirement to provide "X" hours of local programming

 

Stage 5) leftists groups (Media Matters) will a file a blizzard of anti-localism "complaints" against all remaining conservative-owned stations

 

Stage 6) the final result-- veiled censorship. Conservative stations -- knowing they'll go broke defending all these "complaints" in court-- find it cheaper to broadcast music/sports than to keep Limbaugh, Hannity, et al. on the air

 

Obama abhors dissent; he will waste no time in placing localism into action. It'll soon be bye-bye to your favorite talk radio shows-- there will no longer be a way to hear the truth.

 

But Obama will couch it all in noble phrases, declaring: "It's about progressing to a more egalitarian society"...and..."Divisive, hateful, irresponsible speech over the public airways is unacceptable; therefore, is not protected by the First Amendment."

 

Before we know it, talk radio will vanish, and with it, our ability to speak out against Obama's bold tyranny, as he fully intends to shut down ALL political opposition... PERIOD!  

 

And once talk radio disappears, the ability to post our thoughts and opinions over the Internet will be the next freedom taken from us in the same underhanded manner.

 

Independents, Republicans, Conservatives; we must unite and publicly speak out against these egregious tactics!

 

If we choose not to oppose the assault these insidious leftists have declared upon our Constitution, then we deserve the very tyrrany they seek to impose upon us.

 

Just keep in mind this ominous reminder from the Nazi fanatic-- Joseph Goebbels..."truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”  

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The "Haunting"...why the ghost of Reagan won't let go.


Franklin Delano Roosevelt...John Fitzgerald Kennedy...Ronald Wilson Reagan.

Major political parties always outlive their individual leaders and partisans. But for party heroes, the past is never dead. So for most Republicans, Ronald Reagan's philosophy is revered as the last word in conservative theory of government.
 
But nowadays, Mr. Reagan may be TOO revered, and his sage wisdom may actually be a party flaw--the underlying reason WHY the Republicans keep getting grossly outsmarted by the political cunning of the Democrats.
 
For many on the left, it's hard to comprehend why the neo-cons deify Reagan, and act as if he were the Supreme Being incarnate. But for the right, Reagan will always considered the greatest president of the 20th century-- or better.
 
But to call his wisdom FLAWED? The Great Communicator?
 
Reagan, unlike the Pope, was not infallible. But don't try to convince the average Republican Reagan worshipper--you'll get nothing but a heated argument.
 
The pros vs. cons of the Reagan legacy abound:
 
The hostage crisis ended during the first day of his presidency, only because the Iranians didn't want credit to fall to Carter. And Mr. Reagan sold the arms that ultimately are now being used against Coalition forces in Iraq and Afghanistan.
 
And the primary claim for Reagan’s greatness—that he “won” the Cold War—seems exaggerated. The Cold War was won by every President, from Truman through Reagan, not to mention Lech Walesa and his Polish longshoremen. All contributed to the long, hard 4-decade effort of grinding down the Soviet Union from 1945 to 1985.
 
An Evil Empire does not fall in a day.
 
Reagan hugely boosted government spending. He signed every single spending bill that came across his desk-- all with a big smile on his face. He doubled the entire pre-existing national debt in a single term, while insisting all the time that revenues would grow to cover it... which they never did.
 
It was his deficit spending that boosted the economy, not so much the tax cuts.

The problem is that ANY president has an incentive to incur huge deficits to boost the economy. We give Reagan credit for the gains in the 80's economy, but when the bill came due for the debt, Reagan was out of office and it eventually grew to be another president's problem-- William Jefferson Clinton.
 
The supposedly sterling economic record of the Reagan eighties was in fact bracketed by a deep recession and a stock market crash, while the go-go years in between were fueled by record peacetime deficits that his successors labored for years to make up—contradicting nearly everything Reagan claimed to stand for before taking office.

But on the other hand:

Ronald Reagan was a beacon, not unlike Lady Liberty, standing at the gateway to a morning in America...an America that had yet to be its best.

There is the Ronald Reagan who was our President for eight years-- some fairly critical ones at that. Reagan rescued America from the destruction of Carter: a terrible economy... worldwide challenges....a diminished standing abroad... a neglected military, and a disheartened population.

His tax cutting, budget slashing, laissez-faire strategy known as Reaganomics became extremely popular as the U.S. economy recovered from the stagflation and high interest and unemployment rates brought on by the Carter administration.
 
Reagan was an expert at delegating. He didn't let himself get bogged down in the details of governing, and never tried to exceed his constitutional authority. He was skillfull at what a chief executive must be able to do: hire & fire people-- the right people--and let 'em know WHO'S BOSS.
 
He achieved his goal of a 600-ship navy. He re-established the legitimacy of American military power around the world, thwarting a Cuban invasion of Grenada.

Reagan literally scared the Iranians into releasing our hostages-- which they did the very day he was first inaugurated.
 
He shrewdly grasped the historic geo-political opportunity brought about by Mikhail Gorbachev's rise to power in the Soviet Union, which brought the final end to the Cold War. The Berlin Wall fell because of Ronald Reagan, and eastern Europe once again saw the sunlight of freedom.

Thanks to President Reagan, we got 25 consecutive years of prosperity, and the American dream was there for all Americans who were willing to WORK for it.

Mr. Reagan was a secret admirer and imitator of perhaps the greatest democrat-- John F. Kennedy-- who's model to boost defense spending, slash all taxes, and give investment tax credits to businesses would make Kennedy today seem more like a Republican right winger rather than from the party of the democrats, now made up of radical leftists who control Washington.

Finally, the Reagan revolution sought to limit constitutional government, because he understood that to achieve true liberty, government should be smaller. This was his greatest legacy-- and ironically, the remnants of this philosophy have been why the Republicans are now losing America.
 
The greatest damage by the ghost of Reagan was his legacy statement--"getting government off our backs"...and..."government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem."

But to get the government off our backs, or out of our lives? Nowadays? Sorry Republicans, that's patently absurd...impossible. Since the days of Reagan, the government now intrudes into nearly every aspect of our lives!

So wise up ye downcast Republicans, and show a little Reagan-esue resourcefulness! You must concentrate on WINNING ELECTIONS, and gaining CONTROL of THE GOVERNMENT --that's to be your true objective.

Like the old saying goes about goals-- how can you get there if you don't know where you're going? And right now, the Republicans haven't a clue. instead of focusing on controlling Washington, the GOP keeps focusing on Reagan.

Ironically they've done superbly in propping him up as a party saint; but if alive today, Ronald Reagan would be ashamed of what the party has become.
 
If we had the Gipper around today to lead us out of this mess, his reminder that it's morning in America means that for all you lost wandering Republicans souls --its time to  WAKE UP-- grasp onto the issues that will win the next election:

- wake up that our schools are indoctrinating, not educating, an issue that's there for the taking
-wake up that the media has manipulated the democrats into power, and shields their subtle tyranny from the public
-wake up and alert America about ACORN's covert damage to our elections--and ultimately-- our democracy
-wake up to the legislation authored by the democrats that congressional Republicans don't even bother TO READ
-wake up to the fact that Obama's popularity is manufactured and is not for real; people are in fear for their country
-wake up and alarm the populace about the treasonous, dangerous democratic deficit spending
-wake up to the fact that government is about to gain control of EVERY aspect of our lives, from health care, to how many miles we can drive and in what type of cars it shall be

So here are your instructions:

Get organized on the internet. Mimic the success of the Obama campaign for 2010 and 2012.

Ronald Reagan is the PAST--start focusing on the future. Wake up to who are your true leaders and motivators: Michelle Bachmann in the House, and Sarah Palin for the Senate in 2010. And Romney & Paul for 2012. It's the economy stupid. It's always the economy!

Forget about Steele and Limbaugh; they are two opposite extremes.

Go after ACORN; form CAUSE groups (Citizens Against UnAmerican Socialist Extremes) to countermand ACORN's marxist mob insurrection against our democracy.

Explain how tax cuts work, not just keep pushing them.

Attack government health care--explain how it has ruined lives and destroyed the overall integrity of the medical system in every other country that's adopted it.

Explain the economic hardship caused by the democrats' opposition to drilling, and why global warming is the biggest lie known to mankind.

Stand up for LEGAL immigration and against drivers' licenses for illegal aliens --it will only lead to eventual amnesty and granting of citizenship, and 30 million permanent votes for the democrats!

Gin up some catchy slogans for yard signs and bumper stickers:

"What have you done lately... outside of waiting by your mailbox for your Obama check?"
 
"The democrats are the party of the three L's...liberals, liars, and leeches"

And the most relevant slogan of all..." When are we GOING TO LISTEN TO RON PAUL, and start supporting the dollar?

The Republicans could try the emotional approach: "How sad it is to see how far the Presidency has fallen... from the great Ronald Reagan, to the socialist-marxist Barack Hussein Obama, who slavishly follows far left ideology and insults our allies.'

Appoint a "spokes group"--the American Legion--call out CBS-NBC -ABC -CNN on their treasonous omission of what Obama is doing to veterans and our military--and make an issue out of it all:

-stand on the capitol steps
-appoint volunteers and go door to door
-use the congressional franking privilege to not send out fundraising letters- but alarmist warnings
-comprise a Thomas Paine-like mailer of the "New Common Sense for Americans", and focus it on the devastation of deficit spending, using language and analogies that people understand (i.e. taking out a new credit card to make the monthly minimum payments for the maxed-out high interest others that are piling up).

Keep up the tea parties, and let them be themed by Ms. Bachman and Palin... a "Love America, hate government" tour.

And remember, you can't build the Republican party up by simply knocking the other party down. The only way Republicans can retake control of government is not only democratic policies to be attacked, but truly bold ideas to be proposed.

Just uttering the phrase "tax cuts" won't win elections anytime soon.

The GOP must be bold or prepare to be lost in the wilderness for years to come, because presently, there are no true Republicans in the limelight to save us from the destruction of Obama.

And time is of the essence.

www.keenobserver.blogtownhall.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Exponential stupidity...believing Obama will defend America


Nuremberg Germany--1936: Hitler's 8th Party Congress "Rally of Honor" (Reichsparteitag der Ehre) celebrating the invasion of the demilitarized Rhineland, which back then, constituted the restoration of Germany's lost World War I military honor.

Today, everyone is familiar with that frenzied scene from the incorporated footage made at that Nuremburg rally, where Hitler spoke to the masses positioned in front of three towering columns-- emblazoned with 3 huge swatstikas as the backdrop:
 
"Seig-heil...seig heil..seig heil", shouted the frenzied crowd, as Hitler would pause after delivering one of his classic motivational one liners, as he sought to infuse his fellow Germans with the basis of Nazi fanatacism-- absolute unquestionable allegiance to "Mein Feuhrer!"
 
And late last summer in Denver-- as if a Rocky Mountain coronation were not lofty enough-- Barack Obama, in his best imitation of the rally at Nuremberg, seemed to aim for Mount Olympus when he stood  atop a podium in front of an enormous, Greek-columned stage, to accept his party's nomination for president of the U.S.

But just like Herr Hitler, Obama brazenly told his BIG LIE..."We are the party of Roosevelt. We are the party of Kennedy. So don't tell me that Democrats won't defend this country". And then, came forth the biggie.... "I will never hesitate to defend this nation."

But don't hold your breath waiting.

Since taking office, Mr. Obama has announced plans to close the prison camp at Guantanamo Bay, to halt military trials of suspected terrorists there, and to make CIA officers follow the Army field manual’s rules on interrogations .

And by his mixed messages on all foreign policy fronts, he puts America in jeopardy for another Sept.11- clearly illustrating he's yet another flaming democratic liberal appeaser.
 
During his campaign, Obama purported to expand the size of the Army (false) and repeatedly suggested that he would launch unilateral military strikes into Pakistan in an effort to kill bin Laden. But that tough talk has now been toned down, and "unilateral" has been changed to "only after consultation" with the Pakistani government.

Barack talked Reagan-esque bold during his acceptance speech, but predictably, has shown Carter-esque appeasement in his first months as our anti-president.

Obama sees the world as though the enemy is just  like us. But they view his administration as an opportune time to time to extract apologies, build up their nuclear and conventional forces, and are secure in the knowledge that they'll be no consequences to aggression.

Meanwhile, to show his "toughness", Mr. Obama has pledged to send additional troops into Afghanistan to push back against the Taliban insurgency. But to what end? Unlike the Bush doctrine to eliminate al Quida and establish democracy in Iraq, there has been no definition of winning in the Afghan theater, because Afghanistan has been determined by most experts to be...the "unwinnable" war.
 
In his first fifty days, Obama sent out peace feelers to Iran, and offered a compromise to the Taliban. And now, he's proposing huge new aid to Pakistan (the same failed policy of the past three administrations).

Is Obama the reincarnation of Jimmy Carter-- or worse...Neville Chamberlain?

With his new, "get-nice-to-our-enemies" policy, he might as well have mailed engraved invitations to Bin Laden and al Qaida, to let them know it was open season on Americans again.
 
Appeasement is a formulation for disaster. It goes against our long-held foreign policy that the United States, as the world’s preeminent power, can only be secure if it reinforces its strength throughout the globe, and with no exceptions!

Throughout history, America's strongest presidents achieved greatness only through their projection of absolute military power--not through weakness by being some lily flower:

-Bush I rolled Saddam out of Kuwait
-Reagan bombed Libya and ended Moammar Khadaffi's international terrorist party
-Kennedy caused Khruschev to blink and then to withdraw Soviet missiles from Cuba
-Truman rolled back Stalin and the Communists, immediately after taking over for FDR
-Teddy Roosevelt walked with a big stick
-James Monroe in1825, said "keep out-- don't dare come into our western hemisphere!"

But as of now, we've returned to the Carter era of the late 70's, projecting nice-ness, and turning the other cheek.
 
And what if ruthless Islamic radicals test Obama? They tested President Carter and he failed-- and the cost of his failure was calamitous-- the radicalization of Iran, the rise of violent Islamist movements, the loss of a strategic ally, and the emboldening of America's adversaries worldwide (i.e. Osama bin Ladin), which culminated in 9-11.
 
Then after a "post-Carter' pause, Islamic radicals tested the next nice guy--Bill Clinton.

They tested Clinton in Somalia and he failed; they tested him in Tanzania and he failed; they tested him in New York City in 1993 and he failed. Finally, they tested him in Yemen in October of 2000 by ramming an explosive-filled boat into the USS Cole, killing 17 Americans and nearly sinking that ship.

Clinton failed his tests, confirming to Osama Bin Laden his view that America was a paper tiger-- prompting Sept.11.

And now we have Barack H. Obama, and his aversion to the use of force is written on his sleeve.

During the campaign, candidate Obama promised to hold non-conditional talks with America's foes-- making his bold statement that if elected..." he would open dialog with the enemies of this nation"

Then he "misspoke" about the "tiny" country of Iran, and about preemptively invading Pakistan, illustrating his shocking ineptitude in the realm of foreign policy and basic geography. And for sure, none of his statements (or his gaffe-prone political posturing) escaped the notice of America's enemies.

Even Joe Biden mused about the prospects of... “An international crisis.. a generated crisis...to test the mettle of this guy.”
 
So with cowboy-six gunner Bush long gone, and Mr. nicey-nice Obama on board, could our Muslim extremist friends be racing each other to "test" the mettle of our anti-president?

You can count on it.

Appeasement is always is provocative. It’s like waving a red cape in front of a bull-- a sign beckoning… "here we are, come 'n get it!"

And in yet another genuflection to our enemies abroad, Obama took another step for political correctness (and to please his radical Code Pink and ACLU supporters) by ending the classification of “enemy combatants." Then in a memo to the Pentagon, he changed the verbage from "war on terror" to..."overseas contingency operation".

How sweet! Imagine how our enemies in the Middle East must have interpreted it:

"Oh that Barack Obama, he's such a nice guy! We'll have to be nice in return. We'll just forget about all the Great Satan nonsense and let bygones be bygones-- and forget our Muslim extremism. And oh, that Obama has such a way with words! We just love his desire for a new America before the eyes of the world."

Obviously, Mr. Obama thinks he can use his speech abilities to entice Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, North Korea, etc., into falling in love with him and becoming a fan, just as he's always managed to do with all his other "fans" around the world.

And of course, in the eyes of the Obama administration, Ahkmadinejad, Putin, Bin Laden, Kim Jong II, Hamas, and Hezbollah, are all very obviously such nice guys themselves, and honest, forthright, open minded leaders; so we best trust them to behave as good world citizens.

Meanwhile, Obama can't turn away fast enough from the Bush policy of an aggressive war on terror:

First, he appointed an inexperienced lily to run the CIA, Leon Panetta, who has zilcho familiarity with espionage. Then he sends a letter to Iran expressing his willingness to open dialogue with that rogue nation.

And in an "outreach" to our enemies, he recently mailed a sweet letter-candy gram to the so-called moderate factions of the Taliban, proposing to end the Afghan insurgency. But it's blatantly obvious that it's the inflexible EXTREMIST Taliban leaders who are orchestrating the war-- not the moderates.

Maybe he can win over al Quida if he called Rocky Mosele of the international star registry, and named a heavenly body after Bin laden. Wouldn't that be nice?
 
But whatever, Obama believes that America is ALWAYS the bad guy, and that we should rehabilitate ourselves through following the wisdom of all liberals-- being nice and giving the other side a chance to "love" America.
 
So as his liberal supporters urge, let's all be patient and give Obama a chance:
 
-a chance to invite a domestic attack
 -a chance to reduce our military by 25%
 -a chance to be viewed by the world as a contrite nation, rather than carrying a BIG STICK
-a chance for Iran to complete its nuclear program to fruition
-a chance to leave our borders wide open, and for al-Qaida to sneak piece-by-piece an atomic weapon through  Mexico,  assemble it some mosque basement, then detonate in Times Square
-and a chance to blunder us into a flash war in the Middle East

And so far, all the nicey-niceness has worked just as we'd expect:

Iran has recently declared itself to be a space and nuclear power; North Korea is testing its ballistic missiles; and Russia is now using bases in Cuba as well as Venezuela.

America is a Christian country that values life-- while our terrorist enemies live to DIE for their beliefs. So we cannot ever let our guard down, because that can only have one eventual outcome--we will be attacked again, even with a nicey-smiley Obama in office.
 
Our enemies see Mr. Obama for what he really is-- a callow, accommodating, wildly inexperienced and weak foe. Unfriendly regimes and networks-- like oil-rich dictators (Hugo Chavez) and radical Islamist countries-- will always seek to exploit a tepid American foreign policy.
 
Will Russia take the opportunity to gobble up Ukraine? Will al-Qaeda now “pull out all the stops” to kill Americans? Will Lebanon “disintegrate"? And will Iranian President Mahmoud Ahkmadinejad  attack Israel and possibly sink ships at the mouth of the Strait of Hormuz, and cut off our Mideast oil supply?

So what would Mr. Smiley Obama do then... call the UN? Go on a "diplomatic  rampage" and send a strongly worded message?
 
Can you be a world class appeaser without being, at the same time, the enemy?
 
And worse, the effect of the recession now gives Obama a chance to weaken the entire infrastructure and personnel of the US military. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said, "The spigot of defense spending that opened on 9/11 is closing."

Obama promised, "I will cut tens of billion of dollars in wasteful spending." Barney Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, thinks we can cut 25 percent from military spending WITHOUT impacting national security.
 
Once again, like the Carter--Clinton days, we'll have yet another attempt made to wreck our military by the liberal lunatics within the Democrat Party, who are not democrats, but are more aptly described as Communists in bureaucratic clothing.
 
If President Obama "brings the troops home" and dismantles much of our military to save money to help the poor masses, it will be an open invitation for Iran, North Korea, Russia, and China to attack us, and attempt to wipe us out once and for all.


www.keenobserver.blogtownhall.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Driving the EPA bulldozer over America's fragile economy

 

Get your motor running...head out on the highway! Everyone has heard "Born to be Wild", the classic 60's hit song. Especially Barack Obama, and his radical leftist cadre of cabinet appointees.

You can almost read their minds:

Taking a cue from the "first 100 days" of Franklin D. Roosevelt's 1933 presidency, the Obama administration seems to believe in striking while the iron is HOT, and--like the words of the classic song --firing all of their guns at once.

But will all the new radical Obama measures eventually "explode into flames"?

Right now Obama is rattling off one leftist declaration after another, in conjunction with enough deficit spending to defy description. First it was mandatory "no-choice" abortions; next was the anti-stimulus bill; then a spending bill; then educational reform... nationalized health care... renewable energy...card check. Now we have talk of another second stimulus bill.

You name it, and Mr. Obama is planning to "bring it on" before the ardor for his anti-presidency cools off and falls back to reality.

America is about to realize that Obama's Kennedy-esque speeches (and soaring rhetoric) were not of the heart, but from only a teleprompter screen. Now he's removed his campaign mask and assumed his true socialist identity.

And next on comrade Obama's target list: destroying the energy industry.

Despite the fact that America uses gasoline and diesel to run 95% of its transportation needs, Generalissimo Obama has decided to make war on fossil fuels, and has wasted no time in reversing a decision that would have allowed oil exploration offshore, and opened up new exploratory leases within public lands in our interior.

Remember last year's horror of seeing, "regular 4.29", posted on street signs of gas stations? Just keep Mr. Obama's reversal in mind the next time pump prices head back up to 4 bucks/gallon.

But Obama would like to arrive at the European levels of 6, 7-- even 8 dollars /gallon. After all, didn't he accuse America as being wasteful and profligate? And that we are a nation comprising 5% of the world's population, yet consume (hog) 25% of the world's energy?

Mr. Obama will soon remedy that! How? By what he's about to do-- cleverly restrict our energy supply. And all under the masquerade of saving the environment, and halting the decline of the polar bears before its too late.

Despite the fact that we have a huge tracts of land containing an estimated 1.8 trillion barrels of oil (in the shale of our western states), America keeps getting drilled again and again.

First it was Nancy (Nazi) Pelosi, who has prevented every Republican domestic drilling bill from even reaching the House floor. And now our leftist
Interior Secretary, Mr. Ken Salazar, is putting the brakes on a Bush administration plan to open 77 new parcels of land to oil and natural gas drilling, while instead promising a “new way forward” for offshore wind projects. 


Salazar criticized the
Bush administration’s “drill-only approach,” saying the U.S. needs a "comprehensive energy" plan that considers all the "potential resources" in the oceans.

Great. Marvelous. No new oil drilling, no new domestic supply, and an open invitation to the commodity traders to again bid up the world price of petroleum back to $144/barrel -or even higher-- once the world economy revives.

Obama and the dumbo-crats keep lecturing about renewable and alternative energy (the justification is always environmental); but they're openly hostile to cheap and readily available fossil fuels, and are more than willing to treasonously allow us to send $700 billion a year to OPEC than drill our own oil and keep the money at home.

Yes America-- elections do have consequences.

And at a time when proposals for higher taxes are politically unpopular, the radical leftists in Congress have decided to thumb their noses at the average Joe, and are about to spring another cleverly disguised way to squeeze even more tax money from Americans.

Right now, Congress is debating legislation that would create a European-style scam that "caps" the maximum allowable amounts of CO2 from power plants, heavy industries, manufacturers, and you guessed it-- our vehicles.

So once it passes, everytime we get our motors runnin', and head out on the highway, every American driver will not be victimized as a taxpayer--but as a consumer.

This cap and trade system is "designed" to give companies incentives for reducing emissions; but unsuspecting Americans will soon realize it's nothing but a hidden tax in the form of higher utility bills (natural gas & electric) that will jack the prices of everything, including gasoline, food and consumer products.

Obama and his Stalinist minions claim that, "Cap and trade is there for a reason...you cap and trade to pay for investments in renewables, which will lead the country to energy independence."

Energy independence? The arrogance of the democrats know no bounds! And it's all courtesy of an American electorate that is so dumbed-down scientifically, that they know not the difference between harmless CO2 (carbon dioxide ) and poisonous CO (carbon monoxide).

So who was it that said, "We get the government we deserve?" And its a treasonous one indeed. 

 

Realistically, by collecting cap and trade fees from American companies--with the cost borne by consumers-- we are in effect, subsidizing our foreign competitors (China, India, et. al) who have already stated that they're placing economic development above any environmental considerations

It's economic war on every working American who uses energy, and will reduce our economy into a miasma of plunging competiveness, lost jobs, and foolishly misplaced alternative energy investments.

Now let's introduce Dr. Steven Chu, (aka "Dr. No"- no new drilling)  Obama's Energy Czar, who doesn't have "faith" in nuclear power, has called coal, "his worst nightmare," and predicts "dire consequences due to global warming".

But meanwhile, Sweden is "warming" to nuclear power, because in their misguided lengthy attempt to be a leader in alternative energy, they've discovered it's extremely difficult to replace conventional energy with solar and wind. So the Swedes will set aside a 30 year ban on nuclear reactors, and are joining a rapidly growing list of nations who view emission-free nuclear as the best way to deal with "climate change".

 

But predictably, the Obama administration has lent a deaf ear to all this, and has taken an opposite tack-- no nuclear-- at least  for now.

 

Expansion of nuclear power could create tens of thousands of badly-needed U.S. corporate jobs (such as with GE and Westinghouse) and would require a multitude of construction workers to erect new reactors. And these would be high wage jobs--not just some make-work stimulus proposal. And more importantly, it would put America on track to returning to the 90's when the country last prospered as a full-wage economy.

But leftist Chu (and comrade Obama) are having none of it, and have rejected the already agreed-upon desert site at Nevada's Yucca Mountain for nuclear waste storage, saying... "that it's too close to the water table and could harm the environment."

So another solution to America's energy (and employment) problem literally "bites the dust."

Next in line for battle is the EPA's attack on coal, which will be led by Climate Czar, Carol Browner, who recently declared..."The Obama Administration will soon make an "endangerment finding” on carbon dioxide"...and that..."The next step is a notice of proposed "rule making” for new regulations on carbon-dioxide emissions".

 

An "endangerment finding?" Rule making?

Translation: Coal companies --prepare for chapter 13. Consumers --prepare for a 100% hike in your electric bills; and America-- get ready to turn out the lights.

How much more insanity can our country endure! This will turn out to be the ultimate attack on all of America-- the EPA determining that carbon dioxide is a dangerous pollutant-- and setting off the most extensive set of costly regulations in American history.

So you think insane too strong of a word? Hah!

 

Browner's new clean air decree will tag any source as emitting more than 250 tons of a "declared pollutant" as being subject to regulation, potentially including schools, hospitals, shopping centers-- even commercial hog farms and bakeries.

So if you like to eat meat, or enjoy an occasional donut or a fresh loaf of bread, get ready to go vegetarian, unless you want to pay dearly for your dietary staples-- they're gonna cost a lot more once Ms. Browner gets through with her destruction of America's standard of living

So prepare for a revival of that the beloved tradition, "Depression Era cooking". Beans and greens anyone?

The EPA's so called "registry plan" would cover about 13,000 facilities that account for 85 to 90 percent of the nation's greenhouse gas output. EPA Administrator, Lisa P. Jackson, in a recent statement, crowed..."This is a critical step toward helping us better protect our health and environment -- all without placing an onerous burden on our nation's small businesses".

 

But unless you push a hot dog cart or have a roadside hamburger stand, count on the EPA breathing down your neck with these so-called "reporting regulations". Even a farm with more than 25 cows would have to document their "emissions" of methane and other greenhouse gases.

 

Got milk? Maybe not for long--this portends more small farms closing down, and permanently higher dairy and meat prices.

It's all part of the cover-up to restrict supply, and drag America down to an energy-starved, tax-burdened, third world socialist nation, with Obama and his Politburo of cabinet members proudly beaming..."mission accomplished."

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The one good CAUSE that could save the Republicans


Here's a thought.

One idea of how to remedy all the Republican's electoral woes--the calamitous loss of GOP congressional seats, and the presidency -- would be their ability to counteract the criminal interference of ACORN.
 
So here is the plan :
 
The Republicans form their own activist group. It shall be known as "CAUSE"... Citizens Against Unamerican Subversive Extremism. And the goal of CAUSE is staightforward in nature-- attack back against ACORN!
 
CAUSE is how Republicans, young and old, unite under one banner, and ACTIVELY hound ACORN, (the pro-democratic, Marxist rent-a-mob) and literally force the media to take notice, thereby exposing the cataclysmic damage that this subversive organization has wrought upon our democracy.
 
CAUSE co-opts ACORN tactics. They would voiciferously picket outside the New York studios of the TV networks, decrying the liberal one-sided anti-conservative news slant, which is basically what keeps the Democrats in business (bid-ness).
 
CAUSE forms phone banks, and calls registered voters in every congressional district, letting them know if their rep in congress is basically voting in line with treasonous liberals, such as Pelosi , Reid, Schumer, Durban, Frank, Markey, Hoyer, etc.
 
CAUSE forms a website (ala Obama) to reach the young (or anyone) for contributions, and a call to volunteerism for the conservative agenda. And moderates are welcome-- you need not be a Republican.
 
Basically, CAUSE is an awareness group to wake up the dumbed-down American public, concerning the disinformation the media is feeding everyone about Barack Obama.
 
CAUSE is unlimited in what can be done. United under one banner (moniker) , the Citizens Against Unamerican Subversive (socialist) Extremism would provide the spark to lead the Republicn party out of its wandering from the desert of political confusion.
 
Haven't the Republicans taken enough? Under one CAUSE, they have the opportunity to respond to the blatantly liberal media bias. And most importantly, under one CAUSE, the Republicans could command the attention of the American public

Take notice Republicans. Look at the  incalculable damage ACORN has accomplished with its well-honed subversive methodology, precisely aimed at enabling the democrats to prevail in almost any close election.

And practice makes perfect.

Take for example the astounding fraudulence in the Minnesota Senate recount, between Republican incumbent Norm Coleman, and democrat Al Franken. The blatant manipulation is largely because Franken's ACORN-assisted side has displayed a remarkable propensity for defying the numbers in the general election.

Minnesota Secretary of State Mark Ritchie, a democrat (and closet ACORN operative) largely controlled the recount, which saw Mr. Franken pull off a miraculous 950 vote swing in his favor, out of 3 million total votes cast, where Mr. Coleman triumphed originally by 725 votes.

Coleman's winning percentage was only .00024%. Yet Franken's highly unlikely vote swing indicated the recount margin went nearly 70% in his favor, a statistical impossibility.

So how did this all originate? ACORN.

In the election of 2006, the Minnesota ACORN Political Action Committee endorsed candidate Mark Ritchie, who won largely because of financial assistance from a below the radar "527" group -The "Secretary of State Project (SOSP).

The ACORN-funded SOSP backed democrats nationwide, who were running for the offices of secretary of state, knowing full well that if elected, they could likely "fix" possible recounts in any close statewide elections.

ACORN always seems to be able to "see above the horizon". And they play to win. So the Secretary of State Project did very well, judging from Mr. Ritchie's "partisan" performance in Minnesota.

So just how important is the outcome for this Minnesota senatorial seat? It's critical beyond measure.

Right now, the entire next two years in Congress depends on whether the Republicans can keep a 40-seat minority to maintain their filibuster voting bloc. And the margin of Democrats vs. Republicans is tottering between 59-41. So if Franken prevails,  the  current balance would swing to the Democrats. And they could possibly do whatever they want for the next two years, without so much as a sniff toward any partisan opposition.

The result? ACORN will have literally changed the political course of our nation for at least the next 2-4 years.

If we recount all GOP losses in the last two elections (13 Senate seats, 51 House seats and the White House) it begs the question-- how many of these losses were a result of ACORN? We can't know, but most likely at least 2-3rds to 3-4ths of any close races may have been decided by fraudulent voter registrations, which is ACORN's stock in trade.

The problem is that ACORN is always able to fly below the radar. The media is well aware of their influence; yet they say nothing, So this is where CAUSE comes in.

With a pro-Republican organization like CAUSE on the job, all these costly election shenanigans could be countermeasured with CAUSE sounding the alarm--sort of a spy vs. spy situation, or a CIA- KGB type of political intrigue.

Recall the old TV series, "The Man from Uncle". It was the bad spies from the sinister international THRUSH outfit, vs the good guys from UNCLE law enforcement. And it could be relived in true political life form as a CAUSE vs. ACORN scenario...the two organizations, constantly at high-tech political war , each trying to countermand the other's every move.

And make no mistake, war is just what's going on in Congress today. War is the exact description for the bitterly partisan election races that we have now-- there are no gentleman's rules of fair play. The gloves are off. Too much is at stake with every seat in Congress, and with every governor's post in the states. And along those lines, every secretary of state job around the country becomes ever more critical.

If ACORN cannot be reigned in, our democracy will continue to be  a mockery-- it'll continue to be one man, with many votes, in many places--all courtesy of the subversive desperado ACORN operatives, that lurk within the ranks of every state and local election board.

But have faith Republicans.  You can turn this around overnight. Just remember to volunteer for a good CAUSE...your own future survival as a political party.


www.keenobserver.blogtownhall.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Hail Comrade Obama! Let us count your socialistic ways!"

 
QUESTION: Who'll be next in the White house?  Just ask Wall Street. Calculate using this simple ratio: the higher the pre-election polls rise for Obama, the faster the Dow-Jones will tumble. The result? (in biblical parlance)..."and the blame shall falleth on George W. Bush". 

And in the parlance of Wall Street, the term "smart money", refers to those individuals who have the clearest crystal balls (i.e. the insiders). These are the people who "know people". And what are they telling each other?

"PSST...you know what I found out about that Obama? He's going to raise the dividend tax to 39.7% , and capital gains to 35% ! 

"WHAT?..." I'm selling BEFORE he gets in! 

Now magnify this scenario a few million more times around the world for the next few months, and it's not hard to perceive why the market will continue to churn, and then stumble ever lower until about 2011, when Obama is on the way out.

Wall Street is about creating wealth. Yes they are the capitalists. They are the people who seek to put their money where it can multiply, and create more wealth for them. They seek to invest where they see growth possibilities-- companies or industries where there is a bright future. Every investor on Wall Street , large or small,  is therefore,  a venture capitalist, seeking the creation of additional wealth.

But Obama, intentional or not , is about destroying wealth. Oppressive tax policies on the wealthy, destroy venture capital; destroy the most essential element of future economic expansion--M-O-N-E-Y! People seem to be thrown for a loop when the word 'capital' is tossed out there. That includes Barack Obama.

If Mr. Obama only could have a better grasp of the basic premise about wealth creation, he would learn ...the more you tax the wealthy, the faster capital shall flee this country, and seek fertile ground else where. EXAMPLE: Ireland has the lowest corporate tax in Europe (12.5%) and is experiencing a sizzling 7.5%  current rate of economic growth. China is growing at 8%.

But Comrade Obama is about socialism-- spreading the wealth around from a constantly shrinking source-- defying all economic logic. It is the formula for "Economic Failure 101"...seizing wealth from the producers, and giving it to the drones: attacking the growth phase of the economic base, and rewarding the stagnant segment. This implies shortages; this implies class envy.

The basic tenet of the Marx-Engels theory is class warfare..."the individual exists for The State!"...dismantling the anthill of the workers, and transferring their bounty to the do-nothing drones: encourage the people to be lax, and become a public dependent .

The basic socialist theory for retaining power is ..."tax the wealthy (the opposition) and distribute it to those who will vote for you (your base of support).  And when this dependent population ratio rises toward 45-50%, you retain power (i.e. re-election).

So now Comrade Obama's only challenge is to gain the power; so once again he refers to the time tested socialist textbook for the answer...tell the masses what will work for you, and gain their trust in you..."YES AMERICA...I'M GOING TO RAISE TAXES...BUT NOT YOURS!"

This class-warfare tenet for the ascension to power has worked unfailingly throughout any era in modern history; whether it was Lenin, Goebbels, Hitler, Stalin, Castro, Mobutu, Chavez, or Mugabe. But you must strike when the iron is hot (i.e. when times are bad, and the masses are angry).

So now everybody, we shall proceed to connect all the dots. Once again...the lower the Dow-Jones  tumbles... the madder the people will get, and the more likely they are to blame Bush, and vote for the democrats.

Is this all starting to sound familiar? Picture Obama  at one of his rock-star midwest campaign rallies..."Hello St Louis! (flashes his big Cheshire cat-grin)...Today, John McCain said he wants to give more tax cuts to Exxon and big oil...(BOO!) This is just more of the same failed policies of George Bush!  (BOOO!) But Its time we stop favoring Wall Street, and think about Main Street! (YAY!)...It's time we give the rest of America a break! (YAY!!)... I'm going to a give tax cut to the other 95 percent of America! (HOO-RAY!!)...America doesn't need another George Bush in the White house (YAY!)... That's how we will move America  forward (YAY!)... And that’s why I'm running for president of the United States! (WILD APPLAUSE) ...Thank you St Louis...and God bless America! (music plays...Obama steps off podium waving to wildly cheering crowd).

Tsk-tsk-tsk...oh well, they'll never learn. Okay now for all you nice, intelligent Obama-crats out there, it's time for your multiple choice question: What will America look like in just 4 years after the Obamunnism theory of taxation has taken hold? Just fill in the following blank:  economic______ (a) Devastation (b) Havoc (c) Destruction (d) Turmoil)
 
If Obama could only stop his vote-shopping speeches for once, and use some logic, then we could pose to him this obvious question..."Mr Obama sir...why would you think that with higher corporate taxes, companies would stay in the United States, when instead  they could save millions of dollars by opening in another country with a better deal?  (answer) "They won't."

In addition, corporations would migrate to where the labor costs are lowest. Next question: "Comrade Obama...did you ever hear of a country called China?"

Soon, Americans might be reverse-migrating into Mexico after this fanatical proponent of "being fair'', is through.

The impact on raising taxes on corporations is astounding. It drives business offshore, seeking new tax havens. It has nothing to do with not being patriotic. It's about staying competitive.This will take more jobs away from Americans, and stimulate another country's economy.

The funny thing is that 90 percent of the democrats, who pronounce Obama as their candidate, think that he will provide more jobs for the people.

The humor comes in knowing that the public doesn't understand the impact of what increasing corporate taxes really will have on the United States. But it's not funny at all. Does Obama really know what he is saying? Doesn't he understand that corporations open shop elsewhere because of the higher-priced taxes?

The most troubling aspect of all this is-- what if he DOES know this? Oh my gawd! Now we've really opened up a can of worms. Conspiracy!

Now, all of Obama's past associations begin to make sense.

No longer would it be a mystery of why he hung with characters like the honorable, most-reverend Jeremiah Wright, the despicable Billy Ayers, the odious Bernadine Dohrn, sweet Father Plager, and Louie-Louie Farrakhan. They all were cut from the same cloth...rabble rousers, and virulent anti-American radical thinkers. And, lest we not forget- ACORN!

And further coming into focus would be why he chose to launch his political campaign in Mr. & Mrs. Ayers' living room. Could it be that the fact is; Ayers and his wife chose him? They saw in Obama a man richly gifted in the skills of articulation, public oration, manipulation, and equanimity (cool under fire)...skills that would pretext someone who could change people's minds against their own best interests: A man so disarming in appearance and candor, that no one would ever suspect the devious nature within...a man who would turn America against itself.

Could this man be the anti-Christ of our democracy? He seems too intelligent, and has surrounded himself with so many economic experts, that how could he possibly NOT know the almost certain devastation it will do to our economy if he raised taxes during a downturn? Why would America even think of revisiting Herbert Hoover and 1931 again?

Haven't these democrats damaged the wealth of America enough? Look at the wealth destruction they have already wrought upon our country!

Nancy Pelosi (estimated net worth-- $25 million) as Speaker of the House, has blocked all Republican drilling bills from reaching the House floor for a vote. We have 4 trillion dollars worth of oil sitting in the ground around us. lt's liquid gold--4 TRILLION DOLLARS! Sitting wasted! For what? 

This is money that could go for investment. It's the money a deficit-plagued America needs at a most critical time. We could rebuild this country's infrastructure. We could invest in alternative energy vehicles: new money for corporate expansion; or for R&D toward high tech medical and pharmaceutical advancements; toward new inventions and hundreds of new entrepreneurial ideas; the list is endless.

But without capital, nothing can move move forward. And the democrats have chosen to stifle all this, and have declared our own resources to be illegal! And if they regain control of both the congress and the presidency, they wil keep it illegal!  And electing Obama would have a "coattails' effect-- more democrats in Congress, inviting more potential liberal devastation. Plus it would only encouraged Nazi Pelosi and her ilk, to legislate more leftist havoc upon us.

Other congressional Leftists like Senator Chuck Schumer (architect of, "we can't drill our way out") and Pelosi rant constantly against "Big Oil". They despise that hateful word, "profit". They are committed to never again permitting any additional domestic drilling, and seem quite content to export our money to OPEC. They're never questioned about this treason by our leftist media , so Americans are manipulated into political insanity, and are easily led to voting against their own best economic interests; and remain pacified by their big lie (we cant drill our way out").

So according to logic of this perfidious bunch, we should... keep our resources off-limits, buy our energy from OPEC, shrink our capital base further, which stifles economic growth; then pacify the expanding unemployed masses (i.e.unemployment benefits)...and further expand political power from those whom you have made newly dependent.

The moral of the Socialist theory? (1) Condemn the profitable (2) Make times seem worse than they really are (3) Get the masses to keep voting for you. Just ask Karl Marx: class warfare; class distinction; class envy; rich vs poor; basic manipulation; basic socialism-- convincing the people that they are getting what they should really want-- someone else's wealth. Why should they want more?

 A vote for Obama seems like irrational political exuberance to its most insane extreme.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »