About Me

Name: thekeenobserver
Email: reallykeenobserver@yahoo.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

The devil himself couldn't have imagined this:

 

(QUOTE) "The majority, oppressing the individual, is guilty of a crime, abuses its strength, and by acting on the law of the strongest, breaks up the foundations of society." --Thomas Jefferson, 1816.

 

And merely 193 years later, Jefferson's caveat now rings true:

 

An outlaw congressional majority - hell bent to destroy the very foundations of society- now reigns over Capitol Hill.

 

Even a gifted visionary like Jefferson could've never imagined mob rule in Congress, in arrogant defiance of hapless constituents back home.

 

Fear is the most powerful motivator; but strangely, to this 111th Congress, they seem to fear no one - even incensed people who could vote them from office.

 

Something bizarre- something unprecedented in our history - is at work here: But what?

When Congress no longer exercises the will of the people, they have, in effect, rendered the Constitution irrelevant.

 

Our Founders designed the federal government so that the PEOPLE - not Congress - would be important; going to great lengths to safeguard against excessive taxation, and protect individual freedoms. But above all, they intended that government would leave the individual ALONE.

 

But now, through some fluke of time- and the idiocy of our electorate- we are witness to the most tyrannical throng of autocrats Washington has ever seen.
 
Connivers...gangsters...liars...traitors. Indeed, these are aptly descriptive of the majority of those who "serve the people" in this 111th, criminally-insane Congress.

 

Instead of Congress fearing their constituents, we have constituents who fear their Congress. 

 

In the brief span of but 150 days, they have passed/proposed laws that will not only bankrupt our country, debase our currency, but will trample the Constitution itself.

 

Laws that not even Niccolo Machiavelli himself could have dreamed up.

 

Laws designed to destroy the wealth of the upper classes, and prostrate them all under the heel of an out-of-control federal government.

 

Their mindless cap 'n trade law will eventually render tens of millions to the unemployment line. Big Brother socialization of medicine will undermine the happiness and integrity of many millions of lives.

 

But still Congress presses onward - oblivious to the protests from their districts back home.

 

With 256 democratic seats in the House, and 60 in the Senate, the common people are but bugs on the windshield of the Obama/ Reid/Pelosi road grader; a triumvirate of desperados that will stop nothing short of instituting full socialism within the United States.

 

Their unconstitutional actions and power grabs - abetted by our 111th  Congress - are unprecedented in all of American history.

 

Even the socialist measures of Franklin Roosevelt (and his Congress of the Great Depression) pale in comparison to what these maniacal fascists are out to accomplish.
 
Pelosi & Reid, each with their idea of securing perpetual power for the Democratic Party, do so for their own self-aggrandizement. And on the heels of all this, is a sycophantic, admiring, throne-sniffing Congress.

 

As these majority leaders delegate public funds toward buying individual votes in Congress, they sign not only the death warrant of our representative republic, but the economy as well.

 

With carbon taxes on energy, and "cradle to the grave" socialized medicine, the future monstrosity our government creates will inevitably enslave us, and impose upon our children unsustainable debt - sure to render them poverty-stricken as well.  

 

And once we've been stripped of our earnings (and savings), resistance will become futile: workers may all end up in welfare lines, dependent on a monthly Obama check. This will indeed be their fate, should Congress continue to act in blind obedience to their blackhearted masters.

 

If voters re-elect these incumbents (as they are likely to do), we can only hope there will still be something remaining of America, once Obama/ Reid/ Pelosi - and our 111th Congress- are done trying to destroy it. 

 

Any questions?

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Transportation 101...How the democrats railroaded the stimulus

 

Wanna see the key to our future? Look into our past-- the Civil War era, when the historic transcontinental railroad initiative was signed into law.

 

A few weeks before his assassination in April 1865, Abraham Lincoln had told an old Illinois friend, who was returning to SanFrancisco: “I have long desired to see California; the production of her gold mines and her devotion to the Union has been a marvel to me’'. 

 

When Mr. Lincoln first ran for president in 1860, California originally had cast its votes at the Republican convention for rival William Seward. And California proved to be the weakest performance for Mr. Lincoln in any state he won in that election year. 

 

But after the Civil War was under way, Mr. Lincoln innately sensed the the gravest danger of all to the Union-- the loss of a primary source of wealth to finance the war.   


The urge to get the the transcontinental railroad built as rapidly as possible was motivated, in part, to bind California to the North during the war. Mr. Lincoln feared losing the state to secession, and the dreadful possibility of California falling under the Confederate flag of the southern states.

 

And how important was California during Lincoln’s first term? It's believed that the product of her mines and precious metals during the year 1864 alone reached, if not exceeded, one hundred million dollars in in value, which was so vital in the Union's military victory over the South.

Of course we all know  the rest of the story-- the tremendous effect the transcontinental railroad had in shaping our country. But more importantly, it was the premier example of the government  actually providing an economic stimulus that actually did just that-- stimulated the economy by creating a whole new industry that employed people in huge numbers.

 

Work is the basic stimulus of any economy; but a stimulus only fulfills its purpose when actual universal good is the result. Thus, you can’t make or create jobs unless there is actual underlying work needing to be done, and where everyone benefits.

 

So what could the government do to actually create REAL jobs? One of the timeless needs of America is better and faster transportation systems. Our history abounds with examples thereof:

 

The Erie canal was an artificial waterway  constructed across central New York from Albany to Buffalo. It eventually enabled New York City to become the metropolitan and cosmopolitan capital of the entire world in the first part of the 19th century.

 

The Panama canal enabled America to become a two-ocean navy, and helped America to consolidate itself as a world military power in the early 20th century

 

The Interstate Highway System enabled the U.S. to carry its post World War II boom forward into the end of the 20th Century.

 

The salient point here is that  all the above projects were (amazingly enough) built and funded by our government.

 

Of course, that was long before politics had permeated the vehemently partisan Congress of our present day.

 

And with the new 111th Congress, headed by Nancy Pelosi (House) and Harry Reid  (Senate), we’ve now entered into a new virulent type of political gridlock that’s imploded into a de facto partisan political civil war. We're no longer the United States.

 

This de facto politico-civil war in Washington is not the blue vs gray, but a conflict of a red vs blue congress-- resulting in the disunited states of America.

 

And while the economy continues to slide, this bitterly divided congress, reminiscent of the pre-civil war era, is engaging in the same type of finger pointing and bitterly partisan bickering that could precede another historic conflict.

 

Remember how Nero fiddled while Rome burned?

 

But looking back in retrospect; when the congress and the country were united in purpose, herculean projects were the result, such winning World War II.

 

During the 1940s, the New Deal Tennessee Valley Authority project generated more power in the eastern United States than in all of Nazi Germany

 

The atomic bomb Manhattan project shortened  the Pacific theater of the war by at least one year, and left the legacy of nuclear power for peaceful purposes.

 

And recall the origins of the internet. It was not because of the great patriotic efforts of Al Gore, but rather the government agency called DARPA, the Defense Advance Research Project Association,  which originally connected the pentagon's mainframe computers over telephone lines,  forming the basic infrastructure of the original internet.

 

But today, such beneficial infrastructure projects are all but impossible, because the only thing our lawmakers agree on is to be disagreeable.

 

Unlike the 1860's, there are no present statesmen to bridge the great political divide. We need someone with the political courage (and moxie) to come forward and pronounce, "The only effective government stimulus is something that would affect the lives of ALL in a beneficial way".

 

Once again the key to the future is looking back to the past-- better, faster transportation… cheaper cleaner power generation...the discovery of new sources of domestic energy. These are timeless needs that would generate the millions of jobs America needs.

 

We could construct 100 new nuclear reactors.

 

We could reopen of offshore deep water energy exploration.

 

And of course, we could spend a trillion dollars rebuilding our roads, sewers, bridges, and mass transit systems. And the crown-jewel idea of infrastructure spending-- we could construct a nationwide corridor of high speed railroad transportation systems:

 

San Francisco, to LA, to San Diego along the west coast. Chicago, to Detroit, to Cleveland, to Pittsburgh, and to Philadelphia in the midwest and east. Dallas to Houston in the southwest. And Richmond, Va. to Washington D.C., to New York, and to Boston on the East coast

 

High speed rail would fulfill the actual purpose of a stimulus ; an entire new industry that could eventually employ tens of millions of people throughout the entire 21st century.

 

But the present politics of today begs the question, “Will the trillion dollar stimulus package actually stimulate?" But if no actual needs are fulfilled (energy, communications, transportation, etc. ) no new actual jobs can be created.

 

But when it comes to actual economic stimuli, the Obama administration appears to only obfuscate and procrastinate.

 

In his internet message of the day, Obama proudly trumpeted on his website..."Last week, the House of Representatives passed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which will jumpstart our economy and put more than 3 million people back to work".

 

Put 3 million people back to work? How so? How can you put people back to work unless there are actual needs to fulfill?

 

Does spending 27 billion on on extended unemployment compensation fulfill any permanent need? Does spending 30 billion for COBRA (medical benefits for the newly unemployed) fulfill a need? How does that help the entire nation? Does remodeling schools, and making federal buildings energy efficient, fulfill any ACTUAL permanent needs?

 

This democratic American Recovery and Reinvestment Act is merely the same old socialist scheme of wealth redistribution: penalizing work with taxation, and rewarding unemployment with subsidies. This craven  bill is only a clever cover for investing huge, unimaginable sums of taxpayer's money for the sake of a partisan political return.

 

In its current, obscenely pork-barreled form, it's a stimulus package that only rewards unions and other  democratic operatives for their support in Obama's political victory in 2008.

 

It boils down to this: spending a trillion on a package that’s less than 5% infrastructure will do nothing other than expand government permanently, and further consolidate the political power of Barack Obama for his second term; thus ordaining all this as the greatest vote- buying scheme ever devised in the 235 year history of our country!

 

And right now, Abe Lincoln, who literally gave his life to keep the United States united,  is probably turning  over in his grave. 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Possible new D.C. struggle for political power...the centrist Obama vs. the leftist Congressional radicals?


Hoo-wee! Will wonders ever cease? Barack Obama suddenly silenced many of his critics with his selection of several pro-REPUBLICAN-policied people to his transition cabinet. At a recent news conference at a Chicago hotel, Mr. Obama announced he is retaining Defense Secretary Robert Gates at the Pentagon, and making retired Marine General James Jones his national security adviser.

It is indeed notable that Mr. Gates was a firm supporter of the surge in Iraq. And even more surprising is that General Jones holds an "all the above" strategy on energy policy, and firmly supports offshore drilling, and favors the development of more nuclear and alternative energy.
 
Well, above all else, Mr. Obama has always been a political pragmatist (i.e. one who only does that which is useful to his own advantage). And if Barack, in sniffing the political winds, believes this is the best way to deal with keeping up his post-election approval, then so be it.
 
Remarkably, Obama is garnering accolades from all quarters as..."not being afraid to appoint strong people who may politically overshadow him in his first administration".

John Warner, distinguished retiring Republican senator from Virginia, recently praised our new president elect..."The duo of Gates and Jones instills great confidence at home and abroad, and further strengthens the growing respect for the president-elect’s ability to exercise sound judgment in selecting the best and the brightest to implement our nation’s security policies".   
 
Okay everyone...let's puts some hands together and give it up for Obama! Could he actually be out to govern from the center? Stay tuned next January 21 for the first installment of the Obama administration.

But hark...let us not go overboard! Franklin Roosevelt, (who's situation in the 1930's was almost parallel to that of Obama's present-day economic conundrums), also campaigned back then against Hoover as a centrist, tax-cutting moderate; but then veered sharply left after his inauguration, and unleashed his litany of New Deal big-government initiatives on a depression-stunned America.
 
Even the stock market, which had been tanking precipitously in great fear of the socialist Obama, rallied sharply in support of the centrist Obama in the wake of the announcements. But there's more to the story than just that. What Wall Street dreads even more than the perceived socialism of Obama's big government promises, is the radical leftism of Nancy Pelosi and a democratic Congress, with Obama as their rubber stamp in the Oval office. That's the real fear.
 
Pelosi, as Speaker of the House, is literally second in line to be president, and legislatively trumps Obama in sheer Washington DC political power. As Speaker, she can block any bill, no matter the origin, from even reaching the floor for a vote. And she has never yet missed an occasion to use her unique "veto" power to sabotage republican policies ever since she took the gavel in January, 2007 .

At her swearing-in ceremony, Pelosi too, also promised that she would use her position to govern from the center, and immediately swerved to the left faster than the demise of 4-dollar gasoline.
 
Question: Is there anyone in Congress who sits prettier than Nancy (Nazi) Pelosi? Since 4/5's of her district encompasses San Francisco, she has, what many believe, the SAFEST seat in the House. She also has a net worth of approximately 25 million dollars, much of it Microsoft stock, and in the combined net value of the vineyards she and he husband own in Napa valley. And true to her San Francisco roots, she is the Energizer Bunny of liberalism in her legislative outlook.
 
But curiously, given all the gay initiatives we've seen from the Golden Gate city since the 60's, extreme liberalism didn't appear here just because, "hey, it's San Francisco, stupid".

Most Americans erroneously believe that it was the hippie movement that spawned the roots of America's foremost city of liberalism. But the hippies didn't suddenly spring from the 60’s music of the era, or from the flower power of drugs and free love. It all goes back to the Second World War as the real origin.
 
San Francisco was known as the P.O.D. (point of departure) and re-entry for many men involved in the Pacific theater of the war. And back in the early 40's, in some cities, if you were even SUSPECTED of being gay, you could not only be run out of town, but murdered as well. So if you knew you were of 'different orientation', you wouldn't exactly want to trumpet it in the singles section of the classifieds.

There were a number of large military bases in San Francisco in World War II, and many of those men stationed there were gay. And those searching surreptitiously for the growing list of gay bars and restaurants in this port town got an unknowing assist from the armed services themselves, who routinely posted lists of off-limits places where you'd be subject to arrest by the M-P's (military police).

During the war, many homosexuals were screened out at induction centers on the grounds that they would make poor combat soldiers, and that their presence would threaten discipline and morale. If they did passed induction, the gays (popularly known as "fruits" back then) were subjected to harassment in the barracks, due to their inability to explain to their fellow inductees, "what type of women they liked"; and were easily distinguished by their lack of interest in female companionship when off-base leaves were issued.

Rather than returning home, many gay soldiers (and particularly those dishonorably discharged for homosexuality) stayed or settled in San Francisco after their service ended. Can you imagine a dishonorably-discharged soldier calling home and "HERIOCALLY" telling his mother..."hey ma, great news! You and pa wont have to worry about me fighting in the war...I got discharged for being homosexual! We'll all celebrate when I get home... maybe they'll have a parade uptown for me as a returning fruit".
 
Actually, rather than admit to this dishonorable shame, the discharged soldiers stayed and decided to start the war from home base gay-central...San Francisco USA! And why not? They found more gay men here than in many of the places they came from; and more tolerant too. So this primarily lent origin to the gay/liberal movement of the left coast.

As the 50's came on, the rest of California (and the nation) took notice of this and more gays started coming in to set up underground organizations, clubs, bars, newspapers and magazines. And as the 60's came on, the Vietnam war gave the "hip" or hippie movement the cause-celebre that provided them an impetus to acquire an aura of legitimacy...i.e. "We hippie liberals are out to demonstrate why Vietnam is an illegitimate war; and America has not the right to fight it!"
 
San Francisco today can best be described as a city-nation unto itself. It's the capital of gay that sits by the Bay. It's the city where "it’s all about being one"...and about, "treating everybody as one". It's been aptly described by those who migrate there as, "heaven and hell on earth", depending on one's preference. It's either the city of fruitcakes; or the city of the enlightened attitude. Once again, it depends on one's outlook.
 
The homeless in San Francisco are of particular interest. They travel by day and hang out in packs together. They belong to their own "union", unlike the vulnerable, despondent drug-dependent winos of other cities, who keep to themselves. In unity there is strength; and in San Francisco there is tolerance.

Unlike the harassment they--in most cities--face from police (and disdainful "get a job" citizens), the 'liberated homeless' of San Francisco are a cause unto themselves.

Recently, hundreds of concerned citizens fanned out through all of San Francisco's neighborhoods to tally the thousands of homeless people sleeping on city streets, and to discern whether the city's efforts to address the problem are working. "I walk to work every day, and I see this man on the corner," said a 27-year old volunteer, who moved to San Francisco from Boise, Idaho, several months ago. "I don't have the funds to help him financially, but my heart is burdened to help."
 
Besides tolerance, San Francisco is known as "Amsterdam at night", where hundreds of gay bars, tattoo and massage parlors, and gay strip clubs are omni-present. But unlike in other cities, the liberal culture has professed tolerance, and accepts all alternative lifestyles as par for the course.  Visitors describe it as having an 'underground appearance' in almost every city neighborhood. One recent traveler described the 'jovial' atmosphere as..."pot-smoking wierdos walking around everywhere".

So whither will the San Francisco attitudes of Nancy Pelosi lead, come the next session of Congress? Will she spin her web of liberalism, and overcome the newfound centrism of Barack Obama? This may shape up to be the most interesting drama on Capitol hill since Monica's dress.

And also in the Senate, there may arise another challenge from the radicals, such as Schumer, Reid, Kennedy, and the other wizened senatorial leftists. Will Barack use his Chicago, thug-style politics to handle this cadre of aristocratic liberals? Or will they, in effect, say to him... "Now listen young man; you're here for only 4 or possibly 8 years...we're here for life! So forget all your centrist moderate babble..THIS is how we do things in Washington, my boy".

And by April of next year, we all should know who's likely to emerge triumphant is this likely-to-come power struggle. Meanwhile, the possibility of an unfolding new Washington drama grows ever more suspenseful.

Will Pelosi and Reid railroad the green-behind-the-ears Obama, with their skillful manipulation of House and Senate parliamentary rules and procedures? Or will the Obama presidential express of centrism roll over the opposition? Will our 44th president honor his political debts to the left? Or will he, out of political expediency, forfeit the payback, and let them eat crow?

Capitol Hill, 2009-10, is likely to be where and when the new battle of Constitutional checks and balances will have taken place.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

RELAX: Even McCain said... "you don't have to be scared of Barack Obama"


SCENE: a John McCain late October election rally in Lakeville, Minnesota.

Mr. McCain had just cautioned some vitriolic supporters that they needed to be "respectful" toward Barack Obama, when a woman standing a few feet from him, raised her hand, stood up, and anxiously declared : "I can't trust Obama...I read about him... He's an Arab."

Senator McCain: "No, ma'am. No, ma'am. He's not...he's a decent family man, and a citizen that I just happen to have disagreements with on fundamental issues... a person that you don't have to be scared of as president of the United States".

McCain was being noble, telling his supporters that if Obama ultimately won..."give the guy a chance".

Well, Obama often said John McCain was out of touch.

But maybe an "IN TOUCH" John McCain could have informed this concerned lady with some REAL straight talk:

"No Ma'am. You think he's a Arab? Not at all ma'am... I just have some fundamental disagreements with the fact that he wants to dismantle our Constitution; suppress our freedoms of speech, corrupt our free elections...and expand the government to the point where individual freedoms and conservative beliefs will slowly and inevitably be crushed by the mantle of socialism. But other than that, he'll be a fine leader for America."

Yes America; we have nothing to fear...nothing to be scared about, now that Comrade Obama is safely at the helm; for Obummunism is at hand!

And there's also nothing to be scared about now that kommisars Pelosi and Reid are poised  to suppress all conservatives from ever again being heard in the Senate or House.

Already, radical leftist plans are underway to marginalize Republicans, and muzzle all their minority opposition, using the blunt politics of the hammer and sickle.

It will be Pelosi and Reid in Congress, hammering through all the new "freedom" legislation that will give them the opportunity to savage our Constitution, and bypass the traditional rules of the House and Senate, including the elimination of the filibuster privilege.

And then, we shall see what kind of chance Obama will give America, if he appoints his rumored-to-be-favored candidate for Attorney General, Jamie Gorelick,  who is likely to run the Justice Department with Gestapo-like efficiency. And she will provide the sickle to cut down all who would dare speak out in defiance.

But, you say... "this can't be true"..."how could this be possible?" Give Obama a chance"..." he's not like that... he wouldn't do that...c'mon... be open minded.... he just got elected".

But Jamie Gorelick as Attorney General, will be about as open-minded as  the Berlin wall.

Here, as follows, is the message of the Obammunist-Pelosi-Gorelick Manifesto: "for the expressed purpose of seeing that never again will conservatives have power in Washington".  But never say "never"-- right?

Wrong: the Justice department will now have one purpose and mission with Gorelick at the top...suppress the opposition; stifle all dissent!

But why would a nice collegial fellow like Barack Obama suddenly turn on all the patriotic Americans who voted for his "change" platform?

Answer: Simple. Obama is like any dictator...it's about seizing absolute control. And the essence of control is suppressing and eliminating all opposition.  If you crush the right to dissent, you achieve absolute control. Then it's...Heil Barack!

Still not convinced? Think this is an exaggeration? Well, if you like surprises, just wait and see what wonderful things are about to become "the change we will all be forced to accede in".

First; Pelosi- Reid will further liberalize the voting laws, and hammer these through both houses of Congress.

Soon, you'll be able to vote early, vote often, and from anywhere you like (mail). Obama often taught seminars to ACORN in the early 90's on how to steal elections... "Project Vote" ('92), Motor Voter (95) are all early examples of Chicago machine politics election fraud "technology".

What has evolved into today's early voting rules, E-Z registration (I.D's no longer required--only need show a utility bill), is an incredible flaunting of our one man- one vote democratic Constitutional principles...courtesy of the diabolical machinations of Barack Obama!

Hey-what about telephone voting? Sh-h-h, (don't give 'em any more ideas).

Now, with liberalized voting laws, every critical seat in the House or Senate can be influenced to go whatever way ACORN wants it. But of course, people think there are protections in place from this ever happening...uh sorry America-- not with kommisar Gorelick swinging away with the force of the entire U.S. Justice system, and IRS behind her to enforce these measures.

Now, the Obama marxist machine will be able to roll over the opposition with the muscle of every law enforcement officer and democratic judge in the nation.

And don't forget boys and girls... before we proceed any further, Mr. Obama happens to be an attorney, who graduated law school with a focus on Constitutional law (and how to get around it).

STAGE I: once Congress  "liberates" the voter laws; it will facilitate the election of liberals everywhere, be it statewide elections, congressional seats,  judges, governors, sheriffs,  even local school boards.

STAGE II: if any individual, group, party, or even boy scout troop dare challenge the results of ANY close election; the Gorelick dragnet will be put in motion...all who file any protest or legal challenge wil be dealt with harshly...you shall be faced with formal charges of "voter suppression", and must personally appear in court to "show cause."

STAGE II: if thou should dare to to protest the voter suppression charge in public...thou shall be charged with "biasly and publicly interfering with an investigation".

STAGE III: if thou dare to protest in public the "interfering with an investigation" charges, you will be formerly charged with perjury...a felony!

Yes, let's all just give Obama a chance...so in the next close election, try to even speak out in protest if your man loses, and see what kind of chance Obama gives you: In addition to having to hire defense attorneys and court appearances, your social security # will be turned over to the IRS, and you will be audited until they find some error in your return ( lest ye forget dear patriot, comrade Obama will place all liberals into key IRS positions nationwide), and if you withhold payment, armed men will come to your house to arrest you. Sound like Red Square to you?

Free speech to protest will be a passing memory, with Big Brother Barack calling the shots --1984 is here and the people are in denial!

NOTE: if YOU are still in denial up to now, check out the blatantly fraudulent recount in Minnesota going on at this very minute in the Al Franken race for the Senate vs Republican Norm Coleman.

Next: the Obama administration will declare Roe-Wade a federal law ( i.e. can't be challenged in states anymore), because abortion will be considered a civil right. So to reiterate; if you will no longer be able to protest abortion for that reason (suppression of a civil right), then states will no longer be able to challenge.

And for Obama's next Marxist trick...it will be "Card Check" (i.e. forced unionization)... no secret voting amongst workers: either join the union, or else-- the union boss gestapo may pay you a friendly night time visit--- "ve know vhere you live" ....so is "Crystalnacht" next?

Now let's make room for more radical leftists laws---how about all the nice new burdensome business-strangling environmental regulations that are sure to be handed down next year  by the EPA?

And if any conservative group (or Think Tank) dare to disagree/protest or try to sue the EPA, Obama will unleash upon them the threat of the IRS hammer to stifle them and rifle them with a tax audit.

Ask Joe the plumber for details about this after the IRS gets through auditing him next year.

Yes comrades , you proletariats vill find out ze hard way.

And the fun is just beginning...look for the Freedom Doctrine to pass with flying colors next year, and watch Limbaugh and Hannity et al. disappear from the airways faster than Milli Vanilli.

But how, you say, is this possible? "Freedom of speech is in our Bill of Rights". Think comrades ...when did a simple thing like our Constitution's First Amendment ever deter Barack Obama ? He despises the Constituton, and has called it "an imperfect doctrine".

And Obama will raise his right hand and swear a lie during his inaugural oath when he-- as president-- promises to "uphold and defend" the Constitution.

Talk radio is destined for the way of the silent movie; gone but not forgotten. First, Hannity and Limbaugh (et.al.) will be determined to be "purveyors of hateful, divisive and irresponsible pronunciations over the public airwaves" by liberal protest groups like Move On dot Org, and Media Matters,  who will record and listen to every second of their shows.
 
Next,  liberal protestors will pop up everywhere in the form of demonstrations around the country (ACORN again--complete with signs)..."no more hate speech"...'Hannity is devisive" ...etc.

Next, the demonstrations begin to turn "violent"( ACORN will stage fights), and the sympathetic liberal media (will just happen to have advanced notice) will play their video tapes as the lead news stories evrywhere, and cast these as "civil unrest".

Slowly (but surely) the people will see this everyday, and over a while become receptive to the idea of no more talk radio, because the "average American" will be dis-informed into thinking..."uh, yeh, dose talk show hosts are nuttin' but trouble makers... an' if Hannity and Limbaugh goes off the air, so what?"

The public now thinks its a good idea to ban talk radio because  "no more bitter dissension from divisive speech over the public airwaves".

Next, the media disinformation will suddenly focus on crime and urban gang violence; and every gunshot, hunting accident, and suicide victim will be front and center lead stories, followed by more ACORN anti-gun demonstrators... "stop the violence" marches, etc. Then Obama will ram through a law about "citizen safety priority over the Second Amendment right to bear arms".

Now with the population disarmed, Obama will break out with his civilian security force plan...
...so keep an eye on THIS concept. It could be what the John Birch Society warned of many years ago. This may be the method by which they..." pry the gun from your cold dead fingers", as was done in Germany in the 1930's, behind the Iron Curtain in the 1940's, and in Cambodia in the 1960's.

So what's next under the comrade Obama regime; euthanasia? How many more partial birth abortion, gay rights, and liberal laws are to follow?

"When the right to life is denied by our government, then morality and democracy are doomed to death".

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Heil America! Get set for the Pelosi-Reid blitzkrieg of 2009


Question: what's the difference between a military vs. a political conflict? America is about to find out.

After 14 years of either a GOP-dominated Congress or a Republican president, Democratic party regulars are under intense pressure. Factions such as 'Move On .Org' and the the big labor unions are urging them to deliver on a new extreme agenda of promises made long before Barack Obama announced his bid for the White House.

And how about our darling, mischievous House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi, who recently "promised" not to lurch to the left, and give in to pent-up demands from party liberals. And Nancy Pelosi never has been one to let anyone stand in her way.

"The country must be governed from the middle," Pelosi, D-Calif., solemnly announced to reporters Wednesday November 5. "You have to bring people together to reach consensus on solutions that are sustainable and acceptable to the American people."

Gee, how utterly gracious of Mrs Pelosi! She seems to be holding the olive branch of bi-partisanship to the defeated Republican minority. Such nobility!

But Nancy Pelosi talking consensus is like the Klan talking affirmative action; because it ain't gonna happen as long as she continues to wield the speaker's gavel like a club at a bouncer's banquet.
 
So why such a sudden change of heart from Mrs. Machiavelli herself? In the parlance of the KGB, it's called disinformation. Pacify the public, while preparing to savage the enemy.

If history is any bellweather of what's about to take place when the new 111th session of Congress convenes, the Republicans had better come to Capitol hill with their rifles locked and loaded; the final phase of the battle for the survival of the conservatives is about to commence.

Pelosi's disinformation strategy goes back to Jan 7, 2007. In her 'swearing-in' speech as the new Speaker, she waved the banner of patriotism, and proclaimed..."I accept this gavel in the spirit of partnership, not partisanship," and continued; "In this House, we may be different parties, but we serve one country."  But what country was she talking about?

Since her 'partnership' promise, Speaker, Nancy (Nazi) Pelosi has wielded her legislative authority with the ruthlessness of a banana republic dictator. There are no checks and balances on the House Speaker. And Pelosi knows it! She is second in line for the presidency, and as far as setting the legislative agenda, she can easily out-manuever a rookie president like Obama almost anytime she sees fit.

So what can we expect from a political desperado like Pelosi? Is she suddenly going to warm up to the Republicans, out of spirit of patriotism, or as a sense of duty to the American public? Will she ascent to the true interests if the people?

Sorry all you Republican moderates; it's just another clever tactic in her divide and conquer strategy...crush all opposition! It's the Pelosi-Reid-Obama classic set up: Waylay thy enemy: convince them that the conflict is over...peace, unity, coopeartion-- that's how we'll govern...it's for the good of the nation, etc...then bam! Assassinate them all at the peace table after they have been unilaterally disarmed.

But would Mr. nice guy, Barack Obama, ever go along with such a dastardly plan? No way you say?

But since when in our recent political history, have the liberals EVER been willing to cede any favor to vanquished Republicans?

And now, the media liberals are at it again, and the gullible Republicans continue to drown in self flagellation, having learned virtually zero from the all the acrimony of the presidential election.

Already, radical leftist operatives (Rahm Emanuel) have been put in place to assure that  a harsh peace will be at hand. And starting next Jan 21, the unsuspecting Republicans will find themselves on the fast track to the political gulag of a merciless Congressional majority. The democrats smell blood in the water, and the radical leftists sharks are circling.

The table has been set for the radical left to expunge any and all vestiges of the conservative right. This is a once-in-a generation chance, and the democrats are not about to blow it. They are quietly stringing barbed wire along the political aisle...and there will be no attempted crossings permitted without harsh reprisal.

Pelosi and her ilk know that as long as they can win the battle of public opinion, they can literally get away with the political murder of our Constitution's Bill of Rights, and basically alter our way of traditional life in America.

EXAMPLE: Once the Fairness Doctrine is implemented by FCC decree next year, the liberals can say... "Rush Limbaugh doesn't OWN the airwaves... Americans have a "civil right" to hear the opinions of the other side"...etc.

Yup...the liberal media spin will be as in as it ever was! Talk radio will be gone, and Americans will think..."uh-yeah... that sounds fair enough", then basically shrug their collective shoulders, and go on with their lives under the new Obammunist manifesto of change for America.

Right now, we're in the phase of the phony war, similar to western Europe in winter of 1939.  But the leftist blitzkrieg will begin Jan 21, 2009, and Nazi Pelosi,  Harry Reid, and Chuck Schumer, with Obama riding shotgun, will shoot down all vestiges of conservative opposition; saying it was their "mandate" to carry this out for the wishes of the American people.

But did Obama truly win a mandate as they profess? In the eyes of the liberal media-- of course!  CNN, MSNBC, NBC, CBS, and ABC...all are now on the same page, espousing that flowery good times are just around the corner as a result of their newly-elected hero taking the Whitehouse.

The pundits continue to gush away about the "historic, never thought possible election results"... and that...."no recent president has ever had the support of such a powerful grassroots movement"-- embellished with phrases like "the will of the people"..."America made history", and all the gee-whiz, feel-good, golly-gee propaganda that works every time .

But the reality is that Obama won in only 2 categories in the battleground states-- minority votes went 96 to 4% for Obama, and 69-31% with the under-25 bracket. He lost in ALL OTHER  age groups, but was able to keep it near enough to win a close majority in almost every hotly-contested state. And the electoral college tally just happened to score a widely divergent result from the popular vote.

So was it a mandate, or just a skewing of the results of the electoral college? The actual popular vote provided Obama with a victory margin of less than 6%.

Next, Obama won only by the luckiest of lucky circumstances when the stock market began to take its Obama victory plunge on Sept 24 . So there was no actual mandate; just the attempt to portray the results as such.

Presently, all the leftist sniper fire has been toned down, and peace feelers are being tossed in all directions. But ask any military general: the way you win in any war is by killing the opposition. And these radical democrats are not about to blow their chance!

There will be no honeymoon of mercy for the Republicans. The Pelosi-Reid alliance will strike on day one. They will use the House and Senate rules to rig procedure, and Card Check and the Freedom Doctrine will be rammed through Congress faster than the spring 1940 blitzkrieg of France.

And Pelosi and Reid will take no casualties once they have those two key Marxist decrees in place. Look for the reinstatement of the ban on drilling, the passage of the World Poverty Act, and radical new proposals for "educational reforms". Basically, this will serve to indoctrinate the school kids to revisionist history, and eliminate all the traditional ways our kids learned how America actually evolved; and further fracturing our country into just a bunch of people with little in common, other than they all happen to reside between Mexico and Canada.

Next, look for Obama to appoint the closest thing to he can find to single mothers, for all the vacant Federal judicial benches.

Then will follow the expansion of abortion rights, new affirmative action directives, and a slew of wealth-transfer fiscal measures, all disguised under names such as "freedom of  this" or, "the right to that" legislative entitlements. Hey, once you're on a roll, why stop there?

But other, more politically contentious things like free health care, and taxes on coal and fossil fuel industries will be tabled for after the midterm elections.The liberals learned their lesson from the first Bill Clinton term...steady as she goes, and after the midterms, then fire away your big guns.

And of course, the American public will be conditioned by then to accept everything, because the media will color the fiasco under some clever Barack misnomer such as the "new Bill of Rights for America", or the "new living Constitution for America".

Eventually, Americans who voted for Obama and the democrats will learn the hard way-- leopards never change their spots. And snakes may change their skins... but they still remain dangerously poisonous. 

So is this basically skin-changing time for Pelosi, Reid, and Obama, as they prepare to administer the final lethal bite to the oppositon? Tune in to the next episode, which will commence January 21, 2009.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »