About Me

Name: thekeenobserver
Email: reallykeenobserver@yahoo.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Gobal warmongering? Climate changers? Islamic aggressors? When the U.N. attacks!

Posted by thekeenobserver on Thursday, February 26, 2009 7:08:32 PM

Almost 65 years ago, in September of 1944, U.S., British, Soviet, and Chinese representatives met at Dumbarton Oaks in Washington to draft the charter of a postwar international peacekeeping organization based on the principle of collective security. It provided for a General Assembly of all member states, and a Security Council .

Voting procedures were finalized at the Yalta Conference in early 1945; and finally, representatives of 50 nations met in San Francisco in June 1945 to complete the final Charter of the United Nations.

And after this promising post-World War II beginning for the U.N., things have gone south ever since.
 
Today the United Nations has morphed from the world's peacemaker, to universal rabble rouser, sticking their collective noses into everything but making peace.
 
Exhibit A-- Islamic countries recently won United Nation's backing for an anti-blasphemy measure, which Canada (and other Western critics) said, "risks being used to limit freedom of speech".

This measure, "The Defamation of Religions," passed 85-50, with 42 abstentions in a key UN General Assembly committee, and will enter into the international record after an expected rubber stamp by the U.N. plenary council later this year.
 
It's an obvious (and ominous) victory for Muslim religious fascists -- they can now exploit a human rights approach towards silencing any dissent of which they disapprove.
 
And already the resolution has stirred controversy within Europe: U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, recently condemned as “offensively anti-Islamic,” a Dutch lawmaker’s film that accuses the Koran of inciting violence.

The film, which was launched by Islam critic Geert Wilders over the Internet, caused enough resentment that the Sec. General appealed for calm to those “understandably" offended by it....“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is NOT at stake here.”
 
An ominous statement indeed, and a possible violation of our First Amendment right to free speech in the United States.
 
Actually, what's being proposed is not just some campaign for religious freedom of expression, but rather a sinister collective movement-- the parallel government of the entire world.

But while the draft's sponsors say it (and earlier similar measures) are aimed at preventing violence against worshippers regardless of religion, religious tolerance advocates warn the resolutions are being accumulated for a hidden ulterior motive... providing international cover for domestic anti-blasphemy laws.

While the current resolution is non-binding, the anti-blasphemy decree would impose its terms on signatory states.

So here's the good ole, peace-keeping, peace-loving UN, busy at work in a back door ploy of upholding the tenets of radical Islamic fundamentalism, which purports: "An Islamic believer must be serious in every field...There are no jokes in Islam...There is no humor in Islam... There is no fun in Islam".                 

And the trend in America (should we become a signatory) is more ominous; more religious segregation; more Muslim demands within the public schools: the permission to wear headscarves; the demand for prayer rugs; special cafeteria provisions; separate gymnasium classes; and ultimately, classroom Sharia law, begetting a parallel society within a supposedly melting pot country-- our Unites States.
 
Yes, give 'em an inch and they take a society hostage by their own form of cultural jihad--subversion of America's schools and colleges-- religious aggression under the guise of cultural awareness.
 
And where does it stop within our domestic borders? Separate schools? Separate laws? Separate cultures? Parallel societies?

As those old timers in Flatbush used to say at Ebbets Field in Brooklyn... "throw da bums out!" Should we expel the U.N., before they exploit America to the point of no return?
 
How much more do we yield to these deceitful aggressors before they have their own Muslim governing bodies within America? This is where we're headed if this liberal, fascist aggression isn't stopped dead in its cultural tracks.

But fostering controversy instead of peace has been the UN's stock in trade for the last two decades.

So now, we move to exhibit B-- U.N. radical environmentalism-- the attempt by the organization to become the power center of the world's political universe.

And demonstrative of the UN's covert strategy has been their insatiable, chicken little attempt to convince the world that the climatalogical sky is falling: the global warmongering drumbeat of climate change.
 
Armed with "expert" climate models, the UN's IPCC maintains that, "Global warming will continue and even intensify in the 21st century."

Vladimir Katsov, the head of a geophysics laboratory in Russia (and member of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), agreed with the IPCC's estimate that the temperature would rise by 1.8 to 4*Centigrade by the end of the century.

Katsov said..."Warming is likely to influence the intensity of precipitation, floods and droughts, affecting crops and probably triggering migration...and future conflict for ever scarcer water and fertile soil resources.

In a report published in Paris, the UN climate panel - a group of 2,500 scientists from 130 countries tasked with assessing climatic changes-- pronounced its latest chicken little post over the internet: "Humanity might face a rise in global sea levels of 5 to 7 inches in the coming years, saying this climate change was, "very likely, man-made".

IPCC scientist Chris Field of Stanford University also weighed in: "Without decisive action, global warming in the 21st century is likely to accelerate at a much faster pace and cause more environmental damage than predicted".

Chairman of the IPCC, Rajendra Pachauri added that..."Concerns about climate change and public awareness on the subject are at an all time high."

Established by the United Nations in 1988, the IPCC brings together hundreds of so-called "experts" from around the world, to assess the science and policy implications of climate change. And In 2007 the IPCC, and the beloved Al Gore, were simultaneously awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.
 
Ah yes--who else-- Al Gore!

But besides Gore, who are all rest of these pretenders who claim that a 3 to 4 degree increase will burn our good earth to a cinder in this 21st century? They are nothing more than an assemblage of self-appointed "experts", at odds with thousands of true scientists and physicists who know climate change is a hoax, but are silenced by the one thing that perpetuates this entire sham --the liberal media.

It's the media, who will plaster any report all over the front pages, whenever the IPCC chooses to come out with yet another of its many gloom-n-doom scenarios; portending that the climate apocalypse will soon be at a threshhold level.
 
So according to this IPCC cast of characters; what are we do about it?

Should we be filling up sandbags to stop the rising oceans from invading our doorsteps...or preparing to live underground to escape the inevitable temperature holocaust? Or how about mandatory flood insurance for every household along the seacoasts?

Yes-- were in the good hands of the IPCC-- here  to save us from the impending disaster. And like the robot from "Lost in Space", it's, "Warning -warning -warning...doomsday ahead! We are the IPCC; and don't you forget it".

But curiously, the heralded members of the IPCC panel conducts no scientific research of their own.
 
But with Al Gore behind it all, you know there's an ulterior motive hidden in there somewhere. And why would the UN persist in these baseless, phony warnings if there wasn't some master plan behind it all?
 
And that motive, of course, is cap and trade-- the scam of the century-- based on the dumbed-down scientific ignorance of the American population, demonizing the very life gas all humans exhale, and plants inhale for their photosynthetic processing of chlorophyll-- carbon dioxide!

Yes-- demon carbon dioxide-- supposedly the cause for the nonexistent global warming, that is scientifically at odds with nearly all other mainstream scientists.
 
So what’s the endgame?

It's the hot air from our good buddy Al Gore, who's been concealing his true interest in stubbornly promulgating the scam--Generation Investment Management.

Question: If his motivation in pushing Global Warming is so altruistic, was it really necessary for the already wealthy Gore to establish this multi-million dollar corporation in England?
 
Generation Investment Management's U.S. branch is headed by a former Gore staffer and fund-raiser, Peter S. Knight, who once was the target of a probe by the Federal Election Commission and the Department of Justice.
  
Gore helped found Generation Investment Management through which he (and others) pay for offsets. The firm invests the money in solar, wind and other projects that reduce energy consumption around the globe.

Gore is chairman of the firm and, presumably, draws an income and will make money as its investments prosper. In other words, he "buys" his "carbon offsets" from himself, through a transaction designed to boost his own investments and return a profit to himself. To be blunt, Gore doesn't buy "carbon offsets" through Generation Investment Management - he buys stock in the company.
  
Fascinating -the great Gore green delusion.

Gore's carbon credits scam, and the IPCC warnings, are based not upon climatalogical factors, but on economic ones-- a third world wealth transfer done incognito through the U.N.
 
And once the Obama administration mandates that the U.S. government establishes an overall emissions cap, and assigns specific emissions allocations, it will not tell industries and companies what to do or how to meet their allocations.

Each company is free to make their own choices. They can reduce their own emissions-- or pay someone else to lower them--drastically raising the utility bills of every American household, and the slow and inevitable draining of the wealth of the middle class.

And beneath the surface, this climate-change guilt trip will ultimately result in nothing more than an excuse to tax energy users and providers, with the U.N. as the ultimate beneficiary.

Cap and trade will assure that America will shrink its economy, on the absurd premise that fossil fuel energy usage emits far too much CO2, and companies will end up purchasing these cap and trade credits from smaller drone nations, which emit miniscule amounts of CO2, because they have no industry-- they produce nothing.

And all these carbon credit payments may ultimately end up being distributed to third world dictators abroad.

The goal? Increasing the worldwide political power of the UN, and projecting the influence of the Obama administration to all the world's continents...thereby assuring Barack Obama eventually arises as the defacto president of the entire world, with buddy Al Gore standing at his side, as one of the world's wealthiest men.
 
And ironically, if one were to attach the word "American" after the initials "U N", it would read-- UN-American.

www.keenobserver.blogtownhall.com
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Barack Obama...President of the world?

Posted by thekeenobserver on Tuesday, January 13, 2009 8:23:37 PM

Well lookee-lookee! Did the cat slip out of the bag? Carol Browner, Obama's proud choice for climate Czar, was recently "unearthed" as a member of the radical socialist (Stalinist) organization known as "Socialist International" (S.I.). And these people aren't exactly your basic local rotary club, but rather a leftist hardball group determined to put forth their radical environmental agenda upon the ENTIRE world.

S. I. calls for the, "redesign of the international rules on intellectual property." That's bureaucrat lingo for compelling an inventor to surrender property rights in order to "share" technologies with less-developed countries. So Ms. Browner--can we get any more socialist than compelling all U.S. inventors to "share" with less developed countries? What in the name of Thomas Edison are you planning?
 
Despite the controversy, president elect Obama, who chose the ex-60's radical Browner for this all-important cabinet position, staunchly supports the nomination, declaring that, "Climate change will be a priority of my administration". Supposedly, in the name of stimulating the economy, Obama plans to spend at least 500 billion dollars (which the government does not have) to convert the economy from carbon-based fuels, to greener alternatives. 
 
The main focus of Socialist International centers on America, as the world's largest energy user, must shrink its economic output (energy usage) in conjunction with the smaller countries of the world increasing theirs. And the mechanism for this philosophy is based not upon climatological factors, but on economic ones-- a third world wealth transfer done incognito through the U.N.
 
An in-depth look at Socialist International would reveal that the organization is pushing hard for "global governance", and that America must shrink its economy, whose energy usage emits far too much Co2, in deference to smaller nations, which emit miniscule amounts of Co2. 
 
But looking inward, this climate change guilt trip is really nothing more than an excuse to tax energy users and providers, and send the money to the U.N. to be distributed to third world dictators abroad. The goal? Increasing the political power of the Obama administration to all continents....i.e. Barack Obama-- president of the world!
 
Socialist International purports all the shop-worn liberal mantras: peak oil; co2 is a pollutant; we've reached the verge of irreversible climate devastation; and the U.S. is poisoning the atmosphere. And all this can only be "counteracted" by cap-n-trade. But why would S.I. wish to shrink the U.S. economy in favor of third world countries, such as Zimbabwe, or even Venezuela?
 
First, let's shed all the arguments about human-generated global warming.This brand new theory postulates a more plausible (and diabolical) presentation of the real underlying agenda of Socialist International, Carol Browner, Obama, and all the other enviro-marxists, They're all actually hiding within a "smokescreen", under the guise of saving the environment.
 
So why do they purport this Machiavellian masquerade? Lets officially brand it as, "The smoke screen theory". 
 
The foundation of this theory rests upon the conservative right always thinking, "You liberals  ARE really stupid, believing that man can change the climate".  But herein lies the brilliance--who are the ones ACTUALLY being stupid? 
 
One thing you cannot deny is that many liberals are decidedly brilliant, and politically astute about obtaining positions of power-- which begs the question..."What if these liberals actually realize that global warming via mankind is sheer scientific folly, but they're cleverly using it as a 'cover story' for obfuscating their real agenda, wealth transfer, and the worlwide consolidation of their political power.
 
Therefore, the smoke screen theory can be explained like this: These enviro-marxists use global warming as a way to hoodwink all the world from their true intent---cementing  cap and trade laws into permanent existence, which will produce giant sucking sounds of seemingly boundless money flowing to the government, via the environmental taxation of all the energy producers and energy users in the United States.
 
Its almost like a plot from the old "Batman" TV series of the mid 60's... "We environmentalists feign stupidity, and outsmart all those on the right who think we're the fools"...ha-ha!
 
The smokescreen theory is designed to turn the tables, and outfox the right..."Go ahead and argue with us, you foolish conservatives; we, the liberals, have the media on OUR side...we have the school children on OUR side; we have assumed the moral majority of an ignorant American electorate over to OUR side. And because of all this, we intend to keep it this way!"
 
"And beginning this January 21, we will get our climate change legislation railroaded  through congress, and tax the heavy industries, coal companies, and utilities out of existence; and then, put forth our green agenda. And you cannot stop us, because socialism is now mainstream".
 
So is the smoke screen theory sounding pretty clear now, or do we need some further explanation?

Socialist International, the people who feed us all this alarmist B.S., is treating Americans as if they are too foolish to know what the REAL political spectrum is about-- subversion of the capitalist system, and advancing the cause of socialism by whatever means necessary (i.e. artificial environmentalism to obtain political power over the entire world).
 
NEXT: let's introduce the future icing on the enviro-marxist cake--senate bill s1389; a bill to authorize a National Science Foundation Climate Change "Education Program". Look for it to be introduced first thing into the senate on Jan 22.
 
Of course any proposal with the phrase "education program"  sound innocuous enough, but what is even more interesting, Senate bill 1389A was authored by no less than His Highness, Barack Obam-0h.
 
And the nuts and bolts of bill 1389 requires the establishment of an education program to:
(1) broaden the understanding of the possible consequences of climate change,
2) apply the latest scientific discoveries to provide "learning opportunities"
for people (brainwashing);
(3) emphasize "actionable information" (more leftist brainwashing) to help people promote implementation of energy conservation, renewable energy, and greenhouse gas reduction.
(4) postulate potential solutions to the "problem." 
 
So who's going to pay for all these directives to fight climate change? WE will. How? The Obama administration will tax the coal companies, power plants, steel companies, and all of heavy industry according to their usage of fossil fuels; they will be required to buy carbon credits, and trade with nations that produce no energy or emissions .
 
"No business will be allowed to emit any greenhouse gases for free,” Obama declared. “Businesses don’t own the sky, the public does, and if we want them to stop polluting it, we have to put a price on all pollution.”

Perfect! Why has a politician not thought of this before? Only someone as diabolical as Obama could have thought of charging for pollution, and be clever enough to sell it to America.
 
Obama's plan would require all credits to be purchased at auction, rather than allocated by industry -- a move ensuring that all "polluters" pay for every ton of emissions released. It's also a move that would massively increase the political power of his administration and go along way toward international wealth redistribution to the third world--a cause Obama and Browner fanatically (but esoterically) have supported for many years.
 
And by appointing Browner to a White House post, Obama has at least implicitly endorsed an utterly radical socialist agenda for his administration's environmental policy.

The incoming chief executive stands at the very foundation of the smoke screen theory--environmental policies aren't really about protecting or preserving the earth, but rather expanding government power and limiting individual freedom.

This enviro-radicalism of the Chosen One could push the nation so far to the left, we will never again recover the right path to sound energy policy, and get back to the economic expansion America has always enjoyed, because of the freedom we once had from government restriction.
 
And with the huge, predictable price increases of energy as a result of this enviro-radicalism, everytime we fill up our tanks, or mail in our electric bills, it'll be us--not business-- who'll really be paying the so-called price for pollution.
 
The smokescreen theory will go along way explaining how a scientifically challenged American electorate supports Obama's green-leaning rhetoric- which is nothing but a half veiled attempt to implement a clearly ideological, leftist agenda.
 
This is all part of an even more hidden agenda-- an undeclared war on capitalism; and its implementation will significantly alter the fabric of American society, as we have known it for decades.

www.keenobserver.blogtownhall.com
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »