About Me

Name: thekeenobserver
Email: reallykeenobserver@yahoo.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Swine fever? Congress feeds at the taxpayer trough


Got a problem with the high cost of living? Well then, just become a member of Congress!

To get elected to Congress these days, you should have a good head of hair (a must for TV soundbites), be able speak very emotionally on the stump, and have well-connected friends. Then bingo--you're probably in luck of landing one of the most 550 coveted jobs in the entire world!

But the real payoff isn't so much the job itself, it's the probability that you'll serve comfortably in a lifestyle of the rich and famous for the rest of your days-- you'll have it made for life.

Don't think so? Well, try this for a wild and crazy hypothetical question: Would you rather hit the state lottery, or win the next available congressional seat in your district?

A lottery winner automatically has to pay 35% in taxes, and is besieged by unwanted publicity. Often times, these winners eventually become losers, especially if they've overspent their millions after having retired prematurely. Some even end up heavily in debt.

Now compare to a newly-elected congressperson:

They get paid six figure incomes, have few living expenses, and "government-paid-everything" perks...right down to free shoe shines and haircuts. They travel worldwide. They have their own limousines, privately chartered flights, and pay for little else other than a residence in DC.

Are you worried about retirement? Well again, just "become involved" and run for Congress.

Hardworking congressional members certainly don't have to worry about contributing to some 401K plan like us common folks. No sir! They can just feed from the congressional "pension honey-pot," which is kept full by the overtaxed American public.

After 20 years, a member of Congress can retire with up to 80 percent of his/her salary. Pity...just eighty percent; what's a poor Congressional retiree to do? But then again, it's not exactly a life of having to wear sackcloth and surviving on pet food either.

New House members are entitled to a personnel allowance from which they may hire up to 18 full-time staff members, and receive office expenses for travel and supplies. Yearly Senate office costs range from $3.5 million to $4 million PER member. That's an approximate $400 million in annual federal expenses, for only 100 Senators!

For House members-- although the figures aren't a matter of public record--18 staff personnel being paid 50k/year, would equal a nice round 900,000 dollars in salary costs. Now add in office, travel, etc., and that's another $200,000; so EACH representative costs us lowly taxpayers $1.1 million/year, and x 450, equals $480 million, just in annual House "support" expenses, let alone their pensions.

So adding it up, we have a combined total of nearly $1 billion/year in annual taxpayer costs, just to keep this aristocracy "functioning."

Now lets get to the real nitty-gritty, and try to compute a rough (very rough) total estimate of what a Congressional retiree will garner-- although many serve to their "expiration" date.

Figuring on a basis of .80 x 150,000 = $120,000/year annual pension, times 20 years average retirement period= $2.4 million total taxpayer cost...that's just for ONE retired congressperson! And if you consider the overall number of living congressional retirees-- plus their free lifetime medical benefits-- the total easily adds into the billions.

Hoo-wee! Is it any wonder that these people will spend several million dollars to get elected for a job that pays 150,000/year, plus "perks" from eager-beaver lobbyists? Well wonder no more. Getting elected to Congress means celebrity, status, and possibly becoming a highly-paid lobbyist yourself, if you retire "prematurely."

How about inflation? Well, fuh-getta about it. If you serve in Congress, your pay is automatically "pegged" to the increases of thousands of other high-ranking personnel in the federal government, including cabinet agency heads and federal judges.

Congress-- in their infinite wisdom-- knows there's never a good time for headlines about relatively rich public officials deciding to give themselves more taxpayer money. So it looks like automatic Congressional pay raises--first instituted in 1989-- are not going away anytime soon.

And what about the income taxes these dutiful, dedicated public servants must pay?

We're all familiar with that coveted position-- member of the congressional "Ways and Means Committee". And why is it so desirable? You can REALLY call the money shots from this perch:

Members of the House Ways and Means (and the Senate Finance Committee) are directly responsible for our insanely complex tax laws-- but they need not bother with their own returns.The IRS maintains two "customer service" centers to exclusively assist lawmakers and Capitol Hill staff in filling out their tax forms, all at a big cost to taxpayers.

Worried about rising medical insurance premiums? Congress gets free outpatient care at Bethesda and Walter Reed Hospitals. House members receive free meals and vacations from lobbyists and others.

Is gasoline burning up your budget? Well then, just consider the "good ole' boy" law allowing members of the U.S. House to lease luxury cars with taxpayer money, and with no regard for rising consumer prices for fuel. There is no price limit, and gas is included-- once again, all paid by taxpayers.

And what about parking fees, fines and tickets? No problem, once again it's part of the "free Congressional ride."

Mr. Charles B. Rangel  (D-NY) paid $1,540 in parking fines on his Chrysler PT Cruiser with campaign funds. And it was also reported that Mr. Rangel has been storing a classic 1972 Mercedes-Benz in the House of Representatives parking garage for at least the last nine years, slightly more than the 45 allotted days. His penalty? Nada. Nothing.

And for his "work car" Mr. Rangel was among the more "footloose" representatives, paying $774 a month for a  Cadillac De Ville-- courtesy of Uncle Sam, and the tax-paying public.

And if we want something done about all this extravagance, we can just write our congressperson for relief. They'll surely be concerned.
 
QUESTION: When was the last time you took an all-expenses paid vacation-- or even had the time to take one?

Congress members often travel to the great golf courses of the world, paid for by private sponsors, who often have direct interests in legislation on Capitol Hill. These trips are tagged as "official business". And members of Congress get to take along spouses and girlfriends-- it's all part of the cover.
 
House Minority Leader John Boehner of Ohio-- avid golfer and world-class traveler-- took 42 trips between 2000 and 2007, often with his wife Debbie. And this poor, overworked, overstressed legislator often had to fly on private, luxury-laden corporate jets, including R.J. Reynolds Tobacco's private plane.

To add insult to injury, all House Members can keep their frequent-flier miles that we taxpayers have paid for.
 
And surprise-surprise...the new congressional crackdown on lobbyists is NOT producing the outcome many had thought it would. For every ban on gifts and limitations on meals, there seems to be a new loophole around it. So despite the window dressing, there probably won't be any letup in public officials accepting lavish gifts, or all those hospitality perks from "private interests."
 
Remember Civic's class, where we all learned about the congressional 'franking privilege' of free mail?  It was founded by Benjamin Franklin with good intentions-- to keep constituents back home informed of an elected official's activities.

But today, these mass mailings are only slick incumbent re-election packages, masquerading as constituent information. And the best congressional perk of all? It's the PROLONGED vacation time, so members can come away with good, first hand information from their districts back home.

Members of Congress get endless benefits, automatic pay increases, and enjoy "featherbedded" retirements, while most Americans have suffered a generation-long period of stagnant wages, due to the over-regulation of the economy-- all brought on by guess who: Congress.

(Quote) "When the people fear their government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty"...Thomas Jefferson.

But consider today's 19% Congressional public approval rating. When people loath the government-- and the government doesn't care about the people--there is decadence.



www.keenobserver.blogtownhall.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Hail hail! Long live our Congressional monarchy!"


What’s the best job in the whole wide world? CEO of a large company like General Motors? Movie star? Television celebrity? Or how about J.K. Rowling, billionaire author of the seven famous Harry Potter book series? They all sure sound like pretty good employment options, don't they? And we could probably think of a lot more.

 

But stop for a second and take a closer look. Top GM chief Richard Wagonner is under enormous pressure to rescue GM from foreign auto dominance. If he doesn't, he's toast. Tom Cruise can laugh at life with his fortune from the movies, but he can't even go into a 7-Eleven for a pack of gum without being mobbed by the unwanted attention of celebrity spotters. Losing your privacy is a horrible nuisance, but that's the price of fame- and it's permanent. Even Author JK Rowling is constantly aggravated. How? Although she's a billionaire, she probably loathes the pressure of those non-stop questions from her fans and the media about when her 8th book is coming out.

 

And don't even mention the President's job. If you look at the before vs. after pictures of almost any long-serving U.S. president, that's all you need to know. Just picture Franklin Roosevelt in 1932 making his famous "Fear Itself" speech. Then picture him in 1945 at the Yalta Conference. Or picture the Clintons in 1992 at the start of their "co-presidency" vs. today. They are $100 million richer, but they look as if they earned every last penny.

 

There are few easy jobs any where in the private sector. They all have responsibilities;  they all require effort; and nearly all require one to perform under pressure, be it time pressure, financial pressure, your "boss-is-mean" pressure, whatever. The point is, earning money requires WORKING under pressure. Our jobs are stressful. There's no easy way to get rich...er wait a minute. Did we forget something? What about running for Congress? Has there ever been a case in our nation's history where somebody had to give up Congress because they couldn’t make a living at it? Hmmm...maybe we've got somethin' here.

 

In all the world, there are only 600 or so jobs that have no definite job description, no requirement to show up everyday, you have the weekends off, most of the summer off, are all part time, there's no boss standing over you, no daily deadlines, they pay you handsomely, have full benefits, and you can earn as much as you want on the side. And best of all, you can never be fired. Can you guess what these jobs are? You are correct. They are the people in the U.S. Congress. Well golly gee, just how do these people manage to have it so good?

 

When our founding fathers drew up the Constitution, they designed the format of our government in a sort of anti-monarchy fashion, because they practically had to sweat blood to throw off the tyrannical British yoke of King George V. Hence our Constitution contains all the safeguards against excessive taxation, protects property rights, individual freedom rights, and above all, it was designed to be a government OF, BY, and FOR the people.  So now lets flash ahead 220 years and look at the situation today.

 

Remember when you were a little kid, and you'd learn in school that " America has the highest standard of living in all the world". Didn't you feel proud about that? Everyone fondly remembers "the good ole days". But what about now? What happened? Did our government change? Nope...we still go by the Constitution. Well, did the people change? Nope...we're still  mostly a people of hard-working patriotic Americans. Well then, did the PEOPLE in the GOVERNMENT change? Hmmm, we might have something here.

 

Lets go back to the good ole days. How was it possible that our country won World War II in the 40's...began building the interstate highway system in the 50's... completed the glorious NASA moon landing mission in the 60's...built the Alaskan pipeline in the 70's...originated the information era boom of the 80's, and was the architect of the tech-internet boom of the 90's?

 

For sixty years, the United States economy saw growth. Unemployment was stable. We were the envy of the world. People were satisfied with their lives for the most part. Each new generation enjoyed a higher living standard than the one before it.

 

Nowadays, it almost seems like we're somehow eerily "being paid back" for it all. These are not easy times. The main culprit, our skyrocketing cost of living, has eroded the quality of life for almost everyone. Even super rich people have cut down on their affluence, because no one escapes inflation. Everyone has to eat, and we all have to travel. Everyone is sacrificing in one way or another...oops...everyone that is, except for a certain group of 600 semi-permanent Washington  D.C. residents; and we just happen to know them as Congress.

 

So who's to blame? The people? Uh-h-h…no! Well, uh--I guess that leaves Washington .


What's become customary in Congress is now completely contrary to our Constitution's concept of government OF the people, BY the people, and FOR the people. Maybe we should require every newly-elected legislator to memorize the Preamble before they can be sworn in, because it's quite obvious that the current crop of lawmakers has totally forgotten why they were elected. But sadly, most of these incumbents will return to office, as WE THE PEOPLE continue to act blindly toward the nation's best interest, seemingly every time we again vote for the same people in election after election.

 

 A lot of people have been forced to lower their standard of living. Many middle-classers are eating like peasants- less meat, more potatoes. People have stopped cable TV, movies, and eating out. Congress has their limos, privately chartered jet flights, and private Senate and House restaurants. They vote themselves pay raises. They pass legislation (ethanol subsidies) that have caused worldwide food riots. And their arrogant self-righteousness is rooted in our tarnished voting tradition: the incumbent re-election factor.

 

In the Bible, Jesus deplored hypocrites. So what about these 600 congresspeople? Are they at all sharing in any of this misery? Or are they the ones who are most responsible for our high taxes, high gasoline prices, and high food prices? Why don't we ask Nancy Pelosi,  or Harry Reid, or Chuck Schumer, or Ed Markey? Did any of them have to switch to taking the bus to work? Ha! They're all part of the no-drilling congressional bloc causing higher energy prices. But are they even worried in the least about the plight of the people? Oh sure. They know they can manipulate Congress just about any way they choose, because they're the party in power.

 

But shouldn't they be concerned about re-election if they aren't acting in the best interests of the people? Nope. They're literally ''sentenced'' to life to their congressional jobs. Literally! Unless they die or retire, they'll all probably hold their seats, and go along merrily without any worry of job security. They can't be impeached. They police themselves through Congressional ethics committees ( hardy har), and they can retire on a huge pension.

 

Since they all have it so tough, that’s why they seem to treat their "jobs" with so much disdain for the country's welfare as a whole. If they can feather their own nest without any reprisal, then more power to them. And do they ever have power! Just ONE person that chairs a certain key committee (like energy) can block the will of an entire majority. Was this ever the intention of our Founders?

 

Since they're the ones legislating the rules that govern themselves, to whom does Congress answer? John McCain claims he's going to shake up Washington. Great idea. But what could he do....fire Nancy Pelosi for blocking every drilling vote from reaching the House floor? She knows her San Francisco constituents will re-elect her in a landslide this November. This is a travesty upon the intentions of our original Founding Fathers.

 

The one apparent "mistake" of our Founders is that they failed to ever see the possibility that the people would ever permit anything like this to occur. But since it's almost an aberration of human nature- that people would continue to vote against their own best interests- the Founders cant be blamed . After all, what voter even knows who's running in opposition to these treasonous incumbents nowadays? People pay more attention to celebrity news than politics. Most of the younger people get their main body of political information from Comedy Central. And along with our standard of living, newspaper circulation is falling.

 

 And when election time rolls around again this November, how will those undecided people probably vote? They'll probably vote for the one who has the "best hair", or against the one "they never heard of". This is the measuring stick of most of today's congressional elections. So until we lift this cloak of ignorance we've placed upon ourselves, we will continue getting the government we deserve.

 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »