Posted by
thekeenobserver on Monday, May 04, 2009 8:06:36 PM
Back in October of '74 (1774), anti-British sentiment had spiked to a fever pitch throughout all the 13 colonies:
There was a decided furor against Lord North in Parliament and King
George III. Their passage of the Intolerable Acts had the colonies in unanimous opposition against the hated Crown.
Hence, delegates were sent to convene the first Continental Congress--
all seeking remedy against tyrannical economic injustice from
abroad. And from that convention, a fateful vote was cast to decide the only
partisan question that had remained. And its outcome
would play a critically important part of both American and world history.
By the 1770's, there were a multitude of German settlers-- roughly
300,000 American colonials were of German ancestry. Many resided in the
rural parts of Pennsylvania, where they constituted almost one third of
the total population. Large parts of New Jersey, New York, and Delaware
were also "bi-lingual."
Thus, a vote in that first congress was proposed: it would be up to
that original body of 55 representatives to determine if English were
to be spoken-- or German.
In attendance during that first session was Pennsylvania delegate
Joseph Galloway, who had stood up before the vote and spoke ardently in
favor of reconciliation with the Crown; and it was he who ended up
casting that one critical vote that determined the final 28-27 tally in favor of English.
Predictably, Galloway would later join the Loyalist cause, eventually fleeing
to England; but were it not for the turncoat's critical
ballot, the standard language of the world may have been German.
In 1868, it was another one-vote margin which changed the course of history: It was Abraham Lincoln's successor, president Andrew Johnson, who was saved from impeachment by only one vote.
During Johnson's trial, the House had voted by a 2/3rds margin to
impeach. But since senate rules also required a 2/3rds majority, the
36--18 margin needed fell short...35 -19.
Once again, were it not for one vote, America's Reconstruction Era
would have proceeded in an entirely different direction, and this land
would not be the same country that exists today.
In 1886, Rutherford B. Hayes--sporting one of the great presidential
names (aside Millard Fillmore)--defeated Samuel Tilden 186-185 in the electoral
college, in the most bitterly partisan presidential
election in history.
It was yet another 'skin-of-the-teeth' one-vote margin that again had decided the course of America's fate.
Then, on November 8, 1921, would come a vote in Europe that would decide the fate of the entire world: It was on that day that the infant Nazi party met at the Rathskeller
beer hall in Munich, Germany, where Adolf Hitler was elected by
ONE VOTE to be its first leader.
This may have been the most critical
one-vote margin in world history--up until now.
Presently, the democrats are a mere vote shy of capturing the
"magic" 60th senate seat-- a filibuster proof margin-- and may propel
America into its most critical phase of history since the tumultuous
1850's, when again our country was at an inflection point-- a political
chasm so wide that it could not be breached.
Ironically, this dilemma could all have been avoided if the GOP had
even showed the slightest inkling of political foresight. But now, our
nation may stand at the political brink for yet a third time in its
235-year history.
Exhibit A- last summer, senator Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) was indicted by
the Justice Department on a flimsy, trumped-up of charge of "failing to
report campaign gifts." During the entire 4-month judicial process, the republicans meekly
chose to not protest the suspicious indictment at the onset; and
senator Stevens' eventual false conviction came to stand-- and it was
scratch one critical republican senate seat.
Exhibit B- On Tuesday, November 4, in the last general election, republican Norm
Coleman defeated democrat Al Franken by 725 votes (out of almost 3 million total
ballots cast) in the Minnesota senate race. But by Wednesday night, Coleman’s lead had shrunk to 477. By Thursday
night, it was down to 336. By Friday, it was at 239. And by Sunday night,
the difference had gone down to just 221 -- a total change of 504
votes. And all occurring BEFORE any recount.
And now, Franken is about to be declared the winner by an 225 vote
margin. Since election night, Coleman has lost EVERY legal challenge,
and Franken has magically gained 1000 votes.
Suspicious? Naw...Democrats always play fair 'n square.
Once again, from the day after the election, the republicans stood by and played ostrich, as democratic
operatives from around the country flew into Minnesota and took charge
of the critical recount, and literally stole Coleman's victory.
Yup--good job Minnesota GOP-- scratch another seat.
Exhibit C- now that "Benedict" Arlen Specter (R-Pa) has 'defected' to
the democrats, scratch seat # 3; And this may be the coup de gras' for
the GOP that marginalizes them into a regional party.
Remarkably, many ostrich-like republicans are treating the Specter
calamity as if it were actually a POSITIVE, and are in "denial" about
the ominous consequences---one party rule in Congress.
So has the GOP lost their ability to count to 60? Now the only thing
standing between one-party rule for posssibly the next generation is Minnesota Governor Tim
Pawlenty.
A political dilemma now faces Pawlenty if the Minnesota state Supreme
Court rejects a final appeal by Mr. Coleman over the disputed
recount, putting the burden on the Governor whether to certify
Mr. Franken as the official winner.
Governor Pawlenty could refrain from signing, and give his fellow Republican
(Coleman) a chance to take his case to the U.S. Supreme Court, while
leaving the Senate seat vacant-- denying the democrats the one vote
magic 60 filibuster proof vote.
But If Pawlenty votes to allow the odious Al Franken to be seated--
it's when the levee breaks--the gates will be flung open, with chairman
Obama smiling broadly as his leftist congress rams through a flood of
legislation that will transform this country hard left into the
"disunited states of Amerika."
By far, the most over-reaching effect (If Franken wins #60) is the
inevitable passage of AMNESTY REFORM, spelling the end of an
all-English speaking America, and the irreparable transition from a
melting pot to parallel societies.
So prepare for "bi-lingual everything"... street signs...TV
commercials... corporate phone messages & voice mail
....newspapers...magazines...printed directions on labels; even
bilingual schools and internet sites.
Does this sound like the America we all love? Two languages (Spanish-English)...two cultures...and a clannish minority population unwilling (or unable) to assimilate into the American mainstream.
A generation from now, many will be wondering..."what country is this?"
And "Latin America" would now span north & south for almost the
entire western hemisphere.
And if Franken wins-- with no senate filibuster protection-- Obama also
gets everything else handed to him on a Congressional platter:
-cap 'n trade taxes on energy consumption
-card check- forced unionism
-nationalized health care
-a feeble, downsized military;
- wide open-borders- a peril to national security
-endless judicial appointments of radical leftist judges
--green energy mandates-- "plug-in" cars
-environmental marxism (Co2 declared a "poisonous gas")
-takeover of major private enterprise
-ACORN everywhere subverting elections
-deficit social spending on steroids
-Obama's 3rd and 4th terms -passage of a constitutional amendment
And how would one-party rule affect the First Amendment?
It'll silence conservative talk radio, Christianity in public, and
spell the onset of a plethora of laws against legal opposition to gay
marriage, gay rights, and hate crime legislation-- even silence our ability to
speak out against democratic candidates during elections.
It can be noted that Barack Obama received 64 million votes last
November-- many of them from 2 voting groups-- 70% of the under-25, and
95% of the African-American bloc.
Democrats claim Mr. Obama has a mandate, but in reality, 260 million
Americans did NOT vote for Barack Obama, or his tyrannical plan for
wealth distribution that could provoke an unwilling silent majority.
Remember the first time a tyrant pushed Americans beyond the brink? It was economic injustice that led to a revolutionary war. And what was the root cause of the Civil War? Was it just slavery
itself...or one group being pushed into an economic corner, and either
lose their traditional way of life-- or fight to keep it.
And so, they chose to secede from the Union.
Americans are like no other people; when faced with economic tyranny,
they'll only stand for so much before they decide to take action; and
soon we may be on the verge of the next political flashpoint.
It took a full 30 years for the Civil War to fester, and within another
generation, the political winds may shift to where the country
PERMANENTLY divides on partisan lines, as conservative-minded states
invoke their Tenth Amendment rights, as Texas governor, Rick Perry, recently mentioned.
History always repeats. Could it be possible that our federal union could disintegrate again? What would our country look like in another generation (or less) if Obammunism goes unopposed?
Remember Canada...that nation up north? We don't hear a whole lot from the Canadians these days, do we?
They were once a proud, prosperous country, and prominent on the world
stage. In the Second World War, Canadian serviceman had the reputation
of being some of the toughest Allied fighters of the war.
But then in the 1970's came Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, and now, Canada is a country of faded glory.
It only took a decade for the popular Trudeau to "socialize" this once
proud nation to where it is today-- a non-descript pacifist land, with
a moribund economy, a downsized military, a weak dollar, a low standard
of living, and the plague of nationalized healthcare.
And given the uncanny devisiveness of Barack Obama--- with his
propensity to enslave unwilling Americans within his utopian ideas-- will
we be seeing this same "Canadian-like" transformation in America?
Obama will now be on speed-dial, and could do it within his first term.
And the only thing standing in the way of this American nightmare is
that ONE vote.
Like 150 years ago, half of America may again see no sense of pulling
the weight for the other half, or staying part of a union where
America is no longer is the land of the free.
Governor Pawlenty can either vote to seat Franken-- a self-aggrandizing
political move that would appease the state's liberal population-- or
choose to patriotically stand in the way of tyranny, and preserve Mr.
Coleman's fight to appeal to the US Supreme Court.
Is America about to follow in Canada's footsteps, and become a nation
of faded glory? Once again it's come down to a final critical vote from
just one person.
And like the first Continental Congress in 1774, outraged Americans
must stand loudly in protest over the intolerable democratic theft of the 60th
senate seat, for it could determine our country's fate for the next
generation-- or perhaps forever.
www.keenobserver.blogtownhall.com