About Me

Name: thekeenobserver
Email: reallykeenobserver@yahoo.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Bow down ye subjects of tyranny!

 
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania...July 4, 1776: 
 
John Hancock has gone first. Then, after a handful of others affix their names, Benjamin Franklin - perhaps the most respected of America's Founding Fathers - is next.
 
Indeed, it was Franklin who summed up perfectly the accompanying mood of that most-anxious day - the signing of the Declaration of Independence: (Quote) ..."Gentlemen, we must all hang TOGETHER, or most assuredly, we will all hang separately."
 
As elementary schoolers, we all remember studying the signing of the Declaration in our history texts.
 
It was about Jefferson; July 4th; liberty; that terrible tyrant King George, and such. As children, it made us all so proud!  The brave Americans had finally decided to strike back - starting their own righteous rebellion.
 
It was about our country's first birthday; it was all so grand and hunky-dory.
 
But now the party's over. Once again, the time now comes: we either "hang" together, because we're all about to hang separately.
 
No longer innocent children, we're all grown-up, sober adults. Thus, rather than jubilation, consider the mood of the Founders on that seminal day in 1776: it was somber - one of overriding anxiety- a heightened sense of trepidation hanging over that room where the original signers once gathered.
 
Imagine: each one aware of not just declaring only freedom, but even more likely, their ignominious impending death - dangling at the end of an English rope! If the rebellion should fail, the British would relentlessly hunt them down - making examples of them before the entire world.  
 
Picture the sheer courageousness of our original signers - each driven by an incredibly powerful motivator: one so omnipotent that ALL were prepared to die to remedy the overriding tyranny the dreadful British had thrust upon them:
 
Taxation without representation! Intrusion! Disrespect! Derision! Disdain of their basic human rights!
 
But worst of all, it was the harassment that spawned the overriding groundswell of resentment. Life in the English colonies, now so unbearable, that rebellion - even death itself - was now a feasable option.
 
Thus, it was time: either put up, or shut up!
 
And so they did.
 
Hence, every generation afterwards has benefited from their resolute bravado.
 
But again it is written - history now repeats: a new form of tyranny has emerged; one from within - threatening incarceration for those defiant of its unreasonable mandates!
 
Page 325 (section 1501) of t
he Senate healthcare bill -  imposing penalty, or actual imprisonment, for people merely exercising their constitutional right of freedom and liberty.
Oppression! Injustice! Shackles for those who dare to refuse health insurance! And to add insult to injury, free health care to illegal aliens!
 
Could not the President and Congress have set up a TRUST FUND for ones that they deem most needful of health care coverage - and leave the rest of us ALONE?
 
Like the hated British Acts of 240 years ago, their mandates are only about ego; a raw abuse of power! A warped desire to force their Socialist will upon us.
 
Congress now chooses to ignore every American's Constitutional rights; utterly disdainful of our liberty; disrespectful of our objections; an imposition ( tax) against our will to resist.
 
But worst of all - a horried intrusion into our once anxiety-free lives!
 
Much like the early 1770's, which taxpayer amongst us does not feel that same overriding sense of anxiety and resentment? A rising, vitriolic anger against a congress, so disdainful...so profoundly arrogant, that they have gall enough to defy the very will of those who have elected them to govern! 
 
Incredibly, anyone refusing to buy insurance - or pay the subsequent penalty - will merit jail! 

But imprisonment? - for exercising the freedoms guaranteed by our Constitution?
 
Congress has now opted for taking away the liberty of every American citizen, imposing aggressive penalties for exercising our cherished right to freely choose what is a necessity - and what is not.  
 
Even more shocking, illegal immigrants (and undocumented workers) are NOT mandated to pay this penalty, or be sent to jail; they will be exempted from it.

And worse, a tyrannical president now chooses to stand with the illegal immigrants. They will not be answerable to the same harsh rules, penalties, nor jail time.
 
During an exclusive interview with ABC News, King Obama decreed that (quote)...“penalties are appropriate for people who try to free-ride the system, and force others to pay for their health insurance.”
 
But even more tyrannical is House HR 3269, with its individually mandated tax - 2.5% of one's hard-earned income - subjecting one to numerous civil and criminal penalties: fines up to $250,000, imprisonment of five years; and all to be enforced by the power of IRS audits! 
 
Is this not tyranny at it's very worst?
 
Will Congress force free men to actually succumb to this?
 
And could it be feasible that there are those actually toying with the notion of accepting this disastrous, Stalinist mandate? 
 
Sure... go ahead...keep rationalizing - thinking why this would be 'good for our society.'
 
Fools! This is how it all starts. Yet one more chip taken from the block of our endangered freedom.
 
And where does it stop? Legal Americans, being dragged off to jail, for not buying insurance? 
 
Yet Muslim terrorists are living on American soil - getting 3 squares, healthcare, citizens rights, and defense attorneys - all for FREE.
 
Is this not grounds for rebellion? Where are the protests? Why is the public not demonstrating in the streets?
 
After 230 years, Americans suddenly no longer value their personal liberties- having taken them for granted for all too long. 
 
Are we ready to stand aside, while a tyrannical, king-like president and Congress stop at nothing until freedom is but a faded memory? Liberty, yielded by a generation so jaded and so divided, that they let it be stripped away - in defiance of our Founders, who fought so valiantly to achieve it; but now, it becomes so easily lost - perhaps forever?
 
Indeed, this is human nature at its very worst!
 
A government, seeking not reform but control...of our hearts, our homes, our bodies; and when they restrict talk radio - our very minds!
 
We must stop this Obammunist health care law in its tracks; otherwise, it will only embolden them to further intrude into our once-free lives, and strip away the right to be left alone, and unharassed.
 
Imagine if our forbearers had not resisted the British tyranny:
 
Would Lord North and Parliament not have levied yet more taxes upon them, and required that the very people who policed them - the hated Redcoats - were to not only be fed and quartered, but also their boots shined and laundry done as well?
 
Tyranny is timeless. Human nature never changes. Power corrupts!
 
Until the Congressional tyrants are 'punched in their noses' - and a tightly-unified public boldly proclaims..."no mandated health insurance"... "we will not pay, and will fight for the right to refuse it" - our lives will become only worse.
 
That's right America - a taxpayer revolt; we either all hang together, or most assuredly, we will all hang separately.
 
We are about to lose our country to those not paying taxes; those who are disdainful of the liberty enjoyed from the very day America once declared its separation from the original tyrants.
 
If we do not hang together, there can be but one ultimate outcome - Socialist oblivion: the tyranny will grow ever stronger.
 
Ultimately, the United States of America shall cease to be free - its liberty lost by people who chose to belie our once-hallowed ideal: America...home of the BRAVE.
 
Bravery is what is now called for fellow citizens. Much like 1776, again it is put up or shut-up time in our nation's history.
 
Obama wil not relent; this cold unfeeling man is unflappable in his desire to enslave us -telling us all the while..."it's for our own good!"
 
Either we rebell now - refuse to pay this putrid, unfair, un-Constitutional tax - or succumb to the misery once and forever!
 
The next time you see a group of children playing innocently, stop and think of what their lives wil be like under the legacy of Obammunism: No future. A 75% taxation rate. America -burdened by a $30 trillion national debt. And all because a previous generation was too accepting of a tyranny they could so easily have united to stop - but chose to hang separately out of selfish individualism.
 
It is our heritage as free Americans; our legacy to stand up and stop this injustice; not only for ourselves, but for each successive generation to come.
 
If we will not all hang together, America can be no longer the land of the free.  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Unplugging talk radio- the FCC's fascist plot for censorship

 

Here are two interesting quotes from none other than Thomas Jefferson:

 

(quote) "There is an enemy somewhere endeavoring to sow discord among us: To buy off one lie is to give a premium for the invention of others."

 

(quote) "There is no vice so mean, so pitiful, so contemptible as that which permits one to tell a lie."

 

 Here is yet another --and MORE interesting-- quote from Joseph Goebbels (Hitler's fabled "communications" director):

 

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it,  people will eventually come to believe it...The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the consequences of the lie...Thus, it becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent... for the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” (circa 1936)

 

Now let's take a qoute from Barack Obama, as he directly addresses the Iranian government for the first time, after a day of violence in Iran:

 

(quote) "We call on the Iranian government to stop all violent and unjust actions against its own people. The universal rights to assembly and FREE SPEECH must be respected, and the United States stands with all who seek to exercise those rights."

 

But what does all this have to do with talk radio? Simple; Obama intends to kill freedom over the public air waves-- a right he staunchly supports in Iran. But at home? Well, that's quite another story. 

 

Obama makes noble statements projecting First Amendment rights to the Iranians; but at the same time, he launches a covert plot to crush all political dissent in America. Make no mistake. Conservative talk radio is now an endangered species.

 

On Feb 18, 2009, Obama himself stated, (quote) "I do not believe the Fairness Doctrine should be re-instated.” But it's what he DIDN"T say that portends his ominous trap.
 
Having watched Obama rise through the ranks in Illinois, he always prefers to eliminate competition whenever possible. So now, as President, why would it be any different?

 

Localism will be Obama's contrivance to rid his world of the last bastion of political dissension...Limbaugh, Hannity, and the other mainstays of conservative talk radio.

 

If Obama truly wanted "fairness" it would also apply to TV, newspapers, and news magazines. But all of these mediums are overwhelmingly liberal, serving the big-government, freedom-killing agenda of Obama and his cadre of leftists in Congress.

 

Now, with Mr. Obama's appointment of his double-talking, Harvard law school buddy, Julius Genachowski as new head of the FCC, Obama has no doubt anointed him as another star addition to the democratic liars' club-- the ability to state one thing but imply another.

 

Recently, Mr. Genachowski told  Kay B. Hutchinson-- a member of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee-- (quote) "No, Senator, I don’t support re-instatement of the Fairness Doctrine"...."I feel strongly about the First Amendment, and I don’t think the FCC should be involved in censorship of content-based limiting of political speech.”

 

Conservatives brace yourselves-- it's all a decoy; an ambush.

Genachowski's "denial" is yet another Trojan horse concealing the evil of Obammunism. His
 repudiation of the Fairness Doctrine is seen as proof positive that the FCC intends to sneak it in under the innocuous-sounding name of "localism."

 

If "right-wing" talk radio is a cancer for these liberals, localism is their form of "chemo-therapy".

 

Obama knows if censorship is disguised as something other than the Fairness Doctrine, then he can champion it without changing his position. By stating his "opposition" to the "Doctrine", Obama's leftist minions will do the dirty work-- giving Mr. Obama the appearance of being "Mr. Forthright."

 

And having taught Constitutional law, Obama knows localism cannot easily be challenged by the Supreme Court. So now, the handwriting of censorship is on the wall-- only it's been written with invisible ink:

 

POINT- Obama's continual references about how Fox News won't give him "a fair shake"

 

POINT - Obama's inference that people should not pay attention (listen) to Rush Limbaugh

 

POINT-- on the campaign trail last year, his repeated references to Sean Hanitty

 

Obama's latest big lie (through Genachowski) is akin to waving a white flag to the Republicans, but all the while he digs a tunnel to subvert them politically. Barack Obama is about fighting dirty, preferring to "clear the field" of competition (dissent) whenever possible; and lying and doublespeak have been his most effective strategems.

 

Once anyone within the Obama administration vows something they absolutely will NOT do, rest assured that it's exactly the course of action they've planned. And Genachowski is no different; as head of the FCC, he'll lie to no end to support what Obama wants-- absolute control of the mainstream media.

 

Mr. Obama is a Saul Alinsky student-- the end justifies the means; hence, the plot will be couched within his seemingly benign support for "community programming" on local radio stations. 

 

To date, Mr.Obama has been mum on localism. But his silence is the "tipoff": he'll soon coyly announce..."I support it." Obama knows better than to take on Rush Limbaugh headlong with his 22 million strong audience-- the courts wouldn’t uphold it.

 

Localism applies only to radio, and the stations/programs that are political in nature. This leaves the bulk of FM programming out of the equation.
 
However, conservative airtime is the much larger percentage of AM political commentary. Hence, Obama (and his sneaky FCC chairman) are going to try and go a different route, but achieving the same end result:

 

-The FCC will start a movement (behind the scenes) to start a “Fairness in Ownership Doctrine"- making a "case" for minorities to own radio stations, and staging it as a "community concern."

 

--The FCC will denounce those "corporate power elites" that have acquired a monopoly of talk radio outlets across the country over the last 16 years (i.e. Clear Channel & CBS). 
 
After the above "groundwork", the process of censorship will be introduced in stages through a series of Federal Communication Commission "decrees:"

 

Stage 1) an entity can only own 1-2 stations; thus, Clear Channel and CBS will be forced to sell all their radio outlets on the "cheap."

 

Stage 2) the "monopoly" break-up will result in stations being sold to minority owners at bargain prices. Obama-connected 'friends" will constitute the mainstay of the new ownership

 

Stage 3) local-broadcast "advisory boards" (ACORN) will be formed to hold radio owners responsible to uphold "opposing opinions" OR, their broadcast licences will not be renewed. (Obama will claim he has no control over what local communities do)

 

Stage 4) more diversity (localism) program will be instituted-- a requirement to provide "X" hours of local programming

 

Stage 5) leftists groups (Media Matters) will a file a blizzard of anti-localism "complaints" against all remaining conservative-owned stations

 

Stage 6) the final result-- veiled censorship. Conservative stations -- knowing they'll go broke defending all these "complaints" in court-- find it cheaper to broadcast music/sports than to keep Limbaugh, Hannity, et al. on the air

 

Obama abhors dissent; he will waste no time in placing localism into action. It'll soon be bye-bye to your favorite talk radio shows-- there will no longer be a way to hear the truth.

 

But Obama will couch it all in noble phrases, declaring: "It's about progressing to a more egalitarian society"...and..."Divisive, hateful, irresponsible speech over the public airways is unacceptable; therefore, is not protected by the First Amendment."

 

Before we know it, talk radio will vanish, and with it, our ability to speak out against Obama's bold tyranny, as he fully intends to shut down ALL political opposition... PERIOD!  

 

And once talk radio disappears, the ability to post our thoughts and opinions over the Internet will be the next freedom taken from us in the same underhanded manner.

 

Independents, Republicans, Conservatives; we must unite and publicly speak out against these egregious tactics!

 

If we choose not to oppose the assault these insidious leftists have declared upon our Constitution, then we deserve the very tyrrany they seek to impose upon us.

 

Just keep in mind this ominous reminder from the Nazi fanatic-- Joseph Goebbels..."truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”  

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The "DUH" generation...will it destroy the Republican party?


School days...school days.


Ah yes; most everyone remembers them fondly.
 
But inside our hallowed halls of education, what's taking place could be more aptly be described as a school daze-- a leftist-slanted, decidedly liberal way of not instructing our children in the "three R's", but rather feeding them a constant stream of "San Francisco" style mainstream liberal teachings.
 
Today's students aren't being educated-- they're being indoctrinated!
 
The children of today can't read, write, add, subtract, multiply, divide, or spell, or even speak English correctly. They, like, uh, like, can't communicate too well-- unless it's by text messages.
 
But these youthful, ecological tyrants can talk all day about how plastic bags are destroying ocean life, or argue vehemently about why the United States should never have gone into Iraq. They learn all about social injustice, and the necessity of trying to be "fair" to everyone at all times.

Many elementary school children are profoundly troubled by the thought that global warming will eventualy burn up their earth. And in almost every school (and college), students are led to believe that CO2 is a poison gas, and its release into the atmosphere must be placed under some type of government authority.
 
Today's children aren't being taught science; but they can tell you why we should use the new light bulbs. And they can talk extemporaneously for hours about coastal cities being swamped because we refuse to give up oil-- the commodity which is basic to our economic strength.

Today's students don't have a clue about why it's critical to construct new power plants and refineries (to enable the U.S. economy to expand along with its population). But instead they're taught to hate the big oil corporations. Thus, they retain a basic anti-capitalist, pro-socialist, anti-American liberal inbreeding.

So what is going on in the classrooms of today? Apparently not education.
 
In 2007, only 36 percent of American eighth graders were rated ''proficient'' in reading on the National Assessment of Education Progress. The math results were similar. This means hundreds of thousands of students, having reached the threshold of high school, have yet to master the ability to read critically or do basic computations, let alone grasp the essentials of science, history and civics.

Today's high school graduates can't make change, or compute percentages; many couldn't qualify for a part time retail job even if it were available
 
But this isn't even the worst problem. Yes, it's bad enough that we'll have 75 million functional illiterates interacting throughout our society for the foreseeable future.

Let's call them the "duh" generation.

And functional illiteracy is only the beginning; the worst problem is political demographics-- the effect this dumbed-down generation will have on future elections.

Just in the last election, Barack Obama won by a 52.7% vs. 46% margin over John McCain; but Obama didn't exceed 50% in any voting groups, except for the under 25 (69%) and the black vote (94%).

Could this portend future doom for the Republican party? Definitely!

Political conservatism is slowly going the way of the incandescent light bulb. The National Education Association (teacher's union) is seeing to that. Anecdotal stories of liberal-slanted teacher-classroom incidents abound:

Last summer, in the Clark County School District in Las Vegas, a ten year old boy had written a letter to president Bush, and got a reply. But when the excited 4th grader brought his letter from the President to school, his teacher told him to put the letter away, citing, "no politics in class". Then the same classroom teacher instructed all her students to write a letter to President-elect Obama several months later.

In the classrooms of today, republicans merit zero tolerance:

In Carmel, California, a 16 year old high school girl, the only Republican on her debate team, was told to... "sit down and shut up until you have something intelligent to say''.

American Enterprise Institute's magazine published a survey of voter registrations. More than nine out of 10 teachers belonged to the Democratic party.

Disturbing stories have surfaced over the past months, further highlighting just how far many segments of American education have now elevated Barack Obama.

A concerned parent reveals that his 1st grader son complained of having to pledge allegiance every day at school to a huge projected image of Mr. Obama.
The 6-year old told his father that the teacher put up a large image of the new president next to the flag. What is worse is that he said all of the kids in class each faced Obama, instead of the flag that hangs in the corner.

What the heck is going on...is this supposed to be what we call citizenship in the community?

Or what about citizenship in the nation? The liberally-slanted history that today's students are being taught is so polarizing, it's almost as if we're splitting into 2 nations --the old vs young, depending on WHEN one went to school

Modern American history textbooks speak little of the American  Revolution, or Civil War; or the 2 world wars; or all the United States stands for-- freedom won through hardfought victory over tyranny through all its years.

Today, revisionist history texts focus on the U.S. as an imperialistic, racist country, with groups being pushed in & out of slavery; groups have been denied rights, and America's bullying of nations.

The story of the Klan is given more weight as an influence in the country than all the great inventors, all the great Presidents, and all the great statesmen of our American past.

On campuses, conservative opinion doesn't qualify as respectable inquiry. You won't often find conservative principles discussed, or patriotism argued on the American campuses of today

Imagine the America of the future:

A country where all the doctors, engineers, and architects are foreign, due to today's  inability of teaching science or math properly.

An America sliding to its inevitable third world migration, where enviro-radicalism abounds:  Recycling bins everywhere. People riding bicycles, and driving little insect-like "green energy" cars to work. People living in small houses, with green "living" roofs, sleeping in 55 degree bedrooms-- to both conserve energy and the save environment.

And imagine the politics-- our Constitution, hanging by a thread...traditional marriage, individuals right to property, freedom of speech-- all under assault, becoming subservient in the name of moral equivalency.

And a constitutional amendment forbidding animosity towards homosexuals-- that preventing two people from marrying one another is discrimination. Such an amendment would be a likely offshoot of the inevitable march toward a one-party form of liberalism, that would guarantee a communal life, with no liberty, and the pursuit of social injustice.


www.keenobserver.blogtownhall.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »