About Me

Name: thekeenobserver
Email: reallykeenobserver@yahoo.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Forget the nukes- oil will become Iran's "killer" weapon

 

Flashback: 36 years ago-- October, 1973. The "Yom Kipper" Arab-Isreali war breaks out. The OPEC nations -- retaliating against the U.S. for its support of Israel-- quadruple world oil prices to 12 dollars/ barrel, having declared an embargo upon all overseas deliveries to American ports.

 

Overnight, gas rocketed from 34.9 to 55.9 cents a gallon. Gasoline stations couldn't get deliveries. Purchases were limited to 10 gallons. Americans experienced their first bitter taste of gas lines. Everyone began selling their beloved, tire-scorching, premium-gas-guzzling muscle cars for "economy" vehicles.

 

The US-- caught flatfooted-- had become vulnerable to imported oil prices for the FIRST time, a preview of things to come. 

 

Between 1971 to1973, the U.S had already begun importing nearly 40% of its oil-- all of it from OPEC. America then entered into one of its deepest-ever recessions, not to recover for 3 long years.

 

In 1955, Arabian light crude sold for $2.08 a barrel.

 

In 1961, the price dropped backed to $1.80, prompting Western industrial  nations to switch from coal (to oil) as their main energy source--exposing themselves economically and politically at the hands of OPEC.

 

The Persian Gulf region has 65 percent of the world's total oil reserves. Iran hold's 14%.

By 1974, under the Shah (Reza Pahlavi), Iran had become the world's second largest oil-exporter. Iran also wielded great geopolitical influence, being seen by the West as a "buffer" separating an agressive USSR from the world's largest oil region.

 

Then, October 1978-- a shock heard round the world: the Shah's overthrow, and Ayatollah Khomeini's rise to power-- the origin of radical Islam-- and the intractable problem it would present to the Western world to this present day.

 

After 1979, "Khomeinism" was exported: Shiite fundamentalist sects were organized using Iranian petro-dollars. Had Khomeini not assumed power, Islamic fundamentalism may not have realized its eventual outgrowth-- the war on terror.

 

And behind it all was oil. The petro-dollars we were sending to Iran enabled Khomeini (and his heirs) to export their brand of radical Islam, with its ultimate goal of destroying Israel, and its evil supporter America-- the "Great Satan." 

 

Since 1979-- because of Iran's huge oil revenues-- Islamic fundamentalism has since expanded at a chilling pace:

 

--In 1991, Iran's government used a $500 million "grant" to send 1,300 fundamentalist "preachers" (agents) to "convert" the newly-independent Muslim republics of Central Asia.

  

--In the last 5 years, Iran has spent $100 million annually to reinforce and maintain their operatives in Lebanon (Hezbollah) and in the Palestinian territories (Hamas).

 

--Iranain oil money has also paved the way for fundamentalism's growth in the Asian and pan-African world. Indonesia's population is over 90 percent Muslim. Half of Nigeria's population is Muslim; and western European countries are now "parallel" societies. 

 

--Iran is currently scattering hundreds of agents in the near and far reaches of the Mideast, covertly spreading Shiite Islamic beliefs in Sunni-majority countries, and setting up terrorist cells at an all-out pace to subvert the entire region. 

    

Despite Iran's outward appearances, Bush (in his "axis of evil" speech) had it nailed: the Iranians are avowed, implacable enemies of America. They have the determination (and plan) to execute America's eventual downfall-- using their oil "weapon."

A prime example has been the war in Iraq, and how Iran used the conflict to weaken the United States economically.

 

Since the late 1990's, Iran has used its oil money (on the black market) and has been diverting sophisticated, American-made electronics into the Mideast region-- in violation of a 1995 ban. These electronics were then used to equip roadside bombs (I-E-D's) with remote-controlled detonators ---accounting for about 70 PERCENT of all American combat deaths in Iraq.

 

And Iranian-sponsored "imported" suicide bombers (from Lebanon) were used to inflame the war to its 2007 peak, resulting in the Pentagon having to commit an additional 300 billion dollars from its budget-- money that America could ill afford. 

 

Iran then used their agents within al Jazeera (the official Islamic TV network) to place the blame on al-Qaida, throwing the CIA completely off the "scent."

 
Should the American military completely exit Iraq in 2010, it’s a preview of what’s to come: the Iranians could step in and precipitate a much worse situation than during the pre-war Saddam era-- nullifying all political gains by the Iraqi infant democracy-- and replace it all with a Shiite theocracy.

It all goes back in 1978, when a naive and trusting  Jimmy Carter was blind to the real threat--Ayatollah Khomeini's ambitions of an oil-funded, religious-inspired domination of the entire Mideast...and beyond.

 

In a remarkably parallel situation, it's the equally naive Barack Obama-- facing Iran's Ayatollah Khameini-- who ignores Mideast history at our peril, and seeks a "season of new beginnings," and talked of Iran's "rightful place in the community of nations" in his 2009 New Year's speech.  

 

Then, in his speech at Cairo, Mr. Obama all but expected his words of conciliation to literally "rock the entire Islamic world" and possibly be a deciding factor in the Iranian presidential election. 

 

But in his egotistical arrogance, Obama denies reality: no matter whom the Iranians had chosen to elect as president, there would be no change in foreign policy. The religious Mullahs long ago had made up their minds they would use subversion-- plus oil revenues-- to fuel their nuclear weapons program, and continually undermine Mideast regional stability.

 

As Obama continually refuses to drill for U.S. domestic oil (and is content to send borrowed petro-dollars to the Mideast)-- it is here where he becomes a pawn in Iranain  hands: 

 

Once Iran eventually become the defacto regional power, it then becomes a replay of 1973-- a sudden Mideast oil embargo -- the price of crude quadruples to perhaps $250-300 per barrel, and defeats the U.S. in a way that only Iran sees...America's economic bankruptcy, where we can no longer supply our military-- nor our nation-- with energy to run our economy, or defend our overseas interests.

 

The Iranian Mullahs have but one objective toward their Great Satan Western enemy..."we shall overcome."

 

 

 www.keenobserver.blogtownhall.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Exponential stupidity...believing Obama will defend America


Nuremberg Germany--1936: Hitler's 8th Party Congress "Rally of Honor" (Reichsparteitag der Ehre) celebrating the invasion of the demilitarized Rhineland, which back then, constituted the restoration of Germany's lost World War I military honor.

Today, everyone is familiar with that frenzied scene from the incorporated footage made at that Nuremburg rally, where Hitler spoke to the masses positioned in front of three towering columns-- emblazoned with 3 huge swatstikas as the backdrop:
 
"Seig-heil...seig heil..seig heil", shouted the frenzied crowd, as Hitler would pause after delivering one of his classic motivational one liners, as he sought to infuse his fellow Germans with the basis of Nazi fanatacism-- absolute unquestionable allegiance to "Mein Feuhrer!"
 
And late last summer in Denver-- as if a Rocky Mountain coronation were not lofty enough-- Barack Obama, in his best imitation of the rally at Nuremberg, seemed to aim for Mount Olympus when he stood  atop a podium in front of an enormous, Greek-columned stage, to accept his party's nomination for president of the U.S.

But just like Herr Hitler, Obama brazenly told his BIG LIE..."We are the party of Roosevelt. We are the party of Kennedy. So don't tell me that Democrats won't defend this country". And then, came forth the biggie.... "I will never hesitate to defend this nation."

But don't hold your breath waiting.

Since taking office, Mr. Obama has announced plans to close the prison camp at Guantanamo Bay, to halt military trials of suspected terrorists there, and to make CIA officers follow the Army field manual’s rules on interrogations .

And by his mixed messages on all foreign policy fronts, he puts America in jeopardy for another Sept.11- clearly illustrating he's yet another flaming democratic liberal appeaser.
 
During his campaign, Obama purported to expand the size of the Army (false) and repeatedly suggested that he would launch unilateral military strikes into Pakistan in an effort to kill bin Laden. But that tough talk has now been toned down, and "unilateral" has been changed to "only after consultation" with the Pakistani government.

Barack talked Reagan-esque bold during his acceptance speech, but predictably, has shown Carter-esque appeasement in his first months as our anti-president.

Obama sees the world as though the enemy is just  like us. But they view his administration as an opportune time to time to extract apologies, build up their nuclear and conventional forces, and are secure in the knowledge that they'll be no consequences to aggression.

Meanwhile, to show his "toughness", Mr. Obama has pledged to send additional troops into Afghanistan to push back against the Taliban insurgency. But to what end? Unlike the Bush doctrine to eliminate al Quida and establish democracy in Iraq, there has been no definition of winning in the Afghan theater, because Afghanistan has been determined by most experts to be...the "unwinnable" war.
 
In his first fifty days, Obama sent out peace feelers to Iran, and offered a compromise to the Taliban. And now, he's proposing huge new aid to Pakistan (the same failed policy of the past three administrations).

Is Obama the reincarnation of Jimmy Carter-- or worse...Neville Chamberlain?

With his new, "get-nice-to-our-enemies" policy, he might as well have mailed engraved invitations to Bin Laden and al Qaida, to let them know it was open season on Americans again.
 
Appeasement is a formulation for disaster. It goes against our long-held foreign policy that the United States, as the world’s preeminent power, can only be secure if it reinforces its strength throughout the globe, and with no exceptions!

Throughout history, America's strongest presidents achieved greatness only through their projection of absolute military power--not through weakness by being some lily flower:

-Bush I rolled Saddam out of Kuwait
-Reagan bombed Libya and ended Moammar Khadaffi's international terrorist party
-Kennedy caused Khruschev to blink and then to withdraw Soviet missiles from Cuba
-Truman rolled back Stalin and the Communists, immediately after taking over for FDR
-Teddy Roosevelt walked with a big stick
-James Monroe in1825, said "keep out-- don't dare come into our western hemisphere!"

But as of now, we've returned to the Carter era of the late 70's, projecting nice-ness, and turning the other cheek.
 
And what if ruthless Islamic radicals test Obama? They tested President Carter and he failed-- and the cost of his failure was calamitous-- the radicalization of Iran, the rise of violent Islamist movements, the loss of a strategic ally, and the emboldening of America's adversaries worldwide (i.e. Osama bin Ladin), which culminated in 9-11.
 
Then after a "post-Carter' pause, Islamic radicals tested the next nice guy--Bill Clinton.

They tested Clinton in Somalia and he failed; they tested him in Tanzania and he failed; they tested him in New York City in 1993 and he failed. Finally, they tested him in Yemen in October of 2000 by ramming an explosive-filled boat into the USS Cole, killing 17 Americans and nearly sinking that ship.

Clinton failed his tests, confirming to Osama Bin Laden his view that America was a paper tiger-- prompting Sept.11.

And now we have Barack H. Obama, and his aversion to the use of force is written on his sleeve.

During the campaign, candidate Obama promised to hold non-conditional talks with America's foes-- making his bold statement that if elected..." he would open dialog with the enemies of this nation"

Then he "misspoke" about the "tiny" country of Iran, and about preemptively invading Pakistan, illustrating his shocking ineptitude in the realm of foreign policy and basic geography. And for sure, none of his statements (or his gaffe-prone political posturing) escaped the notice of America's enemies.

Even Joe Biden mused about the prospects of... “An international crisis.. a generated crisis...to test the mettle of this guy.”
 
So with cowboy-six gunner Bush long gone, and Mr. nicey-nice Obama on board, could our Muslim extremist friends be racing each other to "test" the mettle of our anti-president?

You can count on it.

Appeasement is always is provocative. It’s like waving a red cape in front of a bull-- a sign beckoning… "here we are, come 'n get it!"

And in yet another genuflection to our enemies abroad, Obama took another step for political correctness (and to please his radical Code Pink and ACLU supporters) by ending the classification of “enemy combatants." Then in a memo to the Pentagon, he changed the verbage from "war on terror" to..."overseas contingency operation".

How sweet! Imagine how our enemies in the Middle East must have interpreted it:

"Oh that Barack Obama, he's such a nice guy! We'll have to be nice in return. We'll just forget about all the Great Satan nonsense and let bygones be bygones-- and forget our Muslim extremism. And oh, that Obama has such a way with words! We just love his desire for a new America before the eyes of the world."

Obviously, Mr. Obama thinks he can use his speech abilities to entice Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, North Korea, etc., into falling in love with him and becoming a fan, just as he's always managed to do with all his other "fans" around the world.

And of course, in the eyes of the Obama administration, Ahkmadinejad, Putin, Bin Laden, Kim Jong II, Hamas, and Hezbollah, are all very obviously such nice guys themselves, and honest, forthright, open minded leaders; so we best trust them to behave as good world citizens.

Meanwhile, Obama can't turn away fast enough from the Bush policy of an aggressive war on terror:

First, he appointed an inexperienced lily to run the CIA, Leon Panetta, who has zilcho familiarity with espionage. Then he sends a letter to Iran expressing his willingness to open dialogue with that rogue nation.

And in an "outreach" to our enemies, he recently mailed a sweet letter-candy gram to the so-called moderate factions of the Taliban, proposing to end the Afghan insurgency. But it's blatantly obvious that it's the inflexible EXTREMIST Taliban leaders who are orchestrating the war-- not the moderates.

Maybe he can win over al Quida if he called Rocky Mosele of the international star registry, and named a heavenly body after Bin laden. Wouldn't that be nice?
 
But whatever, Obama believes that America is ALWAYS the bad guy, and that we should rehabilitate ourselves through following the wisdom of all liberals-- being nice and giving the other side a chance to "love" America.
 
So as his liberal supporters urge, let's all be patient and give Obama a chance:
 
-a chance to invite a domestic attack
 -a chance to reduce our military by 25%
 -a chance to be viewed by the world as a contrite nation, rather than carrying a BIG STICK
-a chance for Iran to complete its nuclear program to fruition
-a chance to leave our borders wide open, and for al-Qaida to sneak piece-by-piece an atomic weapon through  Mexico,  assemble it some mosque basement, then detonate in Times Square
-and a chance to blunder us into a flash war in the Middle East

And so far, all the nicey-niceness has worked just as we'd expect:

Iran has recently declared itself to be a space and nuclear power; North Korea is testing its ballistic missiles; and Russia is now using bases in Cuba as well as Venezuela.

America is a Christian country that values life-- while our terrorist enemies live to DIE for their beliefs. So we cannot ever let our guard down, because that can only have one eventual outcome--we will be attacked again, even with a nicey-smiley Obama in office.
 
Our enemies see Mr. Obama for what he really is-- a callow, accommodating, wildly inexperienced and weak foe. Unfriendly regimes and networks-- like oil-rich dictators (Hugo Chavez) and radical Islamist countries-- will always seek to exploit a tepid American foreign policy.
 
Will Russia take the opportunity to gobble up Ukraine? Will al-Qaeda now “pull out all the stops” to kill Americans? Will Lebanon “disintegrate"? And will Iranian President Mahmoud Ahkmadinejad  attack Israel and possibly sink ships at the mouth of the Strait of Hormuz, and cut off our Mideast oil supply?

So what would Mr. Smiley Obama do then... call the UN? Go on a "diplomatic  rampage" and send a strongly worded message?
 
Can you be a world class appeaser without being, at the same time, the enemy?
 
And worse, the effect of the recession now gives Obama a chance to weaken the entire infrastructure and personnel of the US military. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said, "The spigot of defense spending that opened on 9/11 is closing."

Obama promised, "I will cut tens of billion of dollars in wasteful spending." Barney Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, thinks we can cut 25 percent from military spending WITHOUT impacting national security.
 
Once again, like the Carter--Clinton days, we'll have yet another attempt made to wreck our military by the liberal lunatics within the Democrat Party, who are not democrats, but are more aptly described as Communists in bureaucratic clothing.
 
If President Obama "brings the troops home" and dismantles much of our military to save money to help the poor masses, it will be an open invitation for Iran, North Korea, Russia, and China to attack us, and attempt to wipe us out once and for all.


www.keenobserver.blogtownhall.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »