About Me

Name: thekeenobserver
Email: reallykeenobserver@yahoo.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

And now history repeats:


October 31, 2008; on the presidential campaign trail. 

Barack Obama - standing before a raucous crowd, pumping his fist - loudly exclaims:

“We are Five Days Away From Fundamentally Transforming The United States of America!”

Sieg Heil....Obama!

 

Flashback to early 1930's Germany:
 
When Hitler rose to power, it was a time of financial depression.

 

The German mark was essentially worthless. 

 

People had lost homes and jobs. The country's financial markets were in ruin. 

 

Adolf Hitler was promising “schwanken" (change). 

 

He scapegoated the “Zionists” around the world for all Germany's problems. 

 

He promised when HE became leader, the greedy Zionist bankers would be punished - they would be wiped off the face of the earth. 

   

The charismatic Hitler was then elected German Chancellor, but with only a third of the popular vote. 

 

But a coalition of other political parties then named him "Feuhrer" - Germany's supreme leader!

 

As supreme leader, Hitler abruptly expelled those in parliament who had dared to disagree with him. 

S
chools began to teach the children to sing in praise of the Feuhrer - the dawning of the Hitler Youth movement.  

 

The songs all told of a change coming to the Fatherland; that the Feuhrer was a leader EVERYONE could trust! 

 

Now the childrens' songs began to be heard on the streets and over German radio: “With our Feuhrer to lead us, we can change the world!” 

 

But soon thereafter, another abrupt change: pastors and nuns suddenly were turned away from visiting the elderly in hospitals. The people that had come to bring God’s comforting words were no longer welcome. 

 

Nationalized health care had became an open secret. 

 

Initially, they went after the most defenseless - the young.

 

On July 14, 1933, only six months after Hitler was named chancellor of the Reich, the Law for the Prevention of Genetically Diseased Children was passed.

Children with disabilities, and those with Downs syndrome, were secretly euthanized.   

 

Soon, the elderly and gravely ill began disappearing from hospitals, as mercy killing became policy. 

 

People whispered... “Maybe it is better for them now. Put them out of misery. They are no longer suffering; and of course, their death is better for the treasury of our nation. Our taxes no longer must be spent to care for such burdens.” 

 

And so murder became "mercy." 

 

The government took over private business. Industry and health care were “nationalized.” (NAZI stand for National Socialist Party) 

 

The businesses of all Jewish were then seized.

 

In less than a year, Germany had been turned upside down by its "trustworthy" Feuhrer. 

 

And now history repeats:  Is Obama's "rise to power" not eerily reminiscent of 1930's Germany, without the militarism?

Just what did he mean when he promised to fundamentally transform America?

To “fundamentally transform" America requires that our birthright to liberty, and private property, no longer are a basic precept of our Constitution.

Check.

 

To fundamentally transform America means that we can no longer trust the media - that they become a propaganda arm of the administration.

 

Check.

 

To fundamentally transform America means that life - ALL LIFE - is no longer held sacred, and must be subjugated to the moral whims of the government.

 

Check.

 

Like Hitler, Barack Obama's change has been a delusion, leading to destruction. 

 

Recall what Obama said about abortion and the “mercy killing” of tiny babies, who are left in closets to die ignominiously.

 

Is that a change we wanted? 

 

Recall the mocking words of the atheistic Obama - damning those in small Pennsylvania towns because they “cling to their religion.”

 

Obama's transformation is an Amerika where the "haves" are purged, and misery is applied equally among everyone; while the Elites running the Congressional Politburo are enriched by our substance.

 

But unlike Hitler, Obama despises his own country, and will stop at nothing until he renders it level with the other second-rate socialist utopias, and merges them into "One World."

 

It is we Americans who have foolishly put Socialist Obama into office.
 
It is fantasy to believe he is only "naive". In reality, we've chosen a Hitlerian madman who imperils our freedom, and everything our country once stood for.

 

The liberals want to compare him to Kennedy, but the closest parallel is with a Nazi who changed his name from Shicklegruber. 

 

Seig Hiel!

 

 

 

www.keenobserver.blogtownhall.com

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Time for pitchforks and torches?


Welcome to the "USO" - the United States of Obama:

The tyranny of socialized medicine is about to become law.
There is a move afoot to grant amnesty to illegal aliens, because the Senate radicals have got their 60 votes.
 
We have activist judges granting voting rights to convicted felons.

 

Plus ACORN is still busy in all 50 states - with a "wink and a nod" from the existing power structure.

And the tireless Obamacrats are at work again, preparing an even more egregious attack upon our Constitution - Universal Voter Registration: i.e. Motor Voter on steroids.
 

 

Cockroach Charles Schumer - emerging from his sewer beneath the Senate - has drafted a law to create a permanent, 25 million-strong democratic voting block, virtually overnight.

 

It's called the Federal Universal Voting act. It will override all existing voter laws in every state. We're now at the threshhold of a banana republic:

 

In effect, every list of welfare recipients, the unemployed, every list of property owners, plus all driver's license holders, will automatically be eligible to VOTE - no questions asked, nor legal ID required.

 

Conceivably, if one should own a house, have a drivers license, be unemployed, plus drawing welfare, they could cast ballots four times. Oh, and by the way, universal voter registration will include penal institutions: there will be felon re-enfranchisement.

 

Evidently, there WAS a game plan.
 
Why else would Harry Reid be ramming through all this so-called 'heath-care' legislation, when an overwhelming number of Americans disapprove, and don't want it?
Obama now has a 32% approval rating among whites. He's alienated the military, law-enforcement, the elderly, and the majority of those who actually work. 

Now, the great unveiling is about to occur: a opprobious scam to permanently steal elections the Democrats couldn’t possibly ever win.

 

There can be no doubt America; the left will continue to push conservatives until we're at the point that we literally fight back.

 

But will anything change until 500,000 angry Americans show up on the DC Mall, armed? Like Fort Sumpter 150 years ago, universal voter registration could mean civil war - the last option for a return to the Constitution.

 

We are witnessing a political coup - much more devious (and less straightforward) than a military takeover, but in the end, the outcome will be the same.
 
But have they underestimated the will of the American citizens, and the silent majority?  Do they think we’re Venezuela? Do they have any clue that our military, our veterans, and law-enforcement people are openly questioning what the hell is going on?

 

Recall: most of the hijackers that flew into the Twin Towers held valid drivers licenses. The majority of illegal aliens also hold drivers licenses. Many receive welfare checks. And once we're flooded with easily-bribed, illiterate voters, no one's vote really counts.

 

Hence, when elections become fraudulent, and without integrity, the only recourse is rebellion.

 

Think about it: universal voter registration - nationwide electoral choas; creating an infinite number of problems!

 

Many states' lists include vast numbers of illegals; the deceased, and duplicates of property owners, with little (or no) cross-checking capability. Nothing other than a fertile, Democratic voter scam, facilitated by taxpayers.

 

And upon passing, it portends the 2010 and 2012 elections will be totally fixed: the most corrupt ever seen.

ACORN will provide the "expertise" to assure every existing list of people would be registered:

 

Phonebooks. Rahm Emanuel’s Census. Library cards. Tax rolls. Welfare rolls. Drivers licenses. Hospital patients. Mailing lists. Gitmo detainees. The Seven Dwafs. The Ten Most Wanted. Twelve Angry Men. 

 

If you own property in more than one place, you’re registered in both. If you've moved several times, you are registered at all addresses. There is no way of tracking where anyone moves, or assuring they vote only once in their current place of residence.

 

This portends voter pandemonium!  Who is actualy who? Illegal alien? Felon? A Muslim terrorist? It could be anybody pulling that lever in the booth!

 

Could a "voter" be a foreign national, here legally? - or illegally? If you're on any list, you’re registered. Are you someone who illegally contributed to Obama’s campaign last year from overseas? On the list! 

 

This will be equivalent to abolishing registration altogether. It renders legitimate votes as essentialy meaningless: just appear at the polling place and vote. No ID necessary. No questons asked, as long as you vote Democrat.

 

Ironically, it will take more certification of ID to rent a video from Blockbusters, or to check in to a hotel, than vote.

 

So why bother to go to any trouble at all? Why not just hold elections by phone? Call 1-800-VOTE-NOW. Press 1 for candiate A, 2 for B….etc.

 

After a year under Obammunism, many were praying for a peaceful revolution; but now, it appears the demo-marxists leave us little choice.

 

This all began in the late 60's, when liberals christened minorities "permanent democrats" by promising them money for nothing. Then Motor Voter made it easier for the inner-city parasites to vote, with ACORN ferrying them to the polls with instructions (and bribes) on whom to vote for.

 

When our Founders wrote the Constitution, it was based on the hallowed principle: one person, ONE vote; and with individuals registering themselves, it created a built-in system to maintain integrity.

 

But with universal voter registration, there's no need to go to the polls when you can vote from a park bench. No need to even be an American citizen. Just register everybody; give the names to ACORN, who'll send out agents to vote dozens of times apiece under multiple names.

 

Result? A permanent, democratically-controlled government. They'll be tough taskmasters indeed.


Benjamin Franklin once said: (quote)..."When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the Republic."

 

 

www.keenobserver.blogtownhall.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Let the rebellion begin!

 
It's amazing how "stupid" liberals are.
 
Sound familiar?  This same phrase, or any variation thereof, is a staple of all conservative radio talk shows - repeatedly heard over and over; ad infinitum, ad-nauseum.
 
The accustomed dialogue goes something like this:
 
CALLER: Hi (host's name)! Thanks for taking my call. First, I think you're a great American! We all love your show here in Frostbite Falls!
 
HOST: I'm honored to speak with you! So what's on your mind?
 
CALLER: It's amazing how STUPID these liberals are in Congress; they claim socialized medicine will reduce the budget deficit!
 
HOST: Yes! Just like I talk about in my book..."Liberals Are Totally Clueless."
 
CALLER: Oh I just loved reading it! You sure hit the nail on the head!
 
HOST: So what's the temperature in Frosbite Falls? Enjoying that global warming, heh-heh? Those stupid liberals will never change; ha hah!
 
CALLER: Boy, are they ever dumb! I've given up trying to call my Senator about Cap 'n Trade. His office just won't respond. They're all so darn stupid!
 
HOST: Well don't worry; all these brain-dead liberals will be gone in November, and we'll be rid of that idiot Obama by 2012. So keep fighting; we're going take it to 'em in the next election...but right now, I'm up against a hard break...we'll be back in a minute."
 
(end)
 
Yeah; those stupid liberals; they do the dumbest things: like Congress passing every radical-leftist measure on Obama's socialist agenda -against the will of their angry CONSERVATIVE constituents - without a SINGLE defeat!
 
But how could they accomplish such an uphill legislative task? Through sheer stupidity?
 
ITEM: Immediately after inauguration day, President-elect Barack Obama began courting Maine RINOs Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins. Rahm Emanuel then approached Arlen Specter -promising him the DNC would flood his campaign coffers, and offer him full party support - if he would vote YES with the democratic caucus on Obama's stimulus and budget bills, and then switchover parties.
 
Pretty stupid, huh?
 
ITEM: In forcing cap 'n trade through the House, Nancy Pelosi blackmailed democratic blue dogs, telling them it would either be enforced strictly by EPA mandate, OR, they could receive fat earmarks, and the coal and utility companies in their districts would garner "free" credits to reduce their CO2 penalities, once Waxman-Markey was passed.
 
Once again; more of that dumb, liberal stupidity.
 
Meanwhile, all the smart conservative talkers were urging everyone to FLOOD the blue dogs' offices with e-mails and calls! Let them know where you stand! After all, we're the ones who elect them...blah-blah.
 
Yep, absolutely brilliant.
 
ITEM: After months of contentious deal-making, Majority leader Harry Reid manages to win over the last "hold-out" Ben Nelson- the 60th vote - after Rahm Emanuel And Chuck Schumer threatened him, saying, in effect..."Nelson; if you ruin it for the party, you'll never get another bill sponsored, or any party support ever again...you'll be out - permanently!"
 
Again, the conservative talkers had urged everyone to flood Nelson's office with e-mails and calls. "Let Nelson know where you stand! After all, we're the ones who elect him!"
 
Sure. Great idea. Try to convince democrats to vote against their own radical agenda.
 
After a year of democratic hegemony in Washington, let's add up the current score: liberals... everything - conservatives...NOTHING!
 
Liberals - comprising the minority of the population - have the conservative majority virtually tied in knots, faced with much-higher taxes, socialized medicine, and worst of all, overcome by a blind, lemming-like belief: that talk show hosts are infallible gods; while they have done nothing but prove the opposite!
 
How many more times will the Congressional liberals "get away with it" before November 2010 - a date we've been instructed to wait on? 
 
But what happens if we keep on listening to these so-called "great patriots" (who are ALL super-rich)? Where will we be by next November? There will be NO United States of America left to save!
 
If we fail to take an agressive stance NOW to stop socialized medicine, what then? What good will procrastinating until November accomplish? If one's garage catches fire, does he not quickly move to put it out, before the rest of the house burns down?
 
What good is civility toward the opposition, or to be polite? What good are e-mails and phone calls?
 
WHY do we Americans- rather than our own instincts - even bother to trust these conservative radio talkers? Instead of leading us to victory, they're marching us over a cliff; while in the meantime, they keep branding the enemy as stupid!
 
Did the Colonial Americans triumph by thinking the English were stupid? Did The United States win the Second World War thinking Hitler was stupid?
 
Consider: what happens anytime one marches into battle, overconfident of victory? Defeat!
 
And face it Americans, right now; this time; this VERY day, we are in an out-an-out battle for our individual freedom; at the doorstep to permanent enslavemant - courtesy of Barack Obama and the treasoncrats in Congress; who in two weeks (or less) will sign a bill into law that will forever taint liberty - and violate our Constitution: government-run healthcare.
 
So, threatened by tyranny, what is in every red-blooded American's mind? To delay for almost a year, watching liberty bleed away? Or to act now and rebel!

Should we listen to the radio, or take the initiative ourselves?
 
These conservative talkers will never approve of a taxpayer rebellion, or a vitriolic, "Vietnam-style" march on Washington, where people are in actual revolt.
 
Yes. A mob-like atmosphere: that's the only way to catch the attention of a sworn enemy - these vicious democrats, who happily go about, ruining our lives, for the sake of an aloof, unfeeling, leftist president.
 
This is not to imply weaponry, or fisticuffs; but why not a picket in front of the House or Senate office building? Why not the tossing of a few pies, or a few eggs (or tomatoes) at the likes of Pelosi, Reid, Schumer, Frank, Boxer,  Dodd, Bauckus, or Durbin?
 
These are the very people who have ruined our Christmas, and are only weeks away from PERMANENTLY ruining the country, and with it, our lives!
 
We must humiliate them; threaten them; let them KNOW in no uncertain terms that their EVERY move is being watched... to forever quash their ultimate weapon - that by November, the voters "will have forgotten all about it."
 
Can we afford another day of "being told to wait" until November? Are these conservative talkers more concerned with us...or themselves?
 
Think about it.
 
Are they more worried with us, losing our liberty? - or losing their sponsors?
 
If any of 'em were TRULY patriots, they would forget about their aristocratic, always-on-vacation lifestyles, and run for the Senate (or even president) themselves. But they can't be bothered. Nah, that's not for them! Too much of a sacrifice.
 
Some patriots.
 
On August, 27, 1776, when Washington's Continental army was thoroughly routed at the Battle of Brooklyn Heights, British General Sir William Howe issued a proclaimation of surrender to all 13 colonies: "A pardon would be forthcoming to anyone taking an oath of allegiance to the Crown within sixty days."
 
Not surprisingly, those Americans with the most to lose, the wealthy and the well-connected, rushed to swear their allegiance to the Crown. The Loyalists eventually were forced to move to England, after the upstart Colonials somehow managed to "upset" Cornwallis at Yorktown five years later.
 
But the salient point is this: those with the most to lose, are seldom ever willing to take a risk, be it in an actual war, or in a conflict over whether we remain a free society, or surrender our lives to the horrid intrusion of government-run healthcare.
 
And in a remarkable parallel to previous times of war, the average, everyday American once again faces a grave threat to his/her freedom - an enemy who is every bit as vicious and cunning as the British in 1776, or Hitler in 1941.
 
Yet, we have misplaced our trust in "generals," who have no real stomach for fighting, because they have the most to lose.
 
Let the rebellion begin.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Barack Obama: America's suicide?


QUOTE:... "Democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a Democracy that did not commit suicide"...John Adams (1814); letter to Thomas Jefferson.

And now, with government-mandated health care, and anarchy at our borders, is America about to sustain a fatal blow? 
Can the nation survive the treachery of Barack Obama?

 

And to those who blindly rush to this president's defense, we ask them...WHY???

 

Why is Obama ruining the dollar?

 

Why did he cut missile defense?

 

Why is he for cap 'n trade?

 

Why is he for exploding the debt?

 

Why is he pushing socialized medicine?

 

Why is he for open borders?

 

Why is he closing Guantanimo?

 

And with a terrorist near-calamity (almost paralyzing the US economy, and forever tainting the Christmas holiday) again we ask WHY - why is he protecting his Homeland Security Director?

 

Who, besides Obama, better stands for anarchy, dissension, disunity - and outright treasonous behavior - than Janet Napolitano?

 

How many ideologues- and otherwise "innapropriate" nominees - has Obama appointed? A dozen? More? To have such a high rate of failure, one must ask: did Obama deliberately choose these ghastly people for a reason?

 

Consider 1991, when Janet Napolitano played a leading role as Anita Hill's attorney, in slandering Clarence Thomas with sexual harassment allegations. Her goal? - to derail his nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court!

 

It was Napolitano who came up with the idea to besmirch Thomas, using the premise of black men as sexual predators.

 

Shortly thereafter, President Bill Clinton nominated Napolitano to be the United States Attorney for the state of Arizona, notwithstanding the fact she had NEVER prosecuted a single case. 

 

As a U.S. attorney, Napolitano was prominent in the Oklahoma City bombing investigation. She then became chairman of the U.S. attorney’s "advisory committee" to then-Attorney General Janet Reno.

 

In 1998, Napolitano was chosen as Arizona's AG - and then governor in 2000; winning the tightest gubernatorial contest in Arizona history - a margin of 21,000 ballots - less than ONE percent of the vote.

 

But In a state where Republican registrations FAR exceed Democrats, how was Napolitano elected? It was the work of our good friends at ACORN, who'd registered tens of thousands of Illegal aliens - not required to show legal ID's. 

 
Under the two-term, ultra-liberal hand of Governor Janet Napolitano, the once-great state of Arizona grew dangerous - utterly fascist in nature .  
 
Day or night, one cannot drive anywhere in Arizona without traffic cameras to issue tickets. Arizona became the leader in home invasions; property and identity theft. Under Napolitano, government spending nearly doubled.
 
Indeed; great minds think alike - Napolitano would eventually catch the eye of Barack Obama -providing the blueprint for the way he would "rule."
 
On June 26, 2003 - in front of a wildly-cheering Hispanic audience - Governor Janet Napolitano vetoed Arizona H.B. 2345; a bill that would've required voters to show valid identification at polling places.
 

In November, 2004 voters passed "Proposition 200," which made it illegal for state (or local) officials to fail to report any suspected aliens seeking welfare, medical care, or other govt. benefits.

 

Predictably, Napolitano happily vetoed it. But Arizona voted to override. Later, a San Francisco federal judge overturned parts of Prop 200 as "unconstitutional."

 
Then, in May of 2005, Governor Janet Napolitano again vetoed several other highly-popular anti-immigration bills:
 
4- a law that would have stopped the illegal forgery of immigrant ID's.
 

Napolitano then campaigned for "all day kindergarden"- which added millions to the state's school budgets. She pushed through unsustainable spending growth everywhere - then skipped out to Washington, leaving Arizonians beholden to a monster $3 billion state budget deficit. 

 

After her appointment to Obama's cabinet, Napolitano left the Arizona economy officially dead in the water - a legacy that Barack Obama would follow explicitly.

 

After Napolitano was sworn-in (as secretary of Homeland Security) people danced in the streets in Mexico City; border camps broke out in jubilant celebration, well-aware she would quickly dismantle all forms of interior immigration enforcement.

 

On Sunday, April 19, 2009, Napolitano went on CNN’s “State of the Union” and blithely proclaimed...(quote) "that crossing the border illegally is not a crime."

 

And after a stint on all the Sunday morning talk shows, two days after a terrorist attempted to blow up Northweast Airlines flight 235, Napolitano maintains her "system worked" statement was... taken "out of context."

 

All this points to the obvious: Napolitano and Obama are Manchurian candidates, with a mission to dismantle society - content to allow the nation into thinking "that they fail to see the threat" (i.e. that they're stupid). 

 

But who are the ones that fail to see the threat? It's we, the American people!


CONCLUSION: Why would Obama fire Napolitano? She's exactly what he wanted!  Yet another world socialist, wanting to do away with borders.

 

And unless you judge his actions - rather than his IQ - Obama is anything but stupid: the man who managed to get in the Whitehouse, without really saying or proposing anything- other than "we need change."

 

Pretty stupid, eh?

 

Not unlike Germany's Hitler, Barack Obama is America's foremost political evil-genius - with the uncanny ability to suggest, and then ENFORCE, unthinkable policies on the "masses."
 
Recall the old Saul Alinsky goal - " A Marxist  promotes revolution to end capitalism; then into into a new social order -- the political paradise of communism."

 

After an entire year of Obammunist rule, the vast majority of Americans fail to grasp the impending danger before us:..."There never was a Democracy that did not commit suicide..."

 

 

 

 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is the war on terror war going to the dogs?

 

What's the real impetus behind the war on terror? Could it be the color "green"? America's drive toward a "green-energy" economy? 

 

Everyday, we send our enemies another $2 billion for imported oil; they bleed us with casualties in Afghanistan; Iran continues developing nuclear weapons.
 
Meanwhile, OPEC laughs as we impede our own domestic energy production, thereby keeping the world price of crude above $70/barrel - right at a 'sustainable' level to fund an Islamic worldwide terrorist network.

 

The Persian Gulf region has 65 percent of the world's total oil reserves. Of the 4.1 billion tons of oil placed on the world market in the year 2000, some 1,440 million tons were produced in the Middle East. And these petrodollars exported to OPEC are "re-exported" in the form of terrorist attacks.

 

To calculate oil's importance in the war on terror is simple math - supply and demand. The less supply on the world oil market, the higher price per barrel, and the more wealth available for the export of Islamic ‘fundamentalism’ - which of course, is a code word for terror.

 

Consider how Islamic fundamentalism would have been blunted, had the U.S. been drilling offshore since the mid 1990's, rather than declaring our coasts and ANWAR off-limits.

 

If the United States had stepped up domestic oil production through the mid 90's - as it had done all through the 80's - worldwide domestic oil supplies would have lifted anywhere from 7% to 15%. Hence, there would have been no ridiculous oil spikes to $144 per-barrel, nor $4-dollar/gallon gasoline.

 

In simple terms, the more supply on world markets, the oil demand/price curve turns lower; which means less money flowing to the Middle East - thereby removing Iran's capability to develop atomic weapons, and OPEC's funding of terrorists camps in the "have-not" countries of Afghanistan and Yemen.

 

But instead of "drill, baby drill," the radical environmentalists insist upon a mindless march to a so-called 'green energy' economy- a policy which has been an abject failure in Europe.

 

By 1974, world oil prices had reached $12.23/barrel, a rise of 550% from a level of $2.33/ bbl in 1964.

 

Consequently, the explosion of petro-dollars quickly unraveled the social fabric of  Middle Eastern society: The fundamentalist rulers -corrupted by oil wealth - had decided upon a "religious solution" to keep the "deprived masses" at peace within the Islamic fold. Hence, radical islam became firmly entrenched.

 

But that would eventually change. A huge societal disruption throughout the Muslim world was about to occur - American television.

 

QUESTION: Why are our greatest enemies now of Islamic origin? The answer, quite simply, is the satellite dish.

 

For centuries, Islamic societies remained closed to the outside world. But when forbidden American TV shows (and movies) began to percolate throughout their populations (via satellite dishes), the word quickly spread: in America, women have jobs, wear tight jeans, drive cars, and go shopping.

 

With the genie now out of the bottle, so began the rumblings from the masses - no longer content with the asceticism of Islam: "We want what the Americans have!"

 

Suddenly the U.S. was in the crosshairs - an anathema to traditional Muslim culture.The "Great Satan America" threatened the entire Middle East with social upheaval.

 

In its most simplistic analysis, the war on terror is largely cultural: Islamic tradition centers around concealment of the female body (preserving chastity). But the American lifestyle provokes violent condemnation; and a sure trip to Islamic hell. 

 

Thus, given the huge cultural/religious divide between the East vs. West, the terror war springs eternal - unless...an effective cultural weapon can be found: the canine, the ideal antidote to a suicide bomber!

In Arabic culture, dogs are thought of as filthy, repugnant animals. Both Sunni and Shi'a alike consider them to be "ritually unclean". In the Quran, the prophet Muhammad despised canines. Most practicing Muslims do not have dogs as pets.

According to Sunni tradition, it is said that angels do not enter a house which contains a dog.

 

Thus, if the weapon of choice in the terror war is the suicide bomber - cleverly disposed to hide his explosives in some never-ending, novel way, then what's the obvious way to thwart them, with a near 100% success ratio?  - the bomb-sniffing dog!

 

Can there be a better way to intimidate a fanatical terrorist - sneaking around a large airport -than a phalanx of bomb-sniffing dogs? Attempts to sneak explosives aboard airliners would vanish, almost overnight. Virtually all religious Muslims are in abhorrence of dogs, let alone ones that could incriminate them!
 
The war on terror would at last, swing in favor of the West.

The olfactory lobes - the part of the brain which processes odors - are 100 times more developed in canines vs. humans. Even the most clever forms of concealment- such as shoes or undergarments - would instantly be rendered useless.

 

Consider: eager, well-trained dogs, roaming airports? Why not? Americans would love it! Muslims would hate it! Ergo, the problem of "profiling" solved!

 

POINT: Bomb dogs can not only trained in English, but German, Dutch, or Czech or any alternative languages 
 

POINT: Bomb dogs receive extensive training: they search lockers, luggage, and can detect trace amounts of explosive material in packages of varying size and shape. 

 

POINT: Bomb dogs are trained to detect in aircraft, both for the cargo, and the subtleties of the air-frame itself.

 

POINT: Bomb dogs would obviate costly body scanners, which are offensive to women in general - and Muslims in particular - outraged at the embarassment of a fully-clothed female seen as virtually naked by TSA people.

 

POINT: What better way to speed up the passenger boarding process (and allay tensions) than bomb sniffing dogs plus metal detectors? 

And what about the policy of not allowing liquids? If you want to take something on the plane, you would only need to open it up where the dog can walk past and give it a whiff. 

But this is the 21st century, where everything needs to be complicated, and politicized to the point of absurdity.


PREDICTION: The TSA will spend vasts amounts of tax money on huge X-ray-scanners (where you still need to depend on an alert operator), rather than acquire and train a few thousand bomb sniffing dogs, to help keep airline passengers safe, and those "deeply religious" Muslim terrorists at bay. 

 

So look for the terror war to go on abated. Look for the democrats to continue their fallacious, elitist, liberal dream - that green energy will reduce our dependency on foreign oil.

 

And (predictably) look for Congress to spend untold millions of taxpayer money, only to discover body scanners slow down the screening process to a crawl, not to mention the same caliber of people operating complicated equipment.
 
Muslim and women's organizations alike will never accept having their bodies scanned (and personal parts oogled) - even if it is for safety and security.

 

Which leaves the final, obvious solution; allow the war on terror to go to the dogs!

 

Arf! What have we got to lose?
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The treason stops here!

 
December 8th 1941: that dark day after Pearl Harbor - the most dastardly sneak attack in U.S. history.
 
130 million angry Americans are gathered in front of their radios, anxiously awaiting President Franklin Roosevelt's guiding reponse:
 
But mysteriously, the White House is mute! No response is forthcoming.
 
Finally on December 11 - seventy-two hours later - President Roosevelt issues a statement:
 
"I believe that this was an isolated incident, and that we should not overreact"..." I've ordered a full investigation. Pearl Harbor seems to have been a systemic failure"..."In the meantime, throughout this coming Christmas season, I want all Americans to feel that they are safe."
 
But what if Roosevelt really HAD spoken in such a shockingly absurd, treasonous manner? How long would he have remained president? He quickly would have been run out of Washington on a rail, while being splattered with tomatoes.
 
And what is any different from what our beloved Commander-in-Sneak did, after a terrorist attacked Northwest Airlines flight 253 on Christamas?

For three days, liar-in-chief Obama slithered around his motel in Hawaii - figuring a way to blame Bush. Finally, President Stonewall decided he would consider it another (ho-hum) law enforcement matter.
 
On December 8, 1941, when Franklin Roosevelt made his famous war address before Congress, he was indignant; furious; his voice quaking with emotion!
 
When Obama finally emerged to deliver his comments on the failed airliner attack, he was about as emotional as a gerbil - acting in a calm, tranquil manner, similar to his reaction to Fort Hood.
 
Ah yes, it’s so very comforting to know this was just another isolated incident. No possible way it could have been part of a plot! After all, America - with its 57 states - is one of the world's largest Muslim nations.
 
For his entire anti-presidency, Obama has done everything possible to undermine America, as Muslim terorrists brazenly execute yet another dastardly attack - knowing full well that Obama will procrastinate; blame others; parse words; and worst of all - act to protect the perpetrators themselves.
 
When Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was taken into custody, what did Obama do? Was the CIA called? Did Obama have him interrogated?
 
Did our president make any effort to uncover possible life-saving information, like where he was trained? Or who put him up to the attack? Or who were his superiors in al-Quida? How he was able to get on the plane undetected? Who made the bomb? Are there other pending attacks?
 
Nope.
 
Instead, our Commander-in-treason orders this terrorist coward be supplied with a lawyer! And read his constitutional rights!
 
How many more American lives did Obama place at risk, by allowing Abdulmutallab to remain silent?
 
The president of the United States - playing the role of traitor! Yet the lamestream media accepts his phony explanation... that it was all just a "systemic failure" - part of the "old system" that's been in place for the last 8 years.
 
Sure.
 
When will America wake up and show some outrage? This Obama insanity, where a black president can't be criticized because of political correctness, is a recipe for calamity!

And our enemies know it.
 
But wasn't electing Obama supposed to stop all this Muslim terrorism? Whatever happened to that?
 
Even Jimmy Carter - incompetent as he was - finally righted himself in 1980 when he ordered a mission to rescue our American hostages from their Iranian capturers.
 
Yet Barack Obama goes out of his way to protect the other side!
 
What further evidence is needed to illustrate this man could not be a real American?
 
Under what Kenyan rock did this forked-tongue snake emerge from? Why else would he spend two million dollars filing lawsuits to hide the secret of his birthplace?
 
Have we lost our minds? This man is a fraud, yet we continue to let him remain in the White House, while he secretly goes about planning our demise!
 
If we could drag Obama into a military court, could he not - right now - be convicted of high treason?
 
Connect the dots:
 
The CIA - several months ago - garners evidence that a certain Nigerian is planning a terrorist attack in the US; yet the information goes nowhere! 
 
But why?
 
POINT: The CIA knew Obama would not touch the guy because he is black AND a Muslim.
 
POINT: Obama has neutered the agency, and replaced all conservatives with democrat bureaucrats; plus liberal stooge director Leon Panetta
 
POINT:Obama has ordered ALL intelligence to be directed from the White House
 
POINT: the "lawsuit" threat: Agents of the CIA, afraid to show initiative, for fear of charges of racism (or bias) from Eric Holder and his department of injustice
 
That's right America; our CIA - the only thing that stands between us and these idiopathological Muslim terrorists - has been placed in a staightjacket by the America-hating, micro-managing Obama Administration.
 
It’s the same story as the recruitment center attack in Little Rock last June: The FBI  had been tracking Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad right up to the shooting of the two soldiers. He was the first one to emerge from the same Yemeni cell that claimed the attack on flight 253.
 
But predictably, in the bloody aftermath, Obama orders a cover up - the usual "isolated incident" yarn.
 
Instead of waterboarding gunman Abdulhakim Mujahid (and preventing Ft. Hood and the Christmas flight attack), Obama was busy threatening the Bush administration with charges of "torture" in preventing a planned "9-11 style" attack on Los Angeles in 2002.
 
And worse- despite the Yemeni roots of the attack on the Detroit-bound flight - Obama is determined to empty Guantanamo, although nearly half the remaining "detainees" are from Yemen.
 
Sure Mr. Obama: Closing Gitmo is one of your “national security priorites.” But putting a known, Yemen-trained Islamic terrorist on a no-fly list, is not.
 
So what's next? Will Janet Napolitano be recommended for the Medal of Honor? What other president - save for Obama - would have appointed such a rattleskull-fool for Homeland Security director?
 
And besides the insanity of his Napolitano appointment, did Obama cover up evidence submitted to him by the FBI? Yemini terrorist Imam al Zindani, who has an extensive FBI dossier, trained crotch-bomber Abdulmutallab, AND Major Nidel Hasan, AND Imam al Awlaki .Yet the Obama administration did nothing!
 
The dangerous, 38-year-old al-Awlaki, a U.S. citizen born in New Mexico to Yemeni parents, had preached at a Virginia mosque that major Hasan's family attended. The FBI investigated him after learning he had been contacted by a possible "procurement agent" for Osama bin Laden. But no action was taken.
 
And not surprisingly, our good friend Imam al Zindani was discovered as a top level operative of "The Union od Good," a front organization that funds Palestinian suicide bombers - financed by a charity in the UK called "Interpal", a known terrorist group supporting Hamas. 
 
But in every case, connecting the dots yields the same outcome:  Barack Obama - the Kenyan reptile - ordered all this suppressed...put in the FBI junkdrawer.
 
And who himself is better at covering up than Obama?

In every instance, the left-wing democrats never cease to show their hatred of America. Obama (and his left) are not against the war on terror; they are against the U.S. from winning the war.
 
Consider: Why did the insurgency last for so long in Iraq? Was it because the Democrat hacks in Congress gave the enemy hope that they might win? Otherwise, the Iraqi war would have been finished by 2005.
 
Even right before his hanging, Saddam Hussein thanked the anti-war left in his final letter.
 
Unbelievably, after nearly one year in the White House, we're still in the dark about Barack Obama - the sneakiest, most dangerous  president in American history.
 
But the one thing we DO know - we've elected someone who sides with the enemy:
 
Let the impeachment begin.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A religion is a terrible thing to waste

 

So how goes the war on terorrism? Er (as Mr. Obama prefers) the "overseas contingency operation"?

 

Recently a spokesman for the Taliban gave an ominous warning to ABC news:

 

“Every Muslim has to play his real and true role to uphold his religion and his nation. And war and jihad is a duty...There are thousands of our youth who look forward to death, like the Americans look forward to living!"

 

Hmmph. What could he have meant? Could it be that 72 virgins' thing?

 

In the Quran, Mohammed is quoted, “The person who participates in Allah's cause (Holy Battle) will be recompensed by Allah either with a reward, or booty (if he survives) - or will be admitted to paradise (if he is killed).” (Al Bukhari vol. 1:35.)

 

“They (the true believers) will sit with bashful, dark-eyed virgins, as chaste as the sheltered eggs of ostriches” (Sura 37:48).

 

Indeed; the promise of heaven to those who die in battle (for the cause of Allah) is quite a promise - 72 dark-eyed virgins! So where do we sign up?

 

Mohammed - who existed in an era of bloody, tribal territorial struggles for land -knew that sex would sell very well among those he would lead into battle. Hence, if you have no cash to pay your fighters, promising them a trainload of virgins was the next best thing.

 

By constantly emphasizing to his followers that they would get untouched virgins in Paradise, Mohammed clearly expressed a "chauvanist" opinion of marriage - recognizing that male erotic fantasies might oneday enable him to conquer the ancient world. 

 

Thusly, in Muslim heaven, martyrs for Allah conveniently ditch their wives for the fresher (and more pleasurable) encounters with 'Houris' (beautiful virgins).  

 

Indeed; a mind is a terrible thing to waste.

 

But this is EXACTLY what is happening around today's Muslim world.
 
In madrasses everywhere, the tale of 72 virgins is being used to fight the war on terror, in much the same way Mohammed used it to fight his wars of expansion in the 7th century.

 

So does Allah really use chaste virginal females to reward actions of terrorism? Is there a better way to get your point across? Especially to young, "impressionable" Arabic teen-age boys?

 
But what about female suicide bombers; what kind of virgins could they possibly expect? And what about having only 72 virgins? After a while, wouldn't you run out? After all, are they not virginal but once?
 
Arabic culture is rife with myths that are harmless. But this one is fueling ignorant Muslim "warriors" into actually killing us, believing that the consequence of dying merits them virginal "booty" in heaven.
 
In the Book of Sunah (volume IV, chapter 21) "The Prophet Muhammad is quoted saying: "The smallest reward for the people of paradise is an abode where there are 80,000 servants and 72 wives, over which stands a dome decorated with pearls, aquamarine, and ruby, as wide as the distance from Al-Jabiyah (Damascus) to Sana'a (Yemen)."
 
So is it any wonder that in our prisons and penitentiaries, there are thousands of "converts" to Islam? Unlike Christianity, the "teachings" of Allah purport the myth of  "gittin' down" in the afterlife!
 
It sure sounds a lot more enticing to some hapless, hopeless felon than the mystery of the Blessed Trinity.
 
But unfortunately, as simple-minded as it sounds, the 72 virgins myth is all too real to those who would machine-gun unarmed soldiers at an army base; or would blow-up a plane loaded with civilians.
 
ITEM: On the day of the Fort Hood massacre, a convenience store camera's security tape revealed a smiling Major Malik Nadal Hasan, wearing white ceremonial Islamic garb, one hour before the shootings. Previously, he had given away korans that same morning, and later, shouted "allah akbar" as he murdered US army soldiers
 
ITEM: Witnesses on flight 253 from the Netherlands testified that although his entire leg was horribly-burned, terrorist Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab did not express any pain, and seemed to be "in a tranquil mental state." Said another witness...He was staring into nothing."

ITEM: A man with “political and religious motives” killed one soldier and wounded another in a targeted attack on a army-navy recruiting center in Litle Rock, Arkansas. The suspect, Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad, reportedly had been under investigation by the FBI
 
ITEM:Two of the four leaders allegedly behind the al Qaeda plot to blow up the Northwest Airlines passenger jet over Detroit were released from Guantanamo prison in November, 2007, according to American officials and Department of Defense documents.

So what's the common thread behind such fanatical insanity (stupidity)?

Is it pure religious ideology, or, more likely, that darn "72 virgins" thing?

 
It seems utterly delusional that a promise of sensual happiness (and sexual bliss in paradise) is the prime motivator for all these Islamic terrorists; but it does beg the question: Why else would young men, or any man, be willing to blow himself up, or gun down helpless people?  
 
Any half-wit knows know that the description of paradise (or heaven) in the Quran is allegorical. But Mohammed knew that for heavenly rewards, physical things of this world are best used to describe things totally non-physical, and thus could motivate one to perpetrate the most gruesome crimes imaginable against their fellow man. 

 

Voltaire once wrote..."'Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities..."
 

And until the West can come up with some ideological way of countermanding the absurdity of a blissful afterlife, with untouched virgins in heaven, the war on Islamic terror may go on for an eternity.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Who are we kidding?

 
From the year 1738,  Benjamin Franklin's "Poor Richard's Almanack" reveals a searing proverb: "SELL NOT LIBERTY TO PURCHASE POWER!"
 
Various translations abound:
 
- "They that give up essential liberty to purchase safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."

- "Those who sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither."

- "One willing to trade freedom for security, deserve neither and will lose both."

- "A society that would surrender liberty to gain security deserves neither and loses both."

- "Those who would trade freedom for protection deserve neither."
 
Even as a young man, Franklin realized security and liberty we're not interchangable in a free society. No middle ground could exist.
 
A perfect example of Franklin's precognition would later take place in October of 1776: 

After months of
 colonial disasters on the battlefield - British General William Howe issued a proclamation (of surrender): "A pardon would be forthcoming to anyone taking an oath of allegiance to the Crown within sixty days."

Not surprisingly,
those with the most to lose (the wealthy) would accept Howe's terms -becoming "Loyalists" to the English King.
 
Wrote Samuel Adams, in derision of the turncoats..."If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquillity of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you... may your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!"
 
Thoroughly disgusted, Adams was saying ..."Insipid fools! Why cede freedom to save your wealth? Soon, the English will tax you even more, until you have neither!" 
 
And is this any different than our situation now? A tyrannical government, who takes half our wealth- and demands even more - yet we remain loyal.
 
Our forefathers inherently understood: with complete freedom, there is no security. With complete security, there is no freedom. 
 
Rather than be subjected to a tax of "3 pence per pound," Sam Adams would toss tea into the Boston Harbor. But how much in taxes do modern Americans pay on gross income? 45%? 50%? 55%? But yet, they remain loyal.
 
Were they to exist today, the Founding Fathers would deride modern Americans as slaves - slaves that have luxury and tranquility; but still bound by chains; those of a tyrannical government - demanding 20 times more in taxes than our colonial ancestors once paid.

And why do we accede to this? 
Because we're brainwashed to think the government guarantees us "a good life."

Yes, its a wonderful life, where we literally now spend half our lives, slaving for the government. Yet we remain loyal.

And not unlike the Loyalists, we've chosen modern luxuries - feeling them more important than freedom itself. But
make no mistake America - soon we shall have neither!

Is wealth the same as freedom? This is the most dangerous myth of our the time - the
 difference between a free, law-abiding society, and a government that constantly passes intrusive laws to control society's behavior - kept in line by a nanny state.
 
Is this not what George Orwell foresaw after World War II, when he wrote "1984"? 
 
A free society doesn't solely rely on its "Big Brother" government to protect them. A free society is willing to protect itself; which implies sacrifice - a sacrifice that may now be in order.
 
We think of slaves as being poor - deprived of their wealth. But as Sam Adams was only too happy to point out to the loyalists: our lives are little more than slaves living with the luxuries of life - central air; HDTV; computers; and a DVD player in our SUV's.
 
But why do we fail to take notice? 
 
It's because of "incrementalism"...a subtle takeaway of our feedoms - now to the point where we face the ultimate social tyranny -nationalization of our healthcare! A takover of not just the medical establishment, but of every facet of our lives!

With Obamacare, the government tells you where to get your mandatory health insurance (that the upper classes MUST pay for) and what you can/can't do with your life, lest you increase the risk.
 
And when the government controls risk, it controls life!
 
So what about those guns you own, or that motorcycle in your garage? Or the ATV? Say goodbye, or be willing to pay "through the nose."
 
Could they not be interpreted as a"dangerous health risk?" One that forces you to either surrender them, or pay a much higher premium on your health insurance? 
 
Can't we see the tyranny that we are about to face?
 
Could it now be possible that the government will be telling us what food we can ingest? Or what we can drink? And possibly, one day, what we can think?
 
Is it any wonder why the Democrats were crying tears of joy (on the Senate floor) when they passed socialized medicine - opening a Pandora's box of permanent, never-ending expansion of the federal government - one that never ends!
 
And what's to stop it? Right now, the Health & Human Services director, Kathy Sebelius, is planning new ways to lord over our lives.
 
What if the government now requires everyone to obtain an implanted RFID chip in their arms? It would enable your medical records to be scanned every time you boarded a plane ( i.e., you can't board until you get scanned). It would enable them to control our lives, under the guise of "security" - making us safer.
 
The more security - the more control; and little by little, with control comes enslavement, and one day, a total loss of liberty.
 
Hence, after enough government "security" we gradually become slaves - thinking we're safe. But in reality, we end up with neither - liberty nor security. 
 
All it takes is a little deductive logic; something our forefathers had in abundance- realizing that as long as they kept imploring the British to lift their onerous taxation, they were only revealing their weakness, and inviting more. 
 
Hence, they revolted, knowing there was no other way to expel the tyranny.
 
And now, deductive logic is in order of the highest magnitude.
 
Once Obamacare becomes law, what's to stop the government from enslaving us?
 
What's to stop them from raising our taxes? - to perhaps sixty, even seventy percent of our total labor? And all for the purpose of transferring our wealth to those who refuse to be responsible for themselves, thereby buying their votes - perpetuating the tyranny.
 
Who would ever steal, kill, kidnap or defraud others in order to get money, or an HDTV, or some other luxury? Would we not rather devote an honest amount of labor?
 
Yet we allow the government steal from the haves (taxation) in order to pay for the have-nots - making slaves of us all.
 
But the government calls it..."security."

There is an old proverb that says: "No man escapes when freedom fails."
 
If we want to keep our freedom, we must revolt against the most intrusive threat to ever face America since King George III and Lord North - government-run healthcare.
 
But would you be willing to give up your security to save your country? Is not a taxpayer revolt in order? It would stop Obamacare dead in its tracks! It would turn Barack Obama's march to full socialism into a blind alley!
 
Can there be any other way? What then? Who are we kidding? Only ourselves!
 
Sotomayor and the Supreme court will rule Obamacare is legal - and we all KNOW IT!
 
We must stop with all the false hopes!  We can no longer deny the reality to ourselves.
 
50 million taxpayers who say "enough" can destroy the entire Obama presidency; THEY CANNOT ARREST US ALL!
 
To paraphrase Ben Franklin: "We either hang together, or most assuredly, we'll all hang separately"... under the tyrannical rule of Obammunism.

 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Trenton: George Washington's surprise party


What was so remarkable about George Washington's character? He NEVER  felt beaten! Defeat was not an option! 

As a 23 year-old captain during the French and Indian war, he would display uncanny bravery under fire:

Near what is now Pittsburgh, a combined British-American column had been surprised in a bloody ambush.
Despite having two horses shot from beneath him, the gallant young Washington defiantly rode back and forth, rallying his soldiers. Every British and American officer was killed, except for him.

Washington would write: "By the all powerful dispensations of Providence, I had been protected beyond all human probability or expectation, for I had four bullets through my coat, yet escaped unhurt, although death was leveling my companions on every side of me."
 
On July 2, 1776 - two weeks after Bunker Hill - Washington told his troops: "The fate of unborn millions will now depend, under God, on the courage of this army. Our cruel and unrelenting enemy leaves us only the choice of brave resistance, or the most abject submission. We must resolve to conquer or die."
 
Yet only seven weeks later, British General William Howe - in command of 25,000 redcoats - had surrounded Washington in New York. His 8,000-man Continental Army stood trapped on Brooklyn Heights (Long Island), with Howe poised to crush them the following morning.
 
But Washington had other ideas: escape. He ordered his men to scavenge boats to flee across the fog-laden East River. But by dawn, the bulk of his army was still exposed to the British.
 
Washington wrote: "In a most unusual change in weather, the fog did not lift from the river. It stayed thick, covering my retreat until the entire army had evacuated and escaped. So very dense was the atmosphere that I could scarcely discern a man at six yards' distance."
 
Then, after a long southern retreat through all New Jersey, and into Pennsylvania, Washington would record (in his diary): "Instead of beating back the enemy, we ourselves had been beaten back at every point"...."Rhode Island, Long Island, Staten Island, New York, and nearly all of New Jersey, were in possession of the enemy, who were now threatening Philadelphia."
 
For the latter part of 1776, the Continentals seemed powerless before the Redcoats -considered (at that time) to be the world's premier fighting force. Washington's best officers had been killed or taken prisoner. The Continental army - having dwindled from twenty thousand to only four thousand - was in hot pursuit by Cornwallis.
 
In the midst of these disasters, General Howe made public a surrender proclamation: "A pardon would be forthcoming to all who would take the oath of allegiance within sixty days."

Not surprisingly, those
mostly of wealth and influence were in immediate acceptance of Howe's terms - becoming "Loyalists" to the British Crown.

Thus, approaching the end of
 1776, the end seemed near - hope for independence had all but vanished:

Deserters were melting away, returning to their farms. 
Thinking Washington's resolve foolish, hundreds of soldiers - their enlistments up -abandoned the Continental Army in droves.
 
Nevertheless, Washington began planning an offensive! Upon hearing this, his officers agreed: "Our commander has taken full leave of his senses!"
 
But George Washington clearly understood - it was America's only hope.
 
If the Continentals retreated back to Philadelphia, Cornwallis, with 25,000 redcoats, and 3,000 German Hessians - the feared mercenaries - would have time enough to lay seige to the city, and the probable ending of the war. 
 
Hence, there was nothing to lose. 
 
To attack back into New Jersey was the only way to prevent defeat. Once the Delaware river froze, the combined British-Hessian juggernaut could crossover, then easily overpower the Americans. 
 
Washington reasoned with his troops: They were already losing the revolution, so better they resist until the end, for the tyranny of the British would be a living death. His 4000-man army, in unison, agreed - vowing to fight until the last man!
 
Washington - sensing British overconfidence- knew this was the perfect chance to win a strategic battle - one that could save the war.
 
Selecting his 2000 best troops, on December 25, 1776, George Washington moved to cross the Delaware.
 
Beforehand, Washington made a critically important decision -placing Colonel Henry Knox in complete charge of the river crossing.
 
With John Glover's Marbleheaders (14th Continental Regiment) manning the boats, Colonel Knox would perform a miracle: the attack force of men, horses, and artillery crossed the river without any loss. A month later, Knox was elevated to brigadier general. 
 
Later Washinton would write: "At length the boats were launched amid the floating ice, and having reached midstream, were  thrown into confusion. But Henry Knox, who, standing on the farther shore, kept shouting through the darkness with his bellowing voice, indicating the point for which they were to steer."
 
Finally, around four o'clock in the morning, Washington's army began its eight-mile trek to Trenton. They would split into two columns, then attack simultaneously from different directions.
 
Revisionist history would later record that the Hessians were in a blind, drunken stupor on the morning of December 26, 1776, when Washington's army appeared.
 
Actually, Colonel Johanns Rahl - the experienced Hessian commander  - had (for weeks) been expecting an attack, and had implored the English to reinforce Trenton from the south. But Howe, overconfident, repeatedly refused.
 
At 8 AM, the main American force under Washington entered from the northwest. Nathaniel Greene from the South. The remainder took a position to the northeast- blocking any retreat.
 
Suddenly, the command was given: advance!
 
Americans broke through doors, and smashed windows. The thoroughly-surprised Hessians were shot down as they ran outside.
 
Colonel Rahl - waving his sword - ran about, shouting to his troops, "My brave soldiers! Advance!"
 
Washington would record: "His men were frightened and confused, for our men were firing upon them from fences and houses, and they were falling fast. Instead of advancing they ran into an apple orchard, seeking cover."
 
Within an hour, the battle for Trenton was over. it would send a resounding message throughout the colonies: the British could be beaten! The Hessians had suffered 20 killed, 100 wounded, 1,000 captured. In addition, six brass artillery pieces, and a bounty of brown-Betty muskets and pistols were captured.
 
An exultant George Washington turned to one of his officers, and grasping his hand, exclaimed, " This is a glorious day for our country!"
 
The Americans had lost but two men (who had frozen to death) and four wounded: one of whom was artillery lieutenant James Monroe, who would later become the fifth president of the United States.
 
Upon hearing the news, British General Howe was speechless - stunned that a such strong German contingent could be surprised in such a manner, and put up so little resistance.
 
By noon December 26, Washington's force had moved to the Delaware - crossing back into Pennsylvania - taking their prisoners and captured supplies with them.

At once, re-enlistments in the Continental Army exploded across the colonies! The Americans had resoundly defeated a European army. The terror the Hessians inspired in New York had been broken! 
 
The Battle of Trenton was particulary sweet for Washington, whose troops were bayonetted unmercifully by the same Hessian contingent at the battle for Harlem Heights.

Ironically, the renowned painting- by artist Emanuel Luetz - with Washington standing majesticly at the bow of a boat (as it is crossing the Delaware River) is largely mythological: it would have resulted in him tumbling overboard on that gusty, icy night. The flag James Monroe holds was not created until six months after the battle

 

Nonetheless, General Washington would never abandon his belief that "Divine Providence" (God) had intervened in the American cause.

 

In his first Inaugural Address, given in New York City -- Washington declared, "No people can be bound to acknowledge the Invisible Hand more than the people of the United States. Every step by which they have advanced to the character of an independent nation, seems to have been distinguished by some token of providential agency."

 

Not much later, an inscription on all American coins would appear: "In God we trust."

 

 www.keenobserver.blogtownhall.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The nightmare before Christmas


(The following verse is to be read in iambic pentameter)
 
It was the nightmare before Christmas
and throughout the nation
Americans were unaware
of the impending devastation
 
The Senate had finally passed its healthcare measure
that would create only confusion, and grave displeasure
Harry Reid claimed it would save both lives and money
but something about it seemed rather funny
 
A bill had been written, 2000 pages long
and all behind close doors? - something was obviously wrong
The Republicans claimed it was a disaster for the nation
yet the Democrats promised it would be our salvation
 
It would eliminate fraud! Cover the uninsured!
and shrink the deficit; plus bend the cost curve.
But taxes and unemployment would only rise
for the democrats had cloaked it within a clever disguise - THE PUBLIC OPTION!
 
(end)
 
Despite its gawky, corny verses, this silly poem bears a stark ominous warning:
 
Wake up America! Again we're being misled!
 
Once Obama signs the combined (House-Senate) reconciled health care bill, the clock begins ticking immediately - the Public Option becomes inevitable! Its all but a fait-acompli!
 
Think about it: why would the Senate democrats literally sweat blood, staying up until all hours - working weekends; working right up to the holidays, only to pass a so-called "watered down" version of government run healthcare?
 
C'mon: are we THAT stupid?
 
Something else to think about: Our lamestream media keeps reminding us that..."since the Senate bill doesn't contain a Public Option, it may be difficult for the House to sign onto it, and ultimately, everything could fall apart."
 
Right.
 
After Congress resumes Jan 18, (2010) Pelosi and Harry Reid will be like two lovebirds; they'll come to terms literally overnight - just in time for Obama's State of the Union (address).
 
Already, we hear that Nancy Pelosi has signaled she would be willing "to bend" on the Public Option, "just to get something passed."
 
Arrgh! More sucker language from the media!
 
When has Nancy Pelosi ever been willing to bend? Never! This tyrannical woman has enough clout to strike fear into all but the most secure people on Capitol Hill!
 
If our beloved Speaker didn't think there was a public option lurking SOMEWHERE within that 2000-page Senate bill, she'd be making life miserable for the Whitehouse - particularly Obama - for "not doing enough."  
 
Do Americans even realize the disaster - contained within the Senate bill - that awaits them? With the power to tax employers, this will set up a domino-effect that will invariably create a defacto Public Option, while Reid, Pelosi and Obama need only relax and watch it happen.
 
Now consider this: after all this time spent watching Fox news, or all we've read in the newspapers, has ANYONE bothered to really explain terms like "Public Option?" Or "single-payer?" Or defined the role of HHS secretary Kathy Sebelius? It's but another way the Obamacrats have kept us confused, undecided, and divided.
 
But once Obamacare takes effect - that's it - the confusion ceases. The tyranny begins!
 
The government now will be able tax private-employer insurance policies; then, employers will either fire workers, or drop altogether private health coverage- eventually forcing everyone into a government-subsidized insurance plan - the PUBLIC OPTION, and thusly, rationing!
 
Let's re-iterate. 
 
With the inevitable creation a public option, the government eventually becomes the only one (single payer) to compensate care providers. Hence, the rationing of health care, as the government makes it as "economic" as possible (e.g. pulling the plug on grandma).
 
Result? A complete takeover of the entire American medical estabshment!
 
Single-payer means funding will be drastically cut for medicare; drastically reduced payments to doctors and hospitals for services; hospitals may eventually go bankrupt. Many physicians wil retire out of necessity - or disgust
 
Single-payer means the cutting of funds for ALL medical procedures, drugs, therapies, equipment - virtually everything. The government becomes your doctor, and has the final say-so. 
 
Hence, doctors of all stripes will be paid less: Less for cancer treatments; less for heart bypasses- paid less for working even harder. 
 
With single-payer, the goverment can tell any doctor/hospital/care-provider..."either take the fee we offer you - or leave it!  What do they care? The profit incentive in medicine becomes drastically reduced, or GONE altogether!
 
With single payer, boitech and genetic research companies will have no incentive to innovate. Many will merge, struggle, or eventually fold.
 
With single payer, nursing and medical vocations will disappear. American med, dental and nursing schools will see drops in enrollments.The inevitable shortages of med professionals will lead to Indian & Muslim doctors migrating to the US - required to fill the gaps.
 
And lurking behind it all are the death panels of the Department of Health & Human Services, controlled by secretary Kathy Sebelius - an unfeeling woman - who will wield enormous authority in Washington DC (second only to Obama).
 
Even worse, with the unconstitutional mandate that everyone buy health insurance, hundreds of billions from each state's economy will "flow" to Washington, only to be transferred to inner city parasites across the country - providing subsidies to "poor people."
 
The Senate healthcare debacle amounts to little other than a rewriting of the IRS tax code, enabling the government to steal the wealth of one, and transfer it to another: ergo, socialism - reparations in disguise!
 
With socialized medicine, everyone gets to share in the misery; but nothing like what is to be felt by the dehumanizatrion we will suffer because of Obamacare. 
 
So let's all wish a happy holiday to our Congress - and perhaps, a pie in-the-face - to show them our appreciation for the disaster they've planned for everyone - except themselves.
 
Truly we have witnessed a nightmare on the day before Christmas.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Stupak plays his Ben Nelson Card


QUESTION (multiple choice): Who was it that said..."I regret that I have but ONE life to give to my country!
 
A) Nathan Hale
B) Patrick Henry
C) Richard Henry Lee
D) Tupac Shakur
 
And now Bart (Tupac) Stupak - a Michigan democrat - is valiantly offering to give up his political life for his sacred principles, threatening to hold out unless the Senate's language on abortion is amended to that of the House.
 
Horrors! Could the long-awaited passage of Obamacare be derailed?
 
Stupak claims that out of the 64 democrats who voted 'yes' on his 'right-to-life' amendment, there are eight, or possibly nine other House reps who will not compromise on their beliefs! - that they will not bend to the pressure! - that they will not be intimated!
 
These so called "hardcore ten," said Stupak, are quite willing to stand up to all the urgency from the Whitehouse - to stand up to all the threats of Speaker Pelosi, and stick to their guns!
 
What baloney.
 
Seems like we've seen seen that movie before...it's called, The Wheel That Squeeketh Thee Loudest, Gets ze Grease! Eh Comrades?
 
Its all theater folks. You can stop hoping. Look for the ten wheels to immediately stop squeeking as soon as they receive their grease.
 
The tension in the air is thick. Capitol Hill is holdling its collective breath:
 
Will Stupak be able to rally them? Or will the pressure from Obama and Pelosi be enough for them to sell out their principles?
 
Vote for the second option - unfortunately.
 
Imagine the pressure from Rahm Emanuel: Listen Stupak, you !*#*%!!*%**! I'm warning you right now! You'll never get another bill passed again!"
 
Obama then calls: "Stupak; don't be acting stupidly...were keping score here..."
 
Pelosi weighs in: "I've brought all of you this far, and I'm not gonna let a few shrimps defeat the whole thing! Either go along with the program, or lose every one of your Committee chairs! And not one red cent from the DNC for your re-election campaigns!"
 
Recall when Lucifer brought Jesus to top of a mountain and tempted Him:
 
Jesus said to the tempter (who is the devil)..."it is written, man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds out of the mouth of God."
 
Stupak and his so-called "holdouts" are not Christ-like; they are playing like Ben Nelson; they will feign opposition; they will keep making more demands; more "compromises" (payoffs); and as the national spotlight grows ever brighter; ultimately they will "cave in."
 
They will be rewarded by the devils, Emanuel & Pelosi:
 
-huge projects to their districts 
-big earmarks for the rest of their careers
-big funding from the DNC funneled into their 2010 campaign coffers
 
They would never dare to stand in the way (for too long) of Obamacare.
 
Just as their are no moderate democrats, there are no right to-life democrats; these are oxymorons in the most literal sense of the word.
 
THINK about it: you're a democrat, quite willing to vote in FAVOR of the horrors of socialized medicine - ergo rationing:
 
-pulling the plug on grandma
-pulling the plug on premature infants
-denying Down's syndrome babies their right to life
-denying care to the disabled; the diabetic; the cancer-stricken, et al.
 
Yet your opposed to abortion? - willing to holdout to the bitter end?
 
The corruptocrats in DC have but one motto: "Even the most "principled" have their price."
 
Bart Stupak, and 8 or 9 others, holding up Obamacare? After all these months? All these compromises? All these deals? All this sweating of blood?
 
Man! Have I got a bridge for you!
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Tim Pawlenty: on the wrong side of history?

 
When Tim Pawlenty ran for Minnesota governor, one would have thought him as Mr. Clean: a paragon of virtue; a shining model for all candidates!
 
He grew up in a blue-collar neighborhood; was first in his family to graduate from college; who then proceeded to go on to become (ahem-ahem) a "respected lawyer"- raising two wonderful daughters with his wife.
 
As a member of the state's legislature, Pawlenty had cultivated a reputation for being a "straight arrow" - routinely recusing himself from all votes involving the judiciary, revealing..."my wife is a judge." He even declined to vote on school funding packages, citing his past work as an attorney for school districts.

Such integrity!
 
In 2003, voters would lap it up. Pawlenty - a republican - was elected Minnesota's governor, a state that traditionally voted liberal.
 
With his boyish all-American appearance, it seemed as though Pawlenty could himself have authored the Boy Scout Handbook.
 
But as the old axiom goes, looks can be deceiving:
 
Pawlenty's campaign biography seemed so snowy pure - right down to the details of his membership in the Eagan (Minnesota) Lions Club, and his work as a youth soccer coach.
 
And yet Pawlenty, claiming himself to be an "open" politician, conveniently had forgotten about "certain business interests" - feeling them "unworthy" of mention. One year into his governorship, a story broke over local public radio that would peg Pawlenty as a phony:

During the 90's, there was a pile of money to be made in the newly-deregulated telecom industry. As it turns out, "Mr. Clean" had served as a director of "NewTel Holdings", a phone service company accused of unscrupulous business practices in seven states.

Pawlenty repeatedly asserted he was "unaware" that NewTel had been a pioneer in the illegal practice known as "slamming" --the unauthorized switching of customers' long distance service.

Claimed Pawlenty..."If I had known, I would have made inquiries."

Sure. 

Asked whether he had downplayed his shady business ties during his campaign, said the deft governor (Quote)...."I didn't downplay them or up-play them"..."As to the NewTel board, I didn't feel that meeting a few times in a year was a substantial thing to tout as a life accomplishment"..."I didn't view that as my job."

As they say on "Family Feud"...good answer!

Tom Horner - GOP strategist-adviser to Pawlenty's campaign - denied (harrumph) ALL suggestions that Pawlenty would dare conceal his telecommunications background: (quote)..."As all candidates do, he was trying to accent the positives"..."Tim Pawlenty was trying to emphasize that he was the guy next door,"

But ask Minnesota's ex-senator Norm Coleman what he thinks of the "guy next door."


Pawlenty would standby - petrified by political self-interest - while ACORN stole what has proved to be the most damaging US Senatorial election in US history; one that would enable Barack Obama to install socialism, discord, and put the nation on a path that may eventually culminate in civil war.
 
After a long, bitterly-disputed recount, Pawlenty would officially sign-off on the final tally -thereby sanctioning Al Franken as Minnesota's fraudulent winner, rendering Norm Coleman - and America - the ultimate loser.

Immediately after the election, official results -registered on the tapes of voting machines -indicated Senator Coleman (the incumbent) had won with a 750 vote-margin victory, out of 2.9 million ballots legally cast and COUNTED.

 
But that was before the funny stuff began: ACORN and ACLU lawyers from all over the country rushed to Minnesota, to "re-count" absentee ballots.
 
Franken's campaign rolled up their collective sleeves, and went to work to erase Coleman's margin.
 
With the election so narrowly-decided, Franken and his advisers (including Majority Leader Sen. Harry Reid) conceived a plot to reverse the result: Within 72 hours of the election, there was a Friday night "announcement" by Minneapolis' director of elections: she'd "forgotten" to count 32 absentee ballots in her car.
 
The Coleman campaign scrambled to get a county judge to halt the counting of these absentees, since it was impossible to prove their integrity 72 hours after the polls had closed. But a democratic judge refused the request, on grounds that it was "out of her jurisdiction."
 
Governor Pawlenty - chief executive of Minnesota - does nothing!
 
In subsequent weeks, every "legal" move struck pay dirt for Franken and his corps of party lawyers. Again, Governor Phony (er, Pawlenty) - not wanting to offend his liberal electorate - does NOTHING!
 
As if pulled out of a magician's hat, votes materialized out of thin air for Franken: an even hundred here, another 39 "lost ballots" there, all for Franken. Like levitation - an impossibility; a statistical aberration.
 
Again, Pawlenty does nothing.
 
Along with Coleman's lawyers, the Republicans should all have cried FOUL at the first “correction”. The accusations of voter fraud should have hit the airwaves on Thursday, two days proceeding the election- at the very LATEST.
 
But what did Tim Pawlenty say or do? Nothing! He'd let the recount run its "natural course." Sure. Leave Norm Coleman hanging; Pawlenty had more important things to worry about; like retaining his governorship should his presidential campaign go sour.
 
By Sunday, when another one hundred Franken votes trickled in, Colemans’s case (voter fraud) would have been made. Pawlenty should have led the charge.
 
Up in Two Harbors (a liberal outpost) Mr. Franken picked up an additional 246 votes. In Partridge Township, he racked up another 100.
 
Election officials in both places claim..."they had initially 'miscommunicated' the numbers. This was odd, because in the Two Harbors precinct, none of the other contests recorded any changes in their vote totals.
 
Again Tim Pawlenty did nothing!
 
According to statisticians, Franken's gains were 3.5 times the corrections made for Barack Obama across the state; and nearly three times the gains for all Democrats across ALL Minnesota Congressional races.
 
Franken's "new" votes had exceeded all total vote changes for ALL precincts in the entire state, for the Presidential, Congressional and statehouse races COMBINED.
 
The entire process was overseen by Democratic Secretary of State Mark Ritchie - an ACORN operative - not exactly a nonpartisan observer.
 
The results of the recount became uncreasingly under suspicion. Colemen kept filing  lawsuits with the Minnesota State Supreme court. But why would Pawlenty even permit the recount to even get that far? The entire process was rigged from the outset:
 
-The Secretary of State was a Democrat.
-The Minnesota Canvassing Board - in charge of the recount - were all Democrats.
-The Supreme court judges were Democrats.
-The “watchdog” press? All liberals.
 

Time after time, the Minnesota Supreme Court would give challenger Al Franken still another judicial victory, ruling that ballots - not counted previously - being presumably "mistakenly rejected," were to be included in the post-election re-count.

 
Finally, on Jan 5- 2009, The Minnesota State Canvassing Board confirmed that Al Franken officially "won" his Senate election, with 1,212,431 votes to Sen. Norm Coleman's 1,212,206 votes - a 0.0077 percent margin of victory.
 
This meant Franken had effected an impossible 975 vote swing - in an election Coleman had won by a margin of 0.00725%. And through it all, Pawlenty showed he had guts; the guts of a gerbil.
 
Rather than urging Coleman to take his case to the United States Supreme Court - thereby denying Reid his 60-seat supermajority, Pawlenty signed off on the recount- all the while knowing he was signing America over to tyranny! 
 
What possible motivation could Pawlenty have had - other than political? - to play possum, while Franken and his noxious ACORN criminals blatantly stole Coleman's election, in plain sight of everyone!
 
And ironically, has there ever been a more vile, evil, sinister-looking, wretched, contemptible, swine-ish, immoral, iniquitous, unworthy candidate to ever serve in Congress than Al Franken? Who can even bear to be around such a repulsive, vulgar individual?
 
From the moment he arrived, the once-genteel atmosphere of the Senate began to degrade into not only partisan politics, but internecine party warfare!
 
Tragically, seating Franken gave our dear president his coveted number 60 - that crucial vote to hold hostage our Constitutional freedom, and sentence conservative America into a life bound by the chains of Obammunism.
 
And observe closely, America, what is now happening in the Senate: 
 
The ever-escalating partisan conflict portends what is to come: are we headed for a Constitutional crisis; a new civil war? One who's seeds have already been planted, as a conservative-center nation seeks remedy from an unfeeling radical leftist Congress; one bent upon enslaving its constituents - led by the most hated president in US history.
 
We are all losers, just because Tim Pawlenty chose to play politics; all the while knowing he could be dooming conservative America - perhaps forever.
 
And should Pawlenty DARE show his face in New Hampshire, as a presidential candidate, we should respond in kind: pelt the traitor with tomatoes! Tar & feather this phony. 
 
The man is truly worthy of dishonor!
 
Because of his passive treachery, Obama has been able to damage our nation like no president ever before. 
 
And worse, our conservative nation lacks the abilty - other than revolution - to stop the Obamacrats from even more radicalism: socialized medicine; cap 'n trade (climate change); and immigration amnesty.

And what if the nightmare of nightmares - the second term of Barack Obama - should occur?
 
A century from now, one may look upon the victory of Al Franken as a turning point in history - where America no longer was the world's last best hope, a beacon of individual freedom that somehow, had gone dark.
 
And it was all because Tim Pawlenty was proving that he was the nice guy next door.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

ACORN's mighty Louisiana Oak

 
Selma, Alabama - March 7, 1965: State troopers move on marchers crossing the Edmund Pettus Bridge - provoking the worst incident of violence of the entire Civil Rights era.
 
At once, Washington moves to overcome Southern legislators' resistance to effective voting rights legislation:
 
President Johnson issues an emergency call for a"strong voting rights law."
 
Congressional hearings began. Soon thereafter, a bill emerges that would become the "Voting Rights Act." 
 
Three decades later, a Louisiana election takes place - a mockery of democracy. Its outcome would profoundly shake the nation to its very foundation - an outcome "credited" to ACORN.
 
ACORN is a political cancer that continues to metastisize. Voter fraud perils the Republic. Corrupt democratic election officials want to count every vote - again, and again, and again.
 
Recently, in an office building in the New Orleans suburb of Metairie, workers were gathered about the coffee machine - reminiscing about the stolen 1996 election for the U.S. Senate, when Democrat Mary Landrieu "defeated" Republican Louis "Woody" Jenkins:
 
A brilliant conservative orator serving 25 years in the state Legislature, Jenkins was pitted against far-left challenger Landrieu, in a race for the seat vacated by J. Bennet Johnson (a democrat). 
 
On election day, Jenkins led exit polls 51 to 49. As returns came in, it held until 9:45 PM, when suddenly, a surge of votes from New Orleans  saw Landrieu edge slightly ahead.
 
Final returns showed Landrieu won by only 5,788 out of 1.7 MILLION votes cast  - the closest Senate race in America that year, and the closest statewide race in Louisiana history. 
 
Outside New Orleans, Jenkins won the state, prevailing 53% to 47%; but within New Orleans, Landrieu's incredible 100,000-vote margin was just enough to eek out her razor-thin "victory."
 
But it was all the work of ACORN, who's fingerprints were everywhere:
 
Throughout election day, there were countless reports of "irregularities." Jenkins had refused concession - loudly demanding the results be investigated.
 
Predictably, Democratic election officials began stone-walling - defying a federal court order. They denied access to voter registration applications, and other vital documents.
 
Nevertheless, on Dec. 5 1996, Jenkins filed a US Senate petition, challenging the results. 4000 pages were given to the Senate Rules Committee, documenting massive voter fraud, where democrat machine corruption had been obvious.
 
But even though Jenkins had cried "foul" immediately afterwards, a Democratic Committee majority pronounced him..."a sore loser"... who needed to "get on with his life;" the request for a Senate investigation denied.
 
In New Orleans, examples of the rampant vote fraud were unending:
 
The local media garnered hundreds of reports from witnesses who were offered money (or alcohol) to vote. Democrats had placed voter punch cards throughout all black churches in Louisiana.
 
On election day, hundreds of vans and buses cruised New Orleans' public housing projects - soliciting persons to "make some money" by going to the polls, then voting multiple times. Democrats were paid anywhere from $10 up to $120, for their votes.
 
Transcripts of conversations with persons selling their votes in New Orleans - and drivers who paid them - revealed a complex network of democratic operatives, who were paid by county commissioners, with access to large amounts of cash.
 
"This nice person drove up and asked whether I was registered," one woman said to the lawyers and investigators for Jenkins. "I told him I was, but didn't feel like voting. He said, 'If I paid you, would you go?' I got up from the bus stop bench - dusted off my pants - and got in the car."
 
The woman, who neither reads nor writes, claimed the man took her to three polling places, where she voted and signed an "X" each time. 
 
That same election day, a 32-year-old mechanic testified he drove a van, "picking up people who proceeded to vote at least ten times, or even more." For his efforts, he received $700.
 
One woman, who said she voted three times, groused about how much she was paid. "I was supposed to get $75; but all they paid was $25." Added the woman..."they gave me some 'stanky T-shirt' with Landrieu's picture on it."
 
Throughout that election day, Orleans Parish exit polls showed Jenkins and Landrieu in a virtual deadlock. But at 9:45 p.m.--almost two hours after the polls had closed-- some 70 of New Orleans' 474 precincts had not yet reported their votes.
 
Outside the city, Jenkins had won by 95,000 votes. Within city limits, however, he was buried by a margin of 100,000.
 
Over 200 New Orleans city employees had been ordered to campaign for Mayor Marc Morial's "hand-picked candidates" - or be fired. A list of employees was posted in City Hall, directing them to either Clinton or Landrieu headquarters, where they would be given directives.
 
In certain New Orleans precincts, computer voting-machine tapes had incorrect dates -precincts where Jenkins lost to Landrieu by a margin of NINE to one.
 
Under Louisiana law, when polls close, voting machines are to be locked: then three days later, re-opened - in full view of the candidates - and their totals reviewed. But an invesigation revealed the Orleans Parish Clerk of Courts - a Landrieu supporter - opened all 677 voting machines outside the presence of the candidates
 
Democratic Election officials swore the machines had not been tampered with.
 
In 1994 - as required by federal law - Louisiana had enacted a "Motor Voter" statute, allowing voters to sign up at license bureaus or at welfare and government offices. To protect ballot security, any voter registering by mail - who never before had cast a ballot -would produce a photo ID at the polls.
 
That seemed reasonable. But in September 1996, the Clinton Administration said "no."
 
Assistant Attorney General Deval L. Patrick decreed that (quote)..."the provision violated the Voting Rights Act of 1965, because blacks were not as likely as whites to have driver's licenses or other picture IDs."
 
Hence, under Clinton's decree, officials at Louisiana's polls could no longer request a photo ID to uncover fraud.
 
Ten months later, a Lake Charles investigative reporter sent 25 bogus voter applications -complete with fake names, addresses and dates of birth - to Louisiana voter registrars. Twenty of the fictitious residents--including one signed "X"--received voter registration cards.
 
Jenkins's investigators uncovered evidence that of the addresses of 3169 registered voters in New Orleans' public housing projects - considered VACANT by the city- 1380 voted illegally in the election.
 
One unnamed ACORN worker revealed yet more "company secrets”.
 
- Among "certain demographic groups," voters got not only rides to the polls, but money  for "expenses," a free box lunch, plus a list of "those one should vote for."
 
- Certain “poll watchers” also got paid, who's job it was to "co-ordinate votes" with the same list. Hence, Landrieu won 85% of Orleans - the final parish to be counted.
 
- There were a significant number of phantom votes cast: the number of votes tallied on voting machines exceeded the number of voter signatures on the precinct register. Also specific names appearing on poll lists were not found on the lists of registered voters.
 
Not surprisingly, Clinton's Justice Department - under the initiatives of Duval Patrick- made sure that all legal venues sought by Woody Jenkins would mysteriously run into legal "roadblocks."
 
Even worse, the overwhelmingly republican Congress left Jenkins hanging! They did NOTHING - a tradition which seems to have carried over to this very day.
 
Thus, are we not getting the government we deserve? Mary Landrieu, purportedly a moderate democrat, has all along represented the radical left - placed on her Senate throne by ACORN.
 
How many more elections will ACORN steal?
 
How many more "one-critical-vote" margins will the Senate maintain, before we realize how a marxist oligarchy of 60, continues to hold sway over 300 million Americans - two thirds of whom OPPOSE what they do!
 
Meanwhile Landrieu - Harry Reid's high-priced call-girl - has time enough for ACORN to hatch another plot to steal yet ANOTHER election, when she runs in 2014.
 
ITEM:  Landrieu's brother, Mitch, currently, Louisiana's lieutenant governor, will campaign for Mayor of New Orleans in 2010. Hence - like Marc Morial before him – if he wins, Landrieu's 2014 re-election could be a fait accompli.
 
ITEM: Mary Landrieu - is the daughter of Maurice “Moon” Landrieu, former mayor of New Orleans.
 
ITEM: The Landrieus are deeply entrenched in Louisiana politics. Mary’s sister, Madeleine, is a Civil District Court Judge who, like most CDC judges, ran unopposed last election.
 
ITEM: The Landrieu's were germane to the founding of ACORN. 

In 1969 Maurice “Moon” Landrieu ran to become mayor of New Orleans.
Despite winning but 19% of the total vote (placing second in an initial Democrat primary), Moon somehow "defeated" highly favored opponent Jimmy Fitzmorris in a run-off primary, then went on to win the Mayor’s race in 1970.
 
Co-incidentally, in 1970, New Orleans native Wade Rathke moves to Arkansas - founding the "Arkansas Community Organization for Reform Now" (ACORN).
 
But then - viola!  ACORN soon becomes headquartered in New Orleans- then right behind follows SIEU. The "A" in ACORN is changed to "association."
 
Here things become "fuzzy."
 
Did Rathke have a cryptic connection to a prominent political family of corrupt New Orleans?
 
Even more mysteriously, who was it that backed Wade Rathke financially, enabling ACORN to spread like cancer throughout the country?
 
Then twenty six years later, Mary Landrieu - abetted by the SEIU and ACORN - wins her senate seat, setting a pattern which would enable the left to eventually seize control of Congress, using the thuggish tactics of the ACORN playbook. 
 
Mary Landrieu’s sell-out "yes" vote came with a hitch: Hary Reid's promise to funnel campaign money to her brother, to get the "extra ground game" to win the new Orleans Mayorial race - virtually guaranteeing her re-election in 2014.
 
This the real secret behind Reid's so-called "Louisiana purchase."
 
So to all you brain-dead republicans out there - ARE YOU PAYING ATTENTION?
 
Despite polls showing 2-1 voter opposition, is it any wonder that the Senate Democrats have rammed through Obamacare?  
 
Despite polls that show America is a "conservative-center" nation, liberal democrat incumbents keep winning re-election - often by the narrowest margins - yet it never seems to end.
 
POINT: A federal judge (Clinton appointee) has ruled ACORN's 'defunding' was ruled "unconstitional.' Again, the republicans do NOTHING!
 
POINT: Michael Steele, Newt Gingrich, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and every other conservative mouthpiece, keep reassuring everyone..."We'll get 'em in 2010!"
 
POINT: Pollsters and political analysts alike "question" whether incumbent Senate democrats can continue to survive politically.
 
Stupid fools! Don't the republicans realize that this is EXACTLY what these venal democrats want them to think!
 
The Republicans foolishly KEEP DISCOUNTING ACORN! Until this surefire blueprint for stealing elections is made illegal, senate democrats will triumph again & again! Do not the republicans perceive the idiocy of their overconfidence? Is it any wonder why these radicals have no fear of their constituents?
 
Why would democrats vote for something (Obamacare) that is so blatantly unpopular? - are they stupid enough to committ politcal suicide? Liberals are all about control- and never giving it up!
 
Ask Minnesota's Norm Coleman how he feels about it: ACORN stole away his Senate seat like a thief in the night, while Michael Steele and idiot Tim Pawlenty did NOTHING!
 
The result? Two more despicable leftists - Franken and Landrieu - enough to empower a runaway leftist Senate - giving them a crucial 60 seat super-majority, moving to enslave us - usuing OUR OWN tax money- and who will probably remain in power again in  2010!
 
Yet the tea parties and Republicans talk of "sweeping then out of office"
 
Sure. 
 
ALL politics is LOCAL. Politics is not unlike war; and to the overconfident goes defeat.
 
One can only wonder how many other Democrat Senators stole seats with extra votes -added at the last minute. The Dems have concocted a perfect plan to steal elections, thus achieving the magical number of 60.
 
Like 1965, a new federal voting rights act is needed! ACORN cannot go unchallenged!
 
CHANGE # 1: all statewide voting laws must be made federal (i.e. standardized throughout ALL 50 states).
 
CHANGE # 2: all voter registrations must be uniform: One registration- picture ID required - and no "same day" register-voting.
 
CHANGE # 3: absentee ballots must be adressed to a federal voting center in Washington DC - to be counted under supervision of the FBI - who will will arrest anyone showing duplicity.
 
CHANGE # 4 - the BREAKTHROUGH: trash all paper ballots - trash all the expensive voter machines - thereby eliminating all possiblity of local corruption. The republicans submit a new plan for INTERNET VOTING : computer terminals placed nationwide throughout the local polls, enabling voters to cast ballots- who receive a special voter "password," that can be used only ONCE.
 
a) it would trap the democrats: how could they oppose such a measure to assure intregrity in the upcoming 2010 election?
 
b) ACORN would be powerless to submit fraudulent votes, or multiple votes from a single person
 
c) the public would overwhelmingly support such a measure; and the House and Senate majorities in Congress would be virtually powerless to oppose it.
 
Like the IRS in charge of  tax-collections, why not a governent agency - in charge of nationwide voting - with authority to punish those who dare to attempt voter fraud. This is one time when expanding the federal government's power would be an asset.
 
Until elections are controlled, and politicians (like Landrieu and the rest of the corrupto-crats) are thrown out of office, we will continue to march headlong towards one party rule, and the tyranny of the left.
 
And if the hydra-headed monster of ACORN cannot be slain, the Republicans could be left wandering in the political desert for another 40 years.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Jed Clampett's day off


Whee-e-e doggie-e-e!
 
Remember that one? Need a hint? Of course! It's Jed Clampett, from "The Beverly Hillbillies."
 
Watching the show, whenever ol' Jed came across something that inspired a feeling of glee (or amusement) he'd let forth with a..."Wheee dog-ge-e-e! 
 
And on this December day, what could be more amusing -or gleeful - than a massive blizzard, rushing headlong towards Washington, to engulf the liberals in Congress!
 
WHEE -- DOG-GEE!
 
Even better, it's just in time to sock in DC's Reagan Airport -meaning that Obama's return flight from Copenhagen (the international global warming conference) will be diverted, due to 15 inches of blowing/drifting snow!
 
Wheee-ee Doggee-ee!
 
But here's the topper: on Sunday, a desperate Harry Reid will have the Senate in session, trying to get year-end business completed - aiming for a last-chance Christmas-Eve vote on Obamacare. In fact, Dirty Harry is undoubtedly watching the weather channel, with perhaps more than mild concern: What if Capitol Hill becomes snowbound?
 
Poor Harry! He'll have a heckuva time trying to find a government aide to shovel snow on a Sunday. Hope he's familiar with Craig's list.
 
Actually, if one stops to ponder, the weather determines the day-by-day course of all of our lives - more than one could ever imagine.
 
In winter, we dress differently; eat differently, even act differently. Subconsiously, we adopt a  type of "siege mentality"..."if I can only get through this terrible winter."
 
In summer - once again - we dress, eat & act differently. And, of course, subconsciously we think differently..."If only it could be summer forever."
 
It's remarkable how much the weather defines our lives, our destiny, and perhaps - our politics? Could climate even determine one's religion, or belief in a Supreme Being?
 
EXAMPLE: Take California - the land where the weather never changes. Everyday is just  another (ho-hum) repeat of the same ol' thing.
 
If you were in California now - where its sunny and 70* - would you be thinking of chestnuts roasting over an open fire? Jack Frost? Singing carols? Or of the Christ Child in a cave, laying in a manger?
 
Nah! All those thoughts are weather-related. Your mind must be proprerly oriented for Christmas - the most religious-intensive holiday of the year. And religion is something liberals despise.
 
Think about it (hypothetically); you're a liberal, you live in California, and surrounded almost always by good weather - practically everyday. So then what?
 
You don't have to think about overcoats; or long johns; you don't have to worry about anti-freeze - or even a heating bill. Gloves? Hah!
 
Life is simple - too simple.
 
Unencumbered by the concerns of most other Americans, Californians have time enough to think about other things, like..."I'm such a wonderful person"..."How can I make this world better..."
 
"An idle mind is the devil's playground."
 
Californians simply have too much time! Are they not always considering new ways to control other people's lives?
 
Are we (ahem, ahem) getting "warmer?" Is this why California is so much at odds with mainstream America?
 
California is California for a reason. The place crawls with left-thinking people, who literally have nothing better to do than to impose their ideology on the rest of the nation.
 
But where did all this liberalism start? Sure, it was in California, but how did it originate there? And why?
 
Obviously, no more liberal (or more antithetical) place to traditional America exits than San Francisco. But extreme liberalism didn't just appear there because, "hey, it's San Francisco man!".

Erroneously, most Americans believe the 60's hippie movement gave rise to San Francisco's radical-left politics.
 
But hippies didn't just spring up from psychedelic music; nor from the "flower power" of drugs, or because of "free love man!" 
 
Actually, the real origin goes back to the Second World War - when tolerance for the unusual was largely non-existent.
 
Back in the early 40's, in many cities, if you were even SUSPECTED of being gay, you could be run out of town - or murdered. For those of 'different orientation', you wouldn't want to trumpet it in the singles section of the local classifieds.

On the west coast, San Francisco was known as the P.O.D. (point of departure) for all soldiers in the Pacific theater of the war.
 
There were a number of large military bases around San Francisco during World War II; and many of the men stationed there were gay.
 
As the war dragged on, San Francisco's growing list of gay bars got an unknowing assist from the armed services, who routinely posted lists of "places off limits," where one would be subject to arrest by the M-P's (military police).
 
Homosexuals were carefully screened out at military induction centers - the premise being..."they would make poor combat soldiers"..."their presence would threaten discipline and morale."
 
But if they did slip by at induction, gays (popularly known then as "fruits") were subjected to harassment in the barracks, due to their inability to explain to their fellow inductees "what type of women they liked."
 
When off-base passes were issued,  gays were easily pegged by their non-chalance toward female companionship.

Rather than returning home, many gay soldiers (particularly those dishonorably discharged for homosexuality) stayed or settled in San Francisco after their service ended.
 
Imagine a dishonorably-discharged soldier, calling home and "proudly" telling his mother..."hey ma, great news! You and pa won't have to worry about me fighting in the war...I got discharged for being homosexual! We'll all celebrate when I get home!"
 
Actually, rather than admit to dishonor, many gay soldiers stayed to start a new life in wonderful San Francisco USA.
 
And why not? There were more gays there than anywhere; and more tolerance. So this lent origin to the gay/liberal movement of the left coast.

With the onset of the 50's, the rest of California (and the nation) took notice: Gays (from everywhere) migrated to San Francisco - setting up underground organizations, clubs, bars, newspapers and gay magazines.
 
With the 60's, the Vietnam war gave the "hip" or hippie movement an aura of legitimacy; i.e. "We hippies say Vietnam is an illegitimate war, and America has not the right to fight it!"
 
San Francisco today can best be described as a "city-nation" unto itself - the capital of gay by the Bay.
 
San Francisco is all about "being one"..."treating everybody as one". For those who migrate there they discover "heaven and hell on earth"- depending on orientation.
 
The homeless in San Francisco are of particular interest:
 
By day they hang out in packs together - even belong to their own "union" - unlike the despondent, drug-dependent winos of other cities, who keep to themselves.
 
San Francisco is all about "tolerance" - "Amsterdam at night"- gateway to hundreds of gay bars, tattoo and massage parlors, and gay strip clubs. Visitors describe it as having an 'underground appearance' in almost every neighborhood.
 
One recent traveler described San Francisco's 'jovial' atmosphere as..."pot-smoking wierdos, walking around everywhere."
 
But what if the liberals have been right all along?
 
What if California ACTUALLY was hit with rapid climate change? What if San Francisco's weather suddenly turned "Midwestern?"
 
Would not San Francisco be transformed overnight?
 
Threatened by snow storms and zero temperatures, what would happen to the city's huge enclave of the homeless?
 
What would become of the city's underground atmosphere? Would there be pot-smoking hippies, wandering aimlessly? Would the city still retain its flavor of being "Amsterdam at night?"
 
Which goes back to our original point:
 
Man's behavior on earth is largely contingent on the weather. It can determine our resolve to succeed in life - or be a bum. It affects one's subconscious mind  - even to the point of determining liberal or conservative; Christian or atheist. Or even patriotism, vs. one who hates America.
 
The Beverly Hillbillies bear out a true lesson about Californians: Just as ol' Jed Clampett was entirely out of his element in Beverly Hills, the crux of his problem was the fact that he (and his family) no longer had anything worthwhile to do!
 
Once again..."an idle mind is the devil's playground." Which of course explains why these mean-spirited California liberals  (Boxer, Pelosi, Waxman, Feinstein, Barbara Lee, etc.) are always out to subvert their country - they simply have idle minds! 
 
But unfortunately, their constituents will never vote any of them out.
 
So make like a liberal. Insist that climate change is coming, and transforms all of California; then the state becomes too occupied to ever send another leftist to Congress again!
 
Whee doggeee! Wouldn't that be worth a shout!
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The monster that devoured Cleveland


Cleveland?
 
Could it be America's most misunderstood city? The Mistake on the Lake?
 
Perhaps it all started back in the late 1950's, on a TV show called, "The Many Loves of Dobie Gillis" - an inane sitcom about adolescent love, starring Dwaine Hickman.
 
But the program survived only because of the iconic popularity of "beatnik" Maynard G. Crebs," (played superbly by Bob Denver - aka Gilligan), who stole the show.
 
With his quirky disdain for "avoiding work", whenever Maynard Crebs appeared, he would always be on his way to see the movie "The Monster that Devoured Cleveland" - then a barrage of uproarious canned laughter would follow.
 
Hence, from the 1950's on, Cleveland's curse of hapless notoriety would take hold; and nowhere would this become more apparent than with its professional sports teams:
 
In 1954, The Indians won an incredible 111 games, and were expected to sweep the underdog NY Giants in four straight. Then irony struck in game two of the World Series:
 
At a crucial point, feared power-hitter, Vic Wertz, with runners aboard, hit a herculean, 480-foot, high-arcing blast to dead center field, only to have Giant rookie Willie Mays, make his legendary, impossible over-the-shoulder catch - instantly ruining the Indian's momentum; and Cleveland then lost 4 straight in utter humiliation.
 
In 1959, the Indians featured Rocky Colavito, a cannon-armed right-fielder, who occasionally pitched in relief, and quickly became a fan-favorite. 
 
The "Rock" had movie-star looks; he was the second-most-feared hitter in the league (besides Mickey Mantle), and hit a league-leading 47 home runs that year. The Indians - led by their cult hero - held first place until the last week of the season.
 
But then, yet another Cleveland debacle: on the first day of the 1960 season, Frank Lane, Indians general manager, on a spur-of-the-moment quirk, called the Detroit Tigers, and offered Colavito for Harvey Keunn, a singles-hitting short stop, who had led the American league with a .321 average the previous year.
 
Thinking Lane had gone insane, the Tigers jumped at the chance, and made the deal on the spot. The reaction in Cleveland was WHAT???....ARE YOU KIDDING ME!!!!
 
To this day, the town has never recovered.
 
If the deal to sell Babe Ruth (from the Red Sox) to the Yankees had precipated the 84- year "curse of the Bambino," the Colavito-for-Keunn deal would have an equally devastating effect on the Indians.
 
In 1960, attendance - which had always been Cleveland's forte -completely collapsed. Fans felt betrayed. Soon, the franchise came within a inch of leaving town - saved only by the eleventh-hour intervention of Vern Stouffer, a longtime local businessman. 
 
Then, in 1966, Cleveland's affinity for athletic irony would strike again; this time, in the form of Art Modell, the 5-year owner of the Browns (da Browns).
 
But first we regress, back to 1957, when Cleveland drafted their iconoclastic running back, Jim Brown -  their last first-round pick to become a star.
 
From the day Jim Brown arrived in Cleveland, those who saw the man play knew there would never be another:
 
Brown had sprinter's speed, and seemed to be chiseled from granite. On his patented sweep play - with his hall-of-fame guard Gene Hickerson blocking - Brown would take the ball upfield, with opposing players LITERALLY bouncing off his body- lying in his wake. 
 
It was as if Superman himself had donned a Cleveland uniform.
 
Brown led his team to the NFL championship in 1964, defeating the Colts; it would be the last championship of any kind for Cleveland.
 
By 1965, Jim Brown had set every record in the league; many of which stand to this day.
 
But Brown - although he loved Cleveland - despised Modell, who foolishly alienated the mega-star by nitpicking at his demands to be paid accordingly. 
 
Then Modell (who knew as much about football as "Lassie" the collie) made the most foolish blunder of any owner in pro football history:
 
During the off-season, Brown had been in Italy, filming the spaghetti western,"100 Rifles," with co-star Raquel Welch. Production had been delayed by heavy rains in spring (1966).
 
When training camp broke in late July of that year, Brown insisted on finishing his movie. He bitterly resented Modell's demand that he be in camp for the very first day of summer practice; a no-no for someone befitting the status of the all-time leading rusher in pro football history.
 
Then Modell issues his ultimatum: He calls Brown long-distance in Italy, and tells him..."either leave now for training camp, or be kicked off the team." Brown, in effect, tells Modell..."you can't fire me, I quit."
 
The next day, Jim Brown would shock the sports world (and rock Cleveland down to its very foundation) by announcing his official retirement from football - that he would assume a new career as a full-time Hollywood actor.
 
Again - to this day - it would be another Cleveland team that has yet to recover.
 
With his freakishly-solid physique, and fierce determination, Jimmy Brown could undoubtedly have played for at least another five, maybe seven, or possibly even ten more years.
 
Perhaps it would have been the Browns who would've defeated Joe Namath and the New York Jets in the 1968 Super Bowl - and changed the course of pro football history.
 
Perhaps the Browns would have gone on to win four consecutive super bowls.
 
But Cleveland would be left to forever wonder about what "coulda-shoulda-been"- all because of the idiopathic stupidity of Art Modell, who fired both the greatest coach in history (Paul Brown) and football's greatest player ever.
 
But through it all, thick and thin, Clevelanders could count on one thing: their great hometown newspaper, "The Plain Dealer."
 
In 1969, when the Cuyahoga river caught fire, everyone rushed out to buy a copy of the Plain Dealer: Grease had been discharged from a river-front plant, formed a floating slick, then became ignited from sparks coming from a train crossing a trestle.
 
Time magazine ran pictures of arcs of water - shooting from fireboats - landing in an impressive ring of fire on the Cuyahoga’s surface. 
 
Predictably, the wire services, morning disk jockeys, and late-night comedians had their wildest dream come true- yet another way to humiliate Cleveland.
 
Then, on October 16, 1972, the Plain Dealer carried the tale of how mayor Ralph Perk accidentally set his hair on fire while attempting to use a welder's torch for a ribbon-cutting ceremony at a downtown convention.
 
Yep. Another time-honored way to bash Cleveland.
 
But the Plain Dealer was always there to defy the city's reputation as some backwater hick town - one that couldn't get out of its own way. From the '60s to the '80s, Cleveland had become the Rodney Dangerfield of cities.
 
Then, in 1981, a Plain Dealer ad campaign came to light, to combat Cleveland's sullied, hapless image. A clever theme had emerged..."If New York's the Big Apple, Cleveland's a Plum."
 
Finally, a spark! A budding revival had taken hold - designed to reveal the city as more cosmopolitan, more sophisticated; more interesting; cooler than one could imagine.
 
Under Mayor George Vionovich, plans were made for a lakefront Rock 'n Roll Hall of Fame: and around it all, began a new downtown revival.
 
By the1990's, America had taken notice.
 
The Plain Dealer began touting the Cleveland Clinic as the number-one ranked heart hospital in the United States, with a staff comprised of the best cardiologists one could find anywhere.
 
Cleveland then began to ballyhoo its educational excellence- Case Western; a world-class university with a biotech research department second to none.
 
Then viola! The piece' de resistance.'
 
The Plain Dealer broke a story that would once and for all cement Cleveland among the pantheon of great Amercan cities: the Euclid corridor - a  private/public developement that would connect the downtown - via a new modern public transit system - to the midtown area, comprised of several Hospitals of the Cleveland clinic complex.

And lastly, the corridor would run out to University Circle, serving the Case Western campus. 
 
At once, doubters emerged. Critics said it wouldn't be feasible.
 
Cleveland's inner city had a reputation as one of the most dangerous anywhere, and naysayers predicted people would avoid public transportation in droves; that the idea to link downtown to the outer corridor - using public transit - was an expensive boondogle.
 
But The Plain Dealer stayed out in front of the critics; and with its recent completion in 2008, the Euclid Corridor has blossomed into a smashing success. 
 
In 20 minutes, you can get from downtown (Tower City), past the midtown Cleveland Clinic complex, and arrive at University Circle. Thus, the central city & the region's two largest employers are now linked to many of the city's cultural, educational, medical and business centers.
 
And along the way are a plethora of all-new condos, apartments, restaurants, shops, etc. that dot the entire corridor.
 
Heard any Cleveland jokes recently?
 
Cleveland at last is again showing itself off to the nation - living up to the Plain Dealer's claim...the Euclid corridor would "pump new life" into Cleveland's economy and be the "rebirth of Downtown and Euclid Avenue."
 
Indeed, like few other urban areas, Cleveland can proudly extol its claim of a med-centered, recession-resistant regional economy:
 
POINT: Cleveland’s healthcare institutions are consistently ranked on par with anywhere else in the nation.
 
POINT: the Cleveland Clinic has developed its widely-copied philosophy of "patient-centric" care - encouraging innovation and adoption of leading-edge med technologies - attracting brand new businesses - specializing in the latest in patient-care and med devices.
 
POINT: More than 400 bioscience companies are located in Northeast Ohio; Cleveland is now known as a budding new life-science research center, with its strategic midwest location on Lake Erie.
 
POINT: Cuyahoga County employs more than 120,000 healthcare professionals, including 36,000 at the Cleveland Clinic; 25,000 at University Hospitals - providing interaction with influential leaders from top medical associations and administrations around the world.
 
Day-by-day, Clevelands prowess as America's great new health metropolis just seems to get better.
 
For two years now, The Plain Dealer has carried plans for a huge new 120,000 sq. ft. Cleveland Medical Mart; a combination convention center, showroom, meeting complex, etc. for major medical manufacturers and service providers.
 
The completion of the Cleveland Med Mart could catapult the city as the pre-eminent location for the latest in cardiology, surgery, OBGYN, medical imaging, orthopedics, sterilization, office furnishings, patient care, IT, and medical devices.
 
But ironically, is a new curse about to dawn on Cleveland?- one borne of political ignorance, that could (one day) undermine all the planning, all the construction, all the new jobs - destroying much of the progress made thus far?
 
After all these years, has the once-great Plain Dealer turned on the great city it has served so well?
 
Disastrously, Cleveland has fallen victim to the great media cover-up - hiding the true-to-life monster of government run healthcare! 
 
Do the people of Cleveland even realize the calamity - coming out of Washngton - that awaits them in five years? Once it begins, they can thank the censorship of the wonderful  Plain Dealer - and its liberal editors.
 
That's right Clevelanders; your great hometown newspaper has betrayed you. They have taken up the cause of the left - one that will leave Cleveland in shambles, and Washington DC with unprecedented power to control Northeastern Ohio for the next 100 years.
 
Has the Plain Dealer even bothered to explain terms like "Public Option?" Or "single-payer?" Or defined the role of HHS secretary Kathy Sebelius?
 
So here's a quick refresher. Learn it well, lest you be caught blindsided like the rest of the sheep, who are about to be led to the slaughter.
 
When government-run healthcare takes hold, it inevitably creates a public option: i.e. the federal government eventualy becomes the only one (single payer) to compensate the medical providers. Hence, they automatically begin to restrict health care, making it as "economic" as possible (e.g. rationing - pulling the plug on grandma).
 
Got it? Let us expound further:
 
The government now will be able tax private-employer insurance policies, leading to the eventual dropping of all private coverage- forcing everyone into the public option, and ergo - more rationing!
 
Result? A complete takeover of the entire American medical estabshment!
 
This means funding will be drastically cut for medicare; drastically reduced payments to doctors and hospitals for all procedures; hospitals will reduce services; many will go bankrupt; doctors of all specialties will be performing less procedures. Less cancer treatments; less heart bypasses. Less of everything; many physicians & nurses will retire out of necessity - or disgust.
 
With single payer, the goverment can tell any doctor/hospital to either take the fee we offer you - or leave it! Quit! Close down; or go elsewhere! What do they care? The profit incentive in medicine is GONE!
 
With single payer, boitech and research companies will have no incentive to innovate. Many will fold. Pharmaceutical innovations will come to a standstill!
 
With single-payer, many college students will chose fields other than nursing and medicine. The inevitable shortages of medical professionals will lead to an influx of Indian & Muslim doctors into northeastern Ohio, who will be required to fill the gap.
 
For many, expensive cancer treatments will be denied by Health & Human Services secretary Kathy Sebelius, who will have the god-like power of life or death over the eldery, and those stricken with all forms of carcinoma.
 
Premature babies will be left to die; Down's syndrome children will be out of luck; the autistic will be denied therapy; older disabled people could be denied modern wheelchairs.
 
The nightmares go on and on: new  expenses  on employers of companies with more than fifty employees , who MUST provide health coverage or pay a fine. All other individuals MUST maintain qualified health coverage or pay a fine. If you refuse the fine, you are subject to imprisonment!
 
Even worse, with the unconstitutional mandate of everyone having to purchase health insurance, it will suck hundreds of billions out of Cleveland's economy to Washington, and transferred to inner city community centers across the country - providing subsidies to "poor people."
 
And being forced to buy expensive health insurance- many college students will abandon their post-grad educations, and enrollments at local Cleveland universities will suffer, leading to staff cuts, and yet more unemployment.
 
Wage-earners - rocked by higher federal taxes - will have much less disposible income to spend in the local economy.
 
Many of Cleveland's medical device makers will see profit margins suffer, with the burden of a federal 2.5% excise tax on everything - from canes, to the braces the orthodontist will install on one's crooked teeth.
 
With socialized medicine, everyone gets to share in the misery; but nothing like what is about to befall Cleveland.
 
Consider: no longer will the Cleveland Clinic be able to operate as a "world class health center." No longer will Case-Western obtain proper funding for its world class reseach. The Cleveland Med Mart may open just in time to see it become a white elephant in its first few years.
 
But Cleveland has asked for it: given its number of medical centers, the town will one day operate like a giant department of motor vehicles: endless lines; endless waits; endless anger and frustration.
 
Northeastern Ohio voted heavy for Barack Obama; and Obamacare will be the monster that finally devours Cleveland.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123456789102425Next »