Enough of this mystery! The curiosity is all too much. Barack Obama...what's the big secret? Where did you really come from?

Certainly Mr. Obama, you must know better: the more one tries to hide something, the inquisitiveness only deepens, as the public demands the unshrouding of your true origin. And while we search for answers, the divisiveness within the country widens. 

Never in the history of the office, has there been a more polarizing and disruptive president (anti-president) than YOU, Mr. Obama.

During your campaign, you had claimed to be "the great unifier." Sure.

Your standard applause line was...(quote) "We will unite under my Presidency, not as Democrats or Republicans, but as Americans... all working toward the same goal, making this country and the world, a better place".

Such inspiration!

If only your integrity equaled your oratory, you could become one of the great presidents in history; however, nothing of your life's work lends credibility to your soaring rhetoric - just so many hollow words.   

And even more telling: why would you mysteriously choose to conceal your past? 

Where is valid proof of your citizenship? Your birth certificate was obviously forged over the one of your sister Maya. Your Kenyan grandmother claims to have witnessed your birth in Africa .

If you don't mind sir, would you, for once, care to explain? Otherwise, this won't go away. The people of America demand to know who you REALLY are.

You speak nothing of your college activities. No transcripts of your grades exist. You provide no information of anything, and you refuse to even name any collegiate friends.

Your Columbia thesis cannot be located.

And even more mysterious: upon graduation, why you shunned a lucrative Wall Street offer, but instead, drove to Chicago, accepting a $13,000-yr job working in the slums of the south side. What sane college graduate chooses to do this?

Perhaps you had some other agenda in mind - community (Communist) organizing. 

Why are your credentials never challenged by the media? Are we to accept only your 'sacred' word? Underneath your oratorical eloquence, you remain the master of disguise, capable of donning a different face for every political occasion.

So the mystery goes on:

Barack Obama spent his teen years in Hawaii, where he was, by all reports, not a standout high school student. In 1979, on FULL scholarship, he attended Occidental College, located in Eagle Rock, a suburb of Los Angeles, CA. .

To date, all of the litigation filed regarding Obama's record at Occidental has been rejected by the courts. Occidental will not release his transcripts, nor his student file.

After two years, Obama transferred to Columbia University, an Ivy League school in New York. So how did he get into 'exclusive' Columbia, when he was but a marginal student in high school?

Was he picked, pruned and funded long ago by a unknown group (George Soros) for his mystery-shrouded presidency?

Obama arrogantly conceals all his vital records.

His attorney, Robert Bauer, continues to harass anyone daring to delve too deeply into his past. Hence, rumors on the internet will only continue to fester all the more.

Can America trust a person playing by different rules, versus the people he's supposedly representing? We think not.

The most recent evidence that Obama is not legitimate is as follows:

EXHIBIT A: Obama's "Certificate of Live Birth" from Hawaii from 1961 - an obvious fraud. It is LASER-printed. It lists the father's race as "African." But in 1961, lasers were non-existent. Blacks (Africans) were all denoted back then by a different racial term...n-e-g-r-o.

EXHIBIT B: According to Mr. Sam Kipterer Kori, chief editor of the API (African Press International), Obama's genuine birth certificate is in Kenya. Obama's mother had traveled there with her husband; but being in a stage of late pregnancy, Kenyan law forbids women in their last trimester to fly. Thus, it was right after Barak's birth that she then flew back to Hawaii.

Note: Michele Obama tried to bribe Kori for his silence; but when he refused, she threatened him. Kori now remains quiet in fear of his life.

EXHIBIT C: In a November, 2008 television interview - to spark interest in tourism - the Kenyan Ambassador offered to show Obama's birthplace to anyone visiting the country. That same interview has been buried ever since. 

EXHIBIT D: Just after the inauguration, Biden and Obama had a two-hour private meeting with the Supreme Court judges. For a sitting justice, this could be a dis-barring offense to meet privately outside of normal court with a defendant having cases before it- as Obama does.

Currently there are a total of 18 lawsuits brought by citizens, demanding either proof of Obama’s citizenship, or qualification to serve as president

But Obama is just too clever, knowing that even if it was PROVED (beyond a doubt) he was Kenyan, he'll simply claim "dual" citizenship. The media will spin it for a few weeks - and nothing happens.

Therefore, the idea is NOT to remove Obama from office (in violation of the Constitution), as it would only create civil discord; plus no U.S. judge would ever lend his name to history as having ruled against a sitting President.  

So how would the world react with Biden in the Whitehouse? Would the dollar drop to zero? Would the UN attempt to expel the United States on grounds of insanity?

And if Biden got run over by the Amtrak- then what? That's right, Nancy L. (for liar) Pelosi would then sit in the Oval Office - making Obama look honest by comparison.

Yes - the real objective of proving Obama illegitimate is the "come-uppance factor."

The highly visible, smiling Obama would turn into a reclusive, sullen, embarrassed loner- only showing himself on the rarest occasions. Even Whitehouse Wednesday party night would be canceled. Air Force One would collect dust.

The taxpayers would end up saving billions.

Michelle Obama a would go back to shopping at J.C. Penny- no more designer duds as the first lady now realizes her phony imagery party is now over.

All the "name" democrats would go hiding from Capitol Hill.

Chuck Schumer would slither back under his rock - possibly until the next election.

A despondent Barney Frank might become lost at sea off the coast of Martha's Vineyard.

Chris Dodd shaves his head in utter shame.

Nency Pelosi would return to the Catholic Church; Harry Reid wouldn't even be able to run for another term, and goes back to his old job working at the Golden Nugget casino.

So to all you "birthers" and conservatives; keep the faith- dig harder; keep working longer.

Once we uncover the real origins of Obama, exposing him for what he is - the Great Phony Kenyan Baloney - we'll all have the last laugh, and get the ultimate jab back at the gullible liberals who so doggedly had supported him: "WE TOLD YOU SO."

Sleep well, Mr. Obama.

Is Barack Obama another Adolf Hitler? Please...we musn't demean Hitler that way.

As a young, highly-decorated corporal, Hitler survived the horror-filled trenches of World War I.

Obama never saw a day of military service.

Hitler believed his country had been betrayed by its generals; and were it not for them, Germany would've won the Great War.

As a Communist sympathizer & community organizer in south Chicago, Obama set out to betray his country- a Manchurian candidate who'd eventually con his way to the U.S. presidency.

Although both were elected in widely-divergent circumstances, Hitler believed every word of what he preached - a gifted orator who spoke from his soul, who would rouse the German people from their defeated past.

Barack Obama is lost without a teleprompter. But only a liar needs to read every word. A man of integrity will speak what's on his mind- and not be in need of coaching to remember what he said.  

Hitler purged his country of all who were not of Aryan descent - and sought to condense the German population into a single "master race."

Barack Obama wants to bring as many illegal aliens into the U.S. as possible,  and fragment America's melting pot into parallel societies.

Hitler felt "Aryan supremacy" would enable Germany to rise as the greatest power the world had ever seen.

Obama holds America as inferior to European socialist countries - seeking to relegate the U.S. as part of a non-existent "world community."

During the 1940's, Hitler expropriated the gold of each country he conquered, to pay for his war.

Barak Obama bankrupts his country by printing unbacked money, to finance his covert war on America's capitalist economy.

And ironically, when it comes to the well-being of his own citizenry, Obama is the real Nazi.

His concept of "health care reform" could have been written by Adolf Hitler: Forced end-of-life counseling (euthanasia). Obama "storm troopers," entering your home - telling you how to raise your children. Forced abortions. 

Dictator Obama deciding who - and who will NOT- be allowed medical treatment.

And like any totalitarian state, Obama's support of the House Health Care Reform bill (HR 3200) gives one the "choice"...either obey it to the letter - or ELSE.

-Page 22: Mandates audits of ALL employers that self-insure

-Page 29: Admission: your health care will be RATIONED

-Page 30: A government committee decides what treatments and benefits you receive (unlike an insurer- no appeals process)

-Page 42: The “Health Choices Commissioner” decides health benefits. No other choice. None.

-Page 50: All non-US citizens, ILLEGAL or not, will be provided with FREE healthcare services (alien entitlements)

-Page 58: Every person to be issued a National ID Healthcard.

-Page 59: The federal government has direct, real-time access to all individual BANK ACCOUNTS for electronic funds transfer.

-Page 65:Taxpayers subsidize ALL union retiree and community organizer health plans (example: SEIU, UAW and ACORN)

-Page 95: The Government will pay ACORN and AMERICORPS to sign up individuals for Government-run Health Care plan.

-Page 102: Those eligible for Medicaid will be automatically enrolled: you have no choice in the matter.

-Page 124: No company can sue the government for price-fixing. No “judicial review” is permitted against the government monopoly. Put simply, private insurers will be crushed.

-Page 127: The government will set wages: (The AMA sold doctors out).

So is it any wonder the Obama administration decided (as Rahm Emmanuel put it) to "throw long", trying to pass HR 3200 before summer recess - without anyone having read the bill? 

And is it any wonder dictator Obama has been buzzing around the country (like the Roadrunner) trying to convince the insured that... "you'll hardly notice a difference in your healthcare - just believe what I say!"

Passing HR 3200 is an Obama grand slam home run, in the bottom of the ninth, of the 7th game of the World Series:

POINT: Obama controls another 1/7th of the world's biggest, $14 trillion/year economy.

POINT: Obama expands government's size by an additional 15%, adding millions of new workers, and perennial democratic voters to the DNCC's rolls.

POINT: There will be a blinking beacon for an additional 20 million illegal aliens to come fence-jumping (free healthcare), and eventually, have all their "extended families" cross over to join them. Amnesty gives them all "the vote."

POINT: It amounts to the biggest private-to-public wealth transfer ($2 trillion) in the entire of history of mankind- "undercover" reparations. 

Bottom line: Obama garners enough of a permanent democratic voting majority to stay in the Whitehouse for possibly the rest of his life, as the abolishment of the 22nd Amendment (2-term president limit) becomes a virtual certainty.

And with the upper classes at the government's mercy, plus having their bank accounts open to disbursement, HR 3200 would make Hitler, or even Josef Stalin blanche.

Ever mindful of the difficulties in securing a sixty-vote( filibuster-proof) majority in the Senate, Obama successfully pressured Harry Reid (in April) to create an alternative path to passage, by adopting "reconciliation" rules, stating..."if they (Congress) do not act by October 15, the Senate could pass health care legislation with a simple majority of fifty-one votes.

Conclusion: HR 3200 is the worst idea EVER conceived for the American public. 

The elderly must decide if they want to continue to be medicated, or if they would rather 'die naturally.'  The young will be forced to buy unnecessary full health coverage, to pay for ACORN, the unions, and all the illegal aliens (plus their relatives).

And the biggest irony: ALL physicians are going to have to learn how to perform abortions -creating a moral dilemma for Catholic doctors and hospitals alike. 

And true to form, as any good band of Nazis, Obama and his Dems dominate the entire government. There's nothing stopping them if they TRULY wanted to pass this scam. But minister of propaganda, Rahm Emanuel, advises "seeking cover," by having some Republicans "on board with it."

No matter how he does it (or if he does it ) Obamacare will be nothing other than a massive totalitarian welfare bill, making the world's most expensive health care system even MORE expensive- while still not covering everyone.

(QUOTE) "The majority, oppressing the individual, is guilty of a crime, abuses its strength, and by acting on the law of the strongest, breaks up the foundations of society." --Thomas Jefferson, 1816.

And merely 193 years later, Jefferson's caveat now rings true:

An outlaw congressional majority - hell bent to destroy the very foundations of society- now reigns over Capitol Hill.

Even a gifted visionary like Jefferson could've never imagined mob rule in Congress, in arrogant defiance of hapless constituents back home.

Fear is the most powerful motivator; but strangely, to this 111th Congress, they seem to fear no one - even incensed people who could vote them from office.

Our Founders designed the federal government so that the PEOPLE - not Congress - would be important; going to great lengths to safeguard against excessive taxation, and protect individual freedoms. But above all, they intended that government would leave the individual ALONE.

Instead of Congress fearing their constituents, we have constituents who fear their Congress. 

In the brief span of but 150 days, they have passed/proposed laws that will not only bankrupt our country, debase our currency, but will trample the Constitution itself.

Laws that not even Niccolo Machiavelli himself could have dreamed up.

Laws designed to destroy the wealth of the upper classes, and prostrate them all under the heel of an out-of-control federal government.

Their mindless cap 'n trade law will eventually render tens of millions to the unemployment line. Big Brother socialization of medicine will undermine the happiness and integrity of many millions of lives.

But still Congress presses onward - oblivious to the protests from their districts back home.

With 256 democratic seats in the House, and 60 in the Senate, the common people are but bugs on the windshield of the Obama/ Reid/Pelosi road grader; a triumvirate of desperados that will stop nothing short of instituting full socialism within the United States.

Their unconstitutional actions and power grabs - abetted by our 111th  Congress - are unprecedented in all of American history.

As these majority leaders delegate public funds toward buying individual votes in Congress, they sign not only the death warrant of our representative republic, but the economy as well.

With carbon taxes on energy, and "cradle to the grave" socialized medicine, the future monstrosity our government creates will inevitably enslave us, and impose upon our children unsustainable debt - sure to render them poverty-stricken as well.  

And once we've been stripped of our earnings (and savings), resistance will become futile: workers may all end up in welfare lines, dependent on a monthly Obama check. This will indeed be their fate, should Congress continue to act in blind obedience to their blackhearted masters.

If voters re-elect these incumbents (as they are likely to do), we can only hope there will still be something remaining of America, once Obama/ Reid/ Pelosi - and our 111th Congress- are done trying to destroy it. 

Any questions?

Petrified of Congress? Who isn't?

In all of our lifetimes - not since the threat of a Soviet atomic attack in the late 1950's - has the average US citizen lived his/her life in such overriding fear- in trepidation of our own Congress.

Can you think of anything more fright-inducing (politically) than cap 'n trade energy taxation, or government-controlled healthcare?

What could be more un-American, more unconstitutional (or more anti-competitive) than a useless tax on energy, or a welfare-supporting, wealth-transferring government insurance policy - just because our corrupt Congress wants it?

Who are these desperados anyway? Under which geological rock formation did these slimy reptiles emerge? And what can be done about them?

Such irony! Such disgrace! And such hubris! The 111th Congress has declared war on America's economy, and is taking no prisoners! 

(Quote) "In my many years I have come to a conclusion...That one useless man is a 
shame; two is a law firm; and three or more is a Congress.  John Adams (circa 1815).

(Quote) "No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is 
in session" - Mark Twain (1866)

Our constitutional Founders designed checks and balances as a safeguard - to limit power in any one branch of government. And the branch they feared most was the legislature.

Now the worst fears of the Founders have come to pass. 

On 9-12 we declared war on Islamic terrorists - but they only succeeded in destroying two skyscrapers.

While the enemy within -our Democratic Congress- has all but destroyed the entire US economy, starting from the day Speaker Nazi Pelosi grabbed the gavel, and declared "war" on America's $14 trillion annual economy- determined to whittle it down to its "proper size."

America's 111th Congress is moving at the speed of rampant socialism, out to rid taxpayers of their livelihoods, thus rendering them powerless to oppose them.

But where to begin? 

Initially, Pelosi and her Democratic allies in the House rammed through a massive, $787 billion dollar stimulus bill, without one Representative reading it.

Majority Leader Harry Reid forced it through the Senate, and anti-President Obama signed the travesty into law. To date, it has had no positive effect on the economy, and many economists predict grievous damage to the national debt over the long run.

Then the House passed a corrupt, bizarre, cap-and-trade law based solely on disputed "climate change" junk science, that will send energy prices soaring - costing the nation TRILLIONS of wasted dollars by 2020- and well beyond.

Again, not one Representative read the bill before it was voted on.

Congress now has both the young and old tossing & turning at night, worried about buying health insurance they do not either need, or WANT - all because of some marxist President's ideological whim.

Perhaps we should hire al-Quida to plant roadside bombs on Capitol Hill, before its too late: 

But all levity aside, the fundamental character of our 235 year old representative republic is about to be irreparably destroyed.

The actions of these mindless, far-left "progressive leaders" (closet communists)  represent the extreme antithesis of how the Founding Fathers wanted our country's legislature to operate.

Speaker Pelosi presents us with nothing less than irrational and nightmarish mob rule.

And on top of it all, ACORN may manage to steal the 2010 midterm elections, funded with 8 BILLION hidden dollars, courtesy of legislative amendments inserted by our greatest patriot, Barney Frank.

How much more will we take—how much more should we take—before we declare..."You've done ENOUGH harm!"

But the naive (e.g. the uninformed) still murmur in the dark, asking..."Why would  democrats do dis? Aren't dey da party of the workin' man? Why would congress pass laws to destroy our wunnerful country?

Well just read between the lines of your coloring book, simpleton.

The Capitol Hill democrats all march in lock fascist step-  they're plotting multi-decade control of all levers of government. But first - tax the rich to ruin, then kill the remaining economy; then once on their government breadlines, everyone's opposition quickly fades.

But not to worry; there's ready jobs available in Americorps- ACORN's new subdivision.

Just keep in mind Washington DC's first commandment..."Thou shalt not steal, until you've been elected to public office." Then it becomes acceptable to take money from hard-working, successful citizens, and give it to the spongers- illegal immigrants, or those unmotivated to better their own lives.

Plus there's the gerrymandering of congressional districts (and biased media), generating  an entitled class of politicians, whose only attribute is pandering to every special interest group inside the Beltway - while skillfully lying to constituents back home.

Now add Congress' refusal to enforce election laws, then encourage ACORN's scheming fraudulent voter registrations: this equals a constant erosion of individual liberty, and the aggrandizement of power to those whose only virtue is either an ability to be elected - or the ability to corrupt those newly-elected.

And through all of this, our economy is being destroyed (e.g. bail-out money committed from all federal agencies now equals 24 TRILLION dollars) in order to create a failed, top-down economic system, benefiting the elite in government, while impoverishing everyone else.

"We the People" deserve who we vote for and elect. Congress’ average seat retention rate since 1955 is 95.4 PERCENT! By 2004, the retention rate stood at 96.3 percent. The dumbing-down of America via revisionist history - and lowered educational standards - is working beautifully.

Unfortunately, the common refrain is..."we keep re-electing these idiots."

But who are the real idiots?

The bulk of the American electorate has degenerated into idio-pathological stupidity. How else can we explain how Congress, with a 9% approval rating, is re-elected a 95% of the time. What could possibly be more imbecilic?

Basically, these democrats have a bulletproof re-election process, passed down from their unconscionable "ancestors."

All incumbents maintain an office (of propaganda) in home districts, staffed by liberal volunteers. But the incumbents are seldom around - out pocketing campaign funds from lobbyists; which buys airtime for the bi-annual media blitz.

Of course, they all enjoy a highly-supportive relationship with the local (liberal) newspaper, downplaying stories that profoundly impact constituent's lives (cap 'n trade), but printing front page stories about how local congressman Bandido is..."fighting for auto worker's pensions"...or..."is bringing home a $600,000 federal grant for park restoration," or some other insipid project, which creates zero jobs, but wields maximum PR effect.

Then - on the Sunday preceding every election - the local paper supports them with a ringing half-page endorsement in its editorial section.

Meanwhile, for the previous month on television, unrestricted, blatantly-negative campaign ads (mostly lies) are bought en-masse against any republican challenger, building up in intensity to Tuesday morning of election day.

Works every time. 

Now try these stats: Senate: As of 2008, of one hundred Senators, 39 (39%) have been re-elected for 18 yrs or more; and four, over 40 years. 

House: As of 2008, of 435 members, 143 (33%) were re-elected for fourteen years or more; and there were five others re-elected again over thirty-six years (18 consecutive terms). 

And the longer these sellouts are in office, the more of them run unopposed in future elections, since nobody will bother to challenge them. Unopposed House races have doubled in the last 20 years, from 40 to 80 seats. 

And the ever-increasing taxes we send to Washington basically assures we'll continue to fund our own economic undermining, courtesy of ..."The System."

Yep; just keep putting the same ol' liars back in Congress, where they can continue to get rich; then - as they get chauffeured to the bank - laugh about "all those stupid taxpayers in my home district."

But how much longer will America allow this to continue? We can do one of two things:

1) Shrug and say, "you can't fight city hall."

2) Organize a massive Washington tea party rally, ala Martin Luther King.

That's right all you patriots; ride busses together into DC on August 28th, the 46th anniversary of King's 1963 Freedom March on Washington, and declare; "We have a new dream...we will judge our congresspeople, not by the earmarks they deliver to our district, but by the content of their character!  No more dishonesty in our Halls of Congress!"

A nation whose people continually choose to forfeit honor in their nation's government, for the sake of earmarked projects in home districts, gets what it deserves- the most corrupt legislative body ever in world history.

Let's all discuss that forbidden, oft-censored topic of "race." Be seated everyone.

After opening his mouth FAR too wide supporting the odious Henry Gates, Barack Obama has given tacit warning to ALL white police officers across America..."You shall now treat minority suspects with kid gloves- if confronted, turn the other cheek."

Basically, in a perverse, "Miranda-style" message, Obama warned the police: "You have the obligation to "remain silent," should a minority suspect revile you for being a cop. You'll now be rewarded with invectives, because of your evil proclivity of "racial profiling."

Despite the racial resentment Mr. Obama "unintentionally" created, one thing forgotten - how it will silently reverberate across every inner city neighborhood in America.

Obama has made it "official": if any minority should defy a police officer - the Obama administration will come charging to their defense.

This was first done "unofficially" when Obama ordered Eric Holder absolve the Black Panther Party, having blocked whites from voting in Philadelphia. While no one was looking, the door to civil disobedience had opened by a crack.

Now, by branding police as "stupid" for properly answering a B&E radio call, Obama has swung the door WIDE open to unpunished civil disobedience:

Yes Mr. Obama- let's all unite together and hate every cop for their brutal oppression of  poor hapless minorities, who comprise 13% of the population, but are perpetrators of over 90% of America's violent crimes. But sh-h-h-h... it's only because they're poor. Surely, if whites were just as poor, would they not be just as bad? Sure. 

Imagine yourself a cop now - patrolling the peaceful inner city - and you spot an obviously suspicious person, loitering on a corner; what NOW runs through your mind?

"What if I question this guy and he calls me a racist? Will I end up being sued by Eric Holder? Will I lose my job? Will this guy perhaps attack me? And if I defend myself with my firearm, will witnesses then lie in court about what happened?"

What everyone fails to realize - the renewed danger we ALL face:

Obama's 4 foolish words..."the police acted stupidly," gives the green light to all minority criminals; their chances of being arrested and punished have now decreased exponentially, putting EVERYONE -not just those in inner cities - at greatly increased risk.

Great job Mr. Obama - who, besides contempt for our military, despises law officers as well. But not to worry; rumor has it Mr. Obama doesn't hold anything against white firemen - yet.

Basically, Obama has made race a priority over citizen safety; something he has tried to do before as a state senator in Illinois, often revealing his tolerance for criminals, ESPECIALLY if they were minorities:

POINT: Obama fought a bill in the Illinois senate that would send youth, who commit a second violent felony, to adult prison. He fought to keep even the most violent juvenile offenders out of adult jails.

POINT: As an Illinois state senator, Obama voted to WEAKEN penalties on gangbangers dealing drugs in schools.

POINT: Obama favored drug rehabilitation over incarceration for even a second-time offender, according to a 2007 interview he gave to the "Michigan Chronicle" - Detroit’s second-largest African-American newspaper.

POINT: Obama supported rehabbing inmates through prison-to-work programs. He has worked to restore voting rights for felons, saying...“those who serve their sentences should be re-enfranchised.”

POINT: Obama unsuccessfully sponsored a measure to expunge minority criminal records. He contends they are used as a “stigma” against blacks.

POINT: Obama worked to outlaw police use of "racial descriptions" as a means to capture suspects, including Middle-Eastern terrorists.

POINT: As a U.S. senator, he co-sponsored federal legislation to ban “racial profiling.”

Mr. Obama isn’t a big fan of our laws in general, at least not as currently written. He thinks they are racist, along with the courts.

Obama decidedly favors judges with the “empathy" to understand what it’s like to be poor, or African-American. He plans on packing the Dept. of Justice’s Civil Rights Division with African-American prosecutors - making “hate crimes" a priority.

So is it any wonder gun sales in the United States have hit historic levels?

In effect, Obama is trying to emasculate our police forces- branding them as unhooded modern versions of the Klan- who prowl inner cities, shaking down "prisitinely innocent" minorities- just because of skin color.

But think about it...why would cops supposedly act like the Klan? What is there to gain by so-called "racial profiling"? 

After all, if they are not out stopping and questioning suspicious people about their whereabouts, then what are police supposed to be doing ? Distributing fruit baskets?

Yet those same liberals, who decry racial profiling, lampoon our police forces for the high black-on-black crime rates - condemning them for "slow response."

But no matter WHERE you look, there are NO statistics available anywhere about the high numbers of police officers shot every year by minority suspects; this so-called "racially charged" topic has been tightly-censored by the liberal media.

But even before Obama's "racial gaffe," there has been much previous discussion about "racial profiling" by law enforcement.

In Boston's inner city neighborhoods, suspicious whites are ALWAYS stopped by cops, to find out what they're "up to" (buying drugs). 

In Cleveland - connected by "the Shoreway", a heavily traveled east-west freeway - should whites get off at any "inner city" exits, they are trailed by unmarked police cars, and racially-profiled as likely drug customers.

CONCLUSION: there is very little minority racial profiling; but there are plenty of law enforcement people seeking those most LIKELY to commit a crime.

Assuming most violent crime takes place in "poor" neighborhoods, does it not stand to reason cops would look for perpetrators in those (duh) same neighborhoods? But to Obama & company this is "racial profiling!"

Blacks are in prison at the rate of 4,777 per 100,000.

Hispanics are in prison at the rate of 1,760 per 100,000; while whites are at 727 per 100,000.

Now, given the above, if you were a cop on patrol - especially in a poor neighborhood - or even a predominately white neighborhood, who would you most likely think is a suspect?

BOTTOM LINE: Police work has nothing to do with race, but everything to do with statistics and the law of averages.

If (and when) minorities quit committing crimes at a much higher rate than whites, the cops will stop "profiling".

Face it America: "racial harmony" is a false premise to begin with. In the USA, everything is racial.

And enough of Henry Gates: Although a Harvard "intellectual", his picture more resembles the abominable snowman - and someone who seldom brushes his teeth. From the appearances of his ranting TV shot, you can almost imagine the bad breath- pity that poor Cambridge police sergeant .

At the end of his rambling (tepid) press conference on reforming health care, did you notice how Obama (our post-racial anti-president) lit up like a 200-watt bulb, when asked about the "racially-charged" Gates/cop confrontation?

Predictably, before he could conceive a politically-correct answer, El Presidente AUTOMATICALLY took sides with professor Gates - even without knowing the facts.

But the word "automatically" is the salient point - revealing how we all subconsciously think about "race."

When two boxers, or for that matter, two teams- each being of opposite racial composition- are competing in the arena, whose side does the sports fan AUTOMATICALLY take 98% of the time? (The other 2% are liars).

This is why debating about "racism" is - for all intents and purposes- completely useless.  Despite overpowering political correctness (plus all the pretending) the tendency to side with one's race will supersede rationality EVERYTIME.

The 1975 Pittsburgh Pirates had an incredible, record-setting team average of .295 for that year. Their power-laden lineup of batters was indeed exciting. But the first-place Pirates drew spotty attendance for much of that season.

Then, a local sportswriter in the "Pittsburgh Post Gazette" published a quote from an old- time fan, who summed it up, citing: (quote) "There were too many 'colored' players on the team."

But by phrasing the problem in old-fashioned terms, the old "racist" Pirate fan had merely chosen to stop pretending, and let his true feeling be known.

But herein lies the problem: as long as we perpetuate this insipid PRETENDING within our society, race relations will conflict indefinitely. But don't count on the pretensions to cease anytime soon.

Nowadays, everyone pretends that urban public school students attend classes to learn; but if any actually try, they are pilloried (attacked) by their peers for "acting white;" self- defeating behavior, but nonetheless, supported by their "culture".

Likewise, if  border-crossing "illegals" stopped pretending they wanted to become Americans- instead of welfare spongers - we could begin to address so-called "discrimination" against Latinos, who refuse to speak our English language.

Indeed, these are the two great pretenses that are the crux of America's racial problem.

But are urban minority students- or for that matter, Latinos - any less capable than Caucasians? Of course not.

There is an old axiom that says, "you can educate beyond ignorance... but you can't fix stupid."

The is not at all to infer that "minorities" are stupid; but as long as they exhibit this foolish phenomenon of self-imposed ignorance, the "racial divide" will continue for perhaps another 100 years.

Discrimination? Of course. 

After all, who WOULDN"T discriminate against anyone - be they white, black, Latino - who cannot conjugate their verbs correctly, talks "jive," and presents themselves to society with an image of defiance. Some melting pot, eh?

America has two defiant cultures, who inexplicably deny themselves proper education, and/or, totally refuse to speak proper English- yet insist upon being treated with COMPLETE equality.

So is it racism holding them back... or realism?

The great paradox of racial harmony can be found in America's workplace, where people of all colors interact proficiently; yet after quitting time, choose to go their own separate way.

In the USA, we witness the propensity toward self-imposed racism - separation by choice.

Our college campuses have white fraternities...and black fraternities.

On cable television, there's B E T (black entertainment television); and then there's the Black Miss America pageant.

In school cafeterias across the country, black students insist on segregating themselves.

But as long as there are black people, white people, and Hispanics, there will never exist complete racial harmony in America,  because although we are all equal, we are not all the same.

And for any liberal who begs to differ, let us introduce two examples of "racial profiling,"

and how it subconsciously affects the way people think in our so-called "white-dominated" society:

Racial Profiling Example #1: You are a white employer, having interviewed two very promising young candidates:

First Candidate - an articulate Caucasian female with a degree from Princeton, graduating with honors.

Second Candidate - an equally articulate black male, who graduated from Grambling near the top of his class.

So would you automatically hire the first candidate strictly because of her race, then reject the second, on those same grounds?

Of course not.

Most employers may actually feel compelled to hire candidate number two, because well-spoken, educated black males ALWAYS command a certain type of intangible respect that's hard to define -yet it exists. And having this type of "diversity" is the "cool" thing to do.

But conversely, NO EMPLOYER of any color would hire anyone - white, black, Latino, male or female - if they appear uneducated, with one's attire hanging loosely, and not having good command of the English language.

And for all you Al Sharptons out there, this is not racism: The most distasteful people in our society (in general), are the unemployable, who suffer the "Cool Hand Luke" syndrome: a "failure to communicate" with anyone, except their "own kind."

Racial Profiling Example #2: You wake up at 3am with a ominous pain in the lower abdomen, and drive yourself to the emergency room.

While lying waiting on the gurney, you discover there are but two interns on duty: one, a "hippie-looking" white intern with a scraggly goatee, and the other is black, with an immaculately-trimmed haircut.

So which would you prefer to examine you?

Because of "racial profiling," would you not think to yourself: "Hmmph...a BLACK doctor? He MUST be exceptionally brilliant."

And is this not the exact same reason why Barack Obama became our first African-American president?

In America, proper education -or permitting oneself to be properly educated- is what enables everyone to achieve equality; and once all the so-called oppressed, harassed, profiled, hated, discrimanted-against "minorities" begin realizing it, then and only then will the great "cultural divide" of racism be breached.

Bottom line: Irrespective of color, people perceived to be articulate and well-educated command respect in America; and for the best-paying jobs, no others need apply.

No matter how many "equality laws" are legislated, or the degree of political correctness demanded of our society, there will always be discrimination - by the educated, against the ignorant.

So let's all meet at the Whitehouse - have a brew - and for once, stop all this stupid phony pretending.

 www.keenobserver.blogtownhall.com

However, knowing it was most certainly no fault of her own, Mrs. "O" managed to weather the storm well, taking a leave of absence in early 2007 to go out on the presidential campaign trail for her husband. 

Yes, it was about time she had a break from all the stress...she could now rest on her laurels. Her community outreaching performance for the University of Chicago Hospital was indeed vital work- right up there with open heart surgery. 

 .

Also, while a vice-president at the hospital, she had founded the "Urban Health Initiative", a program matching neighborhood doctors with low-income people, who were flooding the University's emergency room for basic treatment.

A local marketing firm, A S K Public Strategies, was employed by the hospital to sell the Urban Health Initiaive to the community, touting it as a "better alternative" for poor patients.  

And in yet another remarkable coincidence, Senator Obama's  top political strategist, David Axelrod, was co-owner of A S K.

Hospital officials defended the program- and the hiring of Axelrod - claiming..."People without insurance hinder our ability to focus on our more critically ill patients, such as cancer treatment and organ transplants." 

Valerie Jarrett, an Obama friend and adviser, who chaired the medical center's board, staunchly backed the hiring of A S K and its co-owner, Mr. Axelrod. 

But strangely, Mrs. Obama's Urban Health Initiative began drawing fire from local medical professionals, who had the gall to accuse the hospital of unloading uninsured patients on neighboring institutions.

For shame! After all her noble efforts, those ungrateful, greedy local doctors were at it again, trying to besmirch Michelle and her hospital with having bad intentions.

Such calumny!

Nowadays, through all those tough times, Michelle has stuck by her husband's side- fulfilling all her fantasies as America's First Lady.

And to think, not long ago, she had been complaining about how difficult it was for two young professionals to make it on those modest salaries they had long endured - trying to make ends meet.

Let's be very specific:

What REALLY caused the Great Depression? Contrary to popular opinion, Herbert Hoover- falsely accused- had little to do with it.

On October 29, 1929, Congress passed the Smoot Hawley Tariff - the same day of the infamous Wall Street Stock market crash. 

Actually, Smoot Hawley had NOT been designed to protect U.S. manufactured goods:

It's implementation arose from heavy pressure by American farmers, whose exports - although booming during the early 1920's - began falling with the resurgence of European agricultural producers, who'd finally recovered from World War I. 

Also in 1929, Europe's economy was rapidly declining, causing Germany to default on its (Treaty of Versailles) war reparations' payments to the Allies.

After the German default was announced, panicked European money traders began converting their English pounds into gold. After an 18-month run, Britain's gold reserves were approaching danger levels.

Thus, in early 1931, the Bank of London  announced it would no longer peg the British pound to the price of gold. The pound promptly fell in value by 20%.

Now the real American crisis began to unfold.

A less-valuable pound made British exports more competitive, because they became cheaper in foreign markets; this caused U.S. products to become more expensive overseas, and American exports of manufactured goods "fell off the table."

This sudden decline in exports led to rapid job losses in the U.S. manufacturing sector, and concomitantly, American farmers were also going under. 

By September 1931 - with Britain having abandoned its gold standard - foreign depositors in large New York banks, fearing America might follow suit, rushed to convert their cash deposits to gold.

Now the effect began to snowball all across America.

Sudden withdrawal demands in metropolitan areas started a massive panic, as banks everywhere were suddenly bled dry of gold deposits.

By the end of 1931, a liquidity crisis had caused the failure of 2,300 banks.

In late1932, there was near-panic, reaching its peak in March 1933, when new president Franklin Roosevelt decared all banks closed for a four-day holiday.

Hence it was "demon gold"- initiated by the protective policies of the Bank of London- that actually opened the door to the Great depression; and Smoot Hawley, along with the hapless Herbert Hoover, have needlessly shouldered much of the blame.

But history remains accurate in maligning the Federal Reserve for its deflationary, high-interest rate policy of the 1930's, which PROLONGED - not caused- the Great Depression. 

Today, Fed chairman Ben Bernanke claims he is a student of all this; and remains confident that by taking the opposite tack (zero prime interest rates) he can prevent a second depression, with an expansive - rather than restrictive - monetary policy approach.

But "zero-interest" Bernanke ignores the obvious at America's peril:

As Bernacke floods the world with cheaper U.S. dollars (unbacked by gold) to fund Obama's obscene deficits, our currency buys less a home, but enables other nations - now holding more dollars - to purchase more of the world's commodities, thereby making them more expensive to American consumers.

Have you priced a box of cereal lately? Or how 'bout an 8-pack of beer? Do you often wonder why- despite declining demand - U.S. gas prices remain "artificially" high?

Indeed- the dollar's trouble has begun:

In just the last quarter (March to June) the dollar's value has fallen an ominous 11% against the Euro....a result of the growing U.S. deficit (O-Bamanomics), which is reducing confidence in the dollar's value as it trades overseas. 

In stark terms, this means the European standard of living has risen 11%; but the American public's purchasing power is down by that same 11% - without even realizing it!

Indeed...dollar ignorance is NOT bliss! 

EXAMPLE #2: Let's say you're a real shrewdie, and you've hidden $100,000 in your basement freezer in "Benjamins" - $100 dollar bills.

Well guess what mister Shrewdie - although it's the same total amount - your NET loss since March is 11%. But despite the grievous decline from inflation, you did NOT even realize it; and those precious Benjamins are now worth only $89.00 each.

This is similar to why gambling casinos issue you chips; as you lose money, the loss seems ethereal; whereas if you were playing with actual dollars, losses would immediately be apparent, and you would withdraw from the game.

Hence there has been no political backlash against the recklessness of the sneaky fools that call themselves the Obama administration, as they treat America's dollar assets as if they were poker chips.

Thanks to their profligate spending/printing, sooner or later, the public will realize we are fast careening downward to an economic waterloo--- all of our own making.

What Obama and his two dunces- Bernanke and Geithner - are doing resembles a circus high-wire juggling act; but sooner or later it's bound to fall:

-How much longer can they keep the dollar from plunging?

-How much longer will the price of gold stay down?

-How much longer can they keep the level of the stock market up?

Any changes in one (or all of the above) will trigger the downward  spiral, and once begun, what's to stop it?

Right now the Dow Jones Industrial Average has been relatively healthy; but people have failed to notice the REAL leading indicator of trouble.

As of late June, the NASDAQ recently fell below 1800- a critical support level - portending  "net-zero" future job growth.

Why? This means entrepreneurs who start new companies (who list on NASDAQ) - now denied tax cuts and incentives - are literally frozen in fear by the political whims of Obama; and (like the1930's) lack confidence in hiring or expanding until the outlook becomes clearer. 

In the roaring bull market of 1982-87, it was the NASDAQ - not the Dow - that powered the decade-long 80's boom. 

Stocks of brand new companies like Apple & Microsoft - and the tech sector in general- were the drivers of America's economic growth during those "go-go" Reagan years.

And in the 90's, it wasn't the economic policies of Bill Clinton, but rather the wealth created by the booming rise in the NASDAQ, this time powered by the internet companies that were founded by the entrepreneurs of "Silicon Valley."

But as we head into the next decade, once again lets be very specific: the essential need for economic recovery calls for America to commence producing SOMETHING besides mountains of debt.

But lacking any real foundation, the Bernanke-Obama-Geithner juggling act WILL inevitably fall. The Fed's insane "money from nothing" printing press, and the Obama phony anti-stimulus, is just delaying the inevitable.

Have a wonderful life.